On 5/24/2010 10:09 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On May 19, 2010, at 8:15 AM, rickmcgu...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rickmcguire
Date: Wed May 19 12:15:04 2010
New Revision: 946147
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=946147view=rev
Log:
update LICENSE/NOTICE files for latest dependency
=1
This looks much cleaner than the 7.0.0.0 version.
Rick
On 5/24/2010 2:21 AM, Ivan wrote:
Please vote for Geronimo Customized Tomcat 7.0.0.1
a. Recently, Tomcat community has begun their vote for Tomcat 7 RC 3,
so current version should be a more stable one.
b. About the license issues
Jarek Gawor brought to my attention that the web services support in 3.0
has not yet gotten any testing or attention. While it builds, it is in
a state where it doesn't really work. Since the focus of the M1 release
is on the new Aries support and the Java EE 6 Web Profile, I think it
makes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick McGuire closed GERONIMO-5261.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix LICENSE and NOTICE files for the Geronimo bundles subprojects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick McGuire closed GERONIMO-5260.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Geronimo bundle members need to be released separately
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick McGuire closed GERONIMO-5133.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Geroinimo versions of the specs should pick up the additions made
On 5/20/2010 4:55 AM, Ivan wrote:
Hi,
I just noticed that Tomcat community is trying for their RC2, I
guess that the codes for Tomcat are more stable now. and it seems that
we still have some issues to handle for M1. I am thinking to release a
Tomcat 7.0.0.2, thoughts ?
--
Ivan
If you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick McGuire reassigned GERONIMO-5326:
--
Assignee: Rick McGuire
Geronimo javamail does not work on non-ASCII platforms
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick McGuire resolved GERONIMO-5326.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 946312. and 946314.
I believe I found all
NOTICE file looks good this time, rat and ianal checks all pass, and the
code builds fine.
+1
Rick
On 5/17/2010 11:51 PM, Ivan wrote:
Please vote for the geronimo axis2 and axiom-api bundle release, add
Notice and License files for axis2 and axiom-api
axis2-1.5 : For there is split-package
I'm doing some work on the 3.0-M1 release branch to get things switched
over to the M1 version number, and mvn install -Dstage=bootstrap is
having problems because the car-maven-plugin has a dependency on
geronimo-transformer. Things are not getting built in the correct order
so the build
(Regular issues)
Components: buildsystem
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Rick McGuire
Fix For: 3.0
The build step mvn install -Dstage=bootstrap is no longer working because the
car-maven-plugin has a dependency on the geronimo-transformer, which
The vote to release the new XBean version passes with 5 +1 votes and no
0 or -1 votes. Voting in favor were
Rick McGuire
Kevan Miller
Donald Woods
Hai Hong Xu (Ivan)
Guillaume Nodet
The artifacts will be promoted to the central repository this morning.
Rick
On 5/14/2010 10:36 AM, Rick
My +1
On 5/17/2010 9:30 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Please vote for the geronimo openejb 3.1.3.0 release
This is a version of openejb based on revision r942249. This is a
special release to be used on the Geronimo 3.0-M1 release and is being
released under the org.apache.geronimo.ext.openejb
need to be mentioned in the license:
container/openejb-jee/src/main/resources/META-INF/schema/xml.xsd
server/openejb-axis/src/main/resources/META-INF/schema/soap_encoding_1_1.xsd
My build is running now. Given the above, I'm going to be -1.
--kevan
On May 14, 2010, at 5:30 PM, Rick McGuire
Please vote for the geronimo openejb 3.1.3.0 release
This is a version of openejb based on revision r942249. This is a
special release to be used on the Geronimo 3.0-M1 release and is being
released under the org.apache.geronimo.ext.openejb groupid.
Differences from the first attempt:
The axis2 bundle has lost the information contained in the NOTICE files
of axis2-kernel, axis2-jaxws, axis2-metadata, and axis2-saaj. That
information needs to be merged and appended to the NOTICE file of the
generated bundle. See the jaxb-impl bundle for an example of how to do
this.
My
On 5/17/2010 2:32 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Rick,
Maybe we should wait until axis2, axiom, and openejb votes conclude
before creating the branch. Merging the version changes (or anything
else) is/will be a pain.
I'm not sure they're going to be that big of a pain, but there are quite
a few
Please vote for the geronimo xbean 3.7 release
The major changes to this release are:
- xbean-blueprint subproject to provide support for Aries blueprint component
assembly
- xbean-bundleutils subproject to provide useful common utilities for dealing
with OSGi bundles.
Staging repo is here:
haven't checked, but it's possible we
missed this in previous releases.
