[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-918?page=all ]
Jonas Lim resolved AMQ-918.
---
Fix Version/s: 4.0.1
4.0
Resolution: Fixed
fixed applied in 4.x branches and trunk (r443267)
Inactivity Monitor timeout does not on
Add the ability to remove network connectors dynamically
Key: AMQ-923
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-923
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Improvement
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-923?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino resolved AMQ-923.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Done in trunk rev 434068
Add the ability to remove network connectors dynamically
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-922?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino updated AMQ-922:
--
Summary: Add the ability to remove transport connectors dynamically
(was: Add a removeConnector() to BrokerServer to remove added transport
connectors.)
Hi,
I am wondering how to pass a integer value to a message header property
using the STOMP C. I don't find any other information about how to set a
message header with a integer value in the apr hash.
Thanks!
Vik
Hi folks,
Thanks for taking the time to check the release. Vote passes with 6
+1's . We just need to get the incubator PMC to now approve the
release.
+1 Votes:
Hiram Chirino
Guillaume Nodet
Rob Davies
James Strachan
Alan D. Cabrera
Kevan Miller
No +/- 0 or -1's
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog:
Hi Vik.. I don't think stomp supports it.
On 9/14/06, Dhawan, Vikram (LNG-DAY) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am wondering how to pass a integer value to a message header property
using the STOMP C. I don't find any other information about how to set a
message header with a integer value in
Hi Hiram,
Do you know if CMS client for activemq supports it?
Thanks!
Vik
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hiram
Chirino
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 12:26 PM
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: how to pass a integer
Do you know if CMS client for activemq supports it?
We provide a properties object that you can get from a Message object.
The Properties Object allows you to set string properties (string key,
string value). We also provide classes like Integer that define
toString() methods. Or you can
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-915?page=comments#action_36952 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-915:
---
Applied patch to to 4.0 branch rev 443423
Failover transport does not replay all the transaction operations on failover.
Is this feature going to be in activeMQ 4.2 version or was this feature
existed in any of the previous releases (3.2 or any) of activeMQ ?
How about specifying producer priorities and consumer priorities ? Does this
exist in 4.0.1 release? From the documentation, my understanding is
confused.
Patch to make activemq-cpp compile under sun studio 11
--
Key: AMQ-924
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-924
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Improvement
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for the info. Dojo is licensed under Academic Free License and
BSD so I think it should be fine. The only decision now is how to
include Dojo in Geronimo. A couple of suggestions were given by Gianny
and Paul and everybody is definitely welcome for additional input.
Best
HttpComponent can not be deployed as managed!
-
Key: SM-578
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-578
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: servicemix-http
Gianny,
Thanks again for finding time to look at the patch. Sorry to hear that
it didn’t worked out smoothly in Safari. I agree with you that we should
find a better way to include/checkin Dojo in G. I decided to include the
Dojo source in the patch to make it easier for people like you who
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2333?page=comments#action_12434603
]
Chris Cardona commented on GERONIMO-2333:
-
Gianny, I appreciate all your help on checking out this patch too bad it didn't
work out in Safari
Why not use ActiveMQ for communication and take advantage of its
broker network for failover?
--jason
On Sep 12, 2006, at 9:19 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
I wanted to go over a high level design on a gcache cache component
and
get some feedback, input and invite folks who are interested to
When recovering messages on startup - execution of Store.getMessage is executed
as many times as many subscribers to this destination there are
---
On 9/14/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not use ActiveMQ for communication and take advantage of its
broker network for failover?
I'd be better off leaving answering the question to Jeff, but here's
my take on Jeff's proposal that may answer your question.
AFAIUI, Jeff proposes
Jeff and Brian did most of the heavy lifting for the Liferay
integration. I don't know why the now defunct method was needed. But
since the method was intentionally removed as part of a security
related JIRA it sounds like we need a new version of the Liferay EAR
and not a new rev of the
On 9/14/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
...
- the former master comes back up
Good question. Do we A) have it return as a master? or B) have it come
in as a slave-n? Need some input here.
First off, I'm a complete clastering beginner so don't be cruel to a
On 9/12/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please vote on this release as it should be our last one.
+1. Go babe go!
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.net.pl
On 14/09/2006, at 10:58 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 9/14/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
- slave 1 (or any intermediate slave) goes down.
