Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC2

On 2/16/17, 12:32 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >It looks like it hasn’t done a build yet and it still waiting on a >pending slot. [1] OK, build finished and I ran the approval script on it and checked asdoc. I'm good to go. -Alex

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC2

On 2/16/17, 12:44 AM, "jus...@classsoftware.com" wrote: >Hi, > >Looks like the issue is this, this has been running for 9+ hours and >should probably be killed [1] > >May be a good idea to limit the time that job runs,it's usually fairly >quick right? Sure, go ahead

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC2

Hi, Looks like the issue is this, this has been running for 9+ hours and should probably be killed [1] May be a good idea to limit the time that job runs,it's usually fairly quick right? Thanks, Justin 1. http://apacheflexbuild.cloudapp.net:8080/job/MD5Checker/15255/

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC2

Hi, > Where did you look? I compiled the SDK from the release branch (using the build/build_release.sh script) on my local machine and looked at the artefacts it produced. > I just looked at apacheflexbuilds and AFAICT it has > not built a build with your changes. It looks like it hasn’t

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC2

On 2/15/17, 5:57 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >I looked at a build from the saxon changes I just made and can confirm: >- saxon notice files are in source release >- saxon9.jar is in the binary >- asdocs works Where did you look? I just looked at apacheflexbuilds and

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC2

Hi, > If you run it with -Drc=2 it would grab RC2 from dist.apache.org > . Also > you can manually download the artifacts and run the main-no-download > target. > > If we improve it, instead of complaining about it, it will save everyone > in the community time and

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC2

On 2/15/17, 5:57 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> I'm not saying the ApprovalScript is a requirement, I'm saying that that >> is what I use, so you can know up front what tests I am going to run so >> you can potentially save all of us time by making sure it

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC2

Hi, > I'm not saying the ApprovalScript is a requirement, I'm saying that that > is what I use, so you can know up front what tests I am going to run so > you can potentially save all of us time by making sure it passes those > tests before offering another RC. The ApprovalScript generally fails

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC2

On 2/15/17, 5:08 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >Compiling the SDK worked for me as I said I compiled it and use to to >test several programs. Can you explain why compiling the source package worked for you and not for me? That's worrisome. > >> run the

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC2

Hi, Compiling the SDK worked for me as I said I compiled it and use to to test several programs. You can probably use the "-keep-going” option to see if there are any errors beyond the saxon one with the approval script. > I would like to suggest that before cutting a new RC that we test the

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC2

I would like to suggest that before cutting a new RC that we test the nightly RC build after you are done making changes. It would save us all time if you could run the ApprovalScript before asking the rest of us to test since the script caught these issues. -Alex On 2/15/17, 4:32 PM, "Alex

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC2

The Approval script died when Saxon wasn't found. I don't know what else it needed to test. I just tried running Ant in the source package. It failed because licenseParts/saxon-NOTICES folder wasn't in the source package. Did it work for you? -Alex On 2/15/17, 4:17 PM, "Justin Mclean"

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC2

Hi, So before I cancel the vote and make another RC can I get confirmation that everything else is good? I have tested the SDK with several application and so far no issues so it should be good. Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC2

On 2/15/17, 12:27 AM, "jus...@classsoftware.com" wrote: >Hi, > >> No I did not. I’ll give it a try. > >ASDocs seems to work for me but it may be picking up the saxon jar from >somewhere else, it’s a little hard to tell. For me, ASDocs did not throw an error but did

RE: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC2

I'll take a look at this tonight. Just got back from a business trip. -MArk -Original Message- From: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com] Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2017 6:05 PM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC2 Hi, Please discuss

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC2

Hi, > No I did not. I’ll give it a try. ASDocs seems to work for me but it may be picking up the saxon jar from somewhere else, it’s a little hard to tell. I did confirm the jar is missing in the binary so I guess we should cancel and fix that minor issue and create another RC. Any thoughts?

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC2

Hi, > I think saxon is only used by ASDoc? Did you try ASDoc? No I did not. I’ll give it a try. Thanks, Justin

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC2

On 2/13/17, 10:17 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> Hmm... For me, the source kit doesn't seem to be result in saxon ending >>up >> in lib/external/saxon9.jar. Instead it has the full version in the name >> (saxon9-1-0-8.jar). The binary kit doesn't seem to have

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC2

On 2/11/17, 3:04 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >Please discuss the release candidate here and not in the vote thread. Hmm... For me, the source kit doesn't seem to be result in saxon ending up in lib/external/saxon9.jar. Instead it has the full version in the

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Flex SDK 4.16 RC2

Hi, Please discuss the release candidate here and not in the vote thread. Thanks, Justin