It was definitely that was in the previous releases toowhich still
doesn't make it acceptable for this release. I agree this is a fatal
problem.
Here's my -1.
--kevan
On May 14, 2010, at 7:07 AM, Rick McGuire
Canceled because of issues with the xbean-finder-shaded license files.
Rick
On 5/14/2010 7:07 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Please vote for the geronimo xbean 3.7 release
The major changes to this release are:
- xbean-blueprint subproject to provide support for Aries blueprint
component assembly
Please vote for the geronimo xbean 3.7 release
The major changes to this release are:
- xbean-blueprint subproject to provide support for Aries blueprint
component assembly
- xbean-bundleutils subproject to provide useful common utilities for
dealing with OSGi bundles.
Differences from the
Please vote for the geronimo openejb 3.1.3.0 release
This is a version of openejb based on revision r942249. This is a
special release to be used on the Geronimo 3.0-M1 release and is being
released under the org.apache.geronimo.ext.openejb groupid.
This is the working version of openejb
I'm getting the openejb snapshot that David Blevins created for the M1
release ready for a release vote, and I was wondering what version
number should be used for these jars. These will be released under the
org.apache.geronimo.openejb groupid and currently is building with a
version number
On 5/13/2010 1:11 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On May 13, 2010, at 9:55 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
I'm getting the openejb snapshot that David Blevins created for the M1 release
ready for a release vote, and I was wondering what version number should be
used for these jars
I'm planning on creating a branch for the Geronimo 3.0-M1 release
tomorrow once I've completed the release process for Xbean and OpenEJB
tomorrow. This will be the version that will be used to generate the
release candidate.
Rick
+1
On 5/7/2010 8:30 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Please vote for the geronimo transaction manager component consisting
of the transaction manager and connector framework 3.0.
The main changes in this release are:
- connector 1.6 support
- retry support in the transaction manager (not well tested
On 5/7/2010 8:41 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On May 4, 2010, at 9:58 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
2) Xbean. Has a dependency on the Aries code. Should be ready for a vote as
soon as the Aries
vote closes.
Created that copy of OpenEJB. It also depends on XBean. So add one more
I did a pass through all of the plugins that are currently disabled from
the build. That set currently consists of:
!--moduleaxis/module--
!--moduledebugviews/module--
!--moduleopenwebbeans/module--
!--moduleplancreator/module--
On 5/10/2010 6:35 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On May 10, 2010, at 3:24 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
On 5/7/2010 8:41 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On May 4, 2010, at 9:58 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
2) Xbean. Has a dependency on the Aries code. Should be ready for a vote as
soon
On 5/8/2010 3:15 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I'm going to look next at a bit of bean validation support. So far my plans
are just to have a naming builder to stuff validator/factory references into
jndi and an appropriate ref object. It looks like there are some requirements
to stuff this into
Source builds cleanly, rat and ianal tests pass, Geronimo builds and
works ok with this version in place.
+1
On 5/5/2010 7:31 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Please vote for the geronimo-jaspi 1.1 component.
The major changes to this release are:
- packaged as an osgi bundle
- fairly non-functional
source builds ok, rat and ianal tests pass, and Geronimo builds and
functions ok with the new versions.
+1
On 5/5/2010 2:51 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Please vote for the geronimo transaction manager component consisting of the
transaction manager and connector framework 3.0.
The main changes
We need to make a decision on how to handle getting a non-snapshot
version of openejb for the Geronimo M1 release. In the past, we've
handled this by having a local repository in the build that copied a
revision pinned version in the local maven repository to do the build.
This type of
On 5/5/2010 3:03 AM, Ivan wrote:
Hi,
I found that currently in xbean components, many log apis are used,
slf4j, commons-logging, and log4j. I would like to use slf4j api
everywhere. Also, I think that we could depend on slf4j-api directly,
as not all the components need to run in OSGI
Doing some last minute dependency checking on the components. I see
that the txmanager components have a parent pom of
geronimo-txmanager-parent 3.0-SNAPSHOT, but I can't seem to find this
version anywhere in the svn tree. The last version in tags is 2.1.4 and
there is nothing in trunk for
On 5/5/2010 6:45 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Doing some last minute dependency checking on the components. I see
that the txmanager components have a parent pom of
geronimo-txmanager-parent 3.0-SNAPSHOT, but I can't seem to find this
version anywhere in the svn tree. The last version in tags
On 5/5/2010 8:12 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
On 5/5/10 6:45 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Doing some last minute dependency checking on the components. I see
that the txmanager components have a parent pom of
geronimo-txmanager-parent 3.0-SNAPSHOT, but I can't seem to find this
version anywhere in the svn
On 5/5/2010 1:38 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Someone needs to make all the maven properties start with a lowercase letter so
they don't end up in the generated bundle manifest.
