Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

2021-05-12 Thread Mark Struberg
I think we could do a VOTE for all repos excluding specs. And then discuss those separate without having any pressure. Wdyt? LieGrue, strub > Am 12.05.2021 um 08:50 schrieb Francois Papon : > > Thanks all for your feedback, I will start a vote to move forward! > > regards, > > François >

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

2021-05-12 Thread Francois Papon
Ok, understand François fpa...@apache.org Le 12/05/2021 à 09:53, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > let's do a bulk vote for all but spec then a discuss thread dedicated > to specs if some disagree to have one repo per spec > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau |  

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

2021-05-12 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
let's do a bulk vote for all but spec then a discuss thread dedicated to specs if some disagree to have one repo per spec Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

2021-05-12 Thread Francois Papon
You mean having a vote per spec repository? regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 12/05/2021 à 09:20, Mark Struberg a écrit : > I think we could do a VOTE for all repos excluding specs. And then > discuss those separate without having any pressure. > Wdyt? > > LieGrue, > strub > > >> Am

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

2021-05-12 Thread JB Onofré
It makes sense to me. Regards JB > Le 12 mai 2021 à 09:20, Mark Struberg a écrit : > > I think we could do a VOTE for all repos excluding specs. And then discuss > those separate without having any pressure. > Wdyt? > > LieGrue, > strub > > >> Am 12.05.2021 um 08:50 schrieb Francois

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

2021-05-12 Thread Francois Papon
Thanks all for your feedback, I will start a vote to move forward! regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 12/05/2021 à 08:46, Francois Papon a écrit : > > +1 to have one repo per spec > > regards, > > François > fpa...@apache.org > Le 11/05/2021 à 15:13, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : >> Guess we

Re: [DISCUSS] - SVN to Gitbox

2021-05-12 Thread Francois Papon
+1 to have one repo per spec regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 11/05/2021 à 15:13, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Guess we should stick to what we are used to. > The most visible part is likely the release so I'm tempted to say we > do one repo per atomic release. > For specs it likely