I attached to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2630 a
simple Java program that can remove any XML comments or xsd:annotation
elements from a given XSD file. It might be useful to check the
hand-typed files with the the cleaned up files (generated by this tool
using the Sun's
It looks to me like the regex in the schema file does not quite match
the HTTP spec. First, the regex in the schema file does not allow
numbers (the HTTP spec does), and second it also allows for
non-english characters (the HTTP spec does not). The regex basically
allows Unicode letters only (see
Building trunk fails for me with:
c:\development\geronimo\modules\geronimo-jetty6\src\main\java\org\apache\geronimo\jetty6\cluster\ClusteredSessionManager.java:[142,12]
cannot find symbol
symbol : constructor Session(java.lang.String)
location: class
Builds fine now. Thanks!
On 1/5/07, Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 5, 2007, at 1:19 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Building trunk fails for me with:
c:\development\geronimo\modules\geronimo-jetty6\src\main\java\org
\apache\geronimo\jetty6\cluster\ClusteredSessionManager.java
Here's a quick Web Services support update (of things I'm aware of):
1) The StAX and JAXB support has been recently added to Geronimo. This
addresses both Axis2 and CXF deliverables (since both will use the
same implementations of these API).
2) Basic JAX-WS support for POJOs is also working
Hi,
I'm looking into integrating CXF with OpenEJB (OpenEJB3 specifically
as that's the version that supposed to be integrated in M2). I see
that OpenEJB2 has a bunch of code for web services support that's
based on Axis1. However, I do not see such code for OpenEJB3. So I'm
wondering what that
On 1/9/07, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 9, 2007, at 7:28 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jan 9, 2007, at 10:19 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking into integrating CXF with OpenEJB (OpenEJB3 specifically
as that's the version that supposed to be integrated in M2). I see
How hard is it to switch between the different assemblies once the TCK
testing environment is setup? If it is easy enough, maybe we should
first test all 8 assemblies and then concentrate on only those that
pass the most tests.
Jarek
On 1/9/07, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think
Some people already mentioned this on IRC:
Compiling 1 source file to c:\development\test\server\modules\geronimo-jetty6-bu
ilder\target\classes
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
I get the following error after the openejb update:
Deployer operation failed: org.apache.openejb.OpenEJBException: Cannot Load jar
C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\geronimo-deployer34093.tmpdir\jaxb-ejb-2.0-SN
APSHOT.jar. The number of beans deployed (0) does not match the number of beans
. The webservices
integration doesn't work yet.
-dain
On Jan 19, 2007, at 9:34 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
I get the following error after the openejb update:
Deployer operation failed: org.apache.openejb.OpenEJBException:
Cannot Load jar
C:\DOCUME~1\ADMINI~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\geronimo-deployer34093
David,
It's a test case in Geronimo source code. See
testsuite/webservices-testsuite/jaxb-tests/jaxb-ejb directory.
Jarek
On 1/19/07, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jarek, if you can send me the app I can take a look.
-David
On Jan 19, 2007, at 9:48 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Dain
Czesc Jacek,
The https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2762 contains a
simple test to show @Resource injection for env-entry entires in
your web.xml file. The current implementation right only only does a
simple JNDI lookup to inject the value. Which means only resources
explicitly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/server/trunk/testsuite/webservices-testsuite/jaxb-tests/jaxb-ejb/
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/19/07, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,
It's a test case in Geronimo source code. See
testsuite/webservices-testsuite/jaxb
Hi,
I have a question on resource visibly to classloaders. Here's an
example. I have a following JSP page packaged in .war file. The JSP
tries to load some descriptors packaged in the war file in two
different ways. The question is should the fist method work?
The JSP does:
, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well getClass().getClassLoader() might possibly not be the
applications classloader??? Do you get the same result if you
precompile the jsp?
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 25, 2007, at 12:31 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Hi,
I have a question on resource visibly
I'm seeing the same problem now.
Jarek
On 1/26/07, anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you please tell us the contents of org/apache/openejb/openejbd
directory in your .m2 repo?
