Sure.
But, as far as I knew, the portlets were using the 1.4.x version of
Dojo. I did update that from 1.4.2 to 1.4.3 - they should have kept
that compatible. But I will check to make sure that all of the monitor
pages still work.
Jay
On 07/08/2012 11:24 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
Hi Jay,
Hey All,
I just took a look at OpenEJB's 3.1.x source tags and they stop at 3.1.4.
Geronimo 2.2.x is looking for 3.1.5-SNAPSHOT - but it looks like there
will never be a 3.1.5 final.
Does anyone know what version has the fixes we were using in
3.1.5-SNAPSHOT and would be backward
Hey Forrest,
The download links for the older versions are supposed to have been
updated to point to the archives (http://archive.apache.org/dist/geronimo/).
Just for the purpose of cleanup of the dist folder.
They all still exist. I am actually surprised at how many are still
available on
+1
Jay
On 12/21/2011 12:05 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
Hi folks,
A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.8 has been created and staged.
The tag has been created here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.8/
The staging repo is here:
Congratulations and welcome!
Jay
On 12/08/2011 10:18 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Everyone,
In recognition of his contributions to the Geronimo project, the Geronimo PMC
recently invited Trygve Hardersen to become a committer on our project. We are
pleased to announce that he has accepted our
Hello Ranjan,
The one hint I would offer is to stop the server using either the
console or the shutdown script. Simply killing the java process can
leave the server in an unstable state.
Jay
On 12/05/2011 11:16 PM, ranbaab wrote:
Hi,
Our exploded web application is extracted in the
Is the idea for this to abandon SVN and move completely over to git?
Or is it just to add git as a way for folks to manage their local copies
of the source?
Jay
On 11/29/2011 03:22 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Forwarding (with permission), in case there's interest within Geronimo
community.
Congratulations Michael and welcome!
Jay
On 08/18/2011 09:18 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
I'd like to welcome Shenghao Fang on aboard, as he recently accepted
the Geronimo PMC invitation to become a committer.
His account was just created , so you should start seeing some commits
from him soon.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13085915#comment-13085915
]
Jay D. McHugh commented on GERONIMO-5743:
-
Is this happening for Tomcat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jay D. McHugh updated GERONIMO-5743:
Comment: was deleted
(was: Is this happening for Tomcat or Jetty (or both
Hey Johannes,
I built my app against G 2.1 using the eclipse plugin - then deployed it
on G 2.2.
Are you specifically calling for versions of your dependencies?
Have you tried building as if you were going to deploy to a 2.1 server
and then deployed onto 2.2?
Jay
On 12/09/2010 08:14 AM,
When I build and start the Tomcat JavaEE server I do not have the
database pools menu choice. I am looking under 'services'.
Did it move?
As confirmation I am double checking the prebuilt bin on the staging site.
Please do not call the vote until I have a chance to confirm whether
this is a
+1
False alarm - I must have done something wrong in starting the server.
Everything looks good (locally built and downloaded). Built and
started. Updated repository, deployed and tested real custom application.
Jay
On 12/08/2010 12:13 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote:
When I build and start
at the
left hand /console/portal/ interface.
Best regards,
Johannes
Am 08.12.10 19:13, schrieb Jay D. McHugh:
When I build and start the Tomcat JavaEE server I do not have the
database pools menu choice. I am looking under 'services'.
Did it move?
As confirmation I am double checking the prebuilt bin
Congratulations Janet!
Jay
On 10/20/2010 08:11 PM, Ivan wrote:
I would like to welcome Janet aboard, as she recently accepted the
Geronimo PMC invitation to become a committer. Her account was just
created this morning (hanhongfang), so you should start seeing some
commits from her soon.
I'll help moderate too.
Jay
On 09/22/2010 01:03 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Sep 21, 2010, at 10:41 AM, Vescovi, Matteo wrote:
Hi,
How can I contact the dev@geronimo.apache.org mailing list administrator?
I tried dev-ow...@geronimo.apache.org as instructed by ezmlm, but I received
no
Congratulations!
Jay
On 09/07/2010 02:32 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Please join us in congratulating Delos as a new member of the Geronimo
PMC. In addition to all his work on GEP and Samples, Delos also has
demonstrated a clear commitment to Geronimo in numerous other areas.
We're very glad
Congratulations!
Jay
On 09/07/2010 02:34 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Please join us in congratulating Forrest as a new member of the Geronimo
PMC. In addition to all his work on Samples, Forrest also has
demonstrated a clear commitment to Geronimo in numerous other areas.
We're very glad that
Congratulations!
Jay
On 09/07/2010 08:44 AM, 王广哲 wrote:
Congratulations to Rex!!!
