[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12579739#action_12579739
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-3907:
Prospective fix committed to openejb in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks reassigned GERONIMO-3907:
--
Assignee: David Jencks
Persistence Exception is not visible/lost for client.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12579740#action_12579740
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-3928:
Is there any incorrect behavior or is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12579745#action_12579745
]
Anish Pathadan commented on GERONIMO-3928:
--
There is no incorrect behaviour as
Upon starting the org.apache.geronimo.configs/wadi-clustering/2.0.2/car in
Geronimo Jetty 2.0.2 distribution, I got an NCDFE error. Has anyone hit
this error? Stack trace is given below.
12:13:38,750 ERROR [GBeanInstanceState] Error while starting; GBean is now
in the FAILED state:
I have attempted the steps from
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/clustering-configuration-for-jetty.html with
Geronimo Tomcat 2.1. even though
*org.apache.geronimo.configs/jetty6-clustering-builder-wadi//car
*is running, deploying the sample application resulted in an error given
below:
xml
I have attempted the steps from
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/clustering-configuration-for-jetty.html with
Geronimo Jetty 2.1. I was able to get a cluster with two nodes running and
deploy the sample application too. But, when I access
Hello,
This is a problem with the deployment descriptor. You name of the
clustering substitution group element is tomcat-clustering-wadi for
tomcat and not clustering-wadi. As a matter of fact, I have on my to-
do list a task to refactor substitution group element builders for
Tomcat,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12579826#action_12579826
]
Shiva Kumar H R commented on GERONIMO-3843:
---
Plan Creator is calling following
Hi,
There was a typo in the way node2 was started. It used to be:
geronimo/start-server -D node.name=node2 -G server.name=yellow -b
It should actually be:
geronimo/start-server -D node.name=yellow -G server.name=node2 -b
Though, I am not sure that this can explain the problem. What does
the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12579833#action_12579833
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-3354:
Can you also apply AMQ-1438 to their
Hi,
Also, I just deployed a new 2.0-SNAPSHOT which defines a context-root
and use standard (versus delta) replication. You may want to grab it
as the context root is less cryptic with this latest version.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 19/03/2008, at 12:08 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi,
There was a
Hello,
Nope. It seems wadi-clustering dependencies have been cleaned up too
much for the 2.0.2 distribution. I do not think there is an easy work-
around, except the issue or a 2.0.3 wadi-clustering configuration
with the right runtime dependencies.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 18/03/2008, at 9:42
Donald Woods wrote:
Should we investigate the below release for trunk and a future 2.1.2
release?
We need to replace what we are currently using with something
official. The code that we used to build our private pluto image was
formerly the Pluto trunk which had a version 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3923?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ralf Baumhof closed GERONIMO-3923.
--
Resolution: Invalid
Works as designed
Login established without tomcat notification
Hi Remya,
here are a couple of tips for understanding the deployment plans
Schema documentation for geronimo-web.xml
http://geronimo.apache.org/schemas-2.1/docs/geronimo-web-2.0.1.xsd.html
If you want to try Geronimo 2.1 (which I would encourage you to do so) you can
give a shot to the
I am calling below code from within PlanCreator:
DeploymentFactory factory = new DeploymentFactoryWithKernel(
PortletManager.getKernel());
DeploymentManager deploymentManager =
factory.getDeploymentManager(deployer:geronimo:inVM,
null, null);
DeploymentConfiguration
On Mar 18, 2008, at 6:58 AM, Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
I am calling below code from within PlanCreator:
DeploymentFactory factory = new DeploymentFactoryWithKernel
(PortletManager.getKernel());
DeploymentManager deploymentManager =
Load server implementation classes and it's libraries using a private
classloader
-
Key: GERONIMO-3929
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3929
Project:
Thanks Gianny. I will try with the new DD and get back if there is any
problem.
++Vamsi
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Gianny Damour
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
This is a problem with the deployment descriptor. You name of the
clustering substitution group element is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12579917#action_12579917
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-3921:
Committed to branches/2.0 as Rev638438
Generally the contents of plugins are groups of plugins rather than
sincle plugins. Wouldn't this be more appropriate inside system-
database?
Also, I'm pretty sure geronimo-timer is obsolete with openejb3. It
would be great if someone would check and delete it if it isn't used
Hi lists,
i have install the eclipse into my machine by following these steps
1. Download and unzip the eclipse classic version into this path
/home/red/eclipse
2. Download the WTP tools and unzip and install in /home/red/eclipse
3. Next i run the eclipse.
Now i trying to install the GEP with
Summarizing IRC discussion with DJencks below:
1) In extracted server: var/config/jsr88-configurer-config.xml lists a bunch
of modules including module name=org.apache.geronimo.configs
/jsr88-war-configurer/2.2-SNAPSHOT/car/
2) In source tree: \plugins\j2ee\jsr88-war-configurer's plan.xml - it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shiva Kumar H R resolved GERONIMO-3843.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Plan creator fails to create plan and to deploy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12579955#action_12579955
]
Shiva Kumar H R commented on GERONIMO-3843:
---
As hinted by David Jencks, this
Thanks a lot for the reply!
But, while creating our application, I am afraid we didn't follow such a
directory structure that is required by the environment, moduleId and
artifactId. So, using some values for these tags, provide with errors in
the deployment or while running the application. It
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12579967#action_12579967
]
Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-3843:
Shiva,
Can you integrate this fix back into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor reassigned GERONIMO-3906:
-
Assignee: Jarek Gawor
start-server uses hard-coded credentials that cannot be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3858?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12579976#action_12579976
]
Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-3858:
Given that this appears to be an ant issue that
Anymore more thoughts on this issue? If not, I guess I'll just add
options for specifying the username, password and port number as a
temporary solution to get this fixed for the 2.1.1 release.
