To what degree should jVSD be mentioned in the docs? The current writeup is
essentially "go get it if you want it, but be warned that it's not fully
baked and we don't support it".
Would that still be the appropriate jVSD policy for 1.0.0?

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Dan Smith <> wrote:

> I don't think we should try to include jVSD in 1.0.0 at this point, because
> it introduces dependencies that might make the 1.0.0 release more
> complicated such as the MultiAxisChartFX dependency. But I think the should
> try to get it to develop sooner rather than later to make it easier for
> people to get jVSD and play with it.
> -Dan

Reply via email to