Re: [FlexJS][Docs] Started with some docs using a github repo

The history you mentioned is of the Home file. Take a look at this [1] to see the moonshine history. Maybe we should move it all sooner to a docs dir and publish it via github pages. We probably have better control of all the content then. HTH, Olaf [1]

Re: [FlexJS][Docs] Started with some docs using a github repo

>By GitHub pages you mean as part of Apache ? No. Github pages use Jekyll as static site generator under the hood and Jekyll supports Markdown to generate the pages. So the migration should not so much effort. At the end, each particular article is represented by its particular file then which

Re: [FlexJS][Docs] Started with some docs using a github repo

Ups, overlooked this Post... -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Docs-Started-with-some-docs-using-a-github-repo-tp63786p63846.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: FlexJS

>I’d like to be able to use MXML to mark up some HTML and just have the CSS “work”. +1 I think it is a good idea to provide an AS3 accessible counterpart for each particular HTML component inside the html package. >From a users perspective, this is probably what users expect to find inside the

Re: [FlexJS][Docs] Started with some docs using a github repo

Nicholas Kwiatkowski-2 wrote > The current site is actually managed by a static-site generator using > markdown. What do you think about creating a site that is dedicated to FlexJS? @Piotr I've started to put some docs together for the mdl:badge bead. [1] It's not complete and only a first shot.

Re: [FlexJS][Docs] Started with some docs using a github repo

Great input from all of you, thanks! Unfortunately, I'm pretty sure that I don't know most of the FlexJS stuff myself so expect some traffic here on the list related to all the topics next time. I'd like to create a demo (source code and live demo) for each particular topic and I think it makes

Re: [FlexJS][Docs] Started with some docs using a github repo

Hi Piotr, >As for the examples maybe it's worth to put them into FlexJS Tour where Peter start initial work [1]. Is this FlexJS Tour already hosted anywhere as a live demo? >Anyone know whether we could take from Apache some new domain or how to put it as subpage of our website? Would be great

Re: FlexJS more problematic CSS

>To work around bugs in the compiler (which get fixed as they are discovered), I have a separate CSS file >that I include with my app which contains CSS that has trouble being compiled. Just to make sure that I understand it right: Does that mean, that it works if we just outsource the CSS that

Re: [FlexJS][Docs] Started with some docs using a github repo

This is an awesome tutorial, thanks Harbs! Hope I'll have some time to follow these steps by myself. However, if I'll get your permission I will definitely help to put in on the github wiki. Maybe we're also able to build a working example including a live demo... Thanks, Olaf -- View this

Re: [FlexJS][Docs] Started with some docs using a github repo

Forget about this: >The advantage of MXML is that we can declare both JS code and the CSS in the same file. I think you mean AS instead of JS?! Thanks, Olaf -- View this message in context:

Re: [FlexJS][Docs] Started with some docs using a github repo

>Go for it! :-) Done! [1] Looking forward to following the steps by myself. If I'll be successful I'll add a working FlexJS example to the wiki. Olaf [1] https://github.com/ok-at-github/flexjs-docs/wiki/Adapting-HTML-CSS-JS-project -- View this message in context:

Re: FlexJS more problematic CSS

This is also really helpful!! I will try it out by myself and will add it to the docs! Thanks, Olaf -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-more-problematic-CSS-tp63810p63814.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive

[FlexJS] Browser compatibility

Hi, I'd like to write some docs about the browser compatibility of FlexJS and wonder how this technically works. Is there some magic implemented within the compiler or is an external lib used or is there whatever mechanism to ensure that the transpiled code works fine with most of the browsers?

Re: [FlexJS] Browser compatibility

But what mechanism takes care of the compatibility with the main browsers like IE, Edge, Chrome, Firefox, Safari and all those particular versions? Or is there no magic needed and it just works for whatever needed? Thanks, Olaf -- View this message in context:

Re: [FlexJS] Browser compatibility

And if there's nothing already implemented to ensure browser compatibility what could folks do if they have issues with some browsers? Is there something like a conditional compiling for different browsers? Thanks, Olaf -- View this message in context:

Re: [FlexJS] Browser compatibility

>There’s nothing really built in Mhh... but I wonder if FlexJS can not guarantee consistency through different browsers and different platforms, could we really speak about a cross platform framework then? Or do I miss something? Thanks, Olaf -- View this message in context:

Re: [FlexJS][Docs] Started with some docs using a github repo

OmPrakash Muppirala wrote > That said, if you plan to migrate it to the Apache Flex project at a > future > point, it will be easier if you add an Apache V2 license to your repo > right > away. That was the first thing that I've done after creating the repo [1] But cause you mention it I just

Re: [FlexJS] Browser compatibility

>I found one work-around for one scenario and I’m investigating another for a different one. What do you mean with work-around? Is it the approach to find some code that works with all browsers or do you're using browser sniffing (Class BrowserInfo as you mentioned above)? Thanks, Olaf --

Re: [FlexJS] Using transpiled HTML/JS/CSS code with CodePen

>I will try to do this as you were did, but it will not be to fast. Thanks Piotr! I don't know anything about the life time of a particular CodePen, but maybe we could use it to publish some FlexJS live demos. Olaf -- View this message in context:

Re: [FlexJS] Using transpiled HTML/JS/CSS code with CodePen

piotrz wrote > I would rather explore TourJS and make there examples. Then publish links > to each of them. Could you provide me a link to a live demo of TourJS? Thanks, Olaf -- View this message in context:

[FlexJS] Using transpiled HTML/JS/CSS code with CodePen

Hi, I'm trying to create a CodePen for the MDL slider but it doesn't work as expected. I just tried to copy the transpiled HTML/JS/CSS to CodePen. This is a CodePen example for the MDL slider [1]. It basically works but it's not the same result as the browser shows. Do I miss something?

Re: [FlexJS] Browser compatibility

I've got it, thanks! Olaf -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Browser-compatibility-tp63828p63866.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [FlexJS] Using transpiled HTML/JS/CSS code with CodePen

>Could you additionally post what you have in your FlexJS MDL project ? https://gist.github.com/ok-at-github/2e7dd966423db0b3954dce3de89b430e (This works fine in the browser) I have to mention that I copy and paste the code from the FlexJS debug target and also from the browser source while

Re: [FlexJS][Docs] Started with some docs using a github repo

Let's just focus on content for now... there's still a way to go ;-) Olaf -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Docs-Started-with-some-docs-using-a-github-repo-tp63786p63864.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive

Re: [FlexJS] Using transpiled HTML/JS/CSS code with CodePen

Hmm, whether TourJS or some other examples, I think we definitely need to get some examples or live demos online. FlexJS lives a bit in the dark cause all the useful content is hidden behind the scene. Difficult to find and maybe also difficult to get it working. Would be great if we could have

Re: Moonshine 1.5.0 Release

Thank you! I've just installed it on Windows7 and it works! Olaf BTW: Seems that your Moonshine web side is outdated? [1] [1] Moonshine is being developed using: Apache Flex® SDK 4.15.0 Adobe AIR® SDK 22.0 Apache FlexJS® SDK 0.7.0 Apache Ant® 1.9.2 -- View this message in context:

Re: Flash builder is stucked at 57 %

>only with one workspace, other workspaces are fine Do you've already tried to re-create the workspace? I've other weird issues with FB from time to time and re-creating the workspace helps most of the time. HTH, Olaf -- View this message in context:

Re: FlexJS Yeoman generator

Great Josh, you should post it on the users list! @All Please don't forget that everybody can support this awesome guy by being a patron [1] Olaf [1] https://www.patreon.com/josht -- View this message in context:

RE: [FlexJS] question about porting an Adobe Flex 3 project to HTML+JS

>I don't see class SearchClass in the project Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm also don't see a representation for "http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-question-about-porting-an-Adobe-Flex-3-project-to-HTML-JS-tp62698p63036.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list

Re: [FlexJS] End-of-life of the Flash Player

>Having a single code base which can target AIR and HTML in the browser will probably fill a real lack. That would be awesome!! -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-End-of-life-of-the-Flash-Player-tp63557p63561.html Sent from the Apache

[FlexJS] End-of-life of the Flash Player

Hi, I would like to ask if the FP EOL announcement has any effects on FlexJS?! Do you think it is still worth to follow the conditional compiling approach or is it maybe time to abandon the swf side in order to concentrate on JS? Thanks, Olaf -- View this message in context:

Re: Installer Problems

>Yeah. That’s probably the issue with AIR 25 being too big… Would just like to confirm: AIR 23 works, AIR 25 still fails probably cause of this known issue. Olaf -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Installer-Problems-tp62791p62802.html Sent

