+1
Thanks
Manu
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I think it's time for Geronimo 2.1.4 release. We've had a lot of
important fixes since 2.1.3 and we should get them out to our users.
And if we agree, I would also like to volunteer to be a release
Hi,
It looks like there is an issue with deployment.
If I deploy an app with the command
java -jar deployer.jar deploy
C:\Docume~1\Administrator\Desktop\xa\xatest.war
it asks for the username and password. However if i deploy the app via
the command
java -jar deployer.jar --offline
damage.
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 15, 2009, at 3:00 AM, Manu George wrote:
Hi,
It looks like there is an issue with deployment.
If I deploy an app with the command
java -jar deployer.jar deploy
C:\Docume~1\Administrator\Desktop\xa\xatest.war
it asks for the username and password
as well if you switched users.
Joe
Manu George wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for the info. I already have my ICLA on file so I
guess someone with admin privileges needs to grant me edit access.
Regards
Manu
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:05 PM, RunHua Chi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Manu
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for the info. I already have my ICLA on file so I
guess someone with admin privileges needs to grant me edit access.
Regards
Manu
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:05 PM, RunHua Chi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Manu,
Before you contribute to G doc, there are several items to
Hi,
I don't seem to have edit access in confluence. Can someone
grant me access.
Regards
Manu
release?
-Donald
Manu George wrote:
+1 to #1 . But as Jarek says we need a place for future EE5 releases also
Regards
Manu
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems to me that 3.0 (with Java EE 6) is pretty far off and 2.3
release (with Java EE 5
+1 to #1 . But as Jarek says we need a place for future EE5 releases also
Regards
Manu
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems to me that 3.0 (with Java EE 6) is pretty far off and 2.3
release (with Java EE 5) is far more probable by then. But we do
I will commit the EJB Portlet next week once I am clear on which
version to put in. I have one suing 0.4 of dojo and another using 1.1
Regards
Manu
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, looks like we're making good progress towards a 2.2 release.
I have two versions of the EJB Portlet with me. One with dojo 0.4.3
and another with Dojo 1.x. There are 2 possibilities on how to
integrate it.
1) Check in the portlet with dojo 0.4.3 support now as we do not ship
Dojo 1.1 with the default server assembly. Later migrate to Dojo 1.1
if we remove
Congrats Jason
Regards
Manu
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Jack Cai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations from me too, Jason!
- Jack
2008/10/22 Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Congrats Jason!
-Donald
Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
Please join us in congratulating Jason Warner as
+1
--Manu
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 6:55 AM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
--kevan
On Oct 13, 2008, at 10:56 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Hi,
This is a vote for SAAJ 1.3 spec jar version 1.0.1. There was only one
change from version 1.0.0:
, currently when we want the refer to
dojo.js,
the url will be /dojo/dojo/dojo/dojo.js.
I suggest to repackage the dojo-mini.zip file.
2008/10/8 Lin Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Manu, Ok, making it optional sounds good.
Lin
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
We allow symbolic links in web applications via the
allowLinking property of tomcat.
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/configure-allowlinking-for-tomcat-contexts.html
A problem with using symbolic links currently in WAR files is that
during undeployment the deployer follows the links and
Hi David,
Thank you for the response. It was very helpful.
Comments inline
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:47 PM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 10, 2008, at 5:17 AM, Manu George wrote:
Hi David,
Thanks for replying. I have put a few questions
, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi David,
Thanks for replying. I have put a few questions/comments
inline below
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:09 PM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 8, 2008, at 7:42 AM, Manu George wrote:
To me it looks like you are basically
Hi David,
Thanks for replying. I have put a few questions/comments
inline below
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:09 PM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 8, 2008, at 7:42 AM, Manu George wrote:
To me it looks like you are basically proposing a plan editor or config.xml
Hi Lin,
I am using it in the EjbServer Portlet I am developing. But I guess
that it can also be made an optional console plugin
Regards
Manu
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:43 AM, Lin Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jay,
Right, I don't know how far that work went either.
Thus, I didn't include the
the dependencies so currently we will need only a
restart of the openejb configuration
Regards
Manu
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi David,
What is the accessTimeout attribute of the BmpContainerGBean
for? It seems to map to poolSize. You are doing a
set
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will modify that patch to use the changes David has made. Let me
know if you have any suggestions on the UI
Regards
Manu
On 9/26/08, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can try to check in the patch that's
I will modify that patch to use the changes David has made. Let me
know if you have any suggestions on the UI
Regards
Manu
On 9/26/08, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can try to check in the patch that's there, but I've never really
looked at or used EJBs and really don't have a
Hi,
I just found a behaviour in geronimo that I am not certain is
there by design. If I edit one of the gbean attributes of an already
started gbean in a configuration and I then restart that configuration
from the console then the edited properties are not reflected in the
restarted gbean.