- slave 1 (or any intermediate slave) comes back up
- slave n (last slave) goes down.
All great questions. I would
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2163?page=comments#action_12434675
]
Greg Wilkins commented on GERONIMO-2163:
Jan and I went over the patch today and we are generally pleased with it.
I like the architecture of a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2163?page=comments#action_12434678
]
Jan Bartel commented on GERONIMO-2163:
--
Finally got a working network connection!
I like the refactoring in the builder and the introduction of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-915?page=comments#action_36948 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-915:
---
Adrian what was the svn revision that the fix was comitted on and on what
branch?
Failover transport does not replay all
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-915?page=comments#action_36949 ]
Hiram Chirino commented on AMQ-915:
---
I'm not even sure that this has made it into trunk either.
Failover transport does not replay all the transaction
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-915?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino reopened AMQ-915:
---
Assignee: Adrian Co (was: Hiram Chirino)
Failover transport does not replay all the transaction operations on failover.
The one problem I noticed in rc1 is gone.
My +1 (if it counts :o))
VamsiOn 9/13/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have updated build in the following ways:- Removed the code that left extraneous 0 length DTDs in the build.- Built on 1.1.1.These binaries are the final ones that will
Not at the current time.
On 9/13/06, samahome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this mean ActiveMQ(Version 4.0.1) does not support Message priorities ?
If it does support, could you please point me to some specific
documentation ?
Regards
Sreenivas Sama
Ramzi Saba wrote:
Per AMQ-122, the
BTW.. you can.
The ActiveMQ GB now supports a brokerURI attribute that you can set it
to either an external spring or xbean file for the broker
configuration. For example:
xbean:file:/path/to/activemq.xml
or
spring:file:/path/to/applicationContext.xml
Regards,
Hiram
On 9/13/06, Jason Dillon
+1 it's good direction to drive towards!
On 9/13/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2398
Thinking about how we might support plugging in a jta11 transaction
manager I remembered that one part of the little-g work we never did
was to split
[X] +1 CTR with documentation guidelines
On 9/10/06, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a vote to determine the development process the Geronimo
community wishes to use for trunk development. If any modifications
are needed for a branch development process, then a separate vote
On 9/14/06, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My +1 (if it counts :o))
Always!
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.net.pl
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-920?page=comments#action_36950 ]
Sridhar Komandur commented on AMQ-920:
--
Jon brought up another important use case related to brokers outside the
Firewall (perhaps in the DMZ) ...
+1
Thanks for your hard work Matt!
Gianny
On 13/09/2006, at 7:51 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I have updated build in the following ways:
- Removed the code that left extraneous 0 length DTDs in the build.
- Built on 1.1.1. These binaries are the final ones that will be
used for distribution.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2375?page=all ]
Bill Dudney updated GERONIMO-2375:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-2375-bdudney-v2.patch
GERONIMO-2375-bdudney-v2.patch
use this patch instead of the previous on - still not 100% but getting
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2385?page=all ]
Bill Dudney reassigned GERONIMO-2385:
-
Assignee: Bill Dudney
server does not update any state when persistent configuration is loaded and
ready to serve applications
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2344?page=all ]
Bill Dudney reassigned GERONIMO-2344:
-
Assignee: Bill Dudney
Tomcat Console can't find TomcatManagerImpl class during display of ServerLogs
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2375?page=all ]
Bill Dudney reassigned GERONIMO-2375:
-
Assignee: Bill Dudney
console has invalid XHTML in the db bool
Key: GERONIMO-2375
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2180?page=all ]
Rick McGuire updated GERONIMO-2180:
---
Attachment: yoko.zip
A snapshot of the Yoko ORB code to be added to the .m2 repository (unzip under
org/apache directory).
Add Yoko ORB support to
I'm closing this vote now with 7 +1.
I will ask the incubator PMC to validate this release.
On 9/11/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've fixed the missing headers files that Hiram pointed out, so I'm starting
a new vote.
