On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
Hi Steffen,
thanks for your testing and your feed-back.
On Tuesday 22 November 2011, Steffen wrote:
Other log entries which I did not see in 2.2 with loglevel notice.
[:warn] [pid 3800:tid 2216] (OS 10054)An existing
On 22.11.2011 22:42, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
[core:error] [pid 3800:tid 2216] [client 220.134.192.77:42107]
Handler for type-map returned invalid result code 620018, referer:
.
This message denotes that there is a bug in the handler (maybe in
mod_negotiation). The log message itself is new,
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 6:06 AM, Steffen i...@apachelounge.com wrote:
Other log entries which I did not see in 2.2 with loglevel notice.
[:warn] [pid 3800:tid 2216] (OS 10054)An existing connection was forcibly
closed by the remote host. : [client 220.134.192.77:42107] mod_fcgid:
[:warn] [pid 3800:tid 2216] (OS 10054)An existing connection was forcibly
closed by the remote host. : [client 220.134.192.77:42107] mod_fcgid:
ap_pass_brigade failed in handle_request_ipc function, referer: ...
fcgid is supressing this error message if the error is ECONNABORTED
but we
On 11/22/2011 3:50 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:21:31 +0100
Stefan Fritschs...@sfritsch.de wrote:
Hi,
from a cursory glance at mod_request and apreq, it seems that
mod_request offers a subset of the functionality of apreq. Graham, is
that correct?
If we aim for inclusion of
On 18.11.2011 22:21, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
in case any of you also have lots of test failures with libwww-perl 6.0.3,
setting these env vars fixes most of them for me:
PERL_NET_HTTPS_SSL_SOCKET_CLASS=Net::SSL
PERL_LWP_SSL_VERIFY_HOSTNAME=0
No idea why Net::SSL works but
Great news. Genuine progress actually, especially in terms of memory usage and
grow rate.
Bing
-邮件原件-
发件人: William A. Rowe Jr. [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net]
发送时间: 2011年11月21日 13:01
收件人: dev@httpd.apache.org
主题: Re: 2.3.15 on Windows
On 11/20/2011 2:11 PM, Steffen wrote:
No issues so
Seeing a huge number of hanging entries in the Server Status,
already for 20 hours and looks they are staying there forever.
The requests are invalid, not sure since I do not keep the raw logs.
...
...
0-0 3800 0/177/177 _ 64980 1 0.0 0.09 0.09 94.76.244.212
www.familieland.com GET
Seeing a huge number of hanging entries in the Server Status,
already for 20 hours and looks they are staying there forever.
The requests are invalid, not sure since I do not keep the raw logs.
...
...
0-0 3800 0/177/177 _ 64980 1 0.0 0.09 0.09 94.76.244.212
www.familieland.com GET
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 11:26 +0200, Oğuzhan TOPGÜL wrote:
Hi guys, I'm trying to learn shared memory and mutex concepts and i need an
example shared memory apache module code that was written in c.
I found some codes, but none of them is working properly. I'm using ubuntu
10.10 as a development
On 21.11.2011 11:59, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Steffen [mailto:i...@apachelounge.com]
Sent: Montag, 21. November 2011 11:50
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Win 2.3.15 :: The timeout specified has expired
Observing that the error.log is filling with
Summary:
I have a fast-cgi application and am running into an issue whereby inconsistent
error codes (404/403) are returned by the webserver. The issue seems to be
with apr/file_io/unix/filepath.c and mappers/mod_alias.c when using long urls
which approach the filesystem MAXPATHLEN
On 22.11.2011 10:28, Steffen wrote:
Seeing a huge number of hanging entries in the Server Status,
already for 20 hours and looks they are staying there forever.
The requests are invalid, not sure since I do not keep the raw logs.
...
...
0-0 3800 0/177/177 _ 64980 1 0.0 0.09 0.09 94.76.244.212
Other log entries which I did not see in 2.2 with loglevel notice.
[:warn] [pid 3800:tid 2216] (OS 10054)An existing connection was forcibly
closed by the remote host. : [client 220.134.192.77:42107] mod_fcgid:
ap_pass_brigade failed in handle_request_ipc function, referer: ...
Hi all,
With the imminent arrival of v2.4, is it worth going on a style
cleanup of the codebase and fix any glaring differences?
If we did want to do so, now would be the time.
Regards,
Graham
--
I had hoped that we could have gotten 2.4.0 out kinda soon, but
with the wild-west kind of commits going on, there is a LOT
of stuff changed, willy-nilly, between 2.3.15-beta and the current
trunk on httpd-2.4...
So I have to ask: is the intent to really release 2.4.0 anytime soon,
or are is it a
On 21 Nov 2011, at 8:04 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Looks reasonable. Some comments:
The error log handler log_remote_address for %a needs to fall back to
c-remote_ip if r is not specified. Otherwise one would need different
logformats for per-conn and per-request log messages. Also, I would
Since we seem to be changing functional aspects with wild-abandon,
why worry about checking to see if it's OK to do style ones??
