James Strachan wrote:
On 27 Jan 2006, at 18:54, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 27 Jan 2006, at 18:20, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Dain,
David is talking about how SessionManagers (effectively extended
SessionFactories) should be plumbed into Geronimo (i.e. GBeans),
not
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Jan 27, 2006, at 10:54 AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 27 Jan 2006, at 18:20, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Dain,
David is talking about how SessionManagers (effectively extended
SessionFactories) should be plumbed into Geronimo (i.e. GBeans),
not
On 30 Jan 2006, at 09:13, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 27 Jan 2006, at 18:54, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 27 Jan 2006, at 18:20, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Dain,
David is talking about how SessionManagers (effectively
extended SessionFactories) should be
On 30 Jan 2006, at 09:24, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Jan 27, 2006, at 10:54 AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 27 Jan 2006, at 18:20, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Dain,
David is talking about how SessionManagers (effectively
extended SessionFactories) should
My understanding of ActiveSpace is that it supports two state clustering
abstractions :
- Cache - a Map-like API
- Space - a JavaSpace like paradigm (also allowing a pub/sub model)
WADI provides a third model, I have been trying unsuccessfully, to think
of a nice name for it - lets call it
James Strachan wrote:
On 30 Jan 2006, at 09:13, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 27 Jan 2006, at 18:54, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 27 Jan 2006, at 18:20, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Dain,
David is talking about how SessionManagers (effectively
extended
James Strachan wrote:
On 30 Jan 2006, at 09:24, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Jan 27, 2006, at 10:54 AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 27 Jan 2006, at 18:20, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Dain,
David is talking about how SessionManagers (effectively
extended
On 30 Jan 2006, at 10:06, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Finally, as discussed with James on numerous occasions, we should
look at how WADI's pessimistic locking and PartitionManager might
be componentised so that they can be plugged into AS to provide
Cache and Space users, who are not interested
James Strachan wrote:
On 30 Jan 2006, at 10:06, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Finally, as discussed with James on numerous occasions, we should
look at how WADI's pessimistic locking and PartitionManager might be
componentised so that they can be plugged into AS to provide Cache
and Space users,
In login-service re-factoring, I'd like to unify treatment of the default
principal.
Default principal should be designated by a role, not as an instance of a
principal; To find an instance of a default-principal find a principal that
is mapped to a role that has 'run-as' attribute set to true
On 30 Jan 2006, at 10:29, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 30 Jan 2006, at 10:06, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Finally, as discussed with James on numerous occasions, we
should look at how WADI's pessimistic locking and
PartitionManager might be componentised so that they can be
On 29 Jan 2006, at 18:50, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Jan 27, 2006, at 1:11 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
+1
I assume this will just be a regular subproject at present. If
one of
the XBean folks could talk a little about how XBean could ultimately
be adopted by Geronimo (the app server), that would
Big +1 to either :-)
Thanks David
-Vincent
-Original Message-
From: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: lundi 30 janvier 2006 08:23
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Multiple servers sharing the same repo and config store
Many people have talked on and off about how
Hi,
Is there an API that I can use from a java program to ask G whether it has
finished starting?
Thanks
-Vincent
James Strachan wrote:
On 30 Jan 2006, at 10:29, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 30 Jan 2006, at 10:06, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Finally, as discussed with James on numerous occasions, we should
look at how WADI's pessimistic locking and PartitionManager might
be
On 30 Jan 2006, at 11:00, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 30 Jan 2006, at 10:29, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 30 Jan 2006, at 10:06, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Finally, as discussed with James on numerous occasions, we
should look at how WADI's pessimistic
James Strachan wrote:
On 30 Jan 2006, at 11:00, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 30 Jan 2006, at 10:29, Jules Gosnell wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
On 30 Jan 2006, at 10:06, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Finally, as discussed with James on numerous occasions, we
should look at
Project: Apache Geronimo
Status: Open
Assignee: Unassigned
Geronimo Info: Patch Available
Total: 20 items
DATE UPDATED KEY SUMMARY Dec 18 2005 - GERONIMO-1381 -
[Daytrader] Removed unused code
Dec 22 2005 - GERONIMO-1400 - modularize daytrader deployment plan
Jan 3
James Strachan wrote:
On 29 Jan 2006, at 18:50, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Jan 27, 2006, at 1:11 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
+1
I assume this will just be a regular subproject at present. If one of
the XBean folks could talk a little about how XBean could ultimately
be adopted by Geronimo (the
Hi Vincent,
Yes, there is. There are more then one, actually. It depends on what
you're talking to.