I'm not at all sure that the properties like PlanServerHostname are still used,
in which case they could be removed. If
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick McGuire reassigned GERONIMO-5286:
--
Assignee: Rick McGuire
Many irrelevant build properties end up in the manifest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick McGuire resolved GERONIMO-5286.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 941475.
Many irrelevant build properties end up
Everything built correctly and I don't see any obvious license or header
problems this time.
+1
On 5/4/2010 5:10 AM, Ivan wrote:
Please vote for Geronimo Customized Tomcat 7.0.0.0
Vote will be open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Below is a list of the snapshot jars that show up in our assemblies after a
build. We're not looking
in too bad of shape here. So, here are the missing pieces that still need to
be resolved:
1) Aries. Release vote attempt #4 was posted today. Hopefully this will get
through this time.
2)
Congrats Donald!
On 5/2/2010 8:59 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Way to go Donald! Congratulations.
Joe
On 5/2/10 9:28 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Wanted to let the Geronimo community know that Donald Woods is a new
member of the ASF. The ASF membership elected Donald in recognition
of his many
The vote to release these components has passed with 5 +1 votes and no 0
or -1 votes. Voting +1 were
Rick McGuire
Jarek Gawor
Donald Woods
Hai Hong Xu (Ivan)
Joe Bohn
The release artifacts will be promoted to central today.
Rick
On 4/28/2010 8:35 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
To support
The vote to release the Java EE schema xmlbean wrappers passes with 5 +1
votes and no -1 or 0 votes. Voting +1 were
Rick McGuire
Jarek Gawor
Donald Woods
Hai Hong Xu (Ivan)
Joe Bohn
The release artifacts will be promoted to central this afternoon.
Rick
On 4/27/2010 1:18 PM, Rick McGuire
In the 2.x releases, there is a geronimo-boilerplate config that
contains the information used to construct the legal files for the
Geronimo assemblies. This does not appear to exist in the 3.0 trunk,
which I think is probably going to be an issue with getting 3.0 ready
for an M1 release
On 4/29/2010 7:17 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
In the 2.x releases, there is a geronimo-boilerplate config that
contains the information used to construct the legal files for the
Geronimo assemblies. This does not appear to exist in the 3.0 trunk,
which I think is probably going to be an issue
My +1 too
On 4/28/2010 8:35 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
the newly created bundles components.
This components are versions of external Geronimo dependencies that
have been converted into OSGi jars.
This is a single vote for all
+1
On 4/23/2010 4:15 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
I've created a release candidate of a set of plugins that can be
used to upgrade an existing Geronimo 2.1.3, 2.1.4, 2.1.5 or
2.1.6-SNAPSHOT server from OpenJPA 1.x to the new OpenJPA 2.0.0 release,
so users can start experimenting with a JPA 2.0
-discovery-0.4_1
derby-all-10.5.3.0_1_1
dwr-3.0.M1_1
httpcore-4.0.1_1
jaxb-impl-2.2_1
jstl-1.2_1
scannotation-1.0.2_1
sxc-jaxb-0.7.2_1
sxc-runtime-0.7.2_1
wadi-aop-2.1.2_1
wadi-core-2.1.2_1
wadi-group-2.1.2_1
wadi-tribes-2.1.2_1
woden-impl-dom-1.0M8_1
woodstox-3.2.9_1
Rick
On 4/23/2010 2:45 PM, Rick
12:24 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
This is a re-vote for the release of the jaxb-impl and jstl bundles
required for Geronimo 3.0-M1 caused by a problem with the LICENSE and
NOTICE files. These have been removed from the group vote on the
bundles release and resubmitted for a vote.
The RAT and IANAL
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to the
newly created bundles components.
This components are versions of external Geronimo dependencies that have
been converted into OSGi jars.
This is a single vote for all of the converted dependencies required for
the Geronimo
+1
On 4/27/2010 1:18 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
release the 3 Java EE schema xmlbean wrapper jars. These are xmlbean
classes generated from the different J2EE 1.4, Java EE 5, and Java EE
6 schemas. These are used by different
Finally got a small break from pushing out component releases, so I'd
like to start tackling any work items that need to be performed before
we can release the server. Is there a checklist somewhere of items that
need to be updated before the server can be released? I suspect that
the server
+1
built ok and was able to build Geronimo with the new version.
On 4/28/2010 6:30 AM, Ivan wrote:
Please vote for Geronimo Customized Tomcat 7.0.0.0
Vote will be open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Staging repo:
for this is CDDL.
