I'm trying to investigate some core dumps in mod_security and currently
face this
(gdb) bt
#0 0xf6efc232 in create_tx_context (r=0x1eac8ed0) at mod_security2.c:325
#1 0xf6efc606 in hook_error_log (file=0x80a51bd http_filters.c,
line=493, level=3, status=104, s=0x18144178, r=0x1eac8ed0, mp=0x0,
On 24 May 2013, at 10:38 AM, Thomas Eckert thomas.r.w.eck...@gmail.com wrote:
Why would the per_dir_config be NULL here ? I don't think that should ever be
encountered during the request's lifetime, right ?
I had this recently, and a completely clean rebuild sorted it out.
Regards,
Graham
--
How did you investigate into this ? I'll assume with rebuild you mean you
rebuilt apache2 from source and reinstalled it. What made you rebuild it in
this scenario ? Also, why do you think rebuilding solved it ? I'm being so
specific about investigation options since rebuilding and reinstalling it
On 24 May 2013, at 11:03 AM, Thomas Eckert thomas.r.w.eck...@gmail.com wrote:
How did you investigate into this ? I'll assume with rebuild you mean you
rebuilt apache2 from source and reinstalled it. What made you rebuild it in
this scenario ?
Yes, in my case the module that was returning
On 24 May 2013, at 04:14, Eric Covener wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:12 PM, kalyan sita kalyansit...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I just came to know that sha2.c is no longer used from Jan Kaluža. Can
anyone tell me the list of files that are not used in apache source code.
If we had a
There are a few things I'd like to see in 2.4.5, which would
be significant for the 2.4.x release:
o The mod_lua stuff
o the Websocket Proxy module (wstunnel)
o Performance-related patches (Event mod_ssl, cache, etc)
Any news on this?
Greetz
Am Samstag, 18. Mai 2013 schrieb Jim Jagielski :
Please don't submit what could be controversial reverts
over a weekend.
On May 17, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.orgjavascript:;
wrote:
Hi all,
I will revert the changes done with:
On 24 May 2013, at 2:44 PM, Mario Brandt jbl...@gmail.com wrote:
Any news on this?
Not yet, there is however a big push to get 2.4.5 out the door, which is where
the focus is lying at the moment.
Regards,
Graham
--
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Maybe the real question is where exactly do we stand with
Windows right now...
We haven't had (complimentary) binary builds for Windows in
quite awhile and, afaict, there are really no people focusing
on Windows compatibility anymore.
For me, I wouldn't want to stunt httpd development for every
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
I will revert the changes done with:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?**view=revisionrevision=1332643http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1332643
after 72 hours if nobody is going to fix the stuff
On May 24, 2013, at 9:08 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Lots of us are employees of or otherwise manage to siphon money from these
companies. Make a pitch... (And some of us are happy to freelance ;) )
I'll be honest: I don't even know to to *build* for Windows,
at least with
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
There are a few things I'd like to see in 2.4.5, which would
be significant for the 2.4.x release:
o The mod_lua stuff
o the Websocket Proxy module (wstunnel)
Could you provide some notes for testing wstunnel in a
On Fri, 24 May 2013 09:26:34 -0400
Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On May 24, 2013, at 9:08 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Lots of us are employees of or otherwise manage to siphon money
from these companies. Make a pitch... (And some of us are happy
to freelance ;)
On Fri, 24 May 2013 08:52:05 -0400
Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Maybe the real question is where exactly do we stand with
Windows right now...
We haven't had (complimentary) binary builds for Windows in
quite awhile and, afaict, there are really no people focusing
on Windows
Hi,
On 24.05.2013 14:57, Jeff Trawick wrote:
NPN is pretty important,
granted.
I promise to post a patch (or just commit if it is as trivial an issue
as it sounds) in the next week to fix the hard link between core and
ssl. Maybe I'll mess with the AP-SSL hook issue too.
cool!
How close
On 24.05.2013 14:40, Jim Jagielski wrote:
There are a few things I'd like to see in 2.4.5, which would
be significant for the 2.4.x release:
o The mod_lua stuff
ok, after spending a bunch of hours during last weeks with testing
mod_lua mainly on Windows I've finally removed my blocking vote
Hi Jim,
On 24.05.2013 14:52, Jim Jagielski wrote:
For me, I wouldn't want to stunt httpd development for every
other platform we care about simply because it breaks
Windows. But it's not just my decision, 'natch.
well, for me its no reason to just accept every code as long as it
compiles on
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 8:13 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
That fortunately is documented, with some pretty good notes in
the wiki as well that aught to percolate into the docs. That
said, documenting every Microsoft-version-quirk seems out of
scope for a general purpose
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 8:23 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Another question is where exactly do we stand with OS/X right now?
Apple HFS+ is still not supported, there exists a forced lower-case
canonicalization hack authored by Apple, but AFAICT still no progress
on
I dont know who has access / maintains the httpd buildbot, but I would
like to have it build with maintainer mode; this could be useful to
avoid that code we dont want slips in, f.e. var declarations after
statements ...
Gün.
On 24.05.2013 21:37, Ben Reser wrote:
The build system should be able to compile with the major tool chains,
nobody expects to know how to work around weird autoconf, make, gcc,
etc quirks on Linux. I don't say this to be dismissive of anyones
contributions but just to point out that producing
On Fri, 24 May 2013 21:42:58 +0200
Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
I dont know who has access / maintains the httpd buildbot, but I
would like to have it build with maintainer mode; this could be
useful to avoid that code we dont want slips in, f.e. var
declarations after statements
On Fri, 24 May 2013 21:02:04 +0200
Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
also given that currently only Daniel and I (and Gregg with some
testing) care about mod_lua I would like that we make an exception
for this module so that we can backport any further modifications and
fixes directly
On Fri, 24 May 2013 12:43:23 -0700
Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 8:23 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Also wondering where the OS/X download lives? It will build on any
OS/X box with a deployed toolchain, but I imagine many OS/X users
don't
On Fri, 24 May 2013 21:53:50 +0200
Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
On 24.05.2013 21:37, Ben Reser wrote:
The build system should be able to compile with the major tool
chains, nobody expects to know how to work around weird autoconf,
make, gcc, etc quirks on Linux. I don't say this
On Wed, 22 May 2013 14:20:03 -0400
Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I would be nice, imo, to start thinking about a 2.4.5
release Real Soon Now. We have lots of stuff added and
fixed in 2.4.5-dev and even more fun stuff in STATUS.
I'll RM.
What is your thought on RSN? Sometime
On 24 May 2013, at 2:40 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
There are a few things I'd like to see in 2.4.5, which would
be significant for the 2.4.x release:
o The mod_lua stuff
o the Websocket Proxy module (wstunnel)
o Performance-related patches (Event mod_ssl, cache, etc)
On 24.05.2013 22:14, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
There are several others of us, but large patch sets are difficult
to incorporate in our day-to-day build trees. What about a sandbox
of all of the proposed deltas, either just the modules/lua/ branch
or the entire tree if that isn't realistic.
On 05/24/2013 09:02 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
On 24.05.2013 14:40, Jim Jagielski wrote:
There are a few things I'd like to see in 2.4.5, which would
be significant for the 2.4.x release:
o The mod_lua stuff
ok, after spending a bunch of hours during last weeks with testing
mod_lua mainly
Hi Daniel,
On 24.05.2013 23:45, Daniel Gruno wrote:
I can only say +1 from me, we need consistency here :)
great!
That's fine by me, I'm not married to 'sleep' (although I do like a good
nap)
hehe, ok; I look into it soon.
Optional: I really would like to also have DBM support in addition
Hi,
Two questions
First, when apache gracefully reloads, it does not reload the modules?
is there an option to have it fully reloads them? or, is an option
planned?
Case: We use mod cband to control clients speed and limits, but if we
alter their configuration to increase the speed, reload does
Hi Daniel,
On 25.05.2013 02:06, Guenter Knauf wrote:
On 24.05.2013 23:45, Daniel Gruno wrote:
That's fine by me, I'm not married to 'sleep' (although I do like a good
nap)
hehe, ok; I look into it soon.
done.
Found another small docu bug:
r:unescape(string) -- Unescapes an URL-escaped
On 5/24/2013 12:53 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
yeah ...; and from what I see our project files are already broken
even when not converted and used directly with MSVC6, f.e. when doing
a release build a bunch of files land in the debug folder, and finally
at linking stage it breaks ...
On 5/24/2013 2:03 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
ATM I think this is not needed - from what I tested during past weeks
the current trunk code is at least as good / bad as what is already in
2.4.x branch - so copying over trunk to 2.4.x seems an improvement to
me due to various bug fixes beside the
34 matches
Mail list logo