Thanks
Anita
--- Don Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for a stable revision to
Building openejb3 locally fixes the problem.
Jarek
On 1/26/07, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm seeing the same problem now.
Jarek
On 1/26/07, anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you please tell us the contents of org/apache/openejb/openejbd
directory in your .m2
Dain,
This hack is causing problems:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.apache.xbean.naming.context.ContextFlyweight.listBindings(Context
Flyweight.java:92)
at org.apache.xbean.naming.context.ContextFederation.getFederatedBinding
s(ContextFederation.java:72)
at
Joe,
I just noticed that yesterday. There is a small bug in CXFBuilder (and
Axis2Builder) that causes the cxf/axis2 dependencies to be always
added to any application. I don't think that's a major issue. I will
be submitting a patch today or tomorrow that will resolve that issue
(among other
-incubating-20070126.211327-22
Cheers
Prasad
On 1/26/07, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What did you run? This worked great for me an Prasad.
Anyway, I changed the code to catch Exception instead of just
NamingExcetpion.
-dain
On Jan 26, 2007, at 9:26 AM, Jarek Gawor
Why is that needed here?
Jarek
On 1/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: dims
Date: Mon Jan 29 15:33:49 2007
New Revision: 501232
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=501232
Log:
oops! add missing repo
Modified:
Dims,
The following dependency needs to be added to configs/cxf/pom.xml:
dependency
groupIdorg.apache.geronimo.modules/groupId
artifactIdgeronimo-jaxws/artifactId
version${version}/version
/dependency
Jarek
On 1/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
Lin Sun,
When WebServicesBuilder.findWebServices() is called, the 3rd argument
(Map servletLocations) contains the mapping between the servlet-name
and its context location. For example, there would be a mapping of
'cxfPojoServlet' to '/war name/services' or something similar.
Jarek
On
Hi,
I have a question about the following entry in the
configs/jett6-deployer/src/plan/plan.xml:
hidden-classes
filterantlr./filter
filterorg.springframework./filter
/hidden-classes
Is that still needed/necessary?
Can you clarify what you mean exactly? We recently changed how the web
services NamingBuilders are called but they are still called.
Jarek
On 2/3/07, Lasantha Ranaweera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
All the web services related modules are disabled in the latest trunk
assemblies of both tomcat
Hi,
I'm trying to turn on some logging in the server. So I added a line to
the server-log4j.properties, e.g.:
log4j.logger.org.apache.geronimo.cxf=DEBUG
then I started the server with -Dlog4j.debug=true to ensure the right
properties file is being read and my logger settings are set:
log4j:
log4j.appender.FILE.threshold=DEBUG
-Donald
Jarek Gawor wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to turn on some logging in the server. So I added a line to
the server-log4j.properties, e.g.:
log4j.logger.org.apache.geronimo.cxf=DEBUG
then I started the server with -Dlog4j.debug=true to ensure the right
properties file
I think I'm pretty much in the same boat. Here are two cases I have:
1) In WebServiceContainer.findWebServices() (which is called when
ModueBuilder.createModule() is called) I need to discover all classes
in the module that are annotated with @WebService or
@WebServiceProvider annotation.
2)
David,
That sounds like a good plan to me. Better to have something running
then nothing at all.
Jarek
On 2/6/07, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 10, 2007, at 11:21 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 9, 2007, at 8:44 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
On 1/9/07, David Blevins [EMAIL
From within a JSP, I'm doing:
Context ctx = new InitialContext();
ctx = (Context) ctx.lookup(java:comp/env);
and I get:
Caused by: javax.naming.NamingException [Root exception is
java.lang.NullPointerException]
at
That was with Jetty :)
Jarek
On 2/8/07, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jarek,
Is this on tomcat? I'm seeing some different jndi lookup problems with
tomcat but not with jetty.
Joe
Jarek Gawor wrote:
From within a JSP, I'm doing:
Context ctx = new InitialContext
Prasad,
This is great!