* jstl -- same question about dual licensing. Also, the jar contains both
LICENSE and LICENSE.txt. I assume LICENSE.txt already existed in the jar?
Yes, the LICENSE.txt file came from the original jar.
Rick
--kevan
On Apr 23, 2010, at 2:45 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
To support
On 4/27/2010 8:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:27 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
On 4/26/2010 10:32 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Nice stuff Rick. This obviously took some time to prepare the licensing
information properly. Thanks!
One minor comment -- I notice that some
On 4/27/2010 8:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:27 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
On 4/26/2010 10:32 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Nice stuff Rick. This obviously took some time to prepare the licensing
information properly. Thanks!
One minor comment -- I notice that some
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
release the 3 Java EE schema xmlbean wrapper jars. These are xmlbean
classes generated from the different J2EE 1.4, Java EE 5, and Java EE 6
schemas. These are used by different Geronimo components for parsing
the various
This is a re-vote for the release of the jaxb-impl bundle required for
Geronimo 3.0-M1 caused by a problem with the LICENSE and NOTICE files.
This has been removed from the group vote on the bundles release and
resumitted for a vote.
The RAT and IANAL plugins have been run against this. The
These artifacts have the same dual-license issue that the jaxb-impl
has. I'm cancelling this vote so this can be corrected.
Rick
On 4/27/2010 9:44 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
release the 3 Java EE schema xmlbean wrapper jars
On 4/27/2010 11:09 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Apr 27, 2010, at 9:08 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
On 4/27/2010 8:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Apr 27, 2010, at 6:27 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
On 4/26/2010 10:32 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Nice stuff Rick. This obviously
10:58 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
This is a re-vote for the release of the jaxb-impl bundle required for
Geronimo 3.0-M1 caused by a problem with the LICENSE and NOTICE
files. This has been removed from the group vote on the bundles
release and resumitted for a vote.
The RAT and IANAL plugins have
And my obligatory forgotten +1 too.
On 4/27/2010 12:06 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Apr 27, 2010, at 11:19 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
On 4/27/2010 11:09 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Apr 27, 2010, at 9:08 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
On 4/27/2010 8:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote
This is a re-vote for the release of the jaxb-impl and jstl bundles
required for Geronimo 3.0-M1 caused by a problem with the LICENSE and
NOTICE files. These have been removed from the group vote on the
bundles release and resubmitted for a vote.
The RAT and IANAL plugins have been run
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
release the 3 Java EE schema xmlbean wrapper jars. These are xmlbean
classes generated from the different J2EE 1.4, Java EE 5, and Java EE 6
schemas. These are used by different Geronimo components for parsing
the various
Forgot my +1 too.
On 4/25/2010 4:04 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Looks good. Thanks Rick! Here's my +1
--kevan
On Apr 22, 2010, at 8:07 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications
The 5.3.2 snapshot release still seems to be looking for the annotation
1.0 classes, which is breaking the trunk build.
Rick
On 4/26/2010 2:58 AM, djen...@apache.org wrote:
Author: djencks
Date: Mon Apr 26 06:58:38 2010
New Revision: 937940
URL:
The vote to release the new Geronimo Java EE 6 spec versions has passed
with 6 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. The new versions will be released
to central today.
Donald Woods
Kevan Miller
Jarek Gawor
Joe Bohn
David Jencks
Rick McGuire
Rick
On 4/22/2010 8:07 AM, Rick McGuire wrote
On 4/26/2010 8:09 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
The 5.3.2 snapshot release still seems to be looking for the
annotation 1.0 classes, which is breaking the trunk build.
This patch fixes up the activemq build so it will work with either the
1.0 or 1.1 versions of the annotations.
Rick
Rick
On 4
.
Rick
thanks
david jencks
On Apr 26, 2010, at 7:59 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
On 4/26/2010 8:09 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
The 5.3.2 snapshot release still seems to be looking for the annotation 1.0
classes, which is breaking the trunk build.
This patch fixes up the activemq build so
On 4/26/2010 1:30 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Apr 26, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
On 4/26/2010 12:32 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I merged the patch that made amq trunk work to the 5.3 branch and the result
worked for me w/geronimo. Did you try building amq from source before
Just wanted to pull the status of these items together so we know where
things stand and what's being worked on by who.
1) Get the specs released (up for vote now) -- Vote concluded today,
specs promoted to releases, and trunk updated to new version numbers.
2) Release the various Geronimo
of a problem. I suspect we need to just
disable that, since that early experimental version has serious OSGi
split-package issues. I don't believe the concurrent plugin will even
build at the moment.