2010/9/7 Rick McGuire rick...@gmail.com mailto:rick...@gmail.com
Please join us in congratulating as a new member of the Geronimo
PMC. In addition to serving as a release manager for the Geronimo
Congratulations!
Jay
On 09/07/2010 02:34 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Please join us in congratulating Forrest as a new member of the Geronimo
PMC. In addition to all his work on Samples, Forrest also has
demonstrated a clear commitment to Geronimo in numerous other areas.
We're very glad that
+1 (pending TCK)
Jay
On 06/23/2010 04:24 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.6 has been created and staged.
This version is the same as the previous release candidate except for an
upgrade to the spring framework dependency.
The tag has been created here:
+1
Built and started. Thanks Rick!
Jay
On 06/18/2010 11:31 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.6 has been created and staged.
The tag has been created here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.6/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12869772#action_12869772
]
Jay D. McHugh commented on GERONIMO-4130:
-
This ticket has two parts
Wow! Congratulations Donald!
Jay
On 05/02/2010 08:28 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Wanted to let the Geronimo community know that Donald Woods is a new member
of the ASF. The ASF membership elected Donald in recognition of his many
contributions to Geronimo, OpenJPA, and Incubator projects.
+1 pending TCK
Built fine and my live app installs fine and works.
Jay
Rex Wang wrote:
Dear All,
I have managed to use maven-release-plugin to make a 2.1.5 release candidate
The tag has been created here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.5/
The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12851427#action_12851427
]
Jay D. McHugh commented on GERONIMO-5216:
-
Hey Matthias,
It looks like
Congratulations Ashish!
Jay
Jason Warner wrote:
Congrats, Ashish!
~Jason Warner
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Joe Bohn joe.b...@earthlink.net
mailto:joe.b...@earthlink.net wrote:
All,
Please join me in welcoming Ashish Jain as the newest committer on
the Apache
Congratulations Forrest!
Jay
Kevan Miller wrote:
Congrats Forrest!
--kevan
On Mar 8, 2010, at 8:54 PM, Ivan wrote:
I would like to welcome Forrest aboard, as he recently accepted the Geronimo
PMC invitation to become a committer. His account (xiaming) was just
created, so you should
+1
Jay
Donald Woods wrote:
To support the upcoming OpenWebBeans milestone release and as a prereq
to the geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0-beta release, I would like to
release a Beta of the Inject Spec API.
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-006/
+1
Jay
Donald Woods wrote:
To support the upcoming OpenWebBeans milestone release and as a prereq
for the geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0-beta release, I would like to release
a Beta of the EL 2.2 Spec API.
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-007/
+1
Jay
Donald Woods wrote:
To support the upcoming OpenWebBeans milestone release, I would like to
release a Beta of the Interceptor Spec API.
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-073/
Source tag:
+1
Built fine and passed RAT.
Jay
Delos wrote:
Hi All,
Forrest and I work together and prepared a release candidate of Geronimo
Samples 2.2 for your
review and vote.
This is the second independent release of samples for Geronimo. Besides some
bug fixes,
in this release,
+1
Jay
Delos wrote:
Hi everyone,
Please review and vote on the release of the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin
2.2 *RC3*. Compared to RC2, RC3 contains source code packages, checksum
and signature files for you to review.
You can verify the integrity of the files with KEYS
from
+1
Built successfully and verified that rat:check passes.
Jay
Donald Woods wrote:
Hi, I'd like to release v1.0 of the Bean Validation Spec API, now that
we have it passing the Bean Validation 1.0 TCK signature tests.
Staging repo:
+1
Jay
Donald Woods wrote:
Hi, I'd like to release v1.0 of the JPA 2.0 Spec API, now that we have
OpenJPA trunk and our API passing the JPA2 TCK.
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-036/
The svn location is here:
+1
It seems to be working for me.
Thanks again to everyone who works on this.
Jay
Delos wrote:
Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release of the Geronimo
Eclipse Plugin 2.2 *RC2*.
The deployable zip file is here:
I asked on the Dojo mailing list to see if someone was going to deploy a
current version (1.4.0) out to a public repo - but since 12/15/09 there
has not been any response.
Maybe if someone else asked too...
Jay
Rex Wang wrote:
So far I can not find dojo 1.4.x in any public repo? However, i am
+1
I built the server from the source tar and was able to deploy and run my
app (includes EJBs, JPA, messaging, JSPs).
Jay
David Jencks wrote:
I've managed to come up with a 2nd 2.2 release candidate built using the
maven-release-plugin.
This includes Kevan;s fixes of source headers and a
Hello all,
I just got a Google Wave account and it made me think about how this new
technology might get incorporated into Apache culture.