Jarek
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12579987#action_12579987
]
Shiva Kumar H R commented on GERONIMO-3843:
---
Oh! thanks for pointing out (I
Was just following how plugins/spring was created, which is just a
collection of Spring depends for the console and WADI. I started with
it in under system-database, but decided against that as it really
wouldn't be a child of the system-database POM, but system-database
should have it as a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12579991#action_12579991
]
Jay D. McHugh commented on GERONIMO-3921:
-
Jarek,
I just checked the Jetty
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods closed GERONIMO-3843.
--
Plan creator fails to create plan and to deploy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-3843:
---
Affects Version/s: 2.2
2.1.1
Fix Version/s: 2.2
Merged
Agree
-Donald
Jarek Gawor wrote:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 12:28 AM, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 15, 2008, at 12:34 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Jarek Gawor wrote:
Jason,
I thought TCK was using the maven plugin to start the server. I'm not
proposing to change that. But even
I like the more secure option of requiring a uid/pwd, than potential
exposing unwanted data to attackers
-Donald
Jarek Gawor wrote:
Anymore more thoughts on this issue? If not, I guess I'll just add
options for specifying the username, password and port number as a
temporary solution to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Donald Woods resolved GERONIMO-3921.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.2
2.1.1
can you be more specific or provide the deployment plan you are having the
issue with?
Cheers!
Hernan
remya wrote:
Thanks a lot for the reply!
But, while creating our application, I am afraid we didn't follow such a
directory structure that is required by the environment, moduleId and
On Mar 18, 2008, at 11:37 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Was just following how plugins/spring was created, which is just a
collection of Spring depends for the console and WADI. I started
with it in under system-database, but decided against that as it
really wouldn't be a child of the
And please move this discussion to the user list.
thanks
david jencks
On Mar 18, 2008, at 12:33 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
can you be more specific or provide the deployment plan you are
having the issue with?
Cheers!
Hernan
remya wrote:
Thanks a lot for the reply!
But, while creating our
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12580054#action_12580054
]
Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-3902:
Does everyone agree that this is a reasonable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12580059#action_12580059
]
Jason Warner commented on GERONIMO-3902:
Joe,
I just did a quick scan through
Rick (or anybody else that is involved with javamail).
It looks like Geronimo 2.1.1-SNAPSHOT is currently dependent upon
javamail 1.4-SNAPSHOT. We need to remove that snapshot dependency if
we're going to get a 2.1.1 release out the door. Do you think we could
get a javamail 1.4 release out
Geronimo Revision: 638508 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080318/build-1500.log
Download the binaries from
http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/server/binaries/trunk/20080318
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Warner updated GERONIMO-3902:
---
Attachment: Geronimo-3902-IncludesStartClient.patch
This patch makes the changes in both
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joseph Leong updated GERONIMO-3856:
---
Attachment: GERONIMO-3856.patch
Patch Available!
1) At minimum the user should provide
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joseph Leong updated GERONIMO-3856:
---
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Assemble a Server Confirmation Page
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-3483:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1.1)
(was: 2.0.x)
2.2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-3408:
---
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Marked that there is a patch but I'll take Kevan's word that the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12580119#action_12580119
]
Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-2622:
Any info on this one David? Is this something
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12580121#action_12580121
]
Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-2340:
Donald, Since you are currently the assignee
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12580123#action_12580123
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-3902:
Seems like a good compromise for now.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12580125#action_12580125
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-3408:
I'll take another look at it and either
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12580126#action_12580126
]
Joe Bohn commented on GERONIMO-2246:
Should we move this along to 2.2 given that we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joe Bohn updated GERONIMO-3783:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.2
2.1.1
MessageDrivenBean delivery problem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12580185#action_12580185
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-3354:
We need to turn on the openejb
Could you please undo this? Despite anything that may have been
published (by me even, in the past), there is no local db2 adapter.
You can run the xa one in local transaction mode but this one doesn't
actually work.
thanks
david jencks
On Mar 18, 2008, at 2:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell reassigned GERONIMODEVTOOLS-313:
--
Assignee: Tim McConnell (was: YunFeng Ma)
JAXB classes for
Hi newbie-gero, Unfortunately, the GEP 2.1.x that corresponds to the
recently-released Geronimo 2.1 server. However, there is an unstable version
that you can download from the site below. Keep in mind though that the
operative word is unstable. We would be interested though with any problems
IllegalArgumentException reading Transaction Log
Key: GERONIMO-3930
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3930
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12580215#action_12580215
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-3930:
I suspect that we're allowing the
Done. Thanks for keeping an eye on the commits
-Donald
David Jencks wrote:
Could you please undo this? Despite anything that may have been
published (by me even, in the past), there is no local db2 adapter. You
can run the xa one in local transaction mode but this one doesn't
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Gianny Damour
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
There was a typo in the way node2 was started. It used to be:
geronimo/start-server -D node.name=node2 -G server.name=yellow -b
It should actually be:
geronimo/start-server -D node.name=yellow -G server.name=node2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jarek Gawor reassigned GERONIMO-3856:
-
Assignee: Jarek Gawor (was: Joseph Leong)
Assemble a Server Confirmation Page
66 matches
Mail list logo
