When I am building G 2.0.1, I am noticing a
geronimo-txmanager-parent-2.0.1.jar. But I do not see a
geronimo-txmanager-parent-2.0.1 tag under
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/tags. Should
there be one?
Vamsi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12523007
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2964:
---
Paul, Donald,
I don't think it is necessary
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-2964:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-2964.patch
Aman, can you check if GERONIMO-2964.patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-2964:
--
Attachment: g2964.war
Verified that GERONIMO-2964.patch solves the problem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-3254:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.x)
2.1
Changed fix version
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-2964:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-2964-combined.patch
GERONIMO-2964-combined.patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12522835
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-3401:
---
Joe, I guess you are stopping/uninstalling
We should have more TCK runs in winter it looks like :o) Win-win.
Vamsi
On 8/26/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If someone is interested in running the TCK using Lassa, curare,
nique or wilbur let me know. I've shut them down since they weren't
being used. My electric bill
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-2964:
--
Fix Version/s: 2.1
Though there was a patch waiting on the JIRA, it fell
Able to download from remote M2 repos. Thanks Matt.
Vamsi
On 8/25/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I put the 2.0.1 artifacts into the repo at Apache this morning and
they should be propagating if they haven't already. I was able to
build 2.0.1 after deleting my geronimo group in
One other question... Is it necessary that the plugin (if it tends to be
different for Tomcat and Jetty or in another context, say Axis2 and CXF)
should be made available for all distributions? I guess we are establishing
the procedure now and so wanted to cover as many situations as possible.
not been so lucky. I have tried branches/2.0.0 also.
I
have
tried deleting org.codehaus.mojo.jspc and ant from .m2 repo
without
any
success (The trunk builds fine).
Thanks
Anita
--- Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not exactly building
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how do we set the .m2 repo to different directory? I can't find the
config file to set this up.
Cheers!
Hernan
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Problem occurs when there is a space in the M2REPO directory, in this
case C:\Documents And Settings\ Work
).toURI() instead of
URI.create(uri).
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
*From:* Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*To:* dev@geronimo.apache.org
*Sent:* Thursday, August 23, 2007 12:15 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Fwd: Re: building geronimo-2.0-rc1]
Problem occurs when
we don't have an out-of-the-box Geronimo box for the download page?
On 8/22/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know how to get an updated box for Geronimo that says
2.0.1? Since its the first thing people see on that page seems like
it would make more sense for the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12521386
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-3386:
---
Should the fix be merged into branches\2.0 too
On 8/21/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
A few questions.
[snip]
ant elder wrote:
I'm not very keen at all on doing that. Couldn't we actually put
the code in
our svn
I was wondering if there is a procedure to be followed to put new code in
geronimo\plugins? I intend to move the geronimo-tuscany integration thing
Manu and myself are working on out of sandbox and put under
geronimo\plugins. Also, is there a release cycle for geronimo plugins?
Thanks and
+1
vamsi
On 8/20/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Since 1.1.1 is the stable version of Geronimo I'd like to propose
that we remove the older versions from the download site. If there
are no objections I'll do this tomorrow when we announce the 2.0.1
release.
On 8/20/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that we've gotten through the issues that stalled 2.0 we have a
successful vote and I've updated the Press Release as well with
version information.
This should be pretty good as it was the mostly approved version
before the security
+1 to Sachin :o
Vamsi
On 8/17/07, Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello community members...
I'd thought I'd shoot of a note to explain my limited involvement in
the project as of recent. As some have you may have known, I've
taken a new job thats taken has taken away from the
+1
Vamsi
On 8/16/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The updated binaries are available for review. I have incorporated
the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.
Thanks gents !
I also incorporated a few additional fixes. Please note the change
log for the
The recent problems detected in LoginModule implementation are also
applicable to code in branches\1.2, branches\1.1 etc. Though it has not
resulted in a security issue in other releases as serious as the one Donald
has unearthed in 2.0 release, the code is not as per what JAAS recommends.
Should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12520199
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-3390:
---
The Ignore Dates has nothing to do
Have you tried to access the Admin Console before the server fully started?
Are you getting this error consistently?
Vamsi
On 8/16/07, Ashish Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!!
I am getting null pointer exception with geronimo-tomcat6-jee5-2.0.1-bin.
Server starts fine
Booting Geronimo
the
credentials that is username and password I get the error.
On 8/16/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you tried to access the Admin Console before the server fully
started? Are you getting this error consistently?