Re: Installer Problems

It works, great job again Piotr! Thank you, Olaf -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Installer-Problems-tp62791p62828.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache FlexJS 0.8.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.8.0 Released

Great work, a big thank you to all of you to get out this important release! BTW: I also can't see any [Announce] entry on the nabble.com users' list... Thanks, Olaf -- View this message in context:

Re: Installer Problems

The installer is working now! I've just installed 0.8.0 successfully :-) Thank you, Olaf -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Installer-Problems-tp62791p62799.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[FlexJS][Installer] "Unable to download Apache Flex SDK"

Hi, I've just tried to install the 0.8.0 release using the installer on Windows7/64bit but it doesn't work for me. See that attached log [1]. Do I miss something? There's no urgent from my side, I'd just like to give it a try. Thanks, Olaf [1] Installer log: Installer version 3.2.0 (windows)

Re: Installer Problems

For me, both links are working. -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Installer-Problems-tp62791p62797.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [FlexJS][Installer] "Unable to download Apache Flex SDK"

I've overlooked the other "Installer Problems" thread, sorry. The installer is dowloading now... seems that it works for whatever reason. -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Installer-Unable-to-download-Apache-Flex-SDK-tp62793p62796.html

Re: 4.16.0 Install issues

Nicholas Kwiatkowski-2 wrote > - Re-creating Fontkit. Chris Dutz said he might be able to work on it, > but I havent seen anything else to that affect. At ApacheCon somebody found a lib that maybe contains a working FontKit port. Piotr created a JIRA that contains the link [1] HTH, Olaf

[FlexJS][Docs] Started with some docs using a github repo

Hi guys, it seems to me that since Adobe announced the EOL of FlashPlayer there's some more interest in FlexJS. And it also seems to me that is still not so easy to get in touch with FlexJS for others. One reason is probably the lack of the documentation. My feeling is that some more

[Flex/FlexJS] External dependencies (Adobe, Google, ...)

Hi, we have to do a decision in near future what we will do with our Flex apps. So I'd like to know if there are any external dependencies that could stop our Flex or FlexJS apps from working. Flex: Is there something needed to do at Adobes side to ensure that Flex apps will work with future AIR

Re: [Flex/FlexJS] External dependencies (Adobe, Google, ...)

Thanks Alex, that helps! -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Flex-FlexJS-External-dependencies-Adobe-Google-tp63945p63950.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Flex/FlexJS] External dependencies (Adobe, Google, ...)

>What sort of commitment are you looking for? I was not sure about if there something is needed in the AIR source code to support Flex. But of course as you said it's all about AS3 and that should work... Thanks, Olaf -- View this message in context:

Re: [FLEXJS] Modules

Hi Alex, great that you've heard the community voice and start working on this! >...and loaded after application startup... Does this mean that a FlexJS module is loaded from the server (same origin as the main app?) by some magic or is it already bundled and delivered with the FlexJS app and

Re: [FlexJS] Compiler options / VSCode config

Josh Tynjala wrote > Did you delete your ./target/javascript directory before compiling with > the > new SDK? I'm pretty sure that I've done that all the time without any success. After I've changed the "output" option as you mentioned the first time including deleting the target folder it works

Re: [DRAFT] Apache FlexJS 0.8.0 and Apache Flex FalconJX 0.8.0 Released

>New capabilities in this release include: - Maybe it is worth to mention that the layout system was revised... or was this rather a bug fix? >You can also use... - I think it's definitely worth to mention Josh's vscode extension here as a powerful IDE. Thanks, Olaf -- View this message in

Re: [FlexJS] Compiler doesn't recognize reserved JS words like 'enum'

Hi, >It sounds like enum may be one of those that JavaScript allows that ActionScript currently doesn't. I've checked it out and it turns out that for both (AS3 and JS, ECMAScript5) 'enum' is flagged as future reserved keyword [1][2]. Does is makes sense to just add it to as3ReservedWords [3]?

Re: [ApacheCon/FlexJSSummit] Just registered...

Carlos Rovira wrote > btw, I want to ask to you about the experience. could you post about it? > how was it? how many people was attending? what was the overal feeling and > thinking for the people coming? > I could not read anything of this, so I think it could be great some words > about it Hi

Re: [ApacheCon/FlexJSSummit] Just registered...

