[VOTE] Release httpd 2.5.0-alpha

2017-11-07 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Hi, all;    Please find the proposed 2.5.0-alpha release tarballs and signatures at the following location. This release candidate was tagged from trunk as of r1814469: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I'd like to call a vote to release this alpha candidate. Please do note - this

Re: We have soon 5 SVN repo's

2017-11-07 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 11/7/2017 8:30 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > If you are thinking of n.n.n-alphan format, how is that going to be mapped > within ap_release.h? Version numbers are cheap, so cycling n.n.n-alpha > to n.n.n+1-alpha hasn't proven to be an issue. +1 Will do that. In context of conversation

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.29 as GA

2017-11-07 Thread Jan Ehrhardt
Steffen in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 19 Oct 2017 23:15:32 +0200): >I said before: In Apache.dsw is now project xml removed, it is not >building out of the box with current released apr-util. With coming >apr-util 1.6.1 it should be possible to build. > >With the expat/xml changes in

Re: We have soon 5 SVN repo's

2017-11-07 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > This is open for discussion. My opinion: For Alpha, I think it makes sense > to tag from trunk rather than branching first. That is, delay the branching > as long as possible so 2.6 looks as close to trunk for as long

Re: We have soon 5 SVN repo's

2017-11-07 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
(sorry for top post) This is open for discussion. My opinion: For Alpha, I think it makes sense to tag from trunk rather than branching first. That is, delay the branching as long as possible so 2.6 looks as close to trunk for as long as possible. This keeps the APIs in sync as well as avoids

Re: We have soon 5 SVN repo's

2017-11-07 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi Steffen, Am 07.11.2017 um 10:10 schrieb Steffen: Jim wrote below: /What, exactly, are the expected differences between trunk and 2.5.0-alpha?/ I could not find the answer in this (long) thread ? as far as I understand Daniel, he will tag current trunk as 2.5.0-alpha or more likely

Re: We have soon 5 SVN repo's

2017-11-07 Thread Steffen
Jim wrote below: What, exactly, are the expected differences between trunk and 2.5.0-alpha? I could not find the answer in this (long) thread ? Steffen On Sunday 05/11/2017 at 14:31, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Nov 4, 2017, at 6:03 AM, Steffen wrote: Soon

Re: We have soon 5 SVN repo's

2017-11-07 Thread Rainer Jung
Although that list is almost 5 years old, people interested for some major differences between trunk and 2.4.x might have a look at: https://home.apache.org/~rjung/patches/possible-backports-httpd-trunk-2_4.txt especially at items 1)-7). Regards, Rainer