The most common API is to use JMX Remoting via maven plugin or
stripping out the Maven layers - doing it programatically. Take a look
at plugins/geronimo-deployment-plugin or read it
This sounds reasonable to me. I'd prefer to have resolveServer and
always look for /var under there. If there are multiple config
stores, we'll have to figure out how the deploy tool will know which
one to use. Perhaps there should be something indicating whether the
config store is writable at
There is an attributed that gets passed to each configuration when all configurations have started, you can check for it. This is whatis being done in the eclipse plugin. You can call kernel.getAttribute(obname, "kernelFullyStarted") - sachin On Jan 30, 2006, at 6:08 AM, Vincent Massol
Dain,
Here is my request for geronimo-contributor
privileges. Do I enough karma?
Thnaks
Anita
--- Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since on one objected, I added a
geronimo-contributers group that can
assign, resolve and be assigned issues. If this is
becomes an issue
Refactor web module builders
Key: GERONIMO-1555
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1555
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Components: web
Environment: All
Reporter: anita kulshreshtha
Priority: Minor
Thanks Aaron and Sachin. Ill try
your suggestions.
-Vincent
From: Sachin Patel
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: lundi 30 janvier 2006 14:32
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Knowing when G is
started?
There is an attributed that gets passed to each configuration
Oopss that was Lacek and Sachin ;-)
Sorry
-Vincent
From: Vincent Massol
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: lundi 30 janvier 2006 15:54
To: 'dev@geronimo.apache.org'
Subject: RE: Knowing when G is
started?
Thanks Aaron and Sachin. Ill try your
suggestions.
-Vincent
This is great input from the entire community and I hope the ideas
keep coming! I think it would be best if these were all entered as
JIRA issues so that they can all be categorized and tracked.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack(u30,D0G)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]5R\F)R=6-E+G-N61ED\!G;6%I;\YC;VT*
);'
Apache
Does anyone know how other J2EE servers structure their directories
when they have multiple instances configured?
-dain
On Jan 30, 2006, at 5:04 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
This sounds reasonable to me. I'd prefer to have resolveServer and
always look for /var under there. If there are
Done.
-dain
On Jan 30, 2006, at 5:49 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Dain,
Here is my request for geronimo-contributor
privileges. Do I enough karma?
Thnaks
Anita
--- Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since on one objected, I added a
geronimo-contributers group that can
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1555?page=all ]
anita kulshreshtha reassigned GERONIMO-1555:
Assign To: anita kulshreshtha
Refactor web module builders
Key: GERONIMO-1555
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1293?page=all ]
anita kulshreshtha reassigned GERONIMO-1293:
Assign To: anita kulshreshtha
Provide tomcat statistics
-
Key: GERONIMO-1293
URL:
Hi, In WebSphere this is the directory organization: $WAS_HOME/config/cells/$CELL_NAME applications (EAR/WAR/RAR) nodes .$NODE_NAME ..servers (JVM Configurations)
David,
Can you please help clarify the following points
You wrote, ...but in each assemblies module after an assembly is
built is where they need to execute... I'm sorry, I quite didn't
catch what that meant.