Jarek
On 2/8/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/8/07, Lin Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks! I think it would be really good to have a blessed build every
day!:-)
I have set it up to run builds 4 times a day. They will be at
5 am, 11 am, 5 pm and 11
David,
Did you just disable support for Servlet-based WS? If so, why?
Jarek
On 2/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: dblevins
Date: Fri Feb 9 19:52:38 2007
New Revision: 505624
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=505624
Log:
Ported Axis1 integration
Added:
Sorry, my mistake. I thought you changed
jetty-deployer/tomcat-deployer plan.xml files.
Jarek
On 2/10/07, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 9, 2007, at 8:25 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
David,
Did you just disable support for Servlet-based WS? If so, why?
No. Are they not working
Dims,
I don't think that alone will work. I think we need to stop the entire
cxf-deployer/car or axis2-deployer/car modules to deregister several
gbeans. Basically what Lin Sun was saying which can either be done by
changing the config.xml file or through the console today. So I
believe the
Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2821 with a
patch that should fix this issue.
Jarek
On 2/11/07, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Moving to [EMAIL PROTECTED] from tck list as this is non tck related.
On Feb 11, 2007, at 10:26 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:
] wrote:
Jarek,
I've been testing the whole day long, it's working for me.
-- dims
On 2/11/07, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dims,
I don't think that alone will work. I think we need to stop the entire
cxf-deployer/car or axis2-deployer/car modules to deregister several
gbeans. Basically
I was talking to Rakesh about adding additional classloader view to
the Geronimo Console and we are wondering if people have any
comments/thoughts about it. The current view show the tree starting
with the system classloader and ends with child classloaders. Example:
A
- B
- F
- C
- F
In
Yes, that used to work. It used to work because of a bug in CXF that
recently got fixed. The sample needs to be updated (so that the Java
code matches the wsdl).
Jarek
On 2/12/07, Lin Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I found out that the simple jax-ws example we put on the wiki
Is anyone working on making the web.xml file optional?
Jarek
To keep going I disabled Axis2 from my local build for now. Attached
is a quick patch that worked for me.
Jarek
On 2/13/07, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying again, but just hit the following...
Missing:
--
1) org.apache.axis2:axis2-kernel:jar:20070213.160348-1
Try
I'm seeing a similar problem at runtime:
13:32:11,812 ERROR [Deployer] Deployment failed due to
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.apache.xbean.finder.ClassFinder.isAnnotationPre
sent(Ljava/lang/Class;)Z
at org.apache.openejb.config.DeploymentLoader.discoverModuleType(Deploym
After the version update I was able to deploy the ejb jar. Can someone
patch the root pom.xml?
Jarek
On 2/14/07, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm seeing a similar problem at runtime:
13:32:11,812 ERROR [Deployer] Deployment failed due to
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError
Hi,
I was wondering if somebody could review/commit the following patches
I submitted:
1) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2825
2) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2826
3) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2830
4)
Great. A few comments inline:
On 2/15/07, Lin Sun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
After making some changes to the sample[1], I am able to get it
(slightly different versions of it for CXF and Axis2) working with this
week's trunk.
Here are some observations:
1) I have to use the generated
No problem and thanks for committing these!
Jarek
On 2/15/07, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am on it! sorry for the delay.
-- dims
On 2/15/07, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if somebody could review/commit the following patches
I submitted:
1
Hi,
I'm having some dependency issues. Here's the deal:
My cxf-deployer/car has a dependency on cxf/car and
openejb-deployer/car (openejb-deployer/car also pulls in openejb/car).
In cxf-deployer plan.xml I deploy a EJBWebServiceGBean. That GBean
lives in cxf/jar and has a following reference:
Hi,
In the last few days something has changed in CXF that caused
invocations to stop working in Geronimo. I mean, the service got
invoked ok but the HTTP response from the service was empty. I tracked
relevant changes to the following classes:
Sorry, wrong list! :)
Jarek
On 2/16/07, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
In the last few days something has changed in CXF that caused
invocations to stop working in Geronimo. I mean, the service got
invoked ok but the HTTP response from the service was empty. I tracked
relevant
Looks like CXF folks changed their API... Attached is a quick patch to
let the Geronimo code compile. If somebody could commit this for me,
it would be great.