--
Signed,
Mr. Grumpy
On Nov 22, 2011, at 7:31 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
Hi all,
With the imminent arrival of v2.4, is it worth going on a style cleanup of
the
On 22 Nov 2011, at 3:41 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I had hoped that we could have gotten 2.4.0 out kinda soon, but
with the wild-west kind of commits going on, there is a LOT
of stuff changed, willy-nilly, between 2.3.15-beta and the current
trunk on httpd-2.4...
So I have to ask: is the intent
On Nov 22, 2011, at 8:48 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 22 Nov 2011, at 3:41 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I had hoped that we could have gotten 2.4.0 out kinda soon, but
with the wild-west kind of commits going on, there is a LOT
of stuff changed, willy-nilly, between 2.3.15-beta and the current
- Original Message -
On Nov 22, 2011, at 8:48 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 22 Nov 2011, at 3:41 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I had hoped that we could have gotten 2.4.0 out kinda soon, but
with the wild-west kind of commits going on, there is a LOT
of stuff changed, willy-nilly,
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I had hoped that we could have gotten 2.4.0 out kinda soon, but
with the wild-west kind of commits going on, there is a LOT
of stuff changed, willy-nilly, between 2.3.15-beta and the current
trunk on httpd-2.4...
So I
Nick, can you suggest some of these higher-level abstractions, please? I have
been trying to make a module of mine work with a POSIX shared memory
implementation, but I'm going nowhere with that. Are you referring to the
apache shared memory implementation (apr_shm_...) or something else?
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:41:24 -0500
Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I had hoped that we could have gotten 2.4.0 out kinda soon, but
with the wild-west kind of commits going on, there is a LOT
of stuff changed, willy-nilly, between 2.3.15-beta and the current
trunk on httpd-2.4...
So I
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
So I have to ask: is the intent to really release 2.4.0 anytime soon,
or are is it a simple sandbox for people to play around in?
It is safe to predict how that question would be answered ;)
Alternately, Let's plan
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Greg Ames ames.g...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
So I have to ask: is the intent to really release 2.4.0 anytime soon,
or are is it a simple sandbox for people to play around in?
It is safe to
On 13 Feb 2011, at 9:59 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Feb 12, 2011, at 6:03 PM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
Author: minfrin
Date: Sun Feb 13 02:03:29 2011
New Revision: 1070179
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1070179view=rev
Log:
mod_cache: When a request other than GET or HEAD arrives,
On 21 Nov 2011, at 8:04 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
The error log handler log_remote_address for %a needs to fall back to
c-remote_ip if r is not specified. Otherwise one would need different
logformats for per-conn and per-request log messages. Also, I would
prefer %{r}a and %{c}a to force
On 22 Nov 2011, at 6:18 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
I've noticed the %{c}a syntax isn't documented for either
error_log or access_log, should I update that or have I missed
something?
Oops, I meant the %{c}L syntax in mod_log_config. Will fix.
Regards,
Graham
--
On Nov 22, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Greg Ames ames.g...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
So I have to ask: is the intent to really release 2.4.0 anytime soon,
or are is it a simple
After almost 2 days a huge amount hanging entries are still there.
Going to stop/start Apache
From: Steffen
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 10:28 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Win 2.3.15 :: Server Status Entries
Seeing a huge number of hanging entries in the Server Status,
already
Thank you guys so much.
What i want to do with shared memory is to hold the requester IPs and a
counter that holds how many times an IP made request. I'm planning to hold
them in a binary tree.
I thought holding these IPs and counters in a file is slower than holding
them in a shared memory
On Tuesday 22 November 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
+/*
+ * To reduce counting overhead, we only count calls to
+ * ap_expr_eval_word() and ap_expr_eval(). The max number of
+ * stack frames is larger by some factor.
+ */
+#define AP_EXPR_MAX_RECURSION 20
+static int
On Tuesday 22 November 2011, Graham Leggett wrote:
Hi all,
With the imminent arrival of v2.4, is it worth going on a style
cleanup of the codebase and fix any glaring differences?
If we did want to do so, now would be the time.
I think it's already too late. It would now make backporting
On Tuesday 22 November 2011, Nick Kew wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:41:24 -0500
Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I had hoped that we could have gotten 2.4.0 out kinda soon, but
with the wild-west kind of commits going on, there is a LOT
of stuff changed, willy-nilly, between
Hi,
from a cursory glance at mod_request and apreq, it seems that
mod_request offers a subset of the functionality of apreq. Graham, is
that correct?
