Hi,
I noticed that the following Axis Geronimo
module build issue has been around since Aug 18 and I still had the problem
over the weekend :
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1517
It sounds like this issue is specific
to Geronimo's build processing and not Axis itself. I
Hi,
I have been trying to search the dev
list archives (both subjects and the body) and have found the search isn't
picking up any messages from 2004.
Does anyone know who maintains the archives?
If so, could they please forward this message to the appropriate
person.
Hi, I'm a newbie to the project and
have been reading the instructions in the BUILDING.txt file (taken from
CVS) and have some questions:
The following is an extract of the text
in the BUILDING.txt file:
01 Welcome to Geronimo
02 ===
03
04 To build me please install Maven
from
Following the instructions at http://wiki.apache.org/geronimo/Building
(item 8 - Testing Build), To run geronimo under the debugger, I issued
the maven debug:server command in the in the root of
the Geronimo source tree and got the following error from maven:
Hi, I'm a newbie to the project and
have been reading the instructions in the BUILDING.txt file (taken from
CVS) and have some questions:
The following is an extract of the text in the BUILDING.txt file:
01 Welcome to Geronimo
02 ===
03
04 To build me please install Maven
Hi,
I am trying to get a better understanding
of database support in Geronimo (and its components) and have a number
of questions:
* The page http://openejb.codehaus.org/about.html
indicates that OpenEJB provides EJB1.1 compatibility, but on the page http://openejb.codehaus.org/cvs.html
it
Jacek,
FYI..
I got two Wiki update emails for the changes you recently made (to the
Deployment and GBeans pages), because I configured email notifications for
all pages in my Wiki profile.
John
Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/17/2004 06:17:37 AM:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
It
Jacek,
I tried sending an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] regarding the dev
archive search not working but haven't got a response, so I raised an
infrastructure JIRA issue via:
http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10410
Not sure how often the [EMAIL PROTECTED] is checked or
FYI, this problem is being tracked by the JIRA issue raised on the 10th
Sept 04:
http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-291
Regards,
John
Martin Kastner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
21/09/2004 06:52 AM
Please respond to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Specs Link not
Hi,
I am trying to get a feel for how EJB/JNDI clustering will be implemented
in Geronimo and when it might be implemented.
I remember reading somewhere in the mail archives that the clustering
module in Geronimo has been abandoned and that ActiveCluster will be used.
Is it envisaged that
It worked for me... but..
A bit off topic, as my problems don't have anything to do with Dain's
changes, but I have some questions on the build processing.
I tried the following (without cleaning my repository but with an empty
geronimo directory):
maven m:co
maven m:build
I
Jules Gosnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/06/2004 08:21:31 PM:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to get a feel for how EJB/JNDI clustering will be
implemented
in Geronimo and when it might be implemented.
I remember reading somewhere in the mail archives that the
David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 15/10/2004 04:11:29 AM:
I'd agree about the app client except that it can only run on the same
machine as the server at the moment. If this is sufficient, app client
is a much better solution.
david jencks
Is there a JIRA issue documenting the
Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 18/10/2004 01:10:40 AM:
On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 10:54, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Who has access to ibiblio for Geronimo?
I thought jars were synced there from the Apache server and any
committer could write to that.
Hi,
I'm was in the process of setting up a maven-proxy (
http://maven-proxy.codehaus.org/ ) on my machine to speed up my builds
(especially when searching for the same snapshot multiple times, or when
ibiblio isn't responding) and ran into some problems building because I
didn't have all the
MaxPermGen option wasn't recognised. I assume you meant:
SET MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m
http://java.sun.com/docs/hotspot/VMOptions.html
John
Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
19/10/2004 09:58 AM
Please respond to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Did the following on my Windows 2000 box:
maven m:fresh-checkout
maven m:update
maven -p dependencies.xml (error also happens for maven
-Dmaven.test.skip=true m:rebuild-all )
Does anyone else have this problem?
Thanks,
John
D:\Projects\J2EE\geronimomaven m:update
Does anyone know how I can configure Maven so that I can tell where these
files reported with the ? status are (what project / directory path)?