Vamsi
On 8/16/07, Ashish Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-3390:
--
Fix Version/s: 2.1
Assignee: Vamsavardhana Reddy
Server Logs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-3390.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Completed: At revision: 566694 in branches\2.0 and trunk
Will not press for inclusion of this in 2.0.1, but do include rev 566694
(fix for GERONIMO-3390 Server Logs portlet - Web Access Log Viewer is
broken when date fields are empty) in case a new RC needs to be spun for
some reason. Never thought the fix would be one line :o) or else would have
got
How? :o)
Vamsi
PS: Was there a problem in the first place?
On 8/16/07, Ashish Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Problem is resolved thanks Vamsi
regards
Ashish
On 8/16/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strange. I am not seeing this error. I would suggest you re
Documents .. guess long path was the issue..
On 8/16/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How? :o)
Vamsi
PS: Was there a problem in the first place?
On 8/16/07, Ashish Jain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Problem is resolved thanks Vamsi
regards
Ashish
I have tried a plugin installation on Fedora Core 6 with G 2.0-SNAPSHOT (the
one from branches\2.0, before branches\2.0.0 was created). While the
deployer window was still showing downloading of dependencies, the server
window showed startup exceptions due to missing dependencies!! Once the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-836.
jmx port should be explicit in the plans and set from the installer
Please consider the following two revisions:
o Rev 565355 : PluginInstallerGBean fails to find available artifacts when
the repository URL does not end with /.
o Rev 563782 : Plugin installer downloads a different version of dependency
than the one specified
Vamsi
On 8/15/07, Matt Hogstrom
Verified the fix to check for possible regression of GERONIMO-2266 and
GERONIMO-2267. No regression.
Vamsi
On 8/14/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 13, 2007, at 9:33 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
I'd also make the following changes.
Comments? The Test updates are optional,
Verified that the fixes address the security bug Donald has identified. No
regression is observed in case of GERONIMO-2266 and GERONIMO-2267. I
suggest others verify any scenarios they can think of for possible
regression.
Vamsi
On 8/14/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've now
On 8/11/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We put together a demo [1] on Tuscany/Geronimo integration for the
LinuxWorld 2007. You are welcome to play with it and give us feedback.
Please follow the instructions at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12519865
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-411:
--
GERONIMO-1880 is not exactly the same as this one
:o)
Vamsi
On 8/13/07, Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My belated but very enthusiastic +1.
Joe
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I have put together the release and its been a long journey to get here.
If you have comments please put them on the corresponding [DISCUSS]
thread.
[ ] +1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12519460
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-3254:
---
Committed in Revision: 565397 in trunk.
Admin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy resolved GERONIMO-3396.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Vamsavardhana Reddy
Thanks Shiva
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy resolved GERONIMO-3394.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Shiva.
Committed in Revision: 565397 in trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy resolved GERONIMO-3395.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Vamsavardhana Reddy
Thanks Shiva
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy resolved GERONIMO-3398.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Vamsavardhana Reddy
Thanks Shiva
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy resolved GERONIMO-3397.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Vamsavardhana Reddy
Thanks Shiva
At this point, we will want to get a release out fast and address only those
issues (like the security bug Donald has found and hopefully only this) that
are blocker.
+1 to option 2, create branches\2.0.1 from tags\2.0.0.
Vamsi
On 8/14/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Earlier
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-3404:
--
Attachment: GERONIMO-3404.patch
The problem is due to login() method
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-3404:
--
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Using a Null Username allows access
David,
Though there are a few other minor fixes (that may not come in the way of
TCK, for e.g. R565355) that I would have wanted in 2.0.1, I felt that this
may not be the right time to bring up those as we may not any additional
delays in getting 2.0.1 out, perhaps we may have to think about a
On 8/14/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I've fixed GERONIMO-3404 and GERONIMO-3406 in trunk, rev
565599. It might be a good idea for this to get a review before we
port it to branches/2.0 and possibly branches/2.0.x.
We may also want to make sure GERONIMO-2266,
+1
Vamsi
On 8/8/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have put together the release and its been a long journey to get here.
If you have comments please put them on the corresponding [DISCUSS]
thread.
[ ] +1 Release Geronimo 2.0
[ ] 0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release Geronimo
I am not exactly building from geronimo-2.0-src.zip, but from
branches\2.0.0. If that still counts as if I built from src zip... I have
not run into this problem. I have tried after removing
jspc-compiler-tomcat6-2.0-alpha-1.jar from my M2REPO so that it downloads a
fresh.
