That maven module actually has no java sources that is why non are
included the sources.jar. Perhaps we should delete it from the
directory structure.
Most of the other modules do have java sources.
On 11/20/06, Endre Stølsvik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
The sources.jar available at
Howdy ActiveMQ Mentors...
This is just a gentle reminder that this vote is still open and
looking for at least 1 more incubator PMC binding vote to make it
official. Please take a moment and review the release.
Thanks!
On 11/14/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey folks,
I was
+1 :)
Hiram Chirino wrote:
Howdy ActiveMQ Mentors...
This is just a gentle reminder that this vote is still open and
looking for at least 1 more incubator PMC binding vote to make it
official. Please take a moment and review the release.
Thanks!
On 11/14/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm trying to utilize (in the attached activemq configuration file)
the derby-ds DataSource that is commented out in the default
configuration, which has the bean element
bean id=derby-ds class=org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedDataSource
property name=databaseName value=derbydb/
JSR181 component does not generate WSDL types for JAXB2-annotated classes
-
Key: SM-749
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-749
Project: ServiceMix
Issue
It seems we also missed our November slot :(
Should we do the same ?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jeremy Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Nov 20, 2006 6:28 PM
Subject: Woden section of the Inubator board report
To: woden-dev@ws.apache.org
We missed our slot in November when Noel
Hi
some days ago I asked for an implementation of the Content-Enricher
pattern on the ServiceMix user list.
(http://www.enterpriseintegrationpatterns.com/DataEnricher.html). But I
never received any reply to that mail. So I started to implement that
pattern and attached the first version as
Yes, that is where it dies for me too.
Looks like you need to build openejb2 by hand to get around this.
This is s annoying! I really think that we should use a
svn:external to pull in the openejb2 source so that a simple `mvn
install` at the G root will have a greater chance of
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 02:32:26PM -0800, Jason Dillon wrote:
Can you try to build again, w/o -Dstage=bootstrap. configs might
fail, but that is another problem...
But if you don't see missing deps on plugins, then this doc change
should be reverted.
I blew away
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-959?page=all ]
Jonas Lim resolved AMQ-959.
---
Fix Version/s: 4.1.2
4.2.0
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks!
patch applied in :
trunk : 477171
4.1 branch : 477173
Wrong message removed from
Hi,
I am trying to get MySQL to work in the Master/Slave JDBC configuration -
the default sql does not lock the table properly.
I added a MysqlJDBCAdapter that extends
org.apache.activemq.store.jdbc.adapter.DefaultJDBCAdapter so I could
override the lockCreateStatement.
I then edited the
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1042?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino resolved AMQ-1042.
Resolution: Fixed
reverted in trunk rev 477356 and 4.1 branch rev 477357
Made the test case smarter so that the it would not intermittently fail.
The
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2584?page=comments#action_12451564
]
Rakesh Midha commented on GERONIMO-2584:
Every time restart server is called this error occurs because the configId used
to create Artifact is wrong
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1431?page=comments#action_12451624
]
Rakesh Midha commented on GERONIMO-1431:
Fixed all the problems dscussed in this JIRA.
1. If deploy using deploy tool and copy new version into hot
David,
Can you please apply this patch as well.
* It reorders the execution of itests and modules.
* it configures the whole jar plugin to skip adding maven artifacts.
Thanx
prasad
On 11/20/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-305 is
I know most of us would want to work on trunk. Whatever commits are done to
branches\1.2 should also go into trunk. Should some commits done to trunk
be considered for branches\1.2 depending on the relevance?
--vamsi
On 11/18/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Vamsi,
I'd like to
I guess if the build still works with out them... then its not needed
anymore.
--jason
On Nov 20, 2006, at 1:44 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I'd start commenting out items that look like they should be
removed / updated. Now is the time rather than before we put out a
release :)
On Nov
I don't see a runtime...is one needed?
Jeff
Paul McMahan wrote:
Ahh, nice genie ;-) I believe Tomcat will have everything we need.
I built the stuff from:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_2
and stashed a copy here:
What is the best place to set this property?
