Re: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port.

2007-09-25 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 09/24/2007 10:55 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On 9/24/07, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. I would use strcasecmp instead of strcmp to avoid case issues in the config. sure; FWIW, some other format string comparisons are not case insignificant, but those can be checked for in

Re: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port.

2007-09-24 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 09/23/2007 10:49 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On 9/18/07, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Adam Hasselbalch Hansen Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. September 2007 12:25 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port. I

Re: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port.

2007-09-24 Thread Jeff Trawick
On 9/24/07, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 09/23/2007 10:49 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On 9/18/07, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Adam Hasselbalch Hansen Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. September 2007 12:25 An:

Re: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port.

2007-09-24 Thread Jeff Trawick
On 9/24/07, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/24/07, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 09/23/2007 10:49 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On 9/18/07, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Adam Hasselbalch Hansen

Re: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port.

2007-09-24 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 09/24/2007 02:04 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On 9/24/07, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 09/23/2007 10:49 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On 9/18/07, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Adam Hasselbalch Hansen Gesendet: Dienstag, 18.

Re: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port.

2007-09-24 Thread Jeff Trawick
On 9/24/07, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 09/24/2007 02:04 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On 9/24/07, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 09/23/2007 10:49 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On 9/18/07, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Ursprüngliche

Re: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port.

2007-09-23 Thread Jeff Trawick
On 9/18/07, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Adam Hasselbalch Hansen Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. September 2007 12:25 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port. I have created a patch for httpd 2.2.6,

Re: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port.

2007-09-20 Thread Magnus Bodin
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 02:04:32PM +0200, Adam Hasselbalch Hansen wrote: § 5. A provider of electronic communication nets or services for end users must register the following information about an internet session's initiating and terminating package: 1. Originating Internet Protocol

Re: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port.

2007-09-20 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Magnus Bodin wrote: A standalone sniffing box should be the best solution to this, I guess. That does NOT store the content. Ideally, until you note that if this machine is the SSL endpoint it's the only one with any privilage to put 2+2 together. Both a good and bad thing depending on what

Re: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port.

2007-09-20 Thread Oden Eriksson
tisdagen den 18 september 2007 skrev Adam Hasselbalch Hansen: I have created a patch for httpd 2.2.6, giving the additional LogFormat directive %R, which logs the port of the host making the request. This is due to new legislation in Denmark, requiring ISPs and hosting companies to log the

Re: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port.

2007-09-20 Thread Brian Rectanus
On 9/19/07, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Adam Hasselbalch Hansen Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. September 2007 11:13 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Re: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port. Plüm wrote: 1. Please provide

Re: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port.

2007-09-19 Thread Adam Hasselbalch Hansen
Plüm wrote: 1. Please provide a patch against trunk. mod_config_logger.c hasn't changed in trunk, so the patch will work fine. 2. Please also add a patch for the documentation. Done. 3. I am not too happy with using %R, but to be honest I have no better proposal :-). Maybe other

Re: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port.

2007-09-19 Thread Adam Hasselbalch Hansen
Nick Kew wrote: Looks more like legislation for ISPs than folks with a webserver. ISPs and hosting companies alike. I'd be sceptical about that applying to non-sessions such as HTTP requests. I think that semantics are lost on these people. Part 4: [Requirements don't apply if

Re: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port.

2007-09-19 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , VF-Group
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Adam Hasselbalch Hansen Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. September 2007 11:13 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: Re: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port. Plüm wrote: 1. Please provide a patch against trunk. mod_config_logger.c hasn't changed in trunk

Re: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port.

2007-09-18 Thread Nick Kew
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:25:18 +0200 Adam Hasselbalch Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have created a patch for httpd 2.2.6, giving the additional LogFormat directive %R, which logs the port of the host making the request. This is due to new legislation in Denmark, requiring ISPs and hosting

Re: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port.

2007-09-18 Thread Plüm , Rüdiger , VF-Group
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Adam Hasselbalch Hansen Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. September 2007 12:25 An: dev@httpd.apache.org Betreff: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port. I have created a patch for httpd 2.2.6, giving the additional LogFormat directive %R, which logs the

Re: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port.

2007-09-18 Thread Adam Hasselbalch Hansen
Nick Kew wrote: On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:25:18 +0200 Adam Hasselbalch Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have created a patch for httpd 2.2.6, giving the additional LogFormat directive %R, which logs the port of the host making the request. This is due to new legislation in Denmark, requiring

Re: [PATCH 43415] Logging remote port.

2007-09-18 Thread Nick Kew
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:04:32 +0200 Adam Hasselbalch Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can read the entire thing in Danish here: http://www.folketinget.dk/samling/20061/Lovforslag/L63/Bilag/7/351262.PDF Looks more like legislation for ISPs than folks with a webserver. The relevant part is