Thanks to all those who made this awesome event possible and successful at least! And special thanks to Chris of course! I'm pretty sure FlexJS will benefit from this Summit! Olaf -- View this message in context:

[FlexJS] Compiler doesn't recognize reserved JS words like 'enum'

Hi, I've stumbled over the issue that the compiler doesn't recognize the reserved JS word 'enum'. Instead, it just returns just a 'Parse error' without any hints that 'enum' is a reserved JS keyword [1] Is it a big deal to teach the compiler all the reserved JS keywords [2]. I found something

Re: [FlexJS] Compiler doesn't recognize reserved JS words like 'enum'

Hey Piotr, the check-in procedure in Miami was done really quick, much faster than in Germany. So I've had some time to revive the work on my PureMVC EmployeeAdmin FlexJS port ;-) >How this failing fragment of code look like ? Could you post it on https://paste.apache.org/ ? In my case, it

Re: [FlexJS] Compiler doesn't recognize reserved JS words like 'enum'

Josh Tynjala wrote > As I mentioned in my previous post, JavaScript started > allowing reserved words in places where they couldn't be used before with > ES5. Since AS3 is derived from ECMAScript, it's pretty safe for us to do Hi Josh, maybe I get something wrong once again or I miss something

Re: [FlexJS] Compiler doesn't recognize reserved JS words like 'enum'

>I guess the stream will definitely direct towards more people migrating to JS so I think we shouldn’t >prohibit flash related reserver words in the js world. I'm confused. Do you mean that we should allow using AS3 reserved words if they are allowed in the JS world? Wouldn't that mean that AS3

Re: Is it possible to Convert Flex Application to HTML5

Maybe this also helps: http://apache-flex-users.246.n4.nabble.com/FalconJX-How-To-Use-td14824.html#a14841 Summary: You have to remove all flex/flash dependencies from your AS3 code and you have to replace your mx/spark components by FlexJS components. Depending on your code base that could be

Re: Is it possible to Convert Flex Application to HTML5

>Our plan is to migrate from Adobe Flex to HTML/JS but it is not to convert it to FlexJS. FlexJS also places you in the position to use HTML with AS3 [1] >Now, I am asking if any possiblity of converting the MXML to HTM I think there's no way to convert MXML to HTML automatically. Hope this

Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache FlexJS 0.8.0 RC1

Hi guys, >It seems to me there is some interest in the extended community to see a release out It's still hard for me to understand the technical details but it seems to me that the discussion Maven over Ant has reached a new climax which is not very helpful at least. Maybe I got something

Re: Running Flash/AIR as docker container?

You find some approaches at docker Hub [1] Olaf [1] https://hub.docker.com -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Running-Flash-AIR-as-docker-container-tp62462p62463.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[FlexJS] Compiler options / VSCode config

Hi, after some weeks being technically offline at home, I'm hopefully back in the game now;-) I've just downloaded the nightly build using the installer and tried to compile my little test app with no success [1]. I noticed that the target folder contains just a weird javascript file. I've

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

Hi, I just would like to mention that it seems to me that there's an inner urge inside most of us to leave the beaten paths and to build a new identity for FlexJS which is more appropriate to this awesome technology in any respects. Moreover, it seems to me more and more that such a new shiny

[OT] Unsubscribed and offline for a few weeks

Hi, I'd just like to let you know that this my last day at work before I'll start a holiday trip over a few weeks. Hence I've been unsubscribed from the list. Probably I will be sporadically online. Thanks, Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

Could we try to summarize all name proposals in order to build a single post that contains all candidates (project names) before voting? I think it's not so easy to extract all naming ideas from the different threads/posts, I just remember a few. What do you think of just creating a list of

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

Another idea to get out the naming dilemma could be to find a name for the new project that still contains 'flex' but don't let you think of flex when you read it the first time, e.g.: ... Inflexion Flexor Flexure ... Just a Scrabble exercise... ;-) So people might be less confused if they find

Re: [VOTE] Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS?

No (Binding) On 2017-09-14 08:37, Dave Fisher <[hidden email]> wrote: > VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS? > > [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS. > [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be > discussed. > [ ] Abstain -

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

Hi, This was posted by Chris at the [VOTE] thread >and I know what getting rid of "flex" everywhere inside the project would mean regarding refactoring and >tool support. I thought that for now we just vote for a new project name in order to get rid of the word 'Flex' within the Apache project

Re: [VOTE] What should be the new Project Name for Proposed fork of FlexJS?