Please disregard the part about the Configuration class. On further
analysis I found that the restart results in
KernelConfigurationManager.start
Regards
Manu
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I just found a behaviour in geronimo that I am
So to get the changes reflected on restart we need to call
attributeStore.applyOverrides in
ConfigurationUtil.startConfigurationGbeans method. Let me know if this
is an issue and I will open a JIRA and attach a patch
Regards
Manu
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi Ravi,
You can set it via the GERONIMO_OPTS property i.e.
SET GERONIMO_OPTS=-Xmx256m and it will be set in the VM.
However since your system has only 512M of RAM it may be better to
turn off modules that you are not using like say openejb and activemq
if u dont use ejb and jms and so on. You
Hi Shrey,
I also faced this issue recently. My understanding is
that all the DWR calls go through the
org.apache.geronimo.console.servlet.ContextForwardServlet servlet
currently. In that servlet we have a reference to the web app context
of say plan creator or any other console
Congrats Lin
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Lei Wang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lin, congratulations!
Rex
2008/6/27 Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
All,
Please join us in congratulating Lin Sun as the newest member of the
Geronimo PMC. She has been involved with the Geronimo community
Thanks for replying Kevan. I already opened a JIRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4082
as david jencks also mentioned that it is a bug in another thread
Regards
Manu
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 26, 2008, at 8:50 AM, Manu George
Hi,
I recently build geronimo from scratch in linux with a totally
new repo and imported the source in eclipse. After importing I had to
manually the following 3 references to libraries from quite a lot of
projects
M2_REPO/javax/jms/jms/1.1/jms-1.1.jar
Hi Sergio,
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 5:27 PM, zeros [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good morning:
I'm having problems deploying an EJB3 with a deployment descriptor. I've
not had any problems deploying it only with tags, but when I add the
ejb-jar.xml to fix the final values Geronimo detects
Manu
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 9:17 PM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 20, 2008, at 2:46 AM, Manu George wrote:
Hi,
When you are using ejb 2.1 you had to actually specify the
jndi-name/local-jndi-name in the openejb-jar.xml. I believe that that
name was used
Hi,
When you are using ejb 2.1 you had to actually specify the
jndi-name/local-jndi-name in the openejb-jar.xml. I believe that that
name was used if you wanted to do a remote lookup etc. How was this
used for local lookups? Were the ejbs available in the application
specific jndi context
the openejb integration changes as a separate JIRA for
easier tracking and merging.
Let me know if anyone has any concerns with the approach I am taking
or if approach 2 looks to be better.
Regards
Manu
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 5:38 PM, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I came up with a few
Hi,
The geronimo maven build currently automatically decides which
repositories to download artifacts from. AFAIK this is decided by
Genesis. Now if I have a local maven repository in my Lan and want
maven to look into that repo first what do I have to do?
Regards
Manu
by local I meant a remote repository but local to my LAN
Thanks
Manu
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 7:39 AM, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The geronimo maven build currently automatically decides which
repositories to download artifacts from. AFAIK this is decided by
Genesis. Now
Hi,
I just checked opened a a defect in activemq as discussed with
david jencks on IRC. This deals with Mdbs stopping processing if the
instance limit is maxSessions. The defect is
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1618. It is present in
all the versions of AMQ.
I have also
, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi David,
Currently Openejb standalone only allows you to set the configurations
at the container level.
Currently openejb standalone accepts these configuration values at the
constructor of the container. In standalone I believe that you can
have
the portlet prompts you to
restart the server as openejb doesn't support dynamic changes of these
settings. Suggestions welcome
Thanks
Manu
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008, at 7:36 AM, Manu George wrote:
Hi,
What does the community think
with this information
and maybe modify the sample to use DWR.
Regards
Manu
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Manu George wrote:
Hi,
I added a new portlet to the admin console via the new
pluggable mechanism. However when I click on the link to that portlet
I am
suggestion would be to verify whether the JSessionID is getting
corrupted or deleted. Let us know what ya find and hopefully we can step
through this.
Which portlet is this for?
-Joseph Leong
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Manu George wrote:
Hi
Hi,
I added a new portlet to the admin console via the new
pluggable mechanism. However when I click on the link to that portlet
I am always asked to authenticate even though I have authenticated on
the login page of the admin console. How can I configure my portlet to
also be part of the
Thanks all for pointing out the documentation. Looks like its pretty
detailed too. Will be very helpful. Will improve it if anything
missing
Regards
Manu
On Feb 9, 2008 1:11 AM, Joseph Leong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just an update. I'm not sure exactly why the steps i took the first time
What is the point in having geronimo specific annotations? AFAIK there
is a mappedName attribute in the javaEE annotations which can be used
for mapping to server specific resource names. Is this completely
implemented in G? Probably someone with more knowledge on this than me
can comment :).