I have uploaded the 3.0-incubating release at
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2180?page=all ]
Rick McGuire updated GERONIMO-2180:
---
Attachment: GERONIMO-2180-v1-openejb2.patch
GERONIMO-2180-v1-geronimo.patch
Patches to openejb2 and geronimo to enable Yoko ORB
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2180?page=comments#action_12434698
]
Balaji Ravi commented on GERONIMO-2180:
---
Why can't the yoko maven artifacts be pulled from the snapshot repository? I
assume geronimo is using maven as
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2180?page=comments#action_12434695
]
Rick McGuire commented on GERONIMO-2180:
I've added some patches to to enable this support. There are serveral issues I
need community input to
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 9/14/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not use ActiveMQ for communication and take advantage of its
broker network for failover?
I'd be better off leaving answering the question to Jeff, but here's
my take on Jeff's proposal that may answer your
Jason Dillon wrote:
Why not use ActiveMQ for communication and take advantage of its broker
network for failover?
The JMS provider would be a pluggable comm strategy. For performance
reasons, I want to start with TCP communication. I definitely want to
have a JMS strategy...maybe next.
Hi Gianny,
Thanks for the comments. I am not so sure I want to inject election or
quorum into the mix as I want the first pass to be as simple as
possible. For the sake of simplicity, already knowing the order will
help.
As I thought about this more, if a slave comes back, it can notify the
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 9/13/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The code lives in sandbox/gcache. Its in it's early stages.
Could you describe what's already there? A wiki page would be of help,
too. Do you plan to convert these fancy ascii arts into UML diagrams?
I think a
Based on this report, I'm going to mark the current Liferay plugin as
only works for Geronimo 1.1. As soon as a new compatible release is
available, we'll mark it for 1.1.1 and 1.1.2-SNAPSHOT. (It would be
great to have one that worked in the Geronimo/Jetty distribution too!)
Thanks,
Aaron
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2180?page=comments#action_12434707
]
Balaji Ravi commented on GERONIMO-2180:
---
Yes... It is in the apache snapshot repository...
I like the direction but I haven't tried the patches.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 9/13/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2398
Thinking about how we might support plugging in a jta11 transaction
manager I remembered that one part of the little-g
On 9/13/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I use the artifactId with
javax.enterprise.deploy.spi.DeploymentManager and friends?
I'll have to look -- I'm not sure whether the decode artifact to full
module ID code is in the deployment tool or the deployment manager.
But if it's not
I think what you may be looking for is ConfigIDExtractor.identifyTargetModuleIDs perhaps?On Sep 14, 2006, at 10:48 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:On 9/13/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can I use the artifactId withjavax.enterprise.deploy.spi.DeploymentManager and friends? I'll have to look --
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2333?page=comments#action_12434713
]
Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-2333:
Like Gianny I had problems using Safari 2.0.4. I also had problems with
Konqueror 3.5.2, it displayed the
Hi Gianny,
I applied the patch and got a few simple to fix hunks failing. Got
them fixed and it built until the failure to find the wadi-group
artifact. Any chance that could get uploaded so I can be lazy and not
build it myself?
If I understand things correctly geronimo-clustering is an
I am seeing this error on trunk (rev 443034) during shutdown:
11:42:10,359 INFO [TransportConnector] Connector tcp://0.0.0.0:61616
Stopped
11:42:10,359 INFO [TransportConnector] Connector
stomp://your-4dacd0ea75:61613 Stopped
11:42:10,359 INFO [TransportConnector] Connector
I tried your suggestion about using just the artifactId in a mojo
execution. That wouldn't work. However, it works as you said from the
CLI.
Cheers
Prasad
On 9/14/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/13/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I use the artifactId with
Hi Anita,
This is almost certianly from not cleaning everything out before
doing a build. You have to nuke all the m2 repo bits related to
geronimo and openejb 2 to get rid of all the old code that was using
the EDU.oswego classes as well as mvn clean everything (i.e. a
bootstrap :-)
I've just attached patches for issue
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2180, which is to add Yoko
support to Geronimo. This is really patches for this issue plus 2 other
issues that are highly related:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2002 OPENEBJ CORBA
SSL
OK. I guess the issue is that by default, the DeploymentManager
expects a TargetModuleID which is assumed to be complete. We have to
decide in this case whether we should just allow TargetModuleIDs that
essentially have wildcards, or whether we should add some methods to
our DeploymentManager
Would it hurt to adjust bootstrap to whack only the Geronimo-related
content from the M2 repo? Or perhaps only the SNAPSHOT artifacts? I
resist using it only because I have a lot of non-Geronimo content in
my local repo that I hate to lose every time. I used to be happy to
do the m:cleanrepo
Hi Anita,
This problem should be fixed with RC 443131. Suggest you give it a
try...