Rick
Joe
On 4/22/10 2:17 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Ok, I've put together a set of items
+1
ran RAT and IANAL and built from source. RAT is giving a some failures,
but the failures are either missing copyrights in NOTICES.vm and
LEGAL.vm files or in the source files that are directly generated from
the idl files. I don't think either problem is serious enough to
require a
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to the
newly created bundles components.
This components are versions of external Geronimo dependencies that have
been converted into OSGi jars.
This is a single vote for all of the converted dependencies required for
the Geronimo
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a
single vote
for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs have
been updated
with common support for OSGi interactions. The RAT and
I've been working on moving the org.apache.geronimo.bundles components
out of the server tree into its own top-level project so these bundles
can be released separately. The working copy can be found here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/bundles/trunk
One issue is how the legal
how it IS listed. I
corrected the error of the last cycle to make this 1.1 not 1.2.
Rick
-Donald
On 4/22/10 8:07 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a
single vote
Ok, I've put together a set of items that need to be completed for the
M1 release. Here are the items I'm aware of:
Ok, the following things need to be done:
1) Get the specs released (up for vote now)
2) Release the various Geronimo subprojects the server is dependent upon
- Geronimo
check my results?
--kevan
On Apr 16, 2010, at 10:43 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a single
vote
for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition
:
Missing:
--
1) org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-osgi-locator:jar:1.0
Unless I'm able to build from source successfully, afraid I'm going to be -1 on
these releases. Can you or somebody else double check my results?
--kevan
On Apr 16, 2010, at 10:43 AM, Rick McGuire wrote
Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: osgi
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Rick McGuire
Assignee: Rick McGuire
Fix For: 3.0
Currently, there's a subproject under the framework directory that creates
bundle versions of external dependencies
: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: osgi
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: Rick McGuire
Assignee: Rick McGuire
Fix For: 3.0
The individual members of the bundles project may have additional LICENSE and
NOTICE
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick McGuire updated GERONIMO-5261:
---
Summary: Fix LICENSE and NOTICE files for the Geronimo bundles subprojects.
(was: Fix
the previous vote.
Rick
-Donald
On 4/16/10 10:43 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a
single vote
for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs
My +1
On 4/16/2010 10:43 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a
single vote
for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs
have been updated
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a single
vote
for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs have been
updated
with common support for OSGi interactions. The RAT and
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a single
vote
for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs have been
updated
with common support for OSGi interactions. The RAT and
On 4/15/2010 1:58 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 10:29 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.0.7
Hi Rick,
This wasn't quite the spec version that I was expecting...
Our last javamail spec release was: geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.6
So, I was expecting
Because of concerns about how the version numbers got changed in the
process of using a consistent numbering convention, this vote has been
cancelled and new release candidates will be created.
Rick
On 4/15/2010 10:29 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release
The wiki is still missing in action. Unfortunately, I don't have the
details of the Geronimo release process committed to memory. Does
anybody have a copy of that particular page they can make available so I
can start preparing the specs for a release vote?
Rick
On 4/14/2010 6:31 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
The wiki is still missing in action. Unfortunately, I don't have the
details of the Geronimo release process committed to memory. Does
anybody have a copy of that particular page they can make available so
I can start preparing the specs
I just did an experiment to see if the ActiveMQ 5.3.1 release could be
used for the 3.0 M1 release. The results were not good. The build
failed fairly quickly because the 5.3.1 bundles are importing the
annotation packages using [1.0,1.1), which makes them incompatible with
the 1.1 version
If we wish to release a milestone soon, we need to start getting the
different subcomponents released fairly quickly. Here are the things I
believe we need to have release votes on:
1) New spec components. These need to be done first, and should
probably done as a single vote rather than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12856255#action_12856255
]
Rick McGuire commented on GERONIMO-5095:
If you look in the PDF version
On 4/9/2010 12:12 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Rick,
I've noticed two issues with saaj annotation specs.
1) The etc/config.properties exposes javax.xml.soap with version 1.3
through the system bundle. That's the same package version as
geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec which means the geronimo saaj spec is
There's one more bit that needs to be resolved before the Geronimo spec
packages can be released, and that's the issue of package export
versions in the different specs. There are a couple of issues involved:
1) Explicitly specified version numbers in the enterprise specification
2) A
On 4/9/2010 9:48 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Thanks for the update, Rick.
Have you made the OpenJPA community aware of this issue?
No, not yet. I was looking for a little more feedback here to make sure
we had some consensus on what we'd like to ask for before I did that.
And I've found
401 - 500 of 1858 matches
Mail list logo