I know that right now - everything should occur on list. And, the
ability to go back to the list to see what discussions and decisions
were made is
I have been trying to figure out exactly what an OSGi based application
server meant. And how it would be implemented by Geronimo and how it
would be implemented by other server developers.
It seems (please correct me if I am wrong) that we are trying to put
Geronimo into an OSGi container.
Hello,
It looks like the automated build has been failing since 11/7 on that
artifact (com.envoisolutions.sxc).
So - I think that it has somehow become corrupted in the maven
repositories. If anyone had a local version that was 'good', then they
would be able to build 2.2.
If they were
/maven/1/com.envoisolutions.sxc/poms/sxc-runtime-0.7.2.pom;here/a./p
hr
addressApache Server at maven-repository.dev.java.net Port 443/address
/body/html
So that is why it isn't working anymore.
Jay
Jay D. McHugh wrote:
Hello,
It looks like the automated build has been failing since 11/7
I would like access too.
id: jaydm
email: jaydm (at) apache (dot) org
Thanks,
Jay
Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
A new Geronimo community blog has been created at
http://blogs.apache.org/geronimo/
If you'd like the ability to post to the blog, reply to this email. At
the moment, access
Last chance everyone,
The board report needs to be sent in by Monday.
So, if there is anything notable that was missed - please add it!
Thanks,
Jay
Jay D. McHugh wrote:
Hello again everyone,
I have made a couple of additional changes to the report.
Please take a look (especially
your changes/additions soon.
Thanks,
Jay
Jay D. McHugh wrote:
Hello all,
Every three months I resolve that I should keep a running tally of the
important events in Geronimo so that it will be easier to make the
quarterly reports. I'm still making the same resolution.
But, here is a start
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12761715#action_12761715
]
Jay D. McHugh commented on GERONIMO-3832:
-
Antonio - Could you please double
(Regular issues)
Components: OpenEJB
Affects Versions: 2.1.4, 2.1.5, 2.2, 3.0
Environment: Geronimo 2.1.4
Reporter: Jay D. McHugh
Here is what SEEMS to be happening:
Shutting down and bringing Geronimo back up seems to be effectively undeploying
everything
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12761772#action_12761772
]
Jay D. McHugh commented on GERONIMO-4901:
-
Here is a portion of the geronimo.log
+1
Jay
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
The Aries podling has just been accepted (see
http://incubator.apache.org/aries/) and would be a much better place
for the blueprint implementation that has been developped in Geronimo.
This vote is mainly for donating the code to the Aries project and
maintain
Hello all,
Every three months I resolve that I should keep a running tally of the
important events in Geronimo so that it will be easier to make the
quarterly reports. I'm still making the same resolution.
But, here is a start to the report for October. There are a few items
that are not yet
Makes sense to me too.
Jay
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Some time ago, a few Geronimo committers have started an
implementation of the OSGi Blueprint Services spec, which is basically
an OSGi standardized version of Spring-DM (the next version of
Spring-DM being the RI of this spec).
The code was
So it sounds like I can't put off learning OSGi anymore :)
Does anyone have suggested resources (books, websites, or tutorials)
that they found useful?
Thanks in advance,
Jay
David Jencks wrote:
Over the weekend I got my sandbox osgi framework to build and generate
all the plugins as osgi
Congratulations!
Jay
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jul 20, 2009, at 11:42 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
I would like to welcome Delos aboard, as he recently accepted the
Geronimo PMC invitation to become a committer. His account was
created last week (delos), so you should start seeing some commits
This sounds like a good mix to me.
And, even though the agenda for #1 doesn't 'officially' include all of
the new features in 2.2 - that doesn't mean that questions couldn't be
taken and answered later. If we ran through a list of the new features
at the beginning of the session, then that could
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12730511#action_12730511
]
Jay D. McHugh commented on GERONIMO-4723:
-
(I accidentally put the wrong Jira
Hey David,
I'm starting to take a look at it today.
They have a 1.3.1 version out - any objections to me switching the patch
to use it?
Jay
David Jencks wrote:
On Jul 1, 2009, at 10:18 PM, Rex Wang wrote:
Yep, the current portlet dev is really complicated, but there will be
a huge work
+1
Jay
David Jencks wrote:
This is a vote on two bits:
genesis 2.0, a new build system foundation based on great work by Jason
Dillon and the new apache 6 pom and assembly plugin bits.
geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec 1.0 a new spec jar for the jsr 196 jaspic
spec. This passes the jaspic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12715948#action_12715948
]
Jay D. McHugh commented on GERONIMO-4130:
-
I just checked 2.1.5 to see
need to ship this as is (assuming tck
continues to pass) and possibly pull a new OpenJPA into a 2.1.5 release.