--kevan
On Sep 14, 2006, at 12:06 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
I am seeing this error on trunk (rev 443034) during shutdown:
11:42:10,359 INFO [TransportConnector] Connector tcp://0.0.0.0:61616
Stopped
Hi Aaron,
Try bootstrap -Dclean-minimal=true for only nuking the pertinent stuff.
HTH,
-bd-
On Sep 14, 2006, at 10:21 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Would it hurt to adjust bootstrap to whack only the Geronimo-related
content from the M2 repo? Or perhaps only the SNAPSHOT artifacts? I
resist
OK, cool!
Thanks,
Aaron
On 9/14/06, Bill Dudney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Aaron,
Try bootstrap -Dclean-minimal=true for only nuking the pertinent stuff.
HTH,
-bd-
On Sep 14, 2006, at 10:21 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Would it hurt to adjust bootstrap to whack only the Geronimo-related
Setters on JaxenXPathExpression have no effect on the underlying DOMXPath object
Key: SM-579
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-579
Project: ServiceMix
JSR-88 interfaceOn Sep 14, 2006, at 12:18 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:OK. I guess the issue is that by default, the DeploymentManagerexpects a TargetModuleID which is assumed to be complete. We have todecide in this case whether we should just allow TargetModuleIDs thatessentially have wildcards, or
Hi All,
After running into the jdk 1.5 building problem a couple of days ago
and posting about it ;
http://www.nabble.com/fail-bootstrap-early-with-wrong-jdk-tf2265472.html
I decided to dig into how far away we are from being able to build
with J2SE 5. So I set out to give it a shot. And
I tried it in the 3.0 release and when I run the client a second time it
hangs.
JIRA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-573?page=comments#action_36933
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-573:
+1
-dain
On Sep 12, 2006, at 2:51 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I have updated build in the following ways:
- Removed the code that left extraneous 0 length DTDs in the build.
- Built on 1.1.1. These binaries are the final ones that will be
used for distribution.
They can be found at
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-487?page=all ]
Guillaume Nodet closed SM-487.
--
Resolution: Won't Fix
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
Changing / removing the discovery mechanism will
have no effect if you don't use clustering.
If you need
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2333?page=comments#action_12434757
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2333:
This is very nice. +1 from me, wherever the dojo files end up. I think a
separate plugin would be better.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2333?page=all ]
David Jencks updated GERONIMO-2333:
---
Attachment: GERONIMO-2333-trunk.patch
I moved the files to their locations in trunk and included all the dojo files
in the patch. Also the jsp
Great work!!!
On Sep 14, 2006, at 12:16 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
I've just attached patches for issue http://issues.apache.org/jira/
browse/GERONIMO-2180, which is to add Yoko support to Geronimo.
This is really patches for this issue plus 2 other issues that are
highly related:
Cool ! Unknowingly I had been building on JDK 1.5 for a while now. The
java installation on my windows decided to upgrade itself. The builds
had passed successfully but I hadn't tested the server runtime.
Recently, I downgraded my jdk back to 1.4.2 after I encountered some
build problems. The
The activemq problem was fixed... but I am unaware that the shutdown
EDU/oswego/cs/dl/util/concurrent/LinkedNode is fixed. There is an
open bug assigned to david blevins to fix that.
--jason
On Sep 14, 2006, at 9:21 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Hi Anita,
This problem should be fixed with RC
I started working on a version of geronimo that uses the jta11
transaction manager in the sandbox. So, I wrote a new transaction
configuration using the new gbean and started trying to assemble a
server. My new config has gbeans with exactly the same names (except
for artifactId) as the
This is great news! Feels like we are getting very close to being
able to move to J2SE 5 and Java EE 5!
1) Leave the Sun ORB code in the tree, make the yoko package a
separate module that with a dependency on the openejb2 code. The
existing build works ok, and the tests can be built for
I sure wouldn't mind if a module could say I provide javax.foo.Bar
and a separate module could say I require a parent that provides
javax.foo.Bar... As in, interface dependencies instead of name-based
dependencies.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 9/14/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I started
Support for standard POST request from the provider.
-
Key: SM-580
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-580
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: New Feature
Components:
This sounds a lot like OSGi.
Felix might be a bit young but it seems like a big part of this
functionality is covered there.
Thoughts?
-bd-
On Sep 14, 2006, at 1:32 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I sure wouldn't mind if a module could say I provide javax.foo.Bar
and a separate module could say
Provide Dojo AJAX library as a native webapp
Key: GERONIMO-2406
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2406
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level: public
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2333?page=comments#action_12434786
]
Paul McMahan commented on GERONIMO-2333:
David, the trunk version of the patch didn't work for me. I may not have
applied it correctly. I can see
I'm trying to get a jpa-aware server constructed so I can see if my
code actually works so I've been setting up sandbox/jee5-jta so we
can have jee5 modules, configs, and assemblies. I think this might
be an ok place to work on other jee5 stuff like the jetty6
integration without
Trying to avoid pulling in too much of the server for the plugin, so
the plugin has a better hope of working with different versions of G.
--jason
On Sep 14, 2006, at 9:18 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
OK. I guess the issue is that by default, the DeploymentManager
expects a TargetModuleID
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2163?page=comments#action_12434790
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2163:
Greg and Jan can we take your comments as at least one binding +1 and poke
gianni to improve the docs after
We definitely need some form of type/function/interface/whatever based
dependencies.
I'm working on a new core framework assembly (little-G without the
containers ... micro-G? ) that we could use as a base for user created
assemblies via plugins. This is really the same item that I think
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-924?page=all ]
Timothy Bish reassigned AMQ-924:
Assignee: Timothy Bish
Patch to make activemq-cpp compile under sun studio 11
--
Key:
On 9/14/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to get a jpa-aware server constructed so I can see if my
code actually works so I've been setting up sandbox/jee5-jta so we
can have jee5 modules, configs, and assemblies. I think this might
be an ok place to work on other jee5 stuff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Who is planning on being at ApacheCon in Austin?
I'll be there.
- --
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
Millennium hand and shrimp!
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-924?page=all ]
Chris Knight updated AMQ-924:
-
Attachment: PATCH
makefile-solaris-debug.cfg
makefile-solaris-release.cfg
The 2nd patch fixes the unit tests.
I have also included
On Sep 14, 2006, at 4:27 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 9/14/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to get a jpa-aware server constructed so I can see if my
code actually works so I've been setting up sandbox/jee5-jta so we
can have jee5 modules, configs, and assemblies. I think
Open your address book, see if there is an entry that is being binded to that name.On Sep 14, 2006, at 4:37 PM, David Jencks wrote:On Sep 14, 2006, at 4:27 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: On 9/14/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to get a jpa-aware server constructed so I can see if
Bill Dudney wrote:
This is great news! Feels like we are getting very close to being able
to move to J2SE 5 and Java EE 5!
1) Leave the Sun ORB code in the tree, make the yoko package a
separate module that with a dependency on the openejb2 code. The
existing build works ok, and the tests
Hi,
I am running into a strange issue, I created a consumer program using
STOMP C which actually creates two separate consumer threads and both
threads are reading from the same queue in the AMQ server using their
own selectors on a header property.
I was expecting that each thread will
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2333?page=comments#action_12434823
]
Christopher M. Cardona commented on GERONIMO-2333:
--
Thanks David for checking out the patch. Dojo needs to be unpacked since the
browser
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2163?page=comments#action_12434824
]
Greg Wilkins commented on GERONIMO-2163:
Definitely a +1 from me.
WADI Integration for Jetty
--
Key:
On Sep 14, 2006, at 7:56 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
The JMS provider would be a pluggable comm strategy. For performance
reasons, I want to start with TCP communication.
Why do you think that AMQ will not perform well?
I definitely want to
have a JMS strategy...maybe next. But initially I
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-918?page=all ]
Jonas Lim updated AMQ-918:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.1)
(was: 4.0.2)
Edited fix versions to 4.1 and 4.0 only.
4.1 trunk (r443267)
4.0 branch (r443273)
Inactivity
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-922?page=all ]
Jonas Lim resolved AMQ-922.
---
Resolution: Fixed
fix applied to trunk (443534)
Add the ability to remove transport connectors dynamically
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
