Aaron Mulder wrote:
It would be saying something like, there must be a
GBean to represent a virtual host, and that GBean must have a set of
host names associated with it, and any application can be associated
with that defined virtual host. For Tomcat, this would be
effectively a HostGBean
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1513?page=all ]
John Sisson reassigned GERONIMO-1513:
-
Assign To: John Sisson
The directory geronimo-1.0\lib\extension does not match the
Extension-Dirs: lib/ext value in server.jar's manifest.mf
Another issue you don't show all your code but you will have a
much easier time matching names if you include the j2eeType in both
the reference specifications and the GBeanInfoBuider constructor
infoFactory.addReference(APrinter,APrinterGBean.class,
NameFactory.GERONIMO_SERVICE);
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1402?page=all ]
Jakob Færch updated GERONIMO-1402:
--
Version: 1.0
Recipients set by calling MimeMessage.setRecipients(RecipientType, Adress[])
not remembered by getAllRecipients()
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1513?page=all ]
John Sisson closed GERONIMO-1513:
-
Resolution: Fixed
The directory geronimo-1.0\lib\extension does not match the
Extension-Dirs: lib/ext value in server.jar's manifest.mf file
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1456?page=all ]
John Sisson reassigned GERONIMO-1456:
-
Assign To: John Sisson
geronimo-1.0-src.zip has a meta-inf folder in the root directory
Trieloff, Carl wrote:
One thing I just realized is that we don't want the sub-project to
show up as being called CORBA Server. CORBA is trademarked by the
OMG and that would be an infringement. Thus we can't use CORBA in the name
of the project due to this trademark, so I would suggest
I will be out of the office starting January 20, 2006 and will not return until January 23, 2006.
I will respond to your message when I return.
Hi AllI would like to work on this project. Please let me know how can I invilve in this.Best RegardsThushanthaOn 1/18/06, Alan D. Cabrera
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:That would be great.
Regards,AlanMatt Hogstrom wrote, On 1/18/2006 6:29 PM: Are there any people on the Harmony project that might
Dave, Thanks for the comments...
I made comments below. Would you create installer component JIRAs for the
items that make sense?
On Thursday 19 January 2006 17:02, Dave Colasurdo wrote:
Looks like the Installer has made quite a bit of progress. Thanks Erik!!
I'd like to suggest a few
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1484?page=all ]
Matthias Schmidt updated GERONIMO-1484:
---
Description:
Display the user who is logged into the Webconsole might by handy, esp. when
having something like a role-based administration
Can someone please add me to the geronimo-contributers JIRA group so that I can be assigned issues? My JIRA userid is pmcmahan.thanks,Paul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Guys,
there seems to be some debate about whether the doc should end up in
Confluence or MoinMoin...
please resolve it and I will publish the doc.
Official documentation for the project should be
a) under source
Fix installer license statements
Key: GERONIMO-1514
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1514
Project: Geronimo
Type: Task
Components: installer
Versions: 1.0
Reporter: erik daughtrey
They need to be
Installer - some GBeans do not start correctly after install
Key: GERONIMO-1515
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1515
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: installer
Versions:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone with an interest in working with the documentation,
either directly or for some sort of postprocessing, please
vote here. Unless there are problems, this vote will
close in one week, at 14h00 UTC on 27 January 2006. At
that point, a
Installer - add new components to install: openejb, openejb-builder, axis and
axis-builder
--
Key: GERONIMO-1516
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1516
Project:
Installer - only copy jars needed by selected configuration
---
Key: GERONIMO-1518
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1518
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Components: installer
Installer - Install Derby with base J2EE Features
-
Key: GERONIMO-1517
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1517
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: installer
Versions: 1.1, 1.0.1
[X] Confluence
- sachin
On Jan 20, 2006, at 9:36 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone with an interest in working with the documentation,
either directly or for some sort of postprocessing, please
vote here. Unless there are problems, this
[X] Confluence
On 1/20/06, Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Working documentation for Apache Geronimo should be kept in
[+0] Confluence
[+1] MoinMoin wiki
[ ] Other (explain)
I don't really care except that I know MoinMoin markup quite well and
am newer to Confluence. :) But also, as I
[x] Confluence
From an end-user point of view I think it's more organized and easy to navigate.
From a contributers point of view I think there is already a good skeleton in place for anybody interested to fill in the gaps.
Regards,
Rajith
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1514?page=all ]
erik daughtrey updated GERONIMO-1514:
-
Geronimo Info: [Patch Available]
Fix installer license statements
Key: GERONIMO-1514
URL:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1191?page=all ]
Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-1191:
--
Resolution: Duplicate
Assign To: Kevan Miller
Fixed by 1192
Installer should not allow conflicting configuration information
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Working documentation for Apache Geronimo should be kept in
[X] Confluence
[ ] MoinMoin wiki
[ ] Other (explain)
I haven't written any Geronimo documentation yet, but if I eventually
do, I'd prefer Confluence, primarily because of how easy it makes it to
organize,
[ X ] Confluence
Joe
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone with an interest in working with the documentation,
either directly or for some sort of postprocessing, please
vote here. Unless there are problems, this vote will
close in one week, at
Cannot remove published applications
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-51
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-51
Project: Geronimo-Devtools
Type: Bug
Environment: WINXP, JDK 1.4.2 eclipse 3.1.1
Reporter: Lin Sun
+1 Confluence
-dain
On Jan 20, 2006, at 6:36 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone with an interest in working with the documentation,
either directly or for some sort of postprocessing, please
vote here. Unless there are problems, this vote
Another option would be to add a new attribute to deployment
plans called something like isCompatibleWith or upgrades.
This attribute would tell Geronimo that it can use this version of the
component in place of the component that it upgrades.
So for v1.0.1 we could use
configuration
I have heard from some that 1.1 will be cut next week and from others
that it will be at least 4 more weeks. Can we make a decision now on
what the date will be?
I have a fairly big change I'd like to commit sometime next week, but
if we are going to cut on Friday, I'll wait until
Do you mean 1.0.1 for cutting next week?
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I have heard from some that 1.1 will be cut next week and from others
that it will be at least 4 more weeks. Can we make a decision now on
what the date will be?
I have a fairly big change I'd like to commit sometime next week,
Done.
-dain
On Jan 20, 2006, at 6:24 AM, Paul McMahan wrote:
Can someone please add me to the geronimo-contributers JIRA group
so that I can be assigned issues? My JIRA userid is pmcmahan.
thanks,
Paul
Adi,
Is this a show stopper for you?
I don't understand what you are asking. I was just stating what code
I've managed to get my company to agree to contribute to the project
(if anyone's interested in it), what components might be useful from
another open source project I work on, and what
Nope, I mean 1.1.
-dain
On Jan 20, 2006, at 9:14 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Do you mean 1.0.1 for cutting next week?
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I have heard from some that 1.1 will be cut next week and from others
that it will be at least 4 more weeks. Can we make a decision now on
what the date
[X] Confluence
The integration w/ Jira is great!
Regards,
Alan
+1 Confluence
David Jencks
On Jan 20, 2006, at 6:36 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone with an interest in working with the documentation,
either directly or for some sort of postprocessing, please
vote here. Unless there are problems,
David Jencks wrote:
Personally I am not ready for 1.1 to be frozen.
Also, there is at least one major bug (tomcat cross-context dispatch)
that needs to be fixed and I haven't seen any progress on it.
I am not going to be able to get to this at least until Monday...you
know...day job and
On Jan 20, 2006, at 9:46 AM, David Jencks wrote:
Personally I am not ready for 1.1 to be frozen.
Also, there is at least one major bug (tomcat cross-context
dispatch) that needs to be fixed and I haven't seen any progress on
it.
The nature of your change might affect other peoples
Hmm, please don't take this the wrong way. i am just trying to guide
the discussions and stating the precedents and how things work. Such
discussions can drag on, making it difficult to set up resources for
infra stuff, getting commit privs to everyone involved etc.
FWIW, the first email about a
On 1/20/06, Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone with an interest in working with the documentation,
either directly or for some sort of postprocessing, please
vote here. Unless there are problems, this vote will
close in one
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-51?page=all ]
Sachin Patel resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-51:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Sachin Patel
Good catch! I accidently overrid a line that allows WTP to update the
[ X ] Confluence
Cheers!
Hernan
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone with an interest in working with the documentation,
either directly or for some sort of postprocessing, please
vote here. Unless there are problems, this vote will
close in one
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 10:30:59AM -0500, Aaron Mulder wrote:
But also, as I understand it, even if we
choose Confluence we need a different Confluence installation which
someone TBD needs to take charge of and then all the content needs to
be moved?
Excellent point. It's more important to
Hi,
Does anyone know the answer to the question: Does Apache Geronimo 1.0
run on iSeries? It's been asked and unfortunatelly the answer is not
yet known.
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.laskowski.org.pl
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-22?page=all ]
Sachin Patel resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-22:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Sachin Patel
This is fixed. Once the jars are re-posted on the update site, this feature
On Jan 20, 2006, at 9:59 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Jan 20, 2006, at 9:46 AM, David Jencks wrote:
Personally I am not ready for 1.1 to be frozen.
Also, there is at least one major bug (tomcat cross-context
dispatch) that needs to be fixed and I haven't seen any progress
on it.
The
All,
I've pulled the JIRAS that are currently currently targetted against 1.0.1. I
talked with Alan about doing the 1.0.1 Release Management so I can finish out
the doc of how to get one of these monsters out.
I'm suggesting that we target close of coding for 1.0.1 by next Sunday and then
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1514?page=all ]
David Jencks reassigned GERONIMO-1514:
--
Assign To: David Jencks
Fix installer license statements
Key: GERONIMO-1514
URL:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1505?page=all ]
David Jencks reassigned GERONIMO-1505:
--
Assign To: David Jencks
Installer should default Tomcat on at runtime if Jetty pack is not selected
Aaron,
Thanks for raising this issue - this is important. It's tacky to
force people to change their plans for a minor version upgrade.
1) Ship 1.0.1 with all the configIds saying 1.0 so there is no issue
for at least that release
I like this option for this branch. It looks as if the plan
That would be a question for an IBMer :)
Geronimo currently does not run on iSeries since its an IBM JDK and Geronimo
isn't certified there. We're working towards JDK independence soon but
unfortunately 1.0 is not available.
That said, one can run Geronimo on an IBM JDK and on iSeries by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Regardless, of this change, I don't want to be the one that checks in
stuff that breaks the build or TCK 3 days before a branch is cut.
Who is the release manager? If there isn't one, then there's
no point worrying about
For what it's worth, Dain whiteboarded his plan for me the other day
and I'm 100% on board with the proposed changes.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 1/20/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 20, 2006, at 9:59 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Jan 20, 2006, at 9:46 AM, David Jencks wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-33?page=all ]
Sachin Patel resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-33:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Sachin Patel
Marking as fixed on behalf of originator.
Plugin: Add/remove programs
+1 Confluence
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone with an interest in working with the documentation,
either directly or for some sort of postprocessing, please
vote here. Unless there are problems, this vote will
close in one week, at 14h00 UTC
I'm interested in working on the ORB. My specific areas of interest are in
object copying and marshalling. Alan, can you add me to the list of interested
parties?
Rick McGuire wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Here is the incubation proposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CorbaProposal
One thing I've been meaning to hit the list with now that we are
formalizing our release process a bit more
For every release I've done ever (in OpenEJB, Geronimo, or
otherwise), the dynamic I call Pilot and Co-Pilot seems to always
come in. You have the person leading the show, the
+0
I think the quality of the documentation is more
important than the documentation tool.
But, if Confluence gives us features that would dramatically
improve the documentation by all means change.
However, assuming there's no easy way to slurp the existing
pages into Confluence, I'd
On 1/20/2006 4:57 AM, Anders Hessellund Jensen wrote:
Trieloff, Carl wrote:
One thing I just realized is that we don't want the sub-project to
show up as being called CORBA Server. CORBA is trademarked by the OMG
and that would be an infringement. Thus we can't use CORBA in the name
of the
I agree with this. The release can be difficult at best. And I
appreciate you giving me *much* more credit that is due...you did a lot
more than just a co-pilot (perhaps I should be scolding you for giving
me more credit than is due) ;-)
In any case, this is a great idea, and I would be happy
On Jan 20, 2006, at 12:20 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
I agree with this. The release can be difficult at best. And I
appreciate you giving me *much* more credit that is due...you did a
lot
more than just a co-pilot (perhaps I should be scolding you for giving
me more credit than is due) ;-)
On Jan 20, 2006, at 11:42 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Regardless, of this change, I don't want to be the one that checks in
stuff that breaks the build or TCK 3 days before a branch is cut.
Who is the release
This is really a discussion for the openejb mailing list, but since
you asked here I'll respond here.
On Jan 20, 2006, at 11:17 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jan 20, 2006, at 9:59 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Jan 20, 2006, at 9:46 AM, David Jencks wrote:
Personally I am not ready for 1.1 to
Vijay Balasubramanian
DPRA Inc.,
- Forwarded by Vijay Balasubramanian/R6/USEPA/US on 01/20/2006 03:10
PM -
Vijay
Balasubramanian/
Please post your web.xml for us to review.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 1/20/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vijay Balasubramanian
DPRA Inc.,
- Forwarded by Vijay Balasubramanian/R6/USEPA/US on 01/20/2006 03:10
PM -
Vijay
Balasubramanian/
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1506?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-1506:
---
Fix Version: 1.0.1
1.1
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Paul McMahan
Applied patch to 1.1 and 1.0.1 branches
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just some food for thought on the 'which docco system'
discussion/vote/etc..
Whatever system gets chosen will need to be running on
Apache hardware. That's not an issue for MoinMoin, since
it's already there and the infra people are familiar
with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Who is the release manager? If there isn't one, then there's
no point worrying about any particular date. The release
manager gets to call the shots on freeze, thaw, and cut dates.
Um, I really disagree here. If the
+1 Confluence
Gianny
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anyone with an interest in working with the documentation,
either directly or for some sort of postprocessing, please
vote here. Unless there are problems, this vote will
close in one week, at
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1510?page=comments#action_12363481
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-1510:
More problems revealed by more extensive testing:
If XATransactions are set on the RAR that's not detected properly and
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1506?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder reopened GERONIMO-1506:
Assign To: Aaron Mulder (was: Paul McMahan)
I don't think this issue should be closed until we resolve the
version-in-configId issue. One
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1517?page=all ]
erik daughtrey updated GERONIMO-1517:
-
Attachment: installer-derby-as-j2ee-feature.patch
Apply this fix to both trunk and branches/1.0.
Installer - Install Derby with base J2EE
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1517?page=all ]
erik daughtrey updated GERONIMO-1517:
-
Geronimo Info: [Patch Available]
Installer - Install Derby with base J2EE Features
-
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1517?page=all ]
David Jencks reassigned GERONIMO-1517:
--
Assign To: David Jencks
Installer - Install Derby with base J2EE Features
-
Key:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1505?page=comments#action_12363493
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-1505:
Applied with 1514 and 1517 to trunk.
Sendingassemblies/j2ee-installer/src/izpack/geronimo-izpack.xml
Sending
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1514?page=comments#action_12363494
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-1514:
Applied with 1505 and 1517 to trunk
Sendingassemblies/j2ee-installer/src/izpack/geronimo-izpack.xml
Sending
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1517?page=comments#action_12363495
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-1517:
applied with 1505 and 1514 to trunk
Sendingassemblies/j2ee-installer/src/izpack/geronimo-izpack.xml
Sending
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1192?page=all ]
John Sisson closed GERONIMO-1192:
-
Fix Version: 1.1
Resolution: Fixed
Installer should create a config.xml for the target install
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1505?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-1505:
--
Fix Version: 1.0.1
1.1
Resolution: Fixed
with 1514, 1517, to branch 1.0
Sending
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1514?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-1514:
--
Fix Version: 1.0.1
1.1
Resolution: Fixed
with 1505, 1517, to branch 1.0
Sending
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1517?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-1517:
--
Fix Version: 1.0.1
1.1
Resolution: Fixed
With 1505, 1514, to branch 1.0
Sending
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I have heard from some that 1.1 will be cut next week and from others
that it will be at least 4 more weeks. Can we make a decision now on
what the date will be?
I have a fairly big change I'd like to commit sometime next week, but
if we are going to cut on Friday,
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1075
Looking at the changes made in the JIRA it was prior to the 1.0 branch,
but I'm not clear whether the there were more changes made after the 1.0
branch.
Thanks,
John
Hi,
For now I am just lurking on the geronimo list (my primary interest
is Cayenne persistence framework, which happens to be container-
independent).
Anyways, I am willing to volunteer to get it going at Apache, still I
am not a committer on any of the projects (AFAIK this *is* a
And a thought regarding the content transfer.
This can be done semi-automatically. Using 'wget' I was able to pull
the entire *raw* contents of the current geronimo Wiki on my hard
drive. With a simple Perl script formatting can be converted to
Confluence style (formatting styles are very
+1 for Confluence
--jason
I'm not sure that everyone knows about some of the nicer features of
Confluence...
* WYSIWYG Editor
* Rich integration with JIRA (issue lists and embedded portlets)
* Rich integration with Groovy/Jython/BeanShell SQL
* Simple page linking... no need for *ugly* CamelCase
* Integrated
88 matches
Mail list logo