Joe
Jay D. McHugh wrote:
Hey again all,
I think that this may caused by my rather extreme entity relationships
and the use of OpenJPA's proprietary @ElementJoinColumn annotation
+1
Jay
Joe Bohn wrote:
All,
I've prepared a second release candidate (RC2) of Geronimo Server 2.1.4
for your review and vote.
The only differences from rc1 are:
- addition of a missing license header in
plugins/console/console-filter/src/main/resources/XSRF.js
- removal of an
for another OpenJPA release, as we need to get this
release out ASAP for some other included fixes.
-Donald
Jay D. McHugh wrote:
Hey again all,
I think that this may caused by my rather extreme entity relationships
and the use of OpenJPA's proprietary @ElementJoinColumn annotation
Hey all,
I know that this vote is cancelled, but I tried my real app on 2.1.4 RC1
and some JPA entities are not working the way they used to on 2.1.3.
I am trying to figure out if I have been taking advantage of a bug that
has since been corrected - or if a problem snuck into JPA.
I will let
again shortly.
However, as the previous comments indicate, the images themselves are
not functionally different than what you are using ... just adding in a
missing license header and removing some unnecessary text in the
README.txt file.
Thanks,
Joe
Jay D. McHugh wrote:
Hey all,
I know
Congratulations!
Jay
Donald Woods wrote:
I would like to welcome Ivan aboard, as he recently accepted the
Geronimo PMC invitation to become a committer. His account was just
created this morning (xuhaihong), so you should start seeing some
commits from him soon.
-Donald
+1
Jay
Lin Sun wrote:
Hi,
This is a vote for the geronimo txmanager version 2.1.2 release.
The following changes are included for the txmanager 2.1.2 release:
GERONIMO-4393 - Duplicate Xid with multiple JVMs on single host -
default impl needs some 'random' entropy
GERONIMO-4438 -
+1
Jay
Joe Bohn wrote:
This is a vote for a combined release of the javamail spec and the
javamail provider (+ the uber jar). The provider changes have
dependencies on the spec changes, so these need to be released at the
same time. Geronimo will need the updated uber jar for the Geronimo
+1
Jay
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've uploaded a release of gshell 1.0-alpha2.
The staging repo is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/gshell-1.0-alpha2
The svn tag is:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/gshell/tags/gshell-1.0-alpha-2/
Please review and vote
the
migration issues ... so I'm just wondering if it might be a better
use of our time to address those migration issues now.
Joe
Jay D. McHugh wrote:
The 2.0.x brach got sidelined by an intermittent
ConcurrentModificationException during stress testing. But, recently
there were a number of security
All of the 2.0.3 build issues are fixed.
I will try building 2.0.3 with XBeans 3.5 now and let you all know what
happens.
If it will build, then I might take a look to see whether I can figure
out what changes are necessary for OpenEJB 3.0.1 to use XBeans 3.5 too.
Jay
Jay D. McHugh wrote
XBeans 3.5 too.
Jay
Jay D. McHugh wrote:
The problem is with the version of ASM that is brought in when using a
higher version of XBeans.
OpenEJB is using a method that has been removed:
org.objectweb.asm.ClassReader.accept
And Geronimo (already - not counting XBeans 3.5) is using classes
Hey everyone,
If we want to get OpenEJB 3.0.1 to move up to XBeans 3.5, then I think
that we'll need to chip in to resolve the problems that pop up when you
use a version greater than 3.4.1.
That was the highest version (available at the time) that could be used
in the OpenEJB 3.0 branch without
Those classes that Geronimo is looking for are OpenEJB classes.
Jay
Jay D. McHugh wrote:
The problem is with the version of ASM that is brought in when using a
higher version of XBeans.
OpenEJB is using a method that has been removed:
org.objectweb.asm.ClassReader.accept
And Geronimo
. Perhaps using the various xBean versions
is still the best thing to do here. I didn't realize that there were
core issues in OpenEJB attempting to use anything greater than 3.4.1.
Thanks,
Joe
Jay D. McHugh wrote:
Hey everyone,
If we want to get OpenEJB 3.0.1 to move up to XBeans 3.5
(Regular issues)
Components: core, kernel, OpenEJB
Affects Versions: 2.0.3
Reporter: Jay D. McHugh
Assignee: Jay D. McHugh
Because of a number of changes that have occurred in dependencies of Geronimo
it will no longer build.
--
This message is automatically
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jay D. McHugh updated GERONIMO-4527:
Attachment: geronimo-4527.diff
Put all of the changes here so that there would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jay D. McHugh resolved GERONIMO-4527.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.3
Changes committed to branches/2.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12670246#action_12670246
]
Jay D. McHugh commented on GERONIMO-4527:
-
I have been trying to get 2.0 ready
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jay D. McHugh updated GERONIMO-4527:
Description:
Because of a number of changes that have occurred in dependencies
It seems like using git could provide some really compelling advantages.
At least one of which would be to enable the security team to put
together a patch set outside of SVN. That would make it easier for us
to compile, test, and save partial fixes to security problems without
having the
+1
I added the rat plugin to my local pom and checked each module. There
were some files that were flagged as failures - but they were reasonable
(i.e. generated files, etc). Built fine w/ tests.
Jay
Kevan Miller wrote:
Here's my +1.
I scanned code using RAT, reviewed artifacts, and ran a
+1
Jay
Joe Bohn wrote:
I've prepared a release candidate of the Concurrent spec for your review
and vote. This is spec is still under development so we are using an
artifact version of 1.0-EA to indicate that it is not yet final. I'm
just the release vehicle here ... Jarek did all the work
+1
Jay
(voted on the wrong thread last time)
Joe Bohn wrote:
I've prepared a third release candidate of the Concurrent spec for your
review and vote. The only change from rc2 is an update to the LICENSE
file to include just the apache header (thanks to Kevan).
This is spec is still under
+1 to getting rid of GERONIMO_BASE
Jay
Jarek Gawor wrote:
Hi,
I was looking at GERONIMO-4229 today (please see the bug and my
comments for details). There is a remaining issue with the
GERONIMO_BASE property and what it does. The Java system property that
it sets is not used anywhere in
+1
Jay
Joe Bohn wrote:
This is a vote for specs-parent 1.6.
The primary purpose for this release is to utilize the newly released
genesis 1.5 which included some enhancements to facilitate maven site
generation. There are also some minor changes in specs-parent to
facilitate maven site
+1
Jay
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
In ServiceMix we have rewritten the JAXB specs jars (2.0 and 2.1)
because we needed to be able to do some modifications for OSGi.
We'd like to move them to the Geronimo Specs subproject as it would be
more consistent and would allow them to pass the TCK.
The
I'm just
wondering if it might be a better use of our time to address those
migration issues now.
Joe
Jay D. McHugh wrote:
The 2.0.x brach got sidelined by an intermittent
ConcurrentModificationException during stress testing. But, recently
there were a number of security issues found
?
The 2.0 builds are using Maven 2.0.7 and Sun 1.5.0_16 on a Linux system.
It's been a week or so since I rebuilt branches/2.0, but the last I
tried it worked for me with a clean repo on openSUSE 11.0 and MacOSX.
-Donald
Jay D. McHugh wrote:
Hello all,
I know that we have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jay D. McHugh resolved GERONIMO-1907.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
Assignee: Jay D. McHugh (was: Rakesh Midha)
When an app
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jay D. McHugh closed GERONIMO-1354.
---
The var/config.xml file is always re-written even if no attribute changes are
made
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jay D. McHugh updated GERONIMO-2128:
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.3)
(was: 1.x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jay D. McHugh updated GERONIMO-2288:
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.3)
2.0.4
Abstract/Maven repositories
The 2.0.x brach got sidelined by an intermittent
ConcurrentModificationException during stress testing. But, recently
there were a number of security issues found that apply to 2.0.2.
So, I think it's time to start the discussion for a Geronimo 2.0.3
release (It actually already was started).
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jay D. McHugh updated GERONIMO-2045:
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.3)
(was: 1.x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jay D. McHugh updated GERONIMO-1842:
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.3)
(was: 1.x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jay D. McHugh updated GERONIMO-3815:
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.3)
2.0.4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jay D. McHugh updated GERONIMO-4124:
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.3)
2.0.4
Tomcat jacc usage is messed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jay D. McHugh updated GERONIMO-4222:
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.3)
2.0.4
Database pool unusable after
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jay D. McHugh updated GERONIMO-1807:
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.3)
2.0.4
Remove uses of ObjectName
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jay D. McHugh updated GERONIMO-4295:
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.3)
2.0.4
Upgrade to Derby 10.4.2.0
+1
Jay
Joe Bohn wrote:
This is a vote for Genesis 1.5.
Take 3:
In addition to take 1 take 2 this includes a more appropriate javadoc
max memory setting.
Take 2:
Same as take 1 except for replacing the hard-coded dependency on
geronimo-skin from 1.5-SNAPSHOT with 1.5 (this release).
1 - 100 of 497 matches
Mail list logo