I have tried setting maven.scm.cvs.quiet=false in my build.properties file
but that gave me heaps of output, but didn't give me any further directory
If someone has time at ApacheCon (I am unable to attend), could they
please discuss the mailing list archive search problem with an
infrastructure person? This problem makes it difficult for new developers
to Geronimo as they can't search for topics in the mailing list archives.
In September
I did a maven m:update (now at Geronimo revision 71524) and did a maven
m:rebuild and got the following error.
Is anyone else having this problem? Seems to be related to recent changes
to ActiveMQ:
http://cvs.activemq.codehaus.org/changelog/activemq/?cs=MAIN:mgaffney:20041115221102
Thanks,
It looks like it may be related to Alan's recent change..
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]msgNo=5663
Seems that org.tranql.connector.jdbc.AbstractXADataSourceMCF.java hasn't
been changed to have a setExceptionSorterClass method. Currently it has:
public String
I also have the test failing. On the topic of resources being temporarily
unavailable..
Looked at the stack trace for the failed test and saw that
org.apache.geronimo.remoting.transport.TransportLoader is doing the bind
that failed.
Do you think TransportLoader (implements GBeanLifecycle)
I tried deploying a JMS resource plan and got an error. The amount of
error output produced seems excessive. It looks like the plan was output
to the terminal three times in the error information.
Is it necessary to output so much information, including a stack trace? I
would have expected
Aaron,
Was anything decided on this topic? I didn't see a JIRA issue raised.
Thanks,
John
Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 18/10/2004 07:31:09
AM:
All,
I suggest we add the Geronimo version number to our schema file
names and namespaces. For example, a Geronimo Jetty header
Derby's DRDA (Distributed Relational Database Architecture) Network Server
by default only listens for connections on the loopback address (which is
a good default) and does not have authentication turned on.
Therefore on a multiuser O/S this level of security seems inadequate as
any user on
Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 31/01/2005 10:33:58 AM:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Derby's DRDA (Distributed Relational Database Architecture) Network
Server
by default only listens for connections on the loopback address (which
is
a good default) and does not have
The derby-connector RAR at:
geronimo\openejb\modules\assembly\target\openejb-2.0-SNAPSHOT\repository\geronimo\rars\geronimo-derby-connector-1.0-SNAPSHOT.rar
is not in Geronimo's repository directory (
geronimo\modules\assembly\target\geronimo-1.0-SNAPSHOT\repository )
Shouldn't the
some related questions...
Currently the XML plans are not placed in the
geronimo-assembly-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar, they are placed in
geronimo\modules\assembly\target\plan, which would only be available to
those who build from the source code.
Q1. Should we be relocating the plans so they are
Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/02/2005 06:36:39
AM:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
A DeploymentManager running disconnected from its J2EE
product can only configure modules but not perform administrative
operations.
It might not have access to any product
Something very minor I noticed..
I'd like to change the format of the end of the following message, as it
sounded a bit weird to me:
18:53:26,449 INFO [Daemon] GBean
geronimo.server:J2EEApplication=null,J2EEModule=blah,J2EEServer=geronimo,j2eeType=GBean,name=blahblah
is not running in
For a while now I have been seeing these messages at startup:
18:53:26,433 INFO [Daemon] Alleged GBean
JMImplementation:type=MBeanServerInterceptorConfigurator is not a GBean
18:53:26,433 INFO [Daemon] Alleged GBean
JMImplementation:interceptor=contextclassloader is not a GBean
18:53:26,433
I understand that this may not be important now, but so that others new to
the project (or the average Joe user) don't ask the same question,
wouldn't it make sense to record this as a JIRA issue, so it is flagged as
known and will be dealt with at a future date. Sound reasonable?
Thanks,
I am working on a patch for switching system-datasource plan to the derby
xa connector as well as moving the timer gbeans to the system datasource
plan. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-568
I am having a problem where the JDBCStoreThreadPooledNonTransactionalTimer
GBean is being
If I start Geronimo under the Java Security Manager with everything
enabled in the policy file I get a number of exceptions when starting
Geronimo.
For example, the policy file I used contained:
grant {
permission java.security.AllPermission;
};
I started it used the following JVM
Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 14/02/2005 02:35:03 AM:
It should work so raise an issue.
Not sure if this is related but I have been fixing a couple of issues
with MX4J's MBeanPermission impl recently - can you tell me are you
using it or the one from JDK1.5?
--
Jeremy
John Sisson (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 22/02/2005
10:03:51 AM:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-586?page=comments#action_59546
]
John Sisson commented on GERONIMO-586:
--
The GeronimoPolicy class has two constructors, one
Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 28/02/2005 09:13:59 PM:
Hi,
Has anyone seen this? It's the result of maven m:update m:rebuild.
10:55:34,543 FATAL [EjbRequestHandler] Invocation result object is not
serializable: org.apache.derby.impl.jdbc.EmbedSQLException
FYI.. I created this JIRA issue on OpenEJB's JIRA:
Reduce size and number of JARs needed for an OpenEJB standalone client
--
Key: OPENEJB-19
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/OPENEJB-19
Project: OpenEJB
toby cabot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/04/2005 01:12:42 AM:
Jeremy,
I agree with the first few bullets.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 07:40:13AM -0800, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
* verification that the src bundle actually builds and results in the
same binary as we are distibuting
Is a src
David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/04/2005 04:31:33 AM:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 10:12:42AM -0500, toby cabot wrote:
Jeremy,
I agree with the first few bullets.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 07:40:13AM -0800, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
* verification that the src bundle actually
Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/04/2005 02:17:48 PM:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
No, but I worry about just bundling random whatever from outside the
project with our releases. It would help to use the svn revision on
the
jar, but we should really make it clear that it's
Geronimo project.
Thank you for your participation so far in the project, and we all are
excited to have you as a committer.
Please let us know if you wish to accept this offer.
If you accept, we need the following :
0) your preferred username (sissonj?, jsisson?) for
your apache account and email
A cleanup of
http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/geronimo-spec/jars/ ?
For example, is geronimo-spec-ejb-1.0-M1.jar really the EJB 1.0 spec or is
it before our versioning scheme was sorted out. If it really is 1.0 then
how does one easily find the source for it?
What is the retention
Hi Jeremy,
I am getting 46 of these types of errors when performing an online build:
Attempting to download geronimo-xmlbeans-plugin-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar.
Error retrieving artifact from
[http://www.apache.org/~jboynes/geronimo/plugins/geronimo-xmlbeans-plugin-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar]:
java.io.
David Jencks,
Could you please change your maven.repo.remote for the timer module to
point to http://people.apache.org/~djencks . While you are at it... It
might also be worth changing the commented out repo values in
geronimo\project.properties in case someone decides to uncomment one in
Is the SystemDatasource only intended for the internal use of Geronimo and
associated components (e.g. Geronimo's timertasks table, ActiveMQ's
tables ) and not intended for direct use by J2EE applications? I am
guessing some reasons for this could be:
* safety - we don't want J2EE apps
Should the information regarding incubation be removed from the file?
John
This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential,
proprietary or non-public information. This information is intended
solely for the designated recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission
error has
I am thinking (1).
Some apps would require the web services to be functional from an end user
point of view, but other apps may have multiple methods of access, web
services being one of them and may be able to operate with partial
functionality, but even in this case, it would most likely be
Tom McQueeney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 19/04/2005 02:45:25 PM:
Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 4/18/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the SystemDatasource only intended for the internal use of Geronimo
and
associated components (e.g. Geronimo's timertasks table, ActiveMQ's
Hi Oliver,
Maybe you are having a different problem?
Can you try running maven with the -e option so that exceptions are
printed and send your error messages and stack trace to dev@geronimo.apache.org
so everyone can comment.
See http://maven.apache.org/reference/command-line.html
for maven
Hi Jeff,
Great work!
In your the example SSL configuration
in geronimo\modules\assembly\src\plan\j2ee-server-tomcat-plan.xml , the
connector attributes minProcessor and maxProcessor have been deprecated
(according to the Tomcat doco). AFAICS, from reading the Tomcat mailing
list the maxThreads,
A couple of comments on the Tomcat wiki
to get your opinion, rather than me rushing in and changing your great
work...
* It might be safer (for newbies) to
have the example not specify configids as arguments when geronimo is started.
The reason being they may have deployed other configurations
AFAIK, the org/apache/geronimo/SystemDatabase
configuration is only started due to it being listed in geronimo/var/config/config.list
I'm not sure why it is not in the config
store. Anyone else have any ideas?
See the notes I added (and the linked
pages) for the
Done.
I added some questions to the end of
the Wiki page (I haven't had a chance to investigate them) if you know
the answers, please update the Wiki page.
Thanks,
John
This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential, proprietary
or non-public information. This information is
Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/06/2005
12:37:37 PM:
The jar is here:
http://cvs.apache.org/repository/cglib/jars/cglib-nodep-
HEAD-06-06-05.jar
This is a bit crazy. The jar is in the repository in the right
directory, with the right permissions. You can tell because
you
The following are my thoughts regarding requirements
for running/configuring geronimo on a headless server in a production environment..
Whatever solution we come up with for changing the
configuration settings (e.g. port numbers) it needs to be 'usable' in a
headless environment. By that I mean
Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 21/06/2005 12:59:54 AM:
When you talk about a headless server... Is it
acceptable to have
a GUI tool that you run remotely via X-over-ssh, or does the server
have
no X install such that even that wouldn't work?
There are enterprise platforms (in the
Can anyone think of any reasons why
the DefaultDatasource (default-database-plan.xml) is still needed?
John
Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on
12/11/2004 05:20:50 PM:
The DefaultDB is older and predates Derby's arrival at the ASF. Services
that needed a database backend were using it.
Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 14/06/2005 10:25:14 AM:
I'd add (in no particular order, and not necessarily all for 1.0):
snip
- Remote deployment and management (that is, developer on a
different
machine than server and not FTPing stuff back and forth)
I would like to see
Is there a reason why the IzPack installer
jar is called geronimo-installar.jar ( I have checked that this is the
actual file name produced) instead of geronimo-installer.jar ?
Thanks,
John
This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential, proprietary
or non-public information.
I have tried building on two different
windows XP PCs and I am getting the same build problem. On both systems
a java process was left running when the build failed.
Any ideas what changes might be causing
it?. I'll continue investigating further tomorrow.
I am at svn ver 191744.
Tried:
maven
FYI,
I have raised Maven JIRA issue http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVEN-1634
for the problem I ran into attempting to build geronimo with Maven 1.1
beta 1 where I get a
MavenException: Unknown error reading project
due to the following parser exception in the file
I think the information on the building page is mostly related to issues
whilst building. I don't think it should be moved to a single FAQ as I'm
sure there will be FAQs on lots of different topics (other than building)
and a single FAQ would get out of hand.
Maybe we can restructure the
Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 27/06/2005 03:28:28 PM:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, Jeff Genender wrote:
I was talking with Bruce about making the Jetty/Tomcat choice
a simple
comment and uncomment task and we came up with a possible idea
andwanted to
run this by people.
Can the
Aarons So I'm working on...
mail prompted me to get this discussion going..
In December 2004 I did done some work
on XDoclet 1.2.2 support for Geronimo EJBs but did not get around to contributing
it. Currently it supports the generation of the openejb-jar.xml file
for session and message-driven
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17/06/2005 10:23:50
AM:
Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17/06/2005 05:05:26
AM:
On Jun 15, 2005, at 10:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dain, FYI, I tried changing my build to use a manually downloaded
cglib-nodep-2.1.1 but the build
After a quick look.. Geronimo's Daemon
class is still calling ToolsJarHack.install().
Jasper2 (the JSP handling component)
which is part of Tomcat as of version 5.5.0 bundles the eclipse JDT to
allow tomcat to run on a JRE, according to
To get the ball rolling on startup scripts
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-693
, what do people think about basing the startup scripts (as much as possible)
on tomcat's catalina.bat catalina.sh http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/bin/
(since they
Jacek,
I still get the error, now only shown twice in build output in svn ver
209054 . I don't get the classnotfoundexception that GERONIMO-673 had.
20:39:37,703 INFO [TSSBean] org/openejb/POA - Unlinked container
openejb.server:EJBModule=org/openejb/scenario001,J2EEApplication=n
toby cabot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/07/2005 12:59:14 AM:
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 11:22:59PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what do people think
about basing the startup scripts (as much as possible) on tomcat's
catalina.bat catalina.sh
Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/07/2005 10:22:36 AM:
David Blevins wrote:
Anything I missed?
SNAPSHOT elimination so the build is reproducible.
+1 on SNAPSHOT elimination if possible.
John
David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/07/2005 12:54:29 PM:
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 06:48:21PM -0700, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
toby cabot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/07/2005 12:59:14 AM:
I like the idea of using a well-known baseline for the Geronimo
Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/07/2005 06:39:32 PM:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should this be done prior to M4, as it is only going to impact more
people
the later we leave it?
Why not? Report an JIRA issue, assign it to you and voila - it's all
yours. I'm sure you'll
Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/07/2005 07:42:42 AM:
Aaron Mulder wrote:
I like the idea of generating DDL automatically. I don't much
like the idea of applying it automatically, though if we generate it,
we
could easily provide a tool or command to apply the generated
I was just thinking about the issues of external project dependencies in
general.. Should there be a process for evaluating the introduction of new
'critical' dependencies in Geronimo.
I think we should at least ensure that a 'critical' external project meets
a minimum criteria, for example:
Go to http://geronimo.apache.org/mailing.html and use the Unsubscribe link
for the Developer Mailing List.
John
Jeff Kittle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
06/07/2005 09:31 AM
Please respond to
dev@geronimo.apache.org
To
dev@geronimo.apache.org
cc
Subject
remove me from mailing list
please remove
I agree that in the case of cglib it is unrealistic, since AFAIK none of
their committers are involved in the Geronimo project and as you said it
is a stable project.
IMHO it would be realistic for the TranQL and GBean.org projects as the
developers on those projects have been involved in the
Jeff,
Should the Tomcat instructions in http://wiki.apache.org/geronimo/Tomcat
also discuss modifying the j2ee-remote-classloading-deployer-plan.xml
file?
Thanks,
John
This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential,
proprietary or non-public information. This information
Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/07/2005 01:24:31 PM:
John,
Yes...it should. Actually that wiki page will need to change after
Aaron's unified web builder.
Hmm, maybe not as simple as a doc update. Looking further it appears that
the HTTPClassLoaderServer class is using Jetty
Gianny DAMOUR (JIRA) dev@geronimo.apache.org wrote on 26/03/2005
05:57:21 PM:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-502?page=history ]
Gianny DAMOUR closed GERONIMO-502:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version: 1.0-M4
Hi Jens, thanks
I think this issue would impact a Tomcat only build for M4. Agree?
John
Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/07/2005 03:01:00 PM:
I looked at this...it would be great to adapt this with interfaces or
similar so we can reuse as much of the same code as possible...
John Sisson (JIRA)
Resending this question as it was hidden in thread 'Re: Startup Scripts
discussion ( GERONIMO-693 )'
Should we be invoking the deploy tool in startup scripts with the
following (taken from GERONIMO-502)?
java -Djava.security.manager
-Djava.security.policy=var/security/deployer.policy -jar
Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/07/2005 01:59:38
PM:
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, David Blevins wrote:
I was going for a pick one response. As in:
1) Separate builds (one jetty build and one tomcat build)
2) One build (both jetty and tomcat in the same build) with jetty
as
David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/07/2005 02:20:22 AM:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 11:07:13AM -0400, Aaron Mulder wrote:
10:51:28,745 INFO [Daemon] Server startup completed
10:51:28,745 INFO [MyMonitor] 3s to start org/apache/geronimo/System
10:51:28,745 INFO [MyMonitor] 5s to
Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/07/2005 02:38:28 AM:
I would like to propose we release the stuff in specs as a separate
module that can be used by M4 and future releases.
We know these modules are compliant and signature correct so there
should be no need for any
Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote on 11/07/2005 12:02:55 PM:
On Jul 10, 2005, at 4:42 AM, mos wrote:
Just some thoughts:
Shouldn't well known and essential bugs be fixed before doing
the
branch?
This could prevent duplicated work.
For example:
I was a little surprised to see that we haven't resolved the SNAPSHOT
issue after so many people said it was something they wanted resolved in
M4 (see responses in thread Re: [PROPOSAL] Next milestone release (M4?).
Can't we resolve the SNAPSHOTs issue by modifying the branch before
releasing
I am working on the startup scripts for Geronimo and was wondering whether
people can see a requirement now or in the future where users would want
to be able to specify their own classpath when executing the startup
script (e.g. in the CLASSPATH env var) and have that appended to the
server's
Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/07/2005 09:46:03 PM:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't we resolve the SNAPSHOTs issue by modifying the branch before
releasing and at least using dated jar files if we can't move to a
formal
release of a dependency?
How could we use the
Is this statement correct.. The var directory intended for holding data
specific to a particular Geronimo instance and not intended to be shared
by multiple instances of geronimo?
If I wanted to run two geronimo instances, sharing the same installation
directory (e.g. so geronimo\lib and
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/07/2005 08:46:53 AM:
On Jul 11, 2005, at 3:24 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote, On 7/11/2005 5:39 AM:
On Jul 11, 2005, at 7:46 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't we resolve the
Alan D. Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/07/2005 10:34:19 AM:
I think that we should have a single simple process. All code
donations go into
/geronimo/incubator/donationx/*
The contributors would get restricted committer access to their
project; granting committer access
I was thinking a good way to get a start on removal of SNAPSHOTs is to
raise a JIRA issue for each SNAPSHOT we depend upon so each can be
individually tracked/discussed and worked on. The etc/project.properties
file could then be updated with a comment for each SNAPSHOT containing the
JIRA
Should this be removed since there is more work to be done on the M4
branch?
John
Apache Wiki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/07/2005 08:43:17 AM:
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Geronimo
Wiki for change notification.
The following page has been
+1 for moving to xmlbeans v2 in HEAD and M4
John
This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential,
proprietary or non-public information. This information is intended
solely for the designated recipient(s). If an addressing or transmission
error has misdirected this e-mail,
Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 13/07/2005 06:01:25 AM:
+1 to accept both the console and trifork code. Let Geir worry about
paperwork. (Ask for a software grant from both companies such that we
can place the code in our SVN.)
+1
I feel we should be focusing on getting the
David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 13/07/2005 09:38:36 AM:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 07:17:44PM -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
It's a judgement call i guess. i have not been on the calls. If you
guys feel that it can support its own eco-system. then thats fine.
I don't know yet,
Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 13/07/2005 12:13:56
PM:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
a) Why can't we create M4 so the source distro actually compiles?
isn't that the point?
b) Can we get rid of the snapshots to allow a) ?
Until we get rid of the
I vote for it to be applied to M4 because one of the first things a user
will see if they are running with a JRE is the message:
WARN [ToolsJarHack] Could not all find java compiler: lib\tools.jar file
not found in ..
I found this confusing as there have been mails and JIRA issues elsewhere
.
Attempting to download geronimo-j2ee-builder-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar.
Attempting to download geronimo-kernel-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar.
Attempting to download commons-jelly-tags-velocity-SNAPSHOT.jar.
BUILD FAILED
File.. C:\Documents and
Settings\sissonj\.maven\cache\maven-multiproject-plugin-1.3.1\plugin.jelly
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