Hi,
On a related note , since the pluggable console was introduced
is there any doc on how to include new portlets or on the architecture
of the pluggable console. A doc will really go a long way in helping
others develop new portlets. A list of files to look at will in itself
be a great
Congrats Viet
On Jan 31, 2008 11:26 AM, Joseph Leong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations Viet
On Jan 31, 2008 12:36 AM, Shiva Kumar H R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations Viet!
On Jan 31, 2008 9:17 AM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I'd like
Hi,
What does the community think about having a portlet in the admin
console for configuring openejb related stuff as well as displaying
the different containers etc deployed in Geronimo. I think this may
improve the usability of Geronimo. If there is interest I would like
to investigate it
Me too. Most of the time I end up writing just the module and
environment properties. Maybe there should be default values for the
environment. Will be a good feature to have
On Jan 21, 2008 12:26 AM, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Just wondering if deploying an ejb module
Hi,
Can someone with Committer Karma grant me contributor access to
the Geronimo JIRA.
Regards
Manu
thanks David :)
On Jan 27, 2008 3:00 AM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IIUC the jira page I managed to do this :-)
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 26, 2008, at 11:56 AM, Manu George wrote:
Hi,
Can someone with Committer Karma grant me contributor access to
the Geronimo JIRA
Thanks Matt And Congrats Kevan
Hello,
I need a clarification regarding the ModuleBuilderExtensions
(MBE) pattern. What I understood about this is that it is to extend
the functionality of the existing module builders. The usage that I
have seen is that the list of MBE's that are used by a ModuleBuilder
are specified in
:
On Jan 3, 2008, at 3:42 AM, Manu George wrote:
Hello,
I need a clarification regarding the ModuleBuilderExtensions
(MBE) pattern. What I understood about this is that it is to extend
the functionality of the existing module builders. The usage that I
have seen is that the list
Hi,
I am trying to add a few custom entries into the app specific JNDI
space. Is it possible to get a handle to the componentContext during
the deployment of a J2EE app so that it can be modified. It becomes
immutable after the application starts as per the spec so i need to do
it during
Hi Shiva,
Congrats
Regards
Manu
On 9/8/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
The Geronimo PMC is pleased to announce that Shiva Kumar H R has recently
accepted our invitation to become an Apache Geronimo committer. Shiva has
been contributing to Geronimo
documentation.
http://activemq.apache.org/activation-spec-properties.html
So no changes were required for the Thread Pool implementation. But do
you think that the
RejectionHandler needs to be changed as per the api docs? Or is it
fine as it is ?
Thanks
Manu
On 9/3/07, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
I was investigating why setting the resourceAdapter poolsize
to 1 and using it in an Mdb for sequential message processing was
failing and found that the org.apache.geronimo.pool.ThreadPool class
in geronimo contains a ThreadPoolExecutor instance created with the
constructor
new
is rejected. Thus tying
up your own thread is not appropriate since it eliminates the
possibility of the caller taking corrective action.
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 2, 2007, at 8:46 AM, Manu George wrote:
Hi,
I was investigating why setting the resourceAdapter poolsize
to 1
Hi David,
Comments Inline
On 9/3/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 2, 2007, at 11:23 AM, Manu George wrote:
Hi David,
Thanks for the explanation.
In case of waitWhenBlocked=true what will be the expected behaviour if
I set the poolsize as 1
Hi,
How can I access ejbs over CORBA in Geronimo 2.0? On specifying
the TSS configs as in 1.1, I was getting an error saying there is no
builder configured for namespace
http://openejb.apache.org/xml/ns/corba-tss-config-2.1 during
deployment. Does anyone know why this is happening. I gave
Got it resolved. Needed to start the openejb-corba-deployer.
Thanks
Manu
On 8/1/07, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
How can I access ejbs over CORBA in Geronimo 2.0? On specifying
the TSS configs as in 1.1, I was getting an error saying there is no
builder configured
Hi Jacek,
Comments inline
On 7/5/07, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/4/07, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes you are right. But if you see the Tuscany samples it supports SCA
modules that don't have sca-contribution.xml and just a .composite
file. So I was on two minds
integration whitepaper at OSOA and Sebastiens comments.
On 7/4/07, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/3/07, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(a) I develop SCA components, assemble them in a composite, package them
in an SCA contribution. I don't really know what a WAR or an EAR
Hi Raymond,
Comments Inline
On 7/4/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Please see my comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 7
Hi Simon,
In one of the previous mails Sebastien proposed two
ways of how the SCADomain should exist in geronimo
(a) one instance of SCADomain per component running on the server,
loaded with a subset of the distributed SCA domain composite
representing that component and enough
think that there are
contradictions here in the spec :(.
Regards
Manu
On 7/4/07, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jacek,
Glad that you could join this discussion. Welcome :). We
need more participants like you to join this dicussion to come out
with the best approach. I have
McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 29, 2007, at 3:11 AM, Manu George wrote:
Some of the questions we have are:
1. Should we use this plugin approach and host the plugin
separatley
or intergrate Tuscany to be bundled as part of the Geronimo
distribution?
The plugin approach looks OK
Hi Jean-Sebastien,
I have put the comments inline.
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Hi,
Myself and Manu have done some work (a small PoC) on Geronimo Tuscany
integration. As a first step, we have created a plugin for Geronimo
that will let the user to deploy standalone tuscany
more week, so I'll try to answer some of these
questions.
Manu George wrote:
Hi Raymond/Jay,
I would like to join this effort. I would like to discuss what
is expected of the deep integration. I will just list down my
understanding of both the current and proposed integrations
Hi Jean-Sebastien,
I have put the comments inline.
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Hi,
Myself and Manu have done some work (a small PoC) on Geronimo Tuscany
integration. As a first step, we have created a plugin for Geronimo
that will let the user to deploy standalone tuscany modules
Congrats Tim
On 6/22/07, Shiva Kumar H R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations Tim!
-Shiva
On 6/22/07, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congrats Tim!
Jarek
On 6/21/07, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
The Geronimo PMC is pleased to announce that Tim McConnell has
Congrats Lin..
On 6/22/07, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations Lin!!
Joe
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Folks,
We're pleased to let you know that we have a new committer in
our midst. Lin Sun has been active on the Web Services integration
for Geronimo for quite some time and has
Congrats to the geronimo community / apache on this amazing achievement.
On 6/21/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 20, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to extend a hearty congrats out to our community for
helping to
get Geronimo fully JavaEE5 certified.
Hi,
Just write and deploy a gbean that implements the
DeploymentWatcher interface and it will get automatically added to the
collection.
Regards
Manu
On 6/16/07, Anita Kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Ajay Panagariya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get some
Hi Jabran,
The openejb-jar.xml seems to be empty .There is no corresponding
message-driven element in the openejb-jar.xml. You will need to add it
in the openejb-jar.xml
as shown below
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
openejb-jar xmlns=http://www.openejb.org/xml/ns/openejb-jar-2.1;
Hi Jay,
I was able to deploy the tuscany calculator webapp (M2
version) on the current geronimo trunk w/o any issues. Probably I was
lucky in selecting my versions :). Which version of Geronimo and
Tuscany were giving the problem?
Regards
Manu
On 5/10/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL
Hi Raymond/Jay,
I would like to join this effort. I would like to discuss what
is expected of the deep integration. I will just list down my
understanding of both the current and proposed integrations
Understanding of the Current Integration
1) TuscanyContextListener creates an SCA domain
it just to see.
Cool that it worked though.
Jay
Jay D. McHugh wrote:
Hey Manu,
The versions that had trouble were trunk of both.
I'm surprised that M2 worked (I'll have to try it just to see).
Jay
Manu George wrote:
Hi Jay,
I was able to deploy the tuscany calculator webapp (M2
Congrats Dain
On 3/31/07, Lasantha Ranaweera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congrats Dain.
Lasantha
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
The Apache Geronimo PMC is pleased to announce that Dain Sundstrom has
accepted an invitation to join the PMC.
Nuf 'said.
Welcome :-0
--No virus found in this incoming
Congratulations donald
On 3/28/07, Shiva Kumar H R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Awesome ... congratulations David!
- Shiva
On 3/27/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
The Geronimo PMC is pleased to announce that Donald Woods has
recently accepted our invitation to become an Apache
Congrats Rakesh
On 3/28/07, Shiva Kumar H R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations Rakesh!
- Shiva
On 3/28/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations Rakesh!!
Best wishes,
Paul
On Mar 27, 2007, at 2:30 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
The Geronimo PMC is pleased to
Congrats Jarek
On 3/20/07, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Sorry Jarek! Mea Culpa!
Folks, We're pleased to let you know that we have a new committer in
our midst. Jarek Gawor has been active on the Web Services integration
for Geronimo for quite some time and has recently
Congrats Chris
--Manu
On 1/25/07, Shiva Kumar H R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congrats Chris!
