Jim Jagielski wrote:
Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3
[+1]apache_1.3.39
[+1]httpd-2.0.61
[+1]httpd-2.2.6
Thanks!!
No, thank YOU :)
Small chaos today as some reports contradicted my earlier testing, but
I see no regressions, with the exception
On 09/05/2007 04:29 PM, Plüm wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. September 2007 23:29
An: dev@httpd.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release
candidate tarballs for review
Available for your
Hi,
i upgraded to Apache 2.2. But since that upgrade, mod_spelling does not
fix misspelled directory names any more. An example:
With Apache 2.0, the URL
/jh/magdeburg/images/btn_home.gif
was changed to
/jh/magdeburg/Images/btn_home.gif
With Apache 2.2, the first URL doesn't work anymore.
And how could i get back old Apache 2.0 behaviour?
OK, found a sollution here:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38635
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
torsdagen den 6 september 2007 skrev Sven Köhler:
Hi,
i upgraded to Apache 2.2. But since that upgrade, mod_spelling does not
fix misspelled directory names any more. An example:
With Apache 2.0, the URL
/jh/magdeburg/images/btn_home.gif
was changed to
(If this is better directed at another Apache httpd tech list, please
let me know.)
I'm trying to modify the behaviour of mod_proxy via its optional
request_status hook. I want Apache to use mod_cache's local copy of
a file if it can't verify it with the remote, reverse-proxied server
(server
On Sep 4, 2007, at 5:29 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3
Apache HTTP Server release candidate tarballs, located,
as expected at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
This vote will run through Sept 6, 2007 and close
Sept 7, unless otherwise
k
I the meantime we have to advise the users not to use 2.2.6 because is not
compatible with some mods (not just mod_fcgid). We shall advise to stay on
2.2.4 or 2.2.5 RC.
Steffen
www.apachelounge.com
- Original Message -
From: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
An other report:
mod_cgi is working OK for me with the Apache 2.2.6 RC, which I built
with VC6 - not VC8, on Win2k sp4.
I can run the Apache-provided /cgi-bin/printenv.pl test Perl program
with no problems.
mod_fcgid is not working for me, either with Perl or with my own FCGI
test program.
On Sep 6, 2007, at 11:05 AM, Steffen wrote:
k
I the meantime we have to advise the users not to use 2.2.6
because is not compatible with some mods (not just mod_fcgid). We
shall advise to stay on 2.2.4 or 2.2.5 RC.
What other mods is it not compatible with? So far, I haven't
heard
Did you rebuild mod_fcgid?
On Sep 6, 2007, at 11:08 AM, Steffen wrote:
An other report:
mod_cgi is working OK for me with the Apache 2.2.6 RC, which I built
with VC6 - not VC8, on Win2k sp4.
I can run the Apache-provided /cgi-bin/printenv.pl test Perl program
with no problems.
mod_fcgid is
On Sep 6, 2007, at 9:48 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
So far, I see nothing yet preventing us from releasing
this tomorrow... assuming that stays the same, I will
move the files over to the main dist location to allow
mirrors to start snagging and allow us a real release
and announcement tomorrow.
I'm assuming the we is you, right?
It is not just me. We are a team and of course the users. Just as an example
the other post from me here which is a report from an other webmaster. I
report here test results from the Apache Windows Community from the Apache
Lounge, mostly I receive them by
I did, not sure the guy from the report below did.
The author(s) of mod_fcgid looking at the issue right now. Do not expect
that there is a solution from them soon.
I do not now how many users are affected by the bug(s) in 2.2.6 . I guess
there are thousands users running mod-fcgid , special
Better we stop this thread.
See the post at: http://www.apachelounge.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=8691 ,
please do not reply to that post.
Steffen
- Original Message -
From: Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 06 September, 2007 21:47
Subject: Re:
Ummm hrmm:
A hurry backport is causing this and there is hardly
tested in real live. Hopefully ASF comes with a patch soon.
So you know what's causing this? Please point out the exact
hurry backport so we can look there.
And again, WHAT OTHER 3rd party modules are having problems??
Can
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 09:48:28AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 4, 2007, at 5:29 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Available for your testing pleasure, 3, count 'em, 3
Apache HTTP Server release candidate tarballs, located,
as expected at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
This vote
On Sep 6, 2007, at 4:33 PM, The Doctor wrote:
Any chance I can test for bugs on BSD/OS ?
The last time it was major.
Well, we are pushing out to mirrors, but that shouldn't
stop people from testing... If something shows up
we have options, the best option being determined by
the kind of
I am a typical Windows user and not a developer. Yes I can build with VC and
can do little adjustments in C++
Sorry I cannot give more info, it is just not working with no signs in the
Apache logs.
As I told, the authors are looking at it, had to wait when they have more
info.
Maybe I am
On 9/6/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ASF hates Windows users
comments??
I usually prefure not to poke my nose into other peoples discussions but...
my experience with the ASF is that they threat windows users equally than
linux/unix/whatever users.
The problem is windows users
I tried to compiled mod_fcgid myself to see if I can replicate the problem.
I can't even compiled it against 2.2.6.
I get a lot of link errors agains APR.
--- complete buildlog availble on request but nothing odd until this ---
1fcgid_spawn_ctl.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol
Steffen wrote:
I the meantime we have to advise the users not to use 2.2.6 because is
not compatible with some mods (not just mod_fcgid). We shall advise to
stay on 2.2.4 or 2.2.5 RC.
If you would like to clear up FUD (some mods) with explicit mods that
would be productive. It would also
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
Windows users (my self included) usually go like:
Dudez XYZ is broken, Fix it, Fix it, Fix it. When the dev's look at it
and ask for more information they usually don't get it. So it isn't
fixed at all or as fast as a linux bug would be.
You know, you hit the nail on
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
I tried to compiled mod_fcgid myself to see if I can replicate the problem.
I can't even compiled it against 2.2.6.
I get a lot of link errors agains APR.
Silly question, did you add libapr-1.lib, libaprutil-1.lib libhttpd.lib to
the link command?
(Worse, if you did add
The later post was a report of an other tester, sorry no answer I have.
Yes, I dicusssed it with the maintainer of mod_fcgid today. He is puzzling
now an as I told before, we have to wait.
Oh, btw: mod_perl (also build with VC8) is not working with 2.2.6, with
2.2.5 RC no single issue.
On 9/6/07, Steffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The later post was a report of an other tester, sorry no answer I have.
Yes, I dicusssed it with the maintainer of mod_fcgid today. He is puzzling
now an as I told before, we have to wait.
Oh, btw: mod_perl (also build with VC8) is not working
On 9/6/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
I tried to compiled mod_fcgid myself to see if I can replicate the
problem.
I can't even compiled it against 2.2.6.
I get a lot of link errors agains APR.
Silly question, did you add libapr-1.lib,
Steffen wrote:
Oh, btw: mod_perl (also build with VC8) is not working with 2.2.6, with
2.2.5 RC no single issue.
Perl, mod_perl, httpd and apr all built with VC8? Or is this AS perl or
some other?
Bill
Phil Endecott wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems like you are right about the smax=0.
Luckily for you, according to the documentation you may control the persistency
of the backend connection with the environment variable proxy-nokeepalive
Well, I can use that to switch of persistency,
Steffen wrote:
The later post was a report of an other tester, sorry no answer I have.
Yes, I dicusssed it with the maintainer of mod_fcgid today. He is
puzzling now an as I told before, we have to wait.
Before he puzzles too long, you might want to ensure you have a full
rebuild of
+1 httpd-2.2.6, OS X 10.4.10, gcc 4.0.1
Roy
31 matches
Mail list logo