1. Boja 2. Limber (Limbr) 3. Beads Thanks, Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [Flex JS] Adobe substitute

There's also a js:Panel [1]. And this is a working snippet [2] HTH, Olaf [1] https://github.com/apache/flex-asjs/blob/develop/frameworks/projects/Basic/src/main/flex/org/apache/flex/html/Panel.as [2]

Re: [FlexJS][Installer] Future packaging of FlexJS releases

>If this sound good to folks.. This sounds really good, Alex!! I think it's an important thing to get rid of some dependencies and to ease the FlexJS setup. Thanks, Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [FLEX JS] How to import mx.managers.PopUpManager?

m_awais wrote > I am trying to import mx.managers.PopUpManager in my flex JS project mxml > file. There's no way to use "s:" or "mx:" components with FlexJS! In general, you can't reuse anything that has a dependency to Flash or classic Flex! This is also true for e.g. the

Re: [DISCUSS] Name of the FlexJS Fork

I would stick with the name "FlexJS" for now. I do not think that people associate negative vibes with it. So many other JS frameworks are born every day, I think a new name may confuse people. But I agree that in future it could make sense to rename it, especially if there will be other targets

Re: Javascript functions

Piotr, whats about just creating some TypeDefs? Olaf -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/Javascript-functions-tp63954p63956.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Flex JS] Flex SDK Installer always get stuck at "Finish uncompressing"

Hmm... if we just would like to target JS, do we still need AIR and playerglobal.swc? If not, maybe we could provide a FlexJS "JS only" version? Maybe another approach could be to declare AIR as a prerequisite? Thanks, Olaf -- View this message in context:

Re: [Flex JS] Flex SDK Installer always get stuck at "Finish uncompressing"

Hi, is there any chance to pre-build the various FlexJS releases including the nightly (maybe also for different platforms) at server side in order to just provide an URL to make it downloadable? So the question is, could we replace the installer by manual SDK downloads for FlexJS? And if not, is

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

I've already replied via nabble a few hours ago but it seems that it is not synced with the list for whatever reason... so sorry for annoying you: Hi Alex, thanks for this summary, I think this is the right way to go! +1 But for me, it sounds a little bit, that Apache Flex is labeled as

Re: [DISCUSS} Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

Hi Alex, thanks for this summary, I think this is the right way to go! +1 But for me, it sounds a little bit, that Apache Flex is labeled as discontinued. We should take care to not scare off or unsettle Apache Flex users. Even if FlashPlayer is dead, Flex with AIR is still an awesome platform!

Re: [VOTE] Fork FlexJS from Apache Flex

+1 Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Life after FlashPlayer, are you prepared?

Hello from the Apache Royale (FlexJS) team, even if Flex with AIR is still an awesome and outstanding technology, Flex in the browser ends with the end of FlashPlayer in 2020. To be clear: There will be no way to run your Flex apps in current browser versions around 2020! The Flex mailing

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 RC1*

Just to give some more feedback for now: I've just downloaded and installed the installer on Windows7/64bit. After starting it I've got the first warning as mentioned. All works fine until this point. Because I am behind a proxy here I cannot continue testing, I'll try to continue with it

Re: Fontawesome 5

Hi, if I understand it correctly, FontAwesome5 was rewritten from scratch and existing FontAwesome4 icons were replaced by new ones. So it seems to me that this update is not the same easy task which it was in the past. However, could you file a JIRA for this task? Thanks, Olaf -- Sent from:

Re: Fontawesome 5

FontAwesome4 is part of the flatspark project. I would like to propose to outsource FontAwesome5 into its own project. If I remember it correctly, such a project just needs the FontAwesome otf font files, a license file and an AS3 class that holds constants for each particular icon name.

Re: Fontawesome 5

Ahhh... I've just seen that you've already created the JIRA [1] Thanks, Olaf [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-35380 -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: Fontawesome 5

Hi, as soon I have time I'll try to make FontAwesome5 part of the SDK as its own project. For those who don't know how to use Font Awesome 5 with Flex: I've just created a little demo project and some explanation [1]. Hope this helps, Olaf [1]

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 RC2*

Hi, just a shoot in the dark: Did you make sure that the selected directory is empty? Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 RC2

+1 Windows7/64bit -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 RC1*

Hi Alex, thanks for the good explanation, got it now! Even if the NativeInstaller is more comfortable, maybe a CaptiveRuntime version which has to be downloaded is enough someday. However, thank you for making the installer work again!! Olaf -- Sent from:

Re: [DRAFT] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 Released!

Hi Piotr, thanks again for preparing the release! I just wonder if we should inform the users a bit more about what happens by using the current release. So, just a suggestion: Instead of this [1] maybe something like this?: The Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 is an update to the Apache Flex SDK

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.2 RC1*

Hi, it works for me on Windows7/64bit. Just my observations: - The first warning came up after starting the installer - After the SDK download has started the second warning came up and after confirming it the installer closed itself - After I manually restarted the installer I had to go through

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC3*

Just for the sake of completeness: Today, the installation was carried out to the end under Windows7, even if it still hangs a while while "Verifying Apache Flex SDK MD5 Signature". But after the installation was finished, our company virus scanner exiles the entire installer.exe for whatever

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC3

+1 Tested on Windows 7 and Windows 10. I had some issues with the virus scanner on my Windows 7 business machine which exiles the *installer*.exe. Maybe others run into similar issues. Thanks, Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC3*

Hi, the installer hangs here on my Windows7 machine while "Verifying Apache Flex SDK MD5 Signature". Is something broken or do I miss something? Thanks, Olaf [1] Installer version 3.3.1 (windows) Using Locale: en_GB Fetched the SDK download mirror URL from the CGI. SDK version Apache Flex SDK

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC3*

>How long did you wait ? Is this your first attempt ? About 20minutes, third attend... Thanks, Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: [Discuss] Apache Flex SDK Installer 3.3.1 RC3*

I'll give it another try tomorrow evening, also on Windows10. Thanks for working on this Piotr!!! Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: Question on Migrating from Flex to FlexJS

I noticed that rarely/sporadically some posts don't make it to the list for whatever reason. Maybe you just should give it another try...? Olaf -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: Question on Migrating from Flex to FlexJS

Hmm... just a test, I just replied and it seems my post didn't make it to the list. -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

[Vote] Moving JIRA issues and Confluence Wiki to GitHub

Hi, this is the official vote thread to approve the move from JIRA issues to GitHub issues and to move the Confluence Wiki to the Github Wiki. As discussed here [1], the idea is to don't migrate the JIRA issues to GitHub. Instead, we want a clean restart at GitHub issues. The JIRA issues will be

Re: [Vote] Moving JIRA issues and Confluence Wiki to GitHub

+1 In 2018, 15 issues were created by using JIRA. So I don't expect too many duplicates for the future. If it is possible, we would set JIRA and the Conflucence Wiki read-only. -- Sent from: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/

Re: Help required - Board report time

Hi Tom, I just copied the September report and added Piotr's text [1]. Maybe that helps? @Piotr Just a shoot in the dark: I always need some attempts to log in because I always forget that just the Apache ID is expected, not the email. Thanks, Olaf [1]

Re: Flex Roadmap 2019

Hi Leo, >I was wondering if there is anyone interested on updating / extending / >improving Flex SDK. Even if we're started using Royale we still heavily rely on Flex/AIR here and I guess we're not alone. > If so, we could discuss what might be good additions for > 2019 and make a roadmap.

Re: Enabling GitHub "Issues" and "Wiki" for flex repositories

I was thinking more like a cut of the old Wiki and JIRA than a migration of the existing stuff. I think it would be easier and more transparent for folks to handle future development (if it will happen) by using GitHub. We may migrate some wiki stuff someday, don't know. Thanks, Olaf -- Sent

Re: Enabling GitHub "Issues" and "Wiki" for flex repositories

> Do we know if it possible it import all historical JIRA issues ... I don't know it this is possible. > JIRA has a number of significant benefits over GitHub issues including > better searching and querying JIRA is probably more powerful but I guess the simplicity of GitHub is the greater

Re: Enabling GitHub "Issues" and "Wiki" for flex repositories

> Are we going to say that we won't fix any of the bugs currently open in JIRA?... > My concern is having two active bug bases... We maybe could set or treat or freeze JIRA as read-only and could link to the entire Flex-JIRA from GitHub in order to not losing the history. If somebody is going to

  1   2   >