-- Shiva
On 1/25/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congrats Chris ! Welcome aboard !
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/24/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In recognition of Chris'
Congrats Vamsi,
Regards
Manu
On 10/19/06, Gianny Damour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations Vamsi!
Gianny
On 19/10/2006, at 1:40 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
The Geronimo PMC is pleased to announce that Vamsavardhana Reddy
has recently accepted our invitation to become an Apache Geronimo
Hi David,
Count me in. I am willing to help in this. Will start
reading the specs as my knowlege in this is limited. This page cleared
some of my questions on why axis/celtix is required. Probably it will
be useful for others who are new and interested
Hi,
When i am building the trunk using Maven 2 I am getting the following error.
Also even though the build is failing it says build successful. I get
this when I run bootstrap assemble. The preceding steps all showed
build successful
Downloading:
and then ran a build. The build was
successful. Are you sure you have the latest source files?
Regards,
Vamsi
On 9/19/06, *Manu George* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
When i am building the trunk using Maven 2 I am getting the
following error.
Also
Hi Gianny,
Thanks for the explanation. Are ejb modules also auto
exploded? I saw that war's are exploded but ejb modules don't seem to
be auto exploded. Any reason for this?
Thanks
Manu
On 8/5/06, Gianny Damour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Manu George wrote:
Hi,
Does Geronimo
Hi Manish,
You need to give a resource reference in the deployment
plan. Geronimo does not have a Global JNDI context currently since its
not mandated by the J2EE spec. So you will be able to lookup and
access the datasource from JNDI only within the module in which it is
defined. The
Hi,
Does Geronimo support exploded deployments of ear's that
contain wars and jars using --inPlace Argument? When I try to deploy
daytrader by extracting it to a directory and passing the path to the
directory as an argument to deploy along with --inPlace it is giving
an error
?
Thanks
Manu
On 7/25/06, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
When i deploy a standalone ejb web service in Geronimo 1.1 it gives an
error
00:11:04,238 ERROR [Servlet] Exception caught:
javax.portlet.PortletException: Exception
Hi, When i deploy a standalone ejb web service in Geronimo 1.1 it gives an error00:11:04,238 ERROR [Servlet] Exception caught:javax.portlet.PortletException: Exception at org.apache.geronimo.console.configmanager.ConfigManagerPortlet.proces
sAction(ConfigManagerPortlet.java:107) at
outside of the WEB-INF directory inside the war? On
glancing through the spec I didn't see anything abt it but most of the
app servers seem to support this.
ThanksManu
On 7/10/06, Mario Ruebsam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Manu George wrote: Hi, I have an application that is packaged as an EAR. The WAR
Hi,
I have an application that
is packaged as an EAR. The WAR inside the EAR is having some images in
the images directory directly inside the war. In Geronimo 1.0, I was
able to access them using
Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader().getResource() method,
but now I am unable to do so.
Hi,
The problem we are
facing regarding adapters is because the binding gbeans were added to
the naming module of geronimo. We are planning to change this by
creating a separate module for global jndi and then adding it as a
dependency in the configuration that is getting deployed. This will be
Hi,
Is it possible for me
to write a GBean that gets notified every time a J2EE artefact is
deployed. How do i enable by GBean to recieve these notifications
Regards
Manu
(butcurrently not all redeployments).Note this is not just for J2EEartifacts -- it will also see deployments of services, etc.If you
care about the type, your GBean can look up the type of the deployedmodule with the module ID it is passed.Thanks,AaronOn 5/31/06, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: Hi
Thanks David. Can I take this jar
(http://people.apache.org/~djencks/maven/commons-modeler/jars/commons-modeler-1.2-GERONIMO-SNAPSHOT.jar
)
and replace the one in a previous version of G say 1.0? Will it be
fine? Or do I have to do a rebuild?
Regards
ManuOn 5/9/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi David,
I just compared the file on your page
with the file in one of my builds of G. It seems to be missing two
files mbeans-descriptors.dtd and ant.properties. Was these files
removed on purpose?
Regards
Manu On 5/9/06, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks David. Can I take this jar
them to modify their environment, but I think
the default for the component environment should be read-only.BTW, I am in favor of making everything else writable.-dainOn Apr 26, 2006, at 6:32 AM, Manu George wrote: Hi, Guillaume
I guess if a writable context is implemented still the approach given
Comments inlineOn 4/26/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking more closely, it seems I was wrong.Gbeans with a j2eeType=JCAManagedConnectionFactory have aconnectionFactoryInterface attribute that gives the name of the maininterface to use when binding the object to the JNDI context.
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
