On 10/30/07, Freeman Fang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I will take care of it.
Thanks, Freeman ;-).
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack(u30,D0G)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]5R\F)R=6-E+G-N61ED\!G;6%I;\YC;VT*
);'
Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
Apache
Interesting points. However, I think we should tackle this and other
further restructuring in our next rev. For now, just baby steps.
To dos:
---
1. Consider breaking specs after a risk-benefit analysis.
2. Change groupIds and artifactIds. While most cars(plugins) are under
I'm not in favor of generalizing the J2G Eclipse plugin into a super
migrator that grows in complexity as we incorporate new types of
source formats. I think that instead we should look into factoring
out the parts of J2G that could be used for other types migrators
into a separate
monitoring pluging: db gets too big, too quickly
Key: GERONIMO-3564
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3564
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Viet Hung Nguyen updated GERONIMO-3564:
---
Attachment: geronimo-3564.patch
monitoring pluging: db gets too big, too quickly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12538788
]
Viet Hung Nguyen commented on GERONIMO-3561:
Anita, thanks for voicing your concerns. I was unaware
OpenEJB trunk at 589976
Geronimo Revision: 590054 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20071030/build-0900.log
Building Geronimo trunk at Revision: 590054
Building OpenEJB trunk at 589976
[INFO] Scanning for projects
I'm with Paul on this. I envision a Migrate2Geronimo Toolkit that will
consist of a suite of individual plugins (for Eclipse and G), each
handling the migration from a specific appserver to G. Of course, all
these may depend on a base or common plugin. But the user will only
deal with the plugin
I agree. Our strategy to make Geronimo secure should include an
elaborate set of unit testcases, a rich set of tests in the
security-testsuite in our testsuite framework, along with peer
review of code in components that are potential security risks.
We should aim to have imbricate or maybe
+1
This is making a -lot- of sense.
There is no reason that we need to build a huge monolithic Eclipse
plugin to allow people to migrate applications to our modular server
platform.
I originally didn't even think about breaking it up into a group of
specific plugins using a common core -
Throwable is not cought in BaseLifeCycle which can result in open transactions
--
Key: SM-1120
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1120
Project: ServiceMix
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40530
]
Martin Landua commented on SM-1120:
---
Sorry, forgot to attach the patch.
Index:
Looking back, I explained what I was intending very poorly in my
previous reply, but Paul has worded it much better. I am in agreement
with this approach 100%.
+1
Jay D. McHugh wrote:
+1
This is making a -lot- of sense.
There is no reason that we need to build a huge monolithic Eclipse
Resending from Apache account, as Yahoo Mail seems to be unable to send right
now
Original Message
Subject: [DISCUSS] Release Devtools maven-plugins-1.0
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:47:14 -0400
From: Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Discussion
The maven-plugins are build tools used by the Eclipse Plugin and J2G
tools and are not included in either tool.
A 72 hour vote is being called for the following:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/maven-plugins/branches/1.0
Revision 590072
Binaries can be downloaded from:
This looks great!
I had a couple of suggestions I mentioned to Prasad on IRC:
- move client-transaction to the plugins/connector
- move the jetty specific clustering stuff from plugins/clustering to
plugins/jetty
Unfortunately the sandbox doesn't seem to have svn history. I think
its
Discussion thread for the maven-plugins-1.0 release...
-Donald
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On Oct 29, 2007, at 3:47 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
With the latest commit to sandbox, I have all the artifacts building
successfully. We have good assemblies too. Tthe groupId and artifactId
of all the artifacts have essentially remained the same.
I noticed that the groupIds in the poms don't
Resending, as this still hasn't hit the mailing list after 2 hours...
Original Message
Subject: [DISCUSS] Release Devtools maven-plugins-1.0
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:47:14 -0400
From: Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Discussion thread for the
Resending, as this still hasn't hit the mailing list after 2 hours...
Original Message
Subject: [VOTE] Release Devtools maven-plugins-1.0 RC1
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:47:32 -0400
From: Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
The maven-plugins are build
Remove the servicemix-bpe SE from the Apache ServiceMix distribution
Key: SM-1121
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1121
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type:
OK. This is how I restructured it.