--vamsi
On 8/9/07,
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: Tomcat
Affects Versions: 2.0
Environment: G 2.0 Tomcat
Reporter: Vamsavardhana Reddy
Assignee: Vamsavardhana Reddy
Fix For: 2.0.x, 2.1
The CA Helper application
:
Hi, I thought the artifact_aliases.properties is designed for this
purpose (if it supports the jar module as well as the car module), but
that may just be my wishful thinking. ;)
Lin
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
I have encountered some unexpected things while trying to install a
plug
metadata has caused the plugin installer to
resolve the snapshot. This is basically the approach I had suggested
in our IRC chat.
Best wishes,
Paul
On Aug 8, 2007, at 3:13 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
I have encountered some unexpected things while trying to install a
plug-in when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12518380
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-3351:
---
Fixed in rev 563782 in branches\2.0 and 563785
Would have been better if the separate distribution files were hosted to
download and evaluate instead of 360MB single tar.gz. I am getting a
download speed of 5K/s ETA 24hrs :o(
Vamsi
On 8/8/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have put together the release and its been a long
Finally we have 2.0 RC :o) Congratulations Matt!!
Vamsi
On 8/8/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For your discussing pleasure.
: public (Regular issues)
Components: console
Affects Versions: 2.0
Environment: G 2.0 Tomcat
Reporter: Vamsavardhana Reddy
Fix For: 2.0.x
Web Access Log Viewer is broken. When Ignore Dates is checked, everything
except Max Results is ignored
I have encountered some unexpected things while trying to install a plug-in
when SNAPSHOT versions are specified as dependencies. Here are some
examples:
1. A query for foo/bar/1.0-SNAPSHOT/jar of an artifact from a remote
repository returned result foo/bar/1.0-beta1/jar. The plug-in installer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-3351:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.1
2.0.x
Fix Version/s
I see the following xml-fragment in pom.xml in branches\2.0.0
!-- This will go away when we move to tomcat6 --
dependency
groupIdxml-apis/groupId
artifactIdxml-apis/artifactId
version1.3.03/version
/dependency
is not used by tomcat6-builder any more. Yes this can
be removed.
Thanks
Anita
--- Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see the following xml-fragment in pom.xml in branches\2.0.0
!-- This will go away when we move to tomcat6 --
dependency
2.0 release will be based on branches/2.0.0 (and I guess, will be tagged
tags\2.0 later on). branches\2.0 is now 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT.
--vamsi
On 8/6/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I missed some discussion or something... but what is the
difference between these 2 branches:
there.
it was decided to just move on to m5 due to problems with the m4
branch. The branch should probably be removed.
--jason
On May 3, 2007, at 2:35 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
This may not be a big or important (??) thing... G 2.0-M4 is still
under branches.
https
there.
it was decided to just move on to m5 due to problems with the m4
branch. The branch should probably be removed.
--jason
On May 3, 2007, at 2:35 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
This may not be a big or important (??) thing... G 2.0-M4 is still
under branches.
https://svn.apache.org
Yes, it does :o)
Vamsi
On 8/6/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yay, doesn't cleaning up feel good, all nice and shinny :-P
--jason
On Aug 6, 2007, at 3:15 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Removed in Revision: 563088
--vamsi
On 5/8/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I guess the startup screen need not list all possible URLs to access each
application. One per app should be good enough for the user to quick
start. Easy to use is our first guiding principle. We will not want a
user to struggle finding out the URL of welcome app!!!
Vamsi
On 8/6/07, Kevan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517894
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-3340:
---
Do we need the directory related code in branches
As part of GERONIMO-3340 Take apache directory plugin out of the main
build, put it in plugins., the directory server code has been disabled from
the main build in rev 558213 (prior to creating branches\2.0), by commenting
out the entries in pom.xml, but the code has been left in the trunk as it
on all
branches is linked in svn.
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 6, 2007, at 5:46 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
As part of GERONIMO-3340 Take apache directory plugin out of the main
build, put it in plugins., the directory server code has been disabled from
the main build in rev 558213 (prior
On 8/6/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's where things stand at the moment
Specs
We have a vote on 3 spec releases that have been held up by a CDDL
licensing issue. After reviewing the issues, I don't think these
specs have a problem. They are not built with CDDL licensed
This is crude!! First I ran the build on modules\geronimo-j2ee-builder with
IBMJDK1.5.0 with tests turned off to be able to build the module. Then I
ran the build (not a clean build) with SunJDK1.5.0 with tests on and the
tests passed!!
--vamsi
On 8/6/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED
branches is linked in svn.
