://xbean.org)-- dimsOn 6/14/06, Guillaume Nodet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have pushed new XBean 2.4 binaries in a private repo for review. They are available at
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/xbean-2.4/m1/org.apache.xbean http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/xbean-2.4/m2/org/apache/xbean
http
-0, i do not see the need of maintaining two different sites for plugins,unless no one will ever want a plugin with non ASL compatible dependencies.As soon as the geronimoplugins.org
site is administered by the geronimo community,I do not see any needs to host it at Apache. This site has no brand
was about to answer :)We already have a set of beans that work nicely and i was planning
to raise a JIRA to import these in geronimo trunk. I guess it would do a nice pluginby itself.Still need to find a good way to build plugin with maven though ...Cheers,Guillaume Nodet
Thanks,AaronOn 6/15/06, Erin
The drools component has been tested with drools 2.1, but unless there is
incompatible changes,
there is no reason why it would not work.
Give it a try and tell us ...
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 6/15/06, hrvoje [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to use JBoss Rules (Drools 3
Congrats, and welcome aboard !Guillaume NodetOn 6/20/06, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In recognition of his contributions to the Apache Geronimo community,the Geronimo PMC is proud to announce the committership of Joe Bohn.
Joe has contributed in many areas, including the console and as
have any wishes for next release ?Cheers,
Guillaume NodetOn 6/14/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have pushed new XBean 2.4 binaries in a private repo for review.They are available at
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/xbean-2.4/m1/org.apache.xbean
http://people.apache.org/~gnodet
According to the maven guys, the release process is:
* deploy snapshot
* vote on snapshot
* build and deploy a release
Currently the m2 release process (if you use the release plugin is): * change all versions in poms and commit * create a tag * release and deploy from tag * revert to
When you use the maven release plugin, maven change the scm urlto point to the tag. I will revert it to trunk asap.Cheers,Guillaume NodetOn 6/22/06,
David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 21, 2006, at 6:37 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: IIUC, version specific informationhas snuck into elements
The distribution repos ?Well, i wanted to publish the release in a private repo so that it can be voted,and then move to public repos.I will change them back to what they were.Cheers,Guillaume Nodet
On 6/22/06, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahh, ok. What about the other elements
I have just launched a deployment of a new version which fixes a few bugs.
Will start a new vote in a few hours.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 6/22/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 6/21/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is my +1
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Fixed.Cheers,Guillaume NodetOn 6/22/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 21, 2006, at 6:37 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: IIUC, version specific informationhas snuck into elements that
should be version free, e.g. scm.Here is a list of elements that should have version information
Could you raise a JIRA and attach the patch for review ?Thanks,Guillaume NodetOn 6/23/06, Krishnakumar B
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:hi,We ( Me Manu )have created a implementation of global JNDI based
on the feedback received on the dev list.It works like this.* The implementation uses
Which version of xbean do you use ?
You may try upgrading to XBean 2.4
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 6/29/06, Charlesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I start serviceMix with
ApplicationContext ac = new
org.springframework.context.support.ClassPathXmlApplicationContext
(config.xml);
I work with jar
The m2 repository for the latest snapshot distribution
http://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/servicemix/apache-servicemix/3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 6/30/06, Charlesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I work with Maven2 on repository 'http
I think you are right. A 202 code should be returned.
Could you raise a JIRA for that please ?
If you can provide a patch, that would be cool :)
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 6/30/06, Renaud Bruyeron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to send a oneway message into a http endpoint, but I am
with Geronimo). We currently lack a simple way for web application to
access an existing JBI container. We could use gbeans inside Geronimo,
but this is not portable, so a JNDI factory seems a good fit.
Does anyone think about a better way ?
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 6/30/06, James Strachan [EMAIL
be delayed until 2.6.
In any cases, I'm +1 to fix the existing problems and release 2.5.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 7/11/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just applied 2 trivial bug fixes to the xbean-spring module of XBean.
The first is a patch from Guillaume which is a one liner
the first time.
I'm not sure this problem will be solved soon and the only workaround
i see for that
is to have different lifecycles and versions for container / tooling /
components.
But I think we can live with the above steps to build servicemix.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 7/7/06, Philip Dodds
but currently need servicemix to
be deployed in a
web application, but this could be changed for Geronimo by using a
gbeans to deploy a servlet
without using a war so that the HTTP BC can retrieve the ServiceMix
container and configure
everything needed.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 7/3/06, Aaron
be put back in the same state (i think we just need to keep the state
of the component to restore it).
Any better idea ?
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 7/24/06, Philip Dodds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been hitting problems with the Maven plugin in situations where I
need to work out
Sure.
