[GitHub] incubator-geode pull request #243: Marked test guaranteed to take at least 1...

2016-09-20 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-geode/pull/243 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the

Re: Review Request 52052: GEODE-1128: Enhance missing-disk-stores command with missing regions

2016-09-20 Thread Darrel Schneider
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52052/#review149759 ---

[GitHub] incubator-geode pull request #243: Marked test guaranteed to take at least 1...

2016-09-20 Thread jaredjstewart
GitHub user jaredjstewart opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-geode/pull/243 Marked test guaranteed to take at least 1 minute as an integration test This test is guaranteed to take at least 65 seconds to run. Our

Re: Error loading cluster config serialized prior to repackage

2016-09-20 Thread Dan Smith
I like your idea of having registered DataSwizzlers. Would registering a DataSerializer for these classes work? It would be nice to just use the extension mechanism that's already there. -Dan On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Bruce Schuchardt wrote: > The repackage broke

Re: Error loading cluster config serialized prior to repackage

2016-09-20 Thread Bruce Schuchardt
The repackage broke those two methods. The oldPackage needs to replace "org.apache" with "com.gemstone". It allows interaction with a locator from WAN sites and clients running GemFire. I'll fix that problem. Le 9/20/2016 à 11:53 AM, Kirk Lund a écrit : If current develop attempts to read

Error loading cluster config serialized prior to repackage

2016-09-20 Thread Kirk Lund
If current develop attempts to read a cluster config that was persisted prior to the repackage, our code now throws ClassNotFoundException. Turns out Cluster Config is implemented by the class org.apache.geode.management.internal.configuration.domain.Configuration which is a DataSerializable.

Re: jvsd

2016-09-20 Thread Dave Barnes
To what degree should jVSD be mentioned in the docs? The current writeup is essentially "go get it if you want it, but be warned that it's not fully baked and we don't support it". Would that still be the appropriate jVSD policy for 1.0.0? On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Dan Smith

Re: [VIRTUAL] Geode Clubhouse TOMORROW Weds, 9/21 10AM Pacific - Domain Driven Design & Reactive Programming w/ Apache Geode - Discussion Panel

2016-09-20 Thread Gregory Chase
Dear Geode Community, This is a reminder that tomorrow we have Vaughn Vernon and Wes Williams joining us for a further discussion of Domain Driven Design and reactive programming. This is a follow on of the Webinar recently run by Pivotal: Why Domain-Driven Design and Reactive Programming?

Re: jvsd

2016-09-20 Thread Dan Smith
I don't think we should try to include jVSD in 1.0.0 at this point, because it introduces dependencies that might make the 1.0.0 release more complicated such as the MultiAxisChartFX dependency. But I think the should try to get it to develop sooner rather than later to make it easier for people

Re: Review Request 52076: GEODE-1511: Remove test dependencies from pom file

2016-09-20 Thread Dan Smith
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52076/#review149687 --- I don't think having this special logic for slf4j-impl is

Re: Review Request 52076: GEODE-1511: Remove test dependencies from pom file

2016-09-20 Thread Mark Bretl
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/52076/#review149677 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Mark Bretl On Sept. 19, 2016, 8:49

Re: jvsd

2016-09-20 Thread Anthony Baker
Hi Gal, This page talks about the goals and status for jvsd: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=61309918 Here’s another thread which discussed options for moving forward:

Re: M3 is out - New release manager for 1.0 ?

2016-09-20 Thread Michael Stolz
I think we should do these security features incrementally after 1.0.0. -- Mike Stolz Principal Engineer, GemFire Product Manager Mobile: 631-835-4771 On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Anthony Baker wrote: > > > On Sep 17, 2016, at 5:29 PM, Swapnil Bawaskar

Re: Review Request 52019: GEODE-1513: Remove duplicate jars from war files

2016-09-20 Thread Anthony Baker
> On Sept. 20, 2016, 2:17 p.m., Jens Deppe wrote: > > geode-pulse.war contains geode-web.jar - I don't think it needs that. > > > > Both geode-pulse.war and geode-web-api.war contain the relevant exploded > > classes. However, geode-web.war contains a geode-web.jar file with the > > actual