But first, the aim was to keep the groupdId and artifactId of all
artifacts as is so that our assemblies and final server is not
affected. So the gIds and aIds of the modules and configs pieces were
left unchanged for now.
| geronimo
|--- framework
|---
On 10/26/07, Freeman Fang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I have uploaded a version of ServiceMix 3.2 for you to review. See
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SM/ServiceMix+3.2
for all the links and release notes.
[ ] +1 Release ServiceMix 3.2
[ ] ± 0
[ ] -1 Do not release
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruce Snyder updated SM-1121:
-
Attachment: SM-1121.diff.txt
Patch attached
Remove the servicemix-bpe SE from the Apache ServiceMix
I am restructuring the trunk in svn to reflect our flexible server.
Instead of a move, it will be a two-step copy/delete process. I shall
first begin by copying some directories to other directories. Server
binaries will be built from the newly created directories. After they
have gone thro' 2
Restructure build tree to reflect flexible server
-
Key: GERONIMO-3565
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3565
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level:
GERONIMO-3565 has now checked in the new restructured trunk into svn.
The default profile will build the new trunk pieces.
The -Dstage=former profile will build the old trunk pieces.
Let's closely monitor the automated builds, testsuites and TCK results.
If everything is going smoothly, I
Monitoring client needs ability to add/edit/delete servers to connect to
Key: GERONIMO-3566
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3566
Project: Geronimo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik B. Craig updated GERONIMO-3566:
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Monitoring client needs ability to add/edit/delete
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik B. Craig updated GERONIMO-3566:
Attachment: GERONIMO-3566.patch
This patch provides this functionality, tested and is
Monitoring client add/edit server pages need 'test these settings' function
---
Key: GERONIMO-3567
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3567
Project: Geronimo
Monitoring client serverview should update the last_seen field in database
where possible
-
Key: GERONIMO-3568
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3568
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik B. Craig updated GERONIMO-3568:
Component/s: monitoring
Monitoring client serverview should update the last_seen field
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik B. Craig updated GERONIMO-3567:
Description:
-The add/edit server pages in the monitoring client need a 'test these
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik B. Craig updated GERONIMO-3567:
Assignee: Erik B. Craig
Monitoring client add/edit server pages need to be polished up
Monitoring client statsgraph object should read/write to db when necessary
--
Key: GERONIMO-3569
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3569
Project: Geronimo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12538944
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-3561:
--
- You could use EJB timer service.
- Since
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12538947
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-3527:
--
GERONIMO-3566 patch applied in rev 590509.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-3559.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in rev 590516.
assembly replaces rather than extends config.xml
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12538956
]
Viet Hung Nguyen commented on GERONIMO-3561:
by making mrc-server a plugin, it can pull openejb onto
I removed all org/apache/geronimo from my m2 repo and executed mvn
install -Dstage=bootstrap. That failed with the error below in
./framework/configs/server-security-config. Looks like the
dependencies are not setup right since it was also downloading
j2ee-deployer/car and a bunch of other modules
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erik B. Craig resolved GERONIMO-3566.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Good after commit,
Thanks anita!
Monitoring client needs ability
Sorry and thanx Jarek. I have fixed the security-deployer-config
pom.xml and plan.xml. This will remove any extraneous dependencies it
has on plugin artifacts.
Cheers
Prasad
On 10/30/07, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I removed all org/apache/geronimo from my m2 repo and executed mvn
OpenEJB trunk at 590271
Geronimo Revision: 590524 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20071030/build-2100.log
78K downloaded
[INFO] snapshot
org.apache.geronimo.modules:geronimo-web-2.5-builder:2.1-SNAPSHOT: checking
The -Dstage=former is not working as desired. I was unsuccessful in
fixing it tonight. I'll try again tomorrow.
However, the new restructuring is building fine. It has passed
testsuite tests too.
(If it passes TCK too, I may not waste any more time trying to fix old
build, esp when I am deleting
Hi,
I wanted to let everyone know I will be giving a presentation at the
Irish Java Technology Conference (ijtc) in Dublin, Ireland on Nov 8th
(16:45-18:00) on Geronimo 2.x. The presentation is called Apache
Geronimo: Leveraging Open Source and is an overview of the Geronimo
server and its
46 matches
Mail list logo
