Re: [FlexJS] Translation from framework to JS

Ok, I'll be experimenting and seeing where things goes, and by the time I get something useful we could see what MDL things are implied and how licenses should be applied. Thanks Justin and Om for taking the time to see this, in the end is equally important as to get the tech done. Carlos

Re: [FlexJS] Translation from framework to JS

Hi, > The wording in the license is very clear. Which part of the highlighted > text do you have concerns with? I have no major concerns with the text, I do have concerns with CC licensed code in a release and just pointing that out. If a release contains no CC code and we’re 100% sure of

Re: [FlexJS] Translation from framework to JS

The wording in the license is very clear. Which part of the highlighted text do you have concerns with? You can double check with Legal if you want, but this is definitely not a blocker issue for Carlos experimenting with MDL-FlexJS integration. Thanks, Om On Oct 14, 2016 4:40 PM, "Justin

Re: [FlexJS] Translation from framework to JS

Hi, Also this [1] from JimJag. Thanks, Justin 1. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/201507.mbox/%3c9b052e9f-e7a1-4b00-a5bf-86333bc47...@jagunet.com%3e

Re: [FlexJS] Translation from framework to JS

Hi, > Justin, please see my earlier response. We dont need to worry about the > license if we are using scss to generate the css. I would prefer that that be confirmed, this is not a minor issue like a header being missing. If we accidentally include CC source in our release it alters the

Re: [FlexJS] Translation from framework to JS

Justin, please see my earlier response. We dont need to worry about the license if we are using scss to generate the css. Thanks, Om On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > The MIT license text in question can be found here [1] > > Thanks, >

Re: [FlexJS] Translation from framework to JS

Hi, The MIT license text in question can be found here [1] Thanks, Justin 1. https://github.com/darius/requestAnimationFrame/blob/master/LICENSE

Re: [FlexJS] Translation from framework to JS

Hi, Depend on how MDL is going to be used there's a couple of minor issues that need addressing: - repo is missing a NOTICE file - this file is MIT licensed [1] and the repo is missing the MIT license text (as a header or in the LICENSE). Can someone please raise a PR for NOTICE file as per

Re: [FlexJS] Translation from framework to JS

Hi, > I think I don't need to include MDL libraríes, I think just a link to them > should be ok, so the library "uses" it directly from the source link. Probably not, as you can only depend on something if it’s licensed Category A or Category B in binary form even if it not in the release

Re: [FlexJS] Translation from framework to JS

Thanks Justin, I think I don't need to include MDL libraríes, I think just a link to them should be ok, so the library "uses" it directly from the source link. That would be ok right? Thanks 2016-10-14 9:40 GMT+02:00 Justin Mclean : > Hi, > > > I'm in the process of

Re: [FlexJS] Translation from framework to JS

Good point. That’s probably the best plan. AIUI, the HTML files there are basically just illustrating how to use the framework, so they don’t seem needed either. On Oct 14, 2016, at 11:13 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: > Here is the relevant part from the license: >

Re: [FlexJS] Translation from framework to JS

Here is the relevant part from the license: === All code in any directories or sub-directories that end with *.html or *.css is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License, which full text can be found here:

Re: [FlexJS] Translation from framework to JS

Hi, > Something is odd there. > > Every css file I could find in that repo had an Apache header in it. > > I wonder if someone forgot to update the license file at some point. Or perhaps they use a tool that added a header (incorrectly) to all files? It would be best to contact them and ask

Re: [FlexJS] Translation from framework to JS

Something is odd there. Every css file I could find in that repo had an Apache header in it. I wonder if someone forgot to update the license file at some point. On Oct 14, 2016, at 10:40 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >> I'm in the process of trying to see how

Re: [FlexJS] Translation from framework to JS

Hi, > I'm in the process of trying to see how integrate a CSS library (like MDL). If (and I don’t know if this is your intention) you want to bundle MDL into FlexJS it may not be possible as the css and html files within are licensed under CC-A [1]. CC-A is "category B” license [2] which means

Re: [FlexJS] Translation from framework to JS

On 10/11/16, 4:52 AM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" wrote: >Thanks Alex, > >thanks for the explanation, just to understand what's behind I >remember >that initially the way some components translates

Re: [FlexJS] Translation from framework to JS

Container is basically a div. Hence it’s in the HTML package. There’s an svg GraphicContainer in the Graphics package which uses an svg namespace and I expect there to eventually be a canvas one as well. Harbs On Oct 11, 2016, at 2:52 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote:

Re: [FlexJS] Translation from framework to JS

le: https://github.com/apache/flex-asjs/tree/develop/examples/flexjs/DataBindingExample_Flat HTH, Olaf -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Translation-from-framework-to-JS-tp55687p55696.html Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing lis

Re: [FlexJS] Translation from framework to JS

Thanks Alex, thanks for the explanation, just to understand what's behind I remember that initially the way some components translates to JS was using a js file as a templete (so some code was transpired and some other not). AFAIR this was removed and now all is converted to JS, and now is

Re: [FlexJS] Translation from framework to JS

On 10/10/16, 2:43 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote: > >IMO, there are at least two valid approaches. I honestly don't favor one >over the other. I thought of a third, that may or may not work for MDL depending on how much, if at all, MDL requires configuration via CSS. There will

Re: [FlexJS] Translation from framework to JS

On 10/10/16, 12:05 PM, "carlos.rov...@gmail.com on behalf of Carlos Rovira" wrote: >Hi, > >I'm in the process of trying to see how integrate a CSS library (like >MDL). >In order to get it, I need to know more about the process of

Re: [FlexJS] Translation from framework to JS

completing existing component sets and adding a MDL component set. > But I'm also pretty sure that I'll have to take some more hurdles to get > familar with asjs... > > Olaf > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://apache-flex- > development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Translation-from- > framework-to-JS-tp55687p55689.html > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >

Re: [FlexJS] Translation from framework to JS

JS journey I'm willing to help with completing existing component sets and adding a MDL component set. But I'm also pretty sure that I'll have to take some more hurdles to get familar with asjs... Olaf -- View this message in context: http://apache-flex-development.247.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Tr

[FlexJS] Translation from framework to JS

Hi, I'm in the process of trying to see how integrate a CSS library (like MDL). In order to get it, I need to know more about the process of converting a FlexJS component to JS. For example, a js:Container, should translate to a or something like that, is that right? (I see js:ContainerBase but