Thanks,
Jarek
On 19 Feb 2007 04:12:53 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Building with Maven version: 2.0.5
Revision:
Yes.
Jarek
On 2/19/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This just turns stuff off until it can be fixed?
--jason
On Feb 18, 2007, at 8:31 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Looks like CXF folks changed their API... Attached is a quick patch to
let the Geronimo code compile. If somebody could
Thanks!
Jarek
On 2/19/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Done, please verify it builds ;-)
--jason
On Feb 18, 2007, at 9:28 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Yes.
Jarek
On 2/19/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This just turns stuff off until it can be fixed?
--jason
On Feb
I have noticed a few issues with openejb and geronimo and I was
wondering what is the status of these problems or if I'm doing
something wrong. I think some of these might already be known issues:
1) Redeployment of the same EJB fails with:
Deployer operation failed:
Hi,
I would be very grateful if somebody could review/commit the following
patches before Wednesday:
1) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2849 (app client test for ws)
2) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2850 (initial ejb
support for ws)
Thanks,
Jarek
jencks
On Feb 20, 2007, at 3:01 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
I think this commit might have broken the app client. I'm pretty sure
I was able to run the WS tests after Dims' commit but before this
commit and everything was fine. But running the same tests after this
patch, the app client tests
Hi,
Looks like the src/test/java/org/apache/hello_control/types/* classes
in geronimo-axis2 module got checked into the svn but they are also
regenerated each time the module is built. So svn diff on the module
will always result in something like:
Index:
The property name change is included in the following patch:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2865
Jarek
On 2/21/07, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 2/21/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the .provider myself
--jason
-Original
have those paths expanded
and the nodes highlighted.
Best wishes,
Paul
On 2/12/07, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was talking to Rakesh about adding additional classloader view
to
the Geronimo Console and we are wondering if people have any
comments
Hi,
I got a question on how things supposed to work if there is no web.xml
supplied. For example, in case of web services, there are certain
rules on how the web.xml file should get updated if the web.xml is not
present. That is, the servlet-name and servlet-class gets set to the
bean class name
Looks like the latest CXF snapshot got corrupted somehow. I sent email
to CXF folks to republish but that will probably take a bit. In the
mean time I'm attaching a patch that will let you build Geronimo
without CXF.
When using the Jetty assembly you might need to start the server with:
Jason,
1) The code is broken because of a change of dependencies in the 3rd
party library (and not because of broken code in Geronimo)
2) I sent out an email about the JAXB issue earlier today. Hopefully,
that issue will be resolved within a day or so.
3) For now somebody could commit that
Attached.
Jarek
On 2/27/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I must have missed that in the ~400 emails I got today... where is
the patch?
--jason
On Feb 27, 2007, at 7:08 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Jason,
1) The code is broken because of a change of dependencies in the 3rd
party
David,
Here are two fairly simple things that we need to do get closer to the
spec compliance with EJB and JAX-WS support:
1) OpenEJB must recognize and inject @Resource WebServiceContext
resource. This is like the EJBContext object I think (not looked up in
JNDI and there is no DD XML for it).
(Resending, sorry for duplicates)
David,
Here are two fairly simple things that we need to do get closer to the
spec compliance with EJB and JAX-WS support:
1) OpenEJB must recognize and inject @Resource WebServiceContext
resource. This is like the EJBContext object I think (not looked up in
looking to release JAX-WS 2.0 support or 2.1? Any idea if
its possible to certify Geronimo with 2.1? Or does certification require 2.0?
I'm not sure what the status is of the JAX-WS 2.1 TCK either.