Next, if the assemblies are assembled using maven 1.. do they then
have to deployed
On 1/29/2006 1:41 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 28, 2006, at 11:51 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jan 28, 2006, at 10:57 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I've updated the trunk of Geronimo Specs to 1.1-SNAPSHOT. The
thinking is that we update the versions of all the spec jars in
tandem. The
One approach that seems user friendly to me would be to allow the user
to pass an argument to Geronimo startup specifying a server root
directory. The immediate subdirectories of this server
root directory would trump those in geronimo_home for that server
instance. Using this technique would
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1196?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-1196:
Fix Version: 1.x
(was: 1.0.1)
Version: 1.0
Deferring out of 1.0.1 to 1.x. This is an issue that was re-existing to 1.0
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1445?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-1445:
Fix Version: (was: 1.0.1)
Allow deployment and use of exploded EAR modules
Key:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1374?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-1374:
Fix Version: 1.x
(was: 1.0.1)
I would like to see this in 1.0.1 but it looks like it might be disruptive.
I'll defer to
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1462?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-1462:
Fix Version: 1.x
(was: 1.0.1)
Moving to 1.x and 1.1. Looks fairly trivial but does not appear to be critical
to users.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1509?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-1509:
Fix Version: 1.x
(was: 1.0.1)
This is more of a build issue. I'm moving out of 1.0.1 so it doesn't get
tracked with this
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1199?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-1199:
Fix Version: 1.x
(was: 1.0.1)
Version: 1.0
Moving to 1.x as this is an issue that predated 1.0.
Keystore portlet
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1524?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-1524:
Fix Version: 1.x
(was: 1.0.1)
DB pool portlet should let you select multiple driver JARs
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1531?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-1531:
Fix Version: 1.x
(was: 1.0.1)
KeyStore portlet should support deletion of certificates and private keys
I am getting this error while deploying any app to
minimal-tomcat-server using :
java -jar bin\deployer.jar deployI
..\..\..\..\applications\jmxdebug\target\geronimo-jmxdebug-1.1-SNAPSHOT.war
Exception in thread main
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
On Jan 30, 2006, at 2:46 AM, Simon wrote:
In login-service re-factoring, I'd like to unify treatment of the
default
principal.
I think this is interesting and important, but I'm having trouble
following what you are proposing. Could you provide more details?
One overall question I
Hi Anita,
I hit this error last week. I created GERONIMO-1541
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1541
and attached a patch to it for the fix. If you apply this patch and
rebuild the assemblies you should be able to deploy.
Another quick, temporary fix is just to copy this jar
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1527?page=all ]
Bruce Snyder closed GERONIMO-1527:
--
Fix Version: 1.1
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Bruce Snyder
InternetAddress does not properly implement address parsing.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1527?page=comments#action_12364490
]
Bruce Snyder commented on GERONIMO-1527:
Patches added:
Adding
geronimo-spec-javamail/src/main/java/javax/mail/internet/AddressParser.java
Sending
Vote passed with:
+1 Jeff Genender, Alan Cabrera, Sachin Patel, Dain Sundstrom, David
Blevins, Andy Piper, Aaron Mulder, Davanum Srinivas, Jacek Laskowski,
Bruce Snyder, Jason Dillion, Gianny Damour, John Sission, David
Jencks, James Strachan
No -1s
I'll file the paperwork with the
Joe,
Thanks, I will try that. Any idea how much
work/modification is involved in getting the console
running?
Thanks
Anita
--- Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Anita,
I hit this error last week. I created GERONIMO-1541
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1541
and
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1419?page=all ]
Bruce Snyder reassigned GERONIMO-1419:
--
Assign To: Bruce Snyder
javax.mail.internet.InternetHeaders has some non implemented features
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1419?page=all ]
Bruce Snyder closed GERONIMO-1419:
--
Fix Version: 1.1
Resolution: Fixed
javax.mail.internet.InternetHeaders has some non implemented features
Anita,
I haven't tried to deploy the console into the minimal assembly ... but
I image that it might have some problems. Because the console manages
many of the configurations in geronimo it might have some hard coded
dependencies which could prevent it from deploying and/or loading (we
On Jan 30, 2006, at 8:54 AM, Paul McMahan wrote:One approach that seems user friendly to me would be to allow the user to pass an argument to Geronimo startup specifying a "server root" directory. The immediate subdirectories of this server root directory would trump those in geronimo_home for
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1426?page=all ]
Paul McMahan updated GERONIMO-1426:
---
Geronimo Info: [Patch Available]
DatabasePoolPortlet gets NPE when saving
Key: GERONIMO-1426
On Jan 30, 2006, at 8:44 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Think of what the alternative is that you are asking the end
developer to cope w/. He must grok what is the current correct
collection of versions are. Even if all the APIs mature and their
version numbers never change thereafter, there
Following the brief discussion we began having on irc, this is what I
believe you mean and are proposing -
that itests should be run (on modules), during the time of an assembly
creation. The key word here is during. This is also why itests
should use the same version of maven that assembly
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Ryan Thomas wrote:
I just took a look at the c-jdbc design and it seems that they have to
execute writes one at a time (one insert statement at a time) - because if
you start multiple write transaction at the same time then multiple sites
could execute the writes in
On Jan 30, 2006, at 11:07 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 30, 2006, at 8:44 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Think of what the alternative is that you are asking the end
developer to cope w/. He must grok what is the current correct
collection of versions are. Even if all the APIs mature and
On 1/30/2006 11:07 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 30, 2006, at 8:44 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Think of what the alternative is that you are asking the end
developer to cope w/. He must grok what is the current correct
collection of versions are. Even if all the APIs mature and their
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1541?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-1541:
--
Fix Version: 1.1
Resolution: Fixed
Applied, I also removed some commented out dependencies
Sending
On Jan 30, 2006, at 11:14 AM, David Jencks wrote:
As I expressed previously, I think it is a bigger mess to be unable
to determine the contents of the uber-spec jar. If you can suggest
a way to make it easy to find out which individual spec jars are
aggregated into the uber-spec jar, I
On Jan 30, 2006, at 11:24 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On 1/30/2006 11:14 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jan 30, 2006, at 11:07 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 30, 2006, at 8:44 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Think of what the alternative is that you are asking the end
developer to cope w/.
On Jan 30, 2006, at 11:24 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
If we moved to Maven 2 and used its transitive dependencies, would
the the need for an Uber jar be obviated?
For maven 2 all we need is an uber pom. For people on maven 1 and
ant and plain IDEs, an uber jar is nice.
-David
On Jan 30, 2006, at 11:37 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 30, 2006, at 11:14 AM, David Jencks wrote:
As I expressed previously, I think it is a bigger mess to be
unable to determine the contents of the uber-spec jar. If you can
suggest a way to make it easy to find out which individual
Hi David,
Currently there is DefaultPrincipal type and it wraps a subject; When I talk
about default principal I mean default principal name.
jetty interceptor code
(org.apache.geronimo.jetty.interceptor.SecurityContextBeforeAfter) generates
a subject for a default principal with the help of the
On Jan 30, 2006, at 2:38 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jan 30, 2006, at 11:24 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On 1/30/2006 11:14 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jan 30, 2006, at 11:07 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 30, 2006, at 8:44 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Think of what the alternative is
As far as directory structure, it seems that WebSphere separates the
binaries (e.g. jars, scripts) from the instance data. Each instance has
it's own copy of configuration data, installed applications, logs and
properties. The scripts (e.g. startup/shutdown) are also available in
each
It's probably going to be you doing this work, so ultimately, you are
the one who decides what you want to write. I will just say that you
and I share the same goals, but your proposal goes against the grain
of maven which fundamentally combines build/test. Anytime you do
that, it's
On Jan 30, 2006, at 11:44 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jan 30, 2006, at 11:37 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 30, 2006, at 11:14 AM, David Jencks wrote:
As I expressed previously, I think it is a bigger mess to be
unable to determine the contents of the uber-spec jar. If you
can
On Jan 30, 2006, at 12:26 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
David Blevins wrote, On 1/30/2006 11:39 AM:
On Jan 30, 2006, at 11:24 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
If we moved to Maven 2 and used its transitive dependencies,
would the the need for an Uber jar be obviated?
For maven 2 all we need is an
As a programmer type it seems intuitive to me that the
presence of a subdir in an alternate server root overrides the default
while its absence makes the server instance inherit the
default. But its possible that I am mingling system
administration with too much OO. At any rate I agree that having
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1544?page=all ]
John Sisson reassigned GERONIMO-1544:
-
Assign To: John Sisson
Installer - Straighten out licensing issues for IzPack sub-components.
On Jan 30, 2006, at 11:49 AM, Simon wrote:
public interface ILoginService {
No Is on interface names please
I agree with you that the default principal and run-as principals
should be
authenticated on application start-up; (That was my thinking as well)
Why would we need to
On Jan 30, 2006, at 11:24 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
If we moved to Maven 2 and used its transitive dependencies, would
the the need for an Uber jar be obviated?
Last time I checked Ant has quite a few users and so did Maven 1.
Having an aggregate jar for those users is pretty nice.
On Jan 30, 2006, at 11:14 AM, David Jencks wrote:
As I expressed previously, I think it is a bigger mess to be unable
to determine the contents of the uber-spec jar. If you can suggest
a way to make it easy to find out which individual spec jars are
aggregated into the uber-spec jar, I
I think the uber jar is convenient but it's already causing a rat's nest of
issues. I'd support dropping it.
Jason Dillon wrote:
IMO uberjar is more trouble than it is worth.
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:26:09
This may not be an issue.. I am wondering whether uber jars could
complicate security in the future.
For example, we could provide sample/default security policies to be
used by a security manager (that assume the individual jars are being
used) that use CodeSource and Principal based
On Jan 30, 2006, at 3:42 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Jan 30, 2006, at 11:49 AM, Simon wrote:
public interface ILoginService {
No Is on interface names please
agreed, I forgot to mention this.
I agree with you that the default principal and run-as principals
should be
authenticated
On Jan 30, 2006, at 4:10 PM, Simon Godik wrote:
When default and run-as principals are in-effect they should be
treated the
same way as any other principal; (eg granting of privilege to perform
certain tasks); That means we should track these objects in the
login-service and believe that
UserTransaction may be in wrong state after ejb ejb call
---
Key: GERONIMO-1556
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1556
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: OpenEJB
Versions: 1.1
Not sure what you mean by the 'interceptor would be creating one of these
(subjects?)'
I want to emphasize that interceptors (or any code for that matter) should
be passed authenticated subject(s) and hopefully we can avoid a call to
ContextManager.registerSubject() altogether;
The only calls an
David,
Thanks for letting me make that decision. I, at this point, would now
have to get the insight and information from people who are more
knowledgeable about the project; something similiar to what you have
provided now. With my limited knowledge, I don't want to go down the
wrong path.
I
On Jan 30, 2006, at 7:43 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
I would like to solicit the views of others too like you and get their
views and opinions.
Great. I poked some other people in irc to get involved as well.
Here is hoping :) More input is going to make for a better
community
On Jan 20, 2006, at 12:53 AM, Greg Wilkins wrote:
Aaron Mulder wrote:
It would be saying something like, there must be a
GBean to represent a virtual host, and that GBean must have a set of
host names associated with it, and any application can be associated
with that defined virtual host.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1287?page=all ]
John Sisson reopened GERONIMO-1287:
---
Ran installer on windows and found the following message at the end of the
output in the IzPack processing window:
Installed configuration
a real simple way to define classloader hierarchies, sounds like you want
Classworlds
--jason
-Original Message-
From: James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:03:24
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [vote] XBean donation
On 29 Jan 2006, at 18:50, Dain
I don't consider classworlds simple at all.
-dain
On Jan 30, 2006, at 9:14 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
a real simple way to define classloader hierarchies, sounds like
you want Classworlds
--jason
-Original Message-
From: James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006
Really? I think it is the simplest classloader API with the most
flexibility... or maybe I'm just tainted by all that UCL mess... so
anything other than that is simple.
BUT, jokes aside, Classworlds is really simple to create hierarchies,
either from configuration or programatically.
When you enter the url of a web servıce ın the console You should get a page
showıng the servıce name
-
Key: GERONIMO-1557
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1557
90 matches
Mail list logo
