this for branches\2.0 as it may break compatibility.
++Vamsi
On Jan 21, 2008 11:21 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vamsi,
Thanks for the detailed analysis. The problem indeed looks non-trivial.
Step 1. This looks pretty simple, and I'm now creating a patch for that.
This change
a little puzzled about how completeServerShutdown can
get caught in a loop, since it appears to have a cap on how many times
it will go around that loop.
Rick
Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
Hi, all,
I observe the following stack trace when shutting down Geronimo
(branches/2.0) running on Harmony
Hi, all,
I observe the following stack trace when shutting down Geronimo
(branches/2.0) running on Harmony, and then Geronimo stops responding
forever.
Otherwise, Geronimo runs pretty well on Harmony, see [1], details are at
[2].
What is interesting is exactly similar stack and hang are observed
, Zakharov, Vasily M
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, all,
I observe the following stack trace when shutting down Geronimo
(branches/2.0) running on Harmony, and then Geronimo stops responding
forever.
Otherwise, Geronimo runs pretty well on Harmony, see [1], details are
at
[2].
What is interesting
can consider this change for branches\2.0.
Comments?
++Vamsi
On Jan 18, 2008 1:37 AM, Zakharov, Vasily M
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, sure, I fully agree.
I've filed GERONIMO-3757 for this issue and now thinking of the patch to
the trunk that would provide the necessary customization - unless
in advance.
SY, Alexey
2008/1/18, Zakharov, Vasily M [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi, all,
Well, finally I can say Geronimo 2.0.2 starts and works on Apache
Harmony!
Some steps yet need to be taken for that to happen - see [1] for
details.
Some issues were overcome, some workarounded, and some just
!
Is this with latest Harmony snapshot? Also, if you rename or remove
the bin/jpa.jar you should be able to use the Geronimo scripts to
start up the server.
Jarek
On Jan 17, 2008 6:15 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, all,
Well, finally I can say Geronimo 2.0.2 starts and works
with patched key store as far as I understand...
right?
SY, Alexey
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2015
2008/1/16, Zakharov, Vasily M [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry for disturbing, I've just found out the cause for this issue - I
had one extra property in config.xml
incompatibilities and not full support of JKS
or PKCS12 why not to let user choose what keystore to use?
We can specify keystore in configs or choose type from available on
current VM.
SY, Alexey
2008/1/15, Zakharov, Vasily M [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi, all,
Is there a way to change the geronimo
Hi, all,
Well, finally I can say Geronimo 2.0.2 starts and works on Apache
Harmony!
Some steps yet need to be taken for that to happen - see [1] for
details.
Some issues were overcome, some workarounded, and some just hotfixed and
wait for their proper resolution, like GERONIMO-3757.
Three
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 2:26 AM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Geronimo 2.0.2 starts on Harmony!
On Jan 17, 2008, at 6:15 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
Hi, all,
Well, finally I can say Geronimo 2.0.2 starts and works on Apache
Harmony!
Some steps yet need to be taken
Hi, all,
I'm found a problem with MailGBean on Harmony due to of JNDI
configuration, and I'm asking for help to understand how to deal with
that problem. The problem would occur on any JDK lacking Sun
implementation of JNDI RMI Registry provider
(com.sun.jndi.rmi.registry.RegistryContext). The
Message-
From: Zakharov, Vasily M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 8:53 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: MailGBean/JNDI problem on Harmony
Hi, all,
I'm found a problem with MailGBean on Harmony due to of JNDI
configuration, and I'm asking for help
Hi, all,
Is there a way to change the geronimo-default keystore
from JKS to, say, PKCS12 without patching the
org.apache.geronimo.security.keystore.FileKeystore* classes?
That way of patching sources is suggested at GERONIMO-2015,
and it works, but it's probably not the best idea.
I see the
a while (e.g. after a
timeout).
Jarek
On Jan 10, 2008 6:09 AM, Zakharov, Vasily M
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jarek,
Thanks for the suggestion, unfortunately that didn't help, the stack
remains the same.
It seems the problem lies elsewhere.
Thanks anyway!
Vasily
-Original Message
27, 2007 12:48 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,
Yes, Harmony supports TLS, but looking at the test code
and configuration I couldn't guess a way how the test
could be reconfigured for TLS.
One of the reasons I'm asking is I now have greater than
99% pass rate for GUT
Hi, all,
What is the current situation with the PKCS12 support in Geronimo?
I see the GERONIMO-2015 issue has a year-and-a-half history, it was
targeted at v2.0, but now v2.0.2 is already out there.
It looks like parts of the proposed functionality are already there, and
otherwise the patches
Hi, all,
I wonder if org.apache.geronimo.yoko.TSSConfigEditorTest test is SSL
dependent?
I'm trying to run Geronimo Unit Tests on Apache Harmony, and this test
fails (with the stack below) for the reason I couldn't find out.
Could that be because Harmony has no SSL implementation?
SEVERE:
expert,
do you have any advice on how to fix this?
thanks
david jencks
On Dec 27, 2007, at 10:33 AM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
Hi, all,
I wonder if org.apache.geronimo.yoko.TSSConfigEditorTest test is SSL
dependent?
I'm trying to run Geronimo Unit Tests on Apache Harmony, and this test
fails
Hi, all,
Geronimo v2.0.2 uses XStream 1.1.3, while the latest version is 1.2.2.
I'd like to ask, are there any plans for moving to a newer version?
I'm trying to run Geronimo Unit Test v2.0.2 on Apache Harmony, and
encounter errors like these:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/XSTR-189,
Great, thanks!
Vasily
-Original Message-
From: Joe Bohn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 12:08 AM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: XStream/Harmony problem
Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
Hi, all,
Geronimo v2.0.2 uses XStream 1.1.3, while the latest
a draft out about two weeks ago and need to publish the final.
I'd expect with Thanksgiving and some other stuff I'd be able to get
going in early December.
On Nov 13, 2007, at 10:40 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
Matt,
Are there any news on that? :)
Thanks!
Vasily
-Original
I get
that completed I'd like to get this tested.
It will be nice to finally run the monster ;-P
On Oct 4, 2007, at 11:29 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
Hi, Matt,
Great to hear from you, and great to hear the news!
I've tried to update the deployment plans to G2.0.1 as best as I
could
Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
Hi David,
Yes, this actually helped, thank you very much!
However, the deployment plan I provided was generated by database pool
wizard in the console, as follows:
Console Navigation - Services - Database Pools
Create a new database pool: Using the Geronimo
on limiting the list of available JARs on the
portlet, but I think his change is only in trunk (which will be geronimo
2.1).
HTH,
Lin
Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
Hi, Lin,
I don't see any org.apache.geronimo.* entries in Driver JAR
selection.
May this be a problem?
And anyway, selecting non-Derby
/dep:artifactId
dep:typecar/dep:type
/dep:dependency
Hope this helps
david jencks
On Oct 9, 2007, at 2:16 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
Hi, all,
I've come into a strange situation, that looks like maybe a bug, while
working on SPECjAppServer2004 deployment
Hi, all,
I've come into a strange situation, that looks like maybe a bug, while
working on SPECjAppServer2004 deployment on G2.0.1.
When working with Embedded XA TranQL connector to internal Derby
database, class org.apache.geronimo.jdbc.DelegatingDriver (implements
java.sql.Driver) comes out in
that completed I'd like to get this tested.
It will be nice to finally run the monster ;-P
On Oct 4, 2007, at 11:29 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
Hi, Matt,
Great to hear from you, and great to hear the news!
I've tried to update the deployment plans to G2.0.1 as best as I
could,
here's what I
Hi,
Are there any plans of moving to the next version of TranQL, 1.3.1 or
maybe 1.4-SNAPSHOT?
Both seem to be available at http://dist.codehaus.org/tranql/jars/
When I was working with G1.x last year, it was found that a critical
flaw exists in TranQL 1.3, that prevents SPECjAppServer2004 from
/specjappserver2004/
On Oct 4, 2007, at 8:57 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
Hi,
Are there any plans of moving to the next version of TranQL, 1.3.1 or
maybe 1.4-SNAPSHOT?