- Dan
(I CC'd [EMAIL PROTECTED] in, hope thats ok)
On 2/28/07, Jarek Gawor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I've noticed recently that the SystemDatabase/ directory and derby.log
files are being created in the current working directory (the
directory from which I start the server from using java -jar ..) and
not in the installation directory of Geronimo. I'm not sure if that's
new or just something
will
eventually find out something useful.
Are the 2.1 spec versions officially released?
Meanwhile we'd certainly appreciate it at Geronimo if you went back
to the 2.0 spec versions for now.
thanks
david jencks
On Mar 1, 2007, at 7:43 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Oh... I didn't even realize
Lin also found https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3387. I
guess it affects a small number of cases (.war file without web.xml
embedded in .ear file) but it's something it's supposed to work in
Java EE 5.
Jarek
On 8/8/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The plugin installer has
+1 (assuming TCK is all good).
Jarek
On 8/8/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have put together the release and its been a long journey to get here.
If you have comments please put them on the corresponding [DISCUSS]
thread.
[ ] +1 Release Geronimo 2.0
[ ] 0 No opinion
[ ]
The following test in geronimo-kernel module is now failing (in trunk only):
Tests run: 11, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.094
sec FAILURE!
testBackwardCompatibility(org.apache.geronimo.gbean.GBeanInfoTest) Time elapsed
: 0.032 sec ERROR!
java.io.InvalidClassException:
Matt,
A few comments:
1) I We should say Apache Axis2 instead of just Apache Axis.
2) I liked the original first paragraph because it announced Geronimo
as Java EE 5 server which is really the most important bit of this
release. Therefore, I think the press release should start with that
and
+1 for option 2.
Jarek
On 8/13/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Earlier today one of the Geronimo committers discovered a bug in the
command line deployer where a null user / password on the deployer
command line will allow a user to deploy modules to a 2.0 server.
This is
Matt,
We could at least release/publish the transaction and connector bits, right?
Jarek
On 8/13/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Earlier today one of the Geronimo committers discovered a bug in the
command line deployer where a null user / password on the deployer
command
I'm wondering what people think about exposing tools such as wsdl2java
or java2wsdl in Geronimo. Geronimo already contains and uses these
tools internally but they are not exposed as command line clients.
This could make developing web services on Geronimo a little bit
easier.
I see that such
I'm pretty sure the following change is causing this failure:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/server/branches/2.0/modules/geronimo-kernel/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/kernel/config/Configuration.java?r1=558791r2=565908
But there might be more to this problem. Yesterday I was trying to
Jarek Gawor wrote:
I'm pretty sure the following change is causing this failure:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/server/branches/2.0/modules/geronimo-kernel/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/kernel/config/Configuration.java?r1=558791r2=565908
But there might be more to this problem
The test should be fixed now (and it also works nicely on IBM JDK now too).
The GBeanBinding.addBinding() method only binds stuff into the JNDI
context on the first call. The way the test was setup, it was called
multiple times for one binding. Therefore, the order in which
addBinding() was
+1.
A bad plan (the service-ref specifies a wrong endpoint address) is
causing two jax-ws tests to fail in the webservices testsuite (it's my
fault for including a version number in the endpoint address - this
has been addressed in trunk and 2.0 branches).
This is definitely not a critical issue
Sachin,
Congrats on the marriage and good luck with your new job!
Jarek
On 8/17/07, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello community members...
I'd thought I'd shoot of a note to explain my limited involvement in
the project as of recent. As some have you may have known, I've
taken a
Can we setup automatic builds of trunk? I just discovered it doesn't build.
Jarek
Hernan,
The 'Javadoc' link on the main page still seems to point to some
outdated API. Also, the 'XML Schemas' link does not have the 2.0
schemas.
Jarek
On 8/21/07, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, the downloads page is updated as well as the News in the front page.
Cheers!
Hey folks,
I'm somewhat confused about the geronimo-boilerplate-jee5 assembly. I
always thought that the geronimo-boilerplate-jee5 assembly would
contain all the shared libraries necessary for java ee bits such as
openejb, cxf, axis2, axis, etc. And the geronimo-tomcat-jee5 and
Hernan,
See the first Windows Tip on
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/building-apache-geronimo.html
:)
Jarek
On 8/23/07, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how do we set the .m2 repo to different directory? I can't find the config
file to set this up.