System.setProperty(javax.xml.transform.TransformerFactory,
com.sun.org.apache.xalan.internal.xsltc.trax.TransformerFactoryImpl);
Thanks
Anita
--- Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just started taking a look at this. The Xerces level
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1431?page=all ]
Rakesh Midha updated GERONIMO-1431:
---
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Fix Version/s: 1.2
(was: 1.1.x)
Assignee: (was: Rakesh Midha)
Patch described
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2542?page=all ]
Jacek Laskowski closed GERONIMO-2542.
-
Fix Version/s: 1.2
2.0
(was: Verification Required)
Resolution: Fixed
Please verify.
Writing
Okay, `mvn -Dstage=bootstrap deploy` is done.
So at least the required 2.0-SNAPSHOT maven-plugins are available now.
--jason
On Nov 21, 2006, at 1:57 PM, toby cabot wrote:
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 01:52:47PM -0800, Jason Dillon wrote:
Um... using -Dstage=bootstrap is not normally required,
Yes and no.
This is the integration-test framework for ALL of Geronimo.
The itests from OpenEJB will also be executed under this now. There
will soon be a ejbcontainer-testsuite.
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/20/06, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/20/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL
so something like:
p:TestICTPInterceptor dataSource=#derby-ds/
and make sure your TestICTPInterceptor has a setDataSource(DataSource
ds) method.
On 11/20/06, J. Patrick Bedell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to utilize (in the attached activemq configuration file)
the derby-ds
Sounds like a good start :)
A few points:
* it would be better imho to have three QName properties
for the tags enricher, request, result.
* when receiving an exchange, a test that the pattern is an
InOut would allow reporting errors correctly (see other EIP patterns)
On 11/21/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul McMahan wrote:
Geronimo 2.0 will be using jetty and tomcat v6 which implement the new
JSP spec. I think that means that for Geronimo 2.0 we'll need a new
version of the jspc maven plugin that references the tomcat v6
artifacts instead
I keep running into car problems, like:
snip
[INFO] Packaging module configuration: /Users/jason/ws/geronimo/
server-1.2/configs/system-database/target/plan/plan.xml
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
On Nov 21, 2006, at 11:08 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
David,
Can you please apply this patch as well.
* It reorders the execution of itests and modules.
* it configures the whole jar plugin to skip adding maven artifacts.
I applied what you described on IRC, let me know if that's not right.
On 11/21/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see a runtime...is one needed?
Jeff
Looks like the runtime stuff got rolled into tomcat6/jasper/6.0.2-alpha.
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-734?page=comments#action_37499 ]
Eric Wood commented on AMQ-734:
---
Hiram,
The issue was intermittent, so the best we can do is run it for long
periods of time. So far we have run with 4.1 for over
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2584?page=all ]
Rakesh Midha updated GERONIMO-2584:
---
Attachment: hotdepoystartup.patch
Solves startup problem in hotdeployer
Hot deploy module/server restart, throws IllegalArgumentException if
Ok...let me try to whip together a 1.4.7-SNAPSHOT of the next week that
allows you to choose your jasper poison.
Jeff
Paul McMahan wrote:
On 11/21/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see a runtime...is one needed?
Jeff
Looks like the runtime stuff got rolled into
Can you try to build again, w/o -Dstage=bootstrap. configs might
fail, but that is another problem...
But if you don't see missing deps on plugins, then this doc change
should be reverted.
Thanks,
--jason
On Nov 21, 2006, at 1:57 PM, toby cabot wrote:
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-23?page=comments#action_12451386
]
Christopher James Blythe commented on DAYTRADER-23:
---
David...
I completely understand the reluctence... and you are right, this does add an
My understanding was that after branching 1.2 we would focus on
stabilizing that branch for TCK. So I would not commit new features
to 1.2 and would only commit bug fixes to 1.2 after getting a green
light from one of the release managers (Dain or Alan).
Paul
On 11/20/06, Vamsavardhana Reddy
SecurityRealm portlet is currently generating a plan given below. There are
no deployment errors. But then the new realm does not get listed in the
portlet and the realm could not be used for authentication. What is wrong
with this plan?
module
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2584?page=all ]
Rakesh Midha updated GERONIMO-2584:
---
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Description:
This is a problem similar to one reported in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2402, the
1.4.6 was a major overhaul. I believe the runtime is only needed during
the compile stage. So I think you can ditch it. Although you will find
out real quick if it's still needed ;-)
Jeff
Jason Dillon wrote:
When was this added to the jspc-m-p? Is it safe to remove these deps
from our poms
Nevermind. That has since been changed. It now takes in a
-DinstallDirectory parameter.