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 6, 2007, at 5:46 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
As part of GERONIMO-3340 Take apache directory plugin out of the main
build, put it in plugins., the directory server code has been disabled from
the main build in rev 558213 (prior to creating
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy updated GERONIMO-3351:
--
Fix Version/s: 2.0
Assignee: Vamsavardhana Reddy
Plugin installer
On 7/30/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/30/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 28, 2007, at 1:41 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
On 7/28/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 26, 2007, at 1:21 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote
On 7/30/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 28, 2007, at 1:41 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
On 7/28/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 26, 2007, at 1:21 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
How about adding a Tech Preview portlet group in Admin Console in G
On 7/30/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 28, 2007, at 1:41 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
On 7/28/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 26, 2007, at 1:21 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
How about adding a Tech Preview portlet group in Admin Console in G
+1 to move.
Vamsi
On 7/27/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should keys move up to a peer to the STATUS file too? Seems these
are project global, not specific to the server bits...
--jason
On 7/28/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 26, 2007, at 1:21 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
How about adding a Tech Preview portlet group in Admin Console in G
2.0where we can include the portlets (for
e.g., the Create Plan portlet Shiva is working on. See
https
Hi,
We have made some progress. See the details in the wiki page
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Tuscany+Geronimo+Integrationunder
Current status. Code is in Geronimo Sandbox.
Thanks and regards,
Vamsi
On 7/7/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I created
with this we can also highlight that their feedback will
help improve the portlet, promote it out of Tech Preview to become one of
the regular portlets.
Vamsi
Lin
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
How about adding a Tech Preview portlet group in Admin Console in G
2.0 where we can include the portlets
Hi,
I am trying to install a plugin which has a dependency on commonj/sdo-
api-r2.1/1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/jar. During the stage at which the
depedency jar are downloaded, I see the following:
Searching for commonj/sdo-api-r2.1/1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/jar at
with an error if it cannot be downloaded from any listed
repo
-Donald
Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
The repo contains commonj/sdo-api-r2.1/1.0-incubating-beta1/jar. This
is the version that should be specified in the plugin not SNAPSHOT.
Thanks
Anita
--- Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL
How about adding a Tech Preview portlet group in Admin Console in G
2.0where we can include the portlets (for
e.g., the Create Plan portlet Shiva is working on. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3254) for which user feedback
will play a great role in improving those further.
: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: deployment
Affects Versions: 2.0
Environment: G 2.0 Tomcat (should be applicable to G 2.0 Jetty as well)
Reporter: Vamsavardhana Reddy
Plugin installer downloads
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3334?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12514757
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-3334:
---
The protocol parameter for Tomcat Connectors
+1
Vamsi
On 7/24/07, Anita Kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Thanks
Anita
--- Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really think the ability to use these 2 connectors
is
very important for the 2.0 release and I would like to put these in.
If
there are no objections, I
No objection.
Vamsi
On 7/22/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I noticed all the keys (except portOffset) in config-
substitions.properties start with Plan which seems redundant
obvious and confusing.
Anyone object if I remove this prefix?
e.g. instead of
PlanServerHostname=0.0.0.0
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: console
Affects Versions: 2.0-M7
Reporter: Vamsavardhana Reddy
Assignee: Vamsavardhana Reddy
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 2.0-M7
Import CA reply throws
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Completed: At revision: 557540 in trunk.
Import CA Reply
+1
Vamsi
On 7/16/07, Rick McGuire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's what I get for cutting and pasting a previous vote as my starting
point :-)
Ok, we're voting on the following:
1) Release 1.1 of the javamail 1.4 spec API. The artifact in question
is geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.1. The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy reassigned GERONIMO-3318:
-
Assignee: Vamsavardhana Reddy
LocalAttributeManager unable to save
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-3318.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Second thoughts... instead of adding classLoader
: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: core
Affects Versions: 2.0-M7
Reporter: Vamsavardhana Reddy
Fix For: 2.0-M7
While editing a SecurityRealm through SecurityRealmPortlet, changes made to
ControlFlag
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: ActiveMQ
Affects Versions: 2.0-M7
Reporter: Vamsavardhana Reddy
Fix For: 2.0-M7
When there is more than one MBeanServer in the JVM, there is no control on the
MBeanServer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy closed GERONIMO-3320.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Completed: At revision: 556056 in trunk.
ActiveMQ MBeans
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy reassigned GERONIMO-3320:
-
Assignee: Vamsavardhana Reddy
ActiveMQ MBeans should get registered
When I do an offline build, I am getting the following build error. If I do
an online build, the build is successful, but, geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-
1.2-SNAPSHOT.jar is not downloaded to m2repo. Any ideas how to fix this?
[INFO]
Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: console, security
Affects Versions: 2.0-M7
Reporter: Vamsavardhana Reddy
Assignee: Vamsavardhana Reddy
Fix For: 2.0-M7
Security Realms portlet is broken. I guess the problem is introduced by recent
601 - 700 of 1644 matches
Mail list logo