Could you raise a JIRA and attach any test case / patch you have ?
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 7/24/06, Terry Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When parsing schemas for flattening a WSDL definition, the schemas
are loaded with the baseUri set to null.
This same problem occurs when using
I guess it mainly depends if we want a timed-box release or a featured-box
release ;)
But we must first agree on that...
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 7/24/06, Philip Dodds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for getting a roadmap in place, though until we have a clear set of
stuf
that we want in place
,
Guillaume Nodet
contribution :)
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 7/24/06, Ramon Buckland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am currently look at this issue with a mind to fixing it.
(im sure the fix will be easy)
I'm working the true test driven by writing the testcase first.
And the case is actually to launch an FTP server
FYI, I have raised an issue on INFRA (
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-896)
to request a mailing list and svn repo for TCK related stuff.
I think these list and repo will only be available to servicemix committers
that have
signed the NDA.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Ramon, I can give you karma to assign issue to yourself on JIRA if you want.
What' s your JIRA id ?
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 7/24/06, Ramon Buckland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am currently look at this issue with a mind to fixing it.
(im sure the fix will be easy)
I'm working the true
You should now be able to assign issues to yourself :)
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 7/24/06, Ramon Buckland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's rbuckland
Thanks Guillame
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Ramon, I can give you karma to assign issue to yourself on JIRA if you
want.
What' s your JIRA id
+1
Guillaume
Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hi,
How would you guys feel if we follow servicemix's lead and switch to
using
the org.apache.activemq group id and and incubator-4.1-SNAPSHOT as
the
version number in our maven poms? It something that we will
eventually need
to do any ways, so, I say
+1 to release often
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 7/25/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've quite a few bug fixes ready to roll in 4.0.2 that its probably
about time we did a release pretty soon.
http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ?report
problems with the way it currently works,
but any opinion is welcome.
You are right that there is no support for installing components and
deploying
SUs from the servicemix.xml configuration file, but I think that the current
way
is easier to deal with.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 7/26/06, Philip
to store it). I think in this case, it would be easier to just start a full
servicemix container
and put the components and assemblies in the install/deploy dir, where they
would automatically be
installed.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 7/26/06, Philip Dodds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So in this case
/creating-a-standard-jbi-component.html
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
P
On 7/26/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It will be difficult to embed servicemix and use non embeddable
components.
(I guess it depends on what you mean by embed).
For example if you take the PXE component
:(
From what i heard, maven 2.1 should handle such a release process better,
but i'm not sure how.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 7/26/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I actually think the maven 2 release plugin is a bit of pain. It's not
built to follow our release process where we
things, they are easier to
modify, as you
do not need to repackage the component.
And I'll try and give you a hand on the documentation :)
Thanks
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
P
On 7/26/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/26/06, Philip Dodds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suppose
that without breaking
compatibility
(I hope, else...) so we would have
http:consumer ... /
http:provider /
http:soap-consumer ... /
http:soap-provider ... /
It may be easier to understand for users.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 7/26/06, Philip Dodds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about
have thought about a User Guide a la spring.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
P
On 7/22/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this is the best way.
We need to rewrite the examples using the archetypes and it will
also provide nice tutorials (we miss them a lot).
Cheers,
Guillaume
to be the exact need :)
I will raise a JIRA so we update the WS-Notification component to use
virtual topics, once we upgrade to AMQ 4.1.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 7/27/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've made a few changes to the virtual destinations feature...
http://activemq.org/site
When you say ' web service', i guess you mean http+soap, right ?
You just need to create a wsdl that would describe the transformation and
deploy it to the servicemix-http component.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 7/27/06, emicalc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I use a servicemix component
If you build the whole source tree at once, the problem should not appear.
Recently, I have tried to upload new snapshots, but the process failed
with the same kind of error you mentionned. :(
However it seems to work build running mvn install instead.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 7/27/06, Renaud
component.
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Exception-handling-tf2011368.html#a5527124
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
:)
+1
P
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
- with the re-org the build order would succeed if
you built core first - the tooling - then everything else since nothing in
core requires the plugin
P
On 7/28/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/28/06, Philip Dodds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I put together a basic plan (with some help
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1911
On 7/28/06, Philip Dodds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So maybe breaking it up into two builds - core/tooling and everything
else?
Is there a JIRA for the Maven bug?
P
On 7/28/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not really.
There is a bug
On 7/31/06, Soumadeep-Infravio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Guillaume,
comments inline...