I think I removed the example comment too. If not, I'll remove it now.
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/21/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 21, 2006, at 1:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd start commenting out items that look like they should be
removed / updated. Now is the time rather than before we put out a
release :)
On Nov 20, 2006, at 3:52 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
In several of the poms that invoke jspc-maven-plugin I see:
!-- Required for JSPC compilation
Excellent, thanks! BTW, no rush. Starting tomorrow morning I'll be
glued in the captain's chair of my minivan for holiday travel until
next week. By the time I get back I will probably have forgotten what
JSP stands for :-)
Best wishes,
Paul
On 11/21/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Generate explicit-versions.properties transitvily
-
Key: GERONIMO-2589
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2589
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level:
Ah.. I see what you mean. Any of the plugin's param can be passed
thro' the -D option, right ! Thanks for reminding me. Good catch.
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/21/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the default... as in if you did not list installDirectory
at all,
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2542?page=comments#action_12451722
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2542:
--
patches applied to trunk rev 477754 and branches/1.2 rev 477783, Thanks Jay D.
McHugh!
Writing
This is the default... as in if you did not list installDirectory
at all, -DinstallDirectory=/whatever would enable it.
I suggest you remove this configuration.
--jason
On Nov 21, 2006, at 3:33 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: prasad
Date: Tue Nov 21 15:33:20 2006
New Revision: 477963
Stomp consumer not removed if client does not send disconnect message.
--
Key: AMQ-1067
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1067
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2589?page=all ]
Jason Dillon closed GERONIMO-2589.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Generate explicit-versions.properties transitvily
-
Key:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2588?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-2588.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in rev 477278 (branches\1.2) and rev 477279 (trunk).
KeyStorePortlet: Locking and unlocking could use some error
While Tomcat is creating a new version of Jasper it looks like Jetty is
using Glassfish. I guess we can use Jasper to compile the JSPs even if
Glassfish is used to in the runtime. We could also look into using
Jasper for both Tomcat and Jetty but since Jetty is already using
Glassfish I was
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1067?page=comments#action_37508 ]
Chris Knight commented on AMQ-1067:
---
To recreate the problem:
clearQueue.pl TEST_QUEUE
Ctrl^C
You'll then find that the consumer is still active according to
FileKeystoreInstance.loadKeystoreData() results in inconsistent state if wrong
password is supplied
---
Key: GERONIMO-2587
URL:
On 11/21/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Issue #2 is now fixed. All the tests in console-testsuites and
deployment-testsuites now run and pass successfully. They continue to
use TestNG. So these testsuites will serve as a good example for
others wanting to use TestNG.
Will you be
Removed ${installDirectory}. Now sleep peacefully :-)
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/21/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nevermind. That has since been changed. It now takes in a
-DinstallDirectory parameter.
I think I removed the example comment too. If not, I'll remove it now.
Cheers
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-751?page=comments#action_37501 ]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-751:
Btw, looking at the patch, I was wondering if it would be interesting to have a
multi-level
correlationId, so that we could
On Nov 21, 2006, at 1:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
!-- EXAMPLE: Use the
following option to re-use a single installation of the server for
all tests --
!--
TestNG is more flexible than JUnit... it does not require that you
extend from a specific base-class for tests, nor does it require that
you name tests starting with test*(), though JUnit 4.0 might have
removed that restriction.
TestNG can also use an xml configuration file to control
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2393?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-2393.
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.2)
Resolution: Invalid
Looks like I am the only one who faced this problem. I don't know why this
I guess this is a relic that we have preserved from our maven 1 days.
We just need to ensure we don't have any hiccups during server runtime
too after we have removed this.
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/20/06, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In several of the poms that invoke jspc-maven-plugin I
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-751?page=comments#action_37507 ]
Gianfranco Boccalon commented on SM-751:
I'll send you the patch, after tested it.
Flow tracing with correlation id
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1029?page=all ]
Jonas Lim resolved AMQ-1029.