Cheers!
Hernan
Vamsavardhana
I think some OpenEJB code in trunk is reconfiguring the log4j
settings. For example, when I start the server (with logging enabled)
first I see nicely formatted log messages (i.e. timestamp debug
level class msg) but after some OpenEJB code is loaded the log
message format changes to debug level
Kevan,
I'm out on vacation all next week but I was planning to take a look at
this issue right after I get back. My intention was to get it done for
the 2.0.2 release.
Jarek
j
On 8/24/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've run into multiple issues caused by the dependency of our cxf
Congrats Tim!
Jarek
On 9/6/07, Shiva Kumar H R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations Tim!
- Shiva
On 9/5/07, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please us in congratulating Tim McConnell as the newest member of the
Geronimo PMC. Tim has contributed a lot to the project in areas
Congrats Donald!
Jarek
On 9/6/07, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow ... we're on a roll!
Congratulations Donald!!
Joe
Hernan Cunico wrote:
Please join us in congratulating Donald Woods as the newest member of
the Geronimo PMC. Donald has contributed to Geronimo in many different
Hernan,
The http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-java-ee-50-report-card.html
page is linked from the main Geronimo web page. I think we should
either remove it, or update it accordingly.
Jarek
On 9/7/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 7, 2007, at 10:38 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
I was collecting the different schema files used by Geronimo to
publish them on a web site and I noticed one thing with the
plugins-1.2 xsd. First, it imports attributes-1.1.xsd
I think we have an acceptable solution for this whole CXF/Spring
issue. First, CXF will continue to be configured with Spring as
before. Second, all web applications will now get an automatic
hidden-classes filtering for Spring classes and resources. That
should enable applications to have their
On 9/11/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. While reviewing config poms I saw some suspicious dependencies.
Axis and Axis2 depend on openejb which subverts any attempt to run
axis web services on a minimal server. The openejb-deployer requires
openejb to be running which subverts
Kevan,
I have one remaining task to do for 2.0.2. I would like to update the
version of CXF to 2.0.1 (or 2.0.2 if it is released really soon). Just
need to verify first if it is all good from TCK standpoint.
Jarek
On 9/14/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I think it's time to
Ugh... I had a feeling that this filtering will cause problems for
someone. Anyway, in general I think moving the hidden-classes filter
to the CXF deployer is a better solution (to keep it all together and
assuming it has the same effect as when specified in the web container
deployer). But, in
I know that at least the 5am build runs with tests on. I would like to
change that so that each build always runs with all tests enabled.
Some of the tests in testsuite/ directory actaully start the server so
if they are successful we should at least know that the server starts
up ok and
Paul,
In the new admin console, do the web applications (that provide
portlets) need to share Spring version/configuration with the Pluto
config module? What if each web application had its own Spring jars?
Would that work?
Moving the Spring filters to cxf-deployer is better from the
modularity
On 9/17/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Moving the Spring filters to cxf-deployer is better from the
modularity point of view (and I'm all for it) but the end results will
be the same in this case. I think Kevan's idea might be the best
solution here.
The end results here
Yes, that's right. I updated the schema files to point to Java EE ones.
Jarek
On 9/17/07, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 2.0 page isn't quite right -- the preferred J2EE schemas on the
top right should name and point to the Java EE 5 ones, I should think.
Thanks,
Aaron
On
As we talked about making things more modular for 2.1, I'm planning to
split the CXF and Axis2 modules into smaller units. The main purpose
of the split is to separate the EJB bits from Servlet bits so that we
can create a minimal server with JAX-WS support but without installing
OpenEJB first.
On 9/17/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe for now we should remove the filtering from web deployers and
let each application configure the Spring filtering if necessary.
Agreed and the idea about using a configuration for spring could be
promising too.
Ok. I removed the
1 - 100 of 3070 matches
Mail list logo