Thanks
Soumadeep
- Original Message -
From: Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Cc: servicemix-users@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 3:14
thought a BAM component would be more
about
monitoring than embedding business logic with rules: see one definition of
BAM at
http://www.ebizq.net/topics/bam/features/4689.html -- of course all
definitions can be argued ;)
- Original Message -
From: Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED
generalize it
and make it available for more than one service.
- Original Message -
From: Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: BAM Component
On 7/31/06, Soumadeep-Infravio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
).
I think this makes a good plan for a 3.0 release, but discussion is welcome.
Pushing a M3 / RC1 this month (when ?) and a 3.0 asap in september sounds
like a good plan to me.
P
On 7/24/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess it mainly depends if we want a timed-box release
/31/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/24/06, Philip Dodds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before pushing 3.0 out of the door I think we need to address :
1/ The project structure so that we can build core/components and
tooling
independently
2/ The packaging so we can create
FYI, I have just upgraded ServiceMix to
xbean 2.5
jencks 1.2
xfire 1.2-RC
spring 2.0-rc1 (there is a problem with xbean 2.5 + spring 2.0-rc2 which
is fixed in xbean svn head, but not yet released)
jetty 6.0.0rc0
On 7/24/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we should
Nodet
On 8/1/06, Philip Dodds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds good :)
P
On 8/1/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/1/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/1/06, Philip Dodds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Probably need to modify the GenerateServiceUnitMojo so
://servicemix.goopen.org/site/servicemix-eip.html
Btw, to create a new component, you could have a look at
http://servicemix.goopen.org/site/creating-a-standard-jbi-component.html
The doc is still incomplete but the maven archetype is really handy.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 8/1/06, Soumadeep
to work with xbean-2.5.
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 8/1/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
re-cuting should be quick to do since only the assembly module was
affected.
On 8/1/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/1/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The chanages were
While looking at http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-28,I was wondering if we should ask for xbean specific mailing lists.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]Any opinion ?-- Cheers,Guillaume Nodet
This is one of the reason why I'd like to have mailing list for xbean :)Else, xbean related stuff will be lost in geronimo mailing lists ...I don't have a strong opinion, but I thought it would be easier forboth developers and users.
-- Cheers,Guillaume Nodet
On 8/1/06, Alan D. Cabrera
[EMAIL
).-- Cheers,Guillaume Nodet
the patches).
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Kleineikenscheidt wrote: As a user of XBean, I'd really appreciate a separate list.
Thanks Guilaume for bringing this up.:-) -Stefan From: Guillaume Nodet [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 7:20 PM To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: [XBEAN] Mailing lists
This is one of the reason why
.
The other way would be to split to jbi plugin into two different plugins,
one that would contain the maven packaging, and one that would
contain the ant tasks and other goals, like jbi:servicemix.
Any opinion on what to do ?
On 7/28/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not really
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-31 http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-29
On 8/1/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about we look at the patches :)...which ones?Guillaume Nodet wrote: Over the last hours, I have applied a few xbean patches in RTC that had 3 +1. However it seems i missed
:)
P
On 8/1/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just seen, thx to a user on the mailing list, that
the maven plugin depends on servicemix-core.
To the mentioned steps won't even work when building from a clean
computer.
Afaik, currently, you will need to build servicemix-core
.
Here's my +1
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
PSHOT
from the specified remote repositories:
central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2)
Any pointers?
~Vikas
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
/servicemix/tooling/servicemix-service-engine/1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT
It should also work.
On 8/3/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We currently have problems uploading snapshots.
Even in this case, as they are not on public repositories, I'm not
sure it would work.
The best way would
See http://servicemix.goopen.org/site/building.html
On 8/3/06, vikas kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks.
Can you send me the steps to do it. i am a newbie.
~Vikas
On 8/3/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We currently have problems uploading snapshots.
Even in this case
UserTransaction to TransactionManager.This is only true if the exposed UserTransaction *is* the TransactionManager.It seems there is a simple UserTransaction implementation on top of the
TransactionManagerImpl which can be exposed.-- Cheers,Guillaume Nodet
Removed OnlineUserTransaction since it was only
doing it lately?
Thanks
Soumadeep
- Original Message -
From: Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 2:40 PM
Subject: Re: creating a standard JBI Component using servicemix-common
module
You can also download
, let me then follow the same dir structure and
use ant to get things moving.
Are you ok with that?
Soumadeep
- Original Message -
From: Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 7:15 PM
Subject: Re: creating a standard JBI
as loan-broker)
* loan-broker (which only use properties so i don' t think it was a good
example)
Any thoughts ?
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
jbi:embedded
which would launch a servicemix configured by a servicemix.xml file in the
root dir.
The only problem is that examples sometimes need a client which must be
compiled and launched ...
On 8/4/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm currently in the process of refactoring
to handle. So
the question is still open - what to use or what could be an elegant
solution for this.
Thanks
Soumadeep
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
,Guillaume Nodet
,
Alan
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I think that dblevins changed that, because in XBean, I
had a Wish for which i provided a patch but was unable
to put it in RTC mode. RTC should also be applied to documentation, so
why were these issue types excluded
from the workflow ?
I think the main problem
too long for me and hopefully this is a one
line answer.
How can I run only one or maybe a handful of ActiveMQ unit tests?
Can maven do this?
Thanks,
Sepand
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
Electrònic i Sanitat
F u n d a c i ó I B I T
Illes Balears Innovació Tecnològica
http://www.ibit.org
Tel. +34 971 17 72 70/71
Fax. +34 971 17 72 79
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
of just about any kind. -David--
Cheers,Guillaume Nodet
responsibilities.Kevan has shown that he is not only a valuable member
of the technical community but also spends much of his time helping others as well as making surethose pesky LICENSE files make it into every jar we ship.Give it up for Kevan :-0
-- Cheers,Guillaume Nodet
!-- Cheers,Guillaume Nodet
to be
able to patch it if it has issues. The latter is also used by Tomcat
so is very well used.
Anyone used both before who could offer feedback?
--
James
---
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
make any difference. (against HEAD from
yesterday afternoon)
Terry
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
-SNAPSHOT|3.0-SNAPSHOT|1.0-i
ncubating-SNAPSHOT)/3.0-2006-08-02-r427980/' XX
Philip Dodds wrote:
+1 for having everthing sync up on 3.0
P
On 8/8/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if we should change the maven plugin / archetype
version
to
be in sync with the container
correlation-sets as method of performing async
calls.
We can see that flows and sequences control the threading of
servicemix-bpe
but because there is a sendSync for every message going out, it means
the threadpool
can get eaten up pretty quickly.
my 2 cents.
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
SM-512
from the ServiceMix - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
and connectormodules to be versioned independently of the main Geronimo server?-dain-- Cheers,Guillaume Nodet
Tim and Nathan!
--
James
---
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
.
Here's my +1
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
generally only use released versions of
the jars in Geronimo (i.e., no snapshots) for two reasons 1) it is much easier to maintain from a build perspective and 2) is will push us to do more frequent releases of them.Not sure I understand the last statement. (no snapshots)
-dain-- Cheers,Guillaume
.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
, int, boolean) line: 1022
ActiveMQEndpointWorker$1.run() line: 163
WorkerContext.run() line: 291
PooledExecutor$Worker.run() line: not available
Thread.run() line: 595
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
.
This would only affect vm transport since the transport oneways. We
should look into making async to be dispatch be the default when using
the vm transport.
On 8/11/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I sometime have deadlocks while running junit tests that involve
ActiveMQ.
Following
toreview and vote for the patch.So, I please have a look at it - and vote for it...:-)-
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-39Cheers,-Stefan--Stefan Kleineikenscheidt tel. +49 (711) 99 33 035Rosenbergstr. 58 mob. +49 (172) 130 54 77
70176 Stuttgart (GERMANY) [EMAIL PROTECTED]-- Cheers,Guillaume
It seems that there is a consensus to create these mailing lists.I will raise a JIRA for that on infra.On 8/1/06, Guillaume Nodet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:While looking at
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-28,I was wondering if we should ask for xbean specific mailing lists.
[EMAIL
The board report is due this month.
I have edited it, but feel free to add / change anything needed.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2006
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
wrong
/Tomas
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
On 8/11/06, Soumadeep-Infravio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the reply, my comments are inline...
- Original Message -
From: Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 3:02 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] Created: (SM-534
Done, see http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-910On 8/11/06, Guillaume Nodet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:It seems that there is a consensus to create these mailing lists.
I will raise a JIRA for that on infra.On 8/1/06, Guillaume Nodet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While looking at
http
- Original Message -
From: Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2006 2:36 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] Created: (SM-534) Business Activity Monitoring
Component
On 8/11/06, Soumadeep-Infravio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the reply
. The other way would
be to include the eip component jar and inherit the WireTap to reuse the
code
as much as possible.
Soumadeep
On 8/13/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the xml content is a stream, you first need to transform it to a
re-readable
xml source before any
://www.ibit.org
Tel. +34 971 17 72 70/71
Fax. +34 971 17 72 79
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/build-broken-tf2089208.html#a5782296
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
1 - 100 of 2485 matches
Mail list logo