Both seem to be available at http://dist.codehaus.org/tranql/jars/
When I was working with G1.x last year, it was found that a critical
Hi, all,
I'm happy to announce that the new version of SPECjAppServer2004 (1.08)
is released, and includes changes allowing publishing results in open
source.
SjAS2004 1.08 includes a special research mode workload called
EAStress2004 that has a different metric but allows SjAS licensees to
would be
useable by all Geronimo committers?
Thanks for the heads up.
On Mar 6, 2007, at 2:44 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
Hi, all,
I'm happy to announce that the new version of SPECjAppServer2004
(1.08)
is released, and includes changes allowing publishing results in open
source
Heinz,
Adding serialVersionUIDs to Serializable classes is sure a great idea!
It's strongly recommended by Sun, and all the way helps when dealing
with serialization in large projects.
It's not in fact important what particular value you specify for
serialVersionUID field, the only thing
Hi, Matt,
What are the perspectives of having the capability to specify the
transaction isolation level in TranQL?
I'm awaiting this feature eagerly, as it looks like a key to a
successful SPECjAppServer2004 run...
Recently you said
Matt,
What do you mean by plans you corrected?
And by select for update we need to be able to specify?
Vasily
-Original Message-
From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2006 5:48 AM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented:
Atlassian to cwiki and I was able to save it
with no problems. It all
seems to work just fine now, let me know if you find any issues.
Cheers!
Hernan
Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
Hernan,
Thank you very much!
Vasily
-Original Message-
From: Hernan Cunico [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hernan,
Thank you alot for your great work on new G wiki!
But oops, I was trying to copy my doc from the old location at:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/SPECjApp
Server2004
to the new location at:
the page markup as soon as I have a min, if I can't find
anything suspicious I could
re-import it from an XML (a new one from the Atlassian install) while we
still look for the final
solution.
Cheers!
Hernan
Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
Hernan,
Thank you alot for your great work on new G wiki
Matt,
By the way, are there any plans to make TranQL an Apache project, or
even a Geronimo component?
Vasily Zakharov
Intel Middleware Products Division
-Original Message-
From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 6:54 AM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Hernan,
Wow, that sounds great!
But what, considering this, would happen to
http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO ?
Should all the documents be migrated from there?
I own a document there, should I move it to the new Confluence
immediately?
Vasily Zakharov
Intel
Haron,
One more question, what is the difference between
http://geronimo.apache.org/documentation and
http://cwiki.apache.org/GERONIMO/home.html ?
These locations have similar structure but are clearly different, and
the latter has many documents from the old
http://opensource.atlassian.com
Jacek,
I'm now writing the doc and I need to place the stacks somewhere to link
to them.
Looks like the Jira issue is a good place for that. :)
Vasily
-Original Message-
From: Jacek Laskowski (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 6:31 PM
To:
) SPECjAppServer2004
Deployment Descriptors
On 4/12/06, Zakharov, Vasily M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jacek,
I'm now writing the doc and I need to place the stacks somewhere to
link
to them.
Looks like the Jira issue is a good place for that. :)
No, it's not. Use the user mailing list
@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: TranQL issue at SPECjAppServer2004 atomicity tests
On Apr 9, 2006, at 1:27 AM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
David,
The deployment plan is
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12324904/specdb.xml
and the deployment string is:
java -jar bin/deployer.jar --user
Hi, all,
I've successfuly deployed SPECjAppServer2004 benchmark on Geronimo 1.0
(see http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1800), but I have
trouble running the basic atomicity tests
(http://localhost:8080/SPECjAppServer/ page, link Atomicity Tests)
that check the correctness of the
Hello, all.
Recently, I accidentally corrupted the config.ser file in
bin/server.jar. It was my fault in this case, but this can also happen
in the presence of ill-formed scripts that manipulate files in
bin/server.jar or as a result of some bug in building procedures.
Geronimo error
46 matches
Mail list logo