Fix Version/s: 4.1.2
4.2.0
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks!
patch applied to :
trunk : 477570
4.1 branch: 477571
Btw, I just added a bit of
On 11/21/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TestNG is more flexible than JUnit... it does not require that you
extend from a specific base-class for tests, nor does it require that
you name tests starting with test*(), though JUnit 4.0 might have
removed that restriction.
Yes, it did.
Paul McMahan wrote:
Geronimo 2.0 will be using jetty and tomcat v6 which implement the new
JSP spec. I think that means that for Geronimo 2.0 we'll need a new
version of the jspc maven plugin that references the tomcat v6
artifacts instead of v5.5.15. Otherwise I think the plugin would not
I have to agree with Prasad. I have the same love-hate issues with
Maven.
So far... Maven has been almost more trouble than its worth for G due
to the build complexity and the tight dependencies with OpenEJB.
This more often than not causes problems unless you build half of G,
then
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2533?page=comments#action_12451647
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2533:
---
Rev 477664 (trunk) and rev 477669 (branches\1.2) takes care of the following
pages:
o
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2533?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-2533:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.1.x)
Password setup forms should use a confirmation field
[patch] Content-Enricher Implementation
---
Key: SM-752
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-752
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: servicemix-eip
Affects
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2585?page=comments#action_12451334
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2585:
---
Typographic error in my previous comment. Fixed in rev 477190 (branches\1.2).
This JIRA is
Thanks for pointing this out. It is a typo. This JIRA is not applicable to
1.1.
--vamsi
On 11/20/06, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you also check this into branches/1.2, since trunk is now 2.0-SNAPSHOT
?
-Donald
Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA) wrote:
[
No it is not a relic. We needed this for jspc at one point... Might be included
now by the plugin automatically.
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 21:06:04
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: jspc-maven-plugin
I guess
#1 for 1.2
#3 for 2.0
-Donald
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Nov 17, 2006, at 9:38 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
After Anita's mail, I tried running the server on 1.5 and the server
started fine. Console output given below.
Yeah. Will also start fine if you simply remove
Nope. I'll look again.
-dain
On Nov 18, 2006, at 1:00 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Did you get this fixed? I see some 2.0 artifacts on people now...
though I also see that some new 2.0 bits are not group writable.
:-(
--jason
On Nov 18, 2006, at 11:05 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I can't
When was this added to the jspc-m-p? Is it safe to remove these deps
from our poms now?
--jason
On Nov 20, 2006, at 8:10 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No it is not a relic. We needed this for jspc at one point...
Might be included now by the plugin automatically.
Sync error (NullPointerException) in Broker
---
Key: AMQ-1066
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1066
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Broker
Affects
Hi Guillaume
I adopted your points and raised an issue:
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-752
Thanks
Kristian
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Sounds like a good start :)
A few points:
* it would be better imho to have three QName properties
for the tags enricher, request,
Hi Marnie,
I have this love-hate relationship with Maven.
Moving up from ANT, I find Maven loaded with a lot of nice features.
There seems to be a plugin for almost everything. It truly does handle
the complete lifecycle of a project. It has a very supportive and
vibrant community that respond
Issue #2 is now fixed. All the tests in console-testsuites and
deployment-testsuites now run and pass successfully. They continue to
use TestNG. So these testsuites will serve as a good example for
others wanting to use TestNG.
Cheers
Prasad
On 11/20/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe Bohn wrote:
While Tomcat is creating a new version of Jasper it looks like Jetty is
using Glassfish. I guess we can use Jasper to compile the JSPs even if
Glassfish is used to in the runtime. We could also look into using
Jasper for both Tomcat and Jetty but since Jetty is already
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2533?page=comments#action_12451737
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2533:
---
Rev 477807 (trunk) and rev 477811 (branches\1.2) takes care of Database Pools
portlet.
I'm getting the following j2ee-builder error with a clean repo and using
the following cmdline to build trunk Rev477664 from this morning.
mvn -Dstage=bootstrap -Dmaven.test.skip=true clean install
[INFO]
[INFO]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-305 is ready.
The java files from the OPENEJB-302 patch were not applied. Hence the
plans kept failing.
I have the same changes in the above patches too. Please apply them.
