Re: update website for WAN, CQ and native client

lti-Site. >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> Swapnil. >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 7:22 PM, theseusyang <theseusy...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I agree with Greg, "Multi-Cluster" is accurated especially f

Re: update website for WAN, CQ and native client

cluster replication in one DC site. -- View this message in context: http://apache-geode-incubating-developers-forum.70738.x6.nabble.com/update-website-for-WAN-CQ-and-native-client-tp6659p6763.html Sent from the Apache Geode (Incubating) Developers Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- -John 503-504-8657 john.blum10101 (skype)

Re: update website for WAN, CQ and native client

>> > > >> > > Thanks! >> > > Swapnil. >> > > >> > > On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 7:22 PM, theseusyang <theseusy...@gmail.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > I agree with Greg, "Multi-Cluster&

Re: update website for WAN, CQ and native client

> > I agree with Greg, "Multi-Cluster" is accurated especially for > > > > cluster-2-cluster replication in one DC site. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > View this message in context:

Re: update website for WAN, CQ and native client

e: > > > > > I agree with Greg, "Multi-Cluster" is accurated especially for > > > cluster-2-cluster replication in one DC site. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > View this message in context: > > > > > > http://a

Re: update website for WAN, CQ and native client

, 2016 at 7:22 PM, theseusyang <theseusy...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I agree with Greg, "Multi-Cluster" is accurated especially for > > cluster-2-cluster replication in one DC site. > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: &g

Re: update website for WAN, CQ and native client

ccurated especially for > cluster-2-cluster replication in one DC site. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-geode-incubating-developers-forum.70738.x6.nabble.com/update-website-for-WAN-CQ-and-native-client-tp6659p6763.html > Sent from the Apache Geode (Incubati

Re: update website for WAN, CQ and native client

I agree with Greg, "Multi-Cluster" is accurated especially for cluster-2-cluster replication in one DC site. -- View this message in context: http://apache-geode-incubating-developers-forum.70738.x6.nabble.com/update-website-for-WAN-CQ-and-native-client-tp6659p6763.html Sent from

Re: update website for WAN, CQ and native client

+1 to "multi-site" (maybe even augmented with, dare I say "replication"), though I personally don't have a problem with WAN. Of course, that might seem dated, but then I am getting older, ;-) Perhaps WAN with a short description.. "Multi-Site Replication for Active/Active, Active/Passive (DR),

Re: update website for WAN, CQ and native client

I like multi-site. It means physical isolation. -- Mike Stolz Principal Engineer - Gemfire Product Manager Mobile: 631-835-4771 On Jun 17, 2016 5:02 PM, "Gregory Chase" wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Gregory Chase wrote: > > > > > > > Boom!

Re: update website for WAN, CQ and native client

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Gregory Chase wrote: > > > Boom! "Multi-site' or "Multi-Cluster" > > > At the risk of sounding like I'm "+1"-ing myself, consider this bullet comes on the next row after "clustering". So if it says "multi-cluster" or "multi-clustering" with

Re: update website for WAN, CQ and native client

I agree with Greg that we shouldn't use the Redis logo. On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Gregory Chase wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Anilkumar Gingade > wrote: > > > John is Right...WAN is more than just a replication of data...In order to

Re: update website for WAN, CQ and native client

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Anilkumar Gingade wrote: > John is Right...WAN is more than just a replication of data...In order to > highlight and meaningful we have described this as Muti Site (WAN) Topology > in GemFire docs... > > -Anil. > Boom! "Multi-site' or

Re: update website for WAN, CQ and native client

John is Right...WAN is more than just a replication of data...In order to highlight and meaningful we have described this as Muti Site (WAN) Topology in GemFire docs... -Anil. On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > Well, you can can replicate

Re: update website for WAN, CQ and native client

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:53 AM, John Blum wrote: > Hmmm, I disagree. > > Second, WAN is much more than Replication. It is a topology used in > Active-Active or DR architectures, or used perhaps for sending a select > subset, "filtered" (possibly transformed), information,

Re: update website for WAN, CQ and native client

I want to say "like a WAN". Just subjective, what do you think? On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Joey McAllister wrote: > +1 > > Looks great, Swapnil. > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:16 PM Swapnil Bawaskar > wrote: > > > Thanks for the feedback. Here

Re: update website for WAN, CQ and native client

+1 Looks great, Swapnil. On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:16 PM Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > Thanks for the feedback. Here is take 2: http://i.imgur.com/gmsHomO.png > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:59 AM, John Blum wrote: > > > @Swap- > > > > Perhaps we should

Re: update website for WAN, CQ and native client

Thanks for the feedback. Here is take 2: http://i.imgur.com/gmsHomO.png On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:59 AM, John Blum wrote: > @Swap- > > Perhaps we should mention Geode also supports *Redis* and *Memcached* > clients (through the respective protocols) as well, though we do not

Re: update website for WAN, CQ and native client

@Swap- Perhaps we should mention Geode also supports *Redis* and *Memcached* clients (through the respective protocols) as well, though we do not develop dedicated clients for either. Thoughts on how to best represent that? -John On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 5:51 AM, Jacob Barrett

Re: update website for WAN, CQ and native client

-1 I would not mention native clients yet since they aren't anywhere near a state to be built and used. On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 5:32 AM yang theseus wrote: > +1 great! > > 2016-06-16 15:14 GMT+08:00 Gregory Chase : > > > +1 > > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016

Re: update website for WAN, CQ and native client

+1 great! 2016-06-16 15:14 GMT+08:00 Gregory Chase : > +1 > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Swapnil Bawaskar > wrote: > > > Hi, > > WAN and CQ were the major features of M2 release[1]. Also, Native client > > has been donated to apache [2].

Re: update website for WAN, CQ and native client

+1 On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Swapnil Bawaskar wrote: > Hi, > WAN and CQ were the major features of M2 release[1]. Also, Native client > has been donated to apache [2]. Considering these new features, I would > like to update the geode website [3]

update website for WAN, CQ and native client

Hi, WAN and CQ were the major features of M2 release[1]. Also, Native client has been donated to apache [2]. Considering these new features, I would like to update the geode website [3] and add these new features as captured in this image [4]