If we aim for inclusion of apreq some time in 2.4.x, it may be a good
idea to not add another API for the same thing. Maybe we could
document
On Tuesday 22 November 2011, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 22.11.2011 10:28, Steffen wrote:
Seeing a huge number of hanging entries in the Server Status,
already for 20 hours and looks they are staying there forever.
The requests are invalid, not sure since I do not keep the raw
logs.
...
Hi Steffen,
thanks for your testing and your feed-back.
On Tuesday 22 November 2011, Steffen wrote:
Other log entries which I did not see in 2.2 with loglevel notice.
[:warn] [pid 3800:tid 2216] (OS 10054)An existing connection was
forcibly closed by the remote host. : [client
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:17:50 +0100
Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
There are two API changes left that I would like to have in 2.4:
- add r-remote_ip
Huh? Surely tcp details belong to the connection, and are accessible
from the request_rec as r-conn-remote_ip ?
--
Nick Kew
On Tuesday 22 November 2011, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 21 Nov 2011, at 8:04 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Looks reasonable. Some comments:
The error log handler log_remote_address for %a needs to fall
back to c-remote_ip if r is not specified. Otherwise one would
need different logformats
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:21:31 +0100
Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
Hi,
from a cursory glance at mod_request and apreq, it seems that
mod_request offers a subset of the functionality of apreq. Graham, is
that correct?
If we aim for inclusion of apreq some time in 2.4.x, it may be
On Tuesday 22 November 2011, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 13 Feb 2011, at 9:59 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Feb 12, 2011, at 6:03 PM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
Author: minfrin
Date: Sun Feb 13 02:03:29 2011
New Revision: 1070179
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1070179view=rev
On Tuesday 22 November 2011, Nick Kew wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:17:50 +0100
Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
There are two API changes left that I would like to have in 2.4:
- add r-remote_ip
Huh? Surely tcp details belong to the connection, and are
accessible from the
On 22 Nov 2011, at 11:45 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
Huh? Surely tcp details belong to the connection, and are accessible
from the request_rec as r-conn-remote_ip ?
They do until a load balancer comes along and sits in the way,
obscuring the remote IP address. Suddenly the IP address is different
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 21:25, Oğuzhan TOPGÜL oguzhantop...@gmail.com wrote:
hey guys,
i'm in terrible with these shared memory.
I tried to write a basic module by looking at the examples that basic module
just holds a counter and prints it to the client.
when i compile the code attached, i
Hello again,
maybe another stupid question but i could not found any
example in the modules dir of the httpd source.
Let's say i have an child_init_function which opens a
filehandle. This filehandle should be open until the child
ends.
In mod_example.c they register an cleanup function to call
Hi Sorin,
thank's for your explanation. Eyerything work fine when i register the
cleanup in the way you suggested.
apr_pool_cleanup_register(p, NULL, child_exit, apr_pool_cleanup_null);
That saved my day.
Greetings
Michael
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 10:02 +0100, Sorin Manolache wrote:
On Tue,
Hi guys, I'm trying to learn shared memory and mutex concepts and i need an
example shared memory apache module code that was written in c.
I found some codes, but none of them is working properly. I'm using ubuntu
10.10 as a development environment. Do you have any basic codes like shared
memory
-Original Message-
From: MATSUMOTO Ryosuke [mailto:matsu1...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 22 November 2011 4:27 PM
To: modules-dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Modules needing the approval of modules-dev@httpd.apache.org
Hi, all
I submitted my module to apache module registry on 10
mod_vlimit https://modules.apache.org/search.php?id=2570
This module count a number of simultaneous connections on shared memory.
2011/11/22 michaelr my...@freenet.de:
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 11:26 +0200, Oğuzhan TOPGÜL wrote:
Hi guys, I'm trying to learn shared memory and mutex concepts and i
On 22 Nov 2011, at 09:26, Oğuzhan TOPGÜL wrote:
Hi guys, I'm trying to learn shared memory and mutex concepts and i need an
example shared memory apache module code that was written in c.
If you're planning to write a module, bear in mind that apache now provides
easy-to-use higher-level
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:41:02 -0500
Pranesh Vadhirajan vadhira...@teralogics.com wrote:
Nick, can you suggest some of these higher-level abstractions, please? I
have been trying to make a module of mine work with a POSIX shared memory
implementation, but I'm going nowhere with that. Are you
hey guys,
i'm in terrible with these shared memory.
I tried to write a basic module by looking at the examples that basic
module just holds a counter and prints it to the client.
when i compile the code attached, i got no error messages. But in apache
error.log file i got
lots of
[notice] child
Sorry for delay, can't seem to find it currently, give me another day or two
to check things out.
OK. If you can't find submitted module, I will submit it again.
regard,
2011/11/22 Gavin McDonald ga...@16degrees.com.au:
-Original Message-
From: MATSUMOTO Ryosuke
54 matches
Mail list logo