I have merged the cmp2 plans with itests-core.
Without the prefetch plan,
Hi All,
I work on the Apache Incubator project Qpid. We are currently mid transition
to maven for build/release.
We've encountered a few issues along the way (snapshots, directory
structures etc). I wondered if you could give me some feedback on your
project's experiences with maven please ?
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-26?page=all ]
Christopher James Blythe updated DAYTRADER-26:
--
Attachment: daytrader-26.patch
Cannot switch between EJB mode and Session Direct mode
On 11/20/06, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The testsuite sub-project, a child module of geronimo/pom.xml, has now
been hooked up to the main Geronimo build in trunk (2.0-SNAPSHOT).
Environment property, -Denv=itests, activates that profile.
Is it somehow connected to itests in
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2454?page=comments#action_12451290
]
Rakesh Midha commented on GERONIMO-2454:
xerces 2.8.1 is available for download from ibiblio, here is the link
Cannot switch between EJB mode and Session Direct mode
--
Key: DAYTRADER-26
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-26
Project: DayTrader
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions:
Geronimo - Monday, November 20, 2006
3 Patches in RTC
[GERONIMO-2485] PersistenceUnitGBean needs a NamespaceDrivenDeployer
- Assignee: David Jencks
- Reporter: David Jencks
- Created: Wed Oct 11 21:23:29 GMT 2006
- Updated: Thu Nov 16 21:56:44 GMT 2006
-
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2542?page=all ]
Jay D. McHugh updated GERONIMO-2542:
Attachment: geronimo-2542-2.patch
This is only the replacement patch for _trunk_
Writing XML schema documentation for geronimo-web in distribution
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2522?page=all ]
Rakesh Midha reassigned GERONIMO-2522:
--
Assignee: Rakesh Midha
Hot deployer makes app hangs
Key: GERONIMO-2522
URL:
How about the name geronimo-admin-realm for administrative security
realm? If there are no objections to this, I will apply the patch in 48
hours.
--vamsi
-- Forwarded message --
From: Vamsavardhana Reddy (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Nov 19, 2006 1:31 AM
Subject: [jira]
Oh, by the way, doesn't this change address the transaction isolation
level
problem in TranQL/OpenEJB (GERONIMO-2128)?
Thanks,
Nellya Udovichenko.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 2:55 AM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org;
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-24?page=all ]
Christopher James Blythe updated DAYTRADER-24:
--
Attachment: daytrader-24.1120.patch
Needed to add the TradeJDBC session bean definition to the plan files. Although
it deploys
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2542?page=comments#action_12451619
]
Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMO-2542:
---
Committed to the trunk and 1.2 branch.
The trunk:
Sending
I can build the trunk with target set to 1.5. I had to build openejb2
locally with some modifications (see attached pom.xml). The server
starts (using startup) and the console seems to work. There are few
exceptions:
15:02:06,655 ERROR [[/console-standard]] StandardWrapper.Throwable
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2103?page=all ]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-2103.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Neither dependency is needed. See previous comment by David Jencks. Reopen if
this is still an issue.
Console
Support multiple namespaces
---
Key: XBEAN-60
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-60
Project: XBean
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: maven-plugin
Affects Versions: 2.7
Matt, et al.
Thanks for getting this rolling...
I don't really have that much to say about the 1.1.1 release since I have
been putting most of my effort into the new 1.2 branch. However, I do have a
question... I have noticed there is a 1.1 branch and a 1.1.0 tag. Can you
explain the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-60?page=comments#action_12451562 ]
Stefan Kleineikenscheidt commented on XBEAN-60:
---
That's actually also true for the Ant-Task.
Support multiple namespaces
---
In several of the poms that invoke jspc-maven-plugin I see:
!-- Required for JSPC compilation --
dependency
groupIdtomcat/groupId
artifactIdjasper-runtime/artifactId
scopeprovided/scope
/dependency
I have a vague recollection about needing
KeystorePortlet: Unlock keystore for availability shows key aliases only when
keystore is unlocked for edit
---
Key: GERONIMO-2586
URL:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No it is not a relic. We needed this for jspc at one point... Might be
included now by the plugin automatically.
Yup...the plugin handles it now.
Jeff
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo