-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: William A. Rowe, Jr.
Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2007 07:50
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: SSL_VERSION_LIBRARY
Zvi Har'El wrote:
This looks similar to PR 43334
(https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43334).
Could
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 14:19:23 +0200
Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will create a Bugzilla report for this issue.
That'll be PR#43308, in which you wrote:
In Apache 2.2.x a worker, and the associated backend connection pool,
is created for each ProxyPass directive. In that
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nick Kew
Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2007 11:29
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [PATCH] Apache 2.2.x: Implicit creation of new
proxy_workers
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 14:19:23 +0200
Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Because it was
int ap_proxy_lb_workers(void);
and not
PROXY_DECLARE(int)ap_proxy_lb_workers(void);
Yep. Ideally, of course, a design like mod_ssl with the
ssl_private.h usage is nice, because there you can
expose functions that need to be
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2007 13:23
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Cc: Jim Jagielski
Betreff: Re: svn commit: r573264 -
/httpd/httpd/trunk/include/scoreboard.h
Plüm wrote:
-Ursprüngliche
Plüm wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2007 13:23
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Cc: Jim Jagielski
Betreff: Re: svn commit: r573264 -
/httpd/httpd/trunk/include/scoreboard.h
Plüm wrote:
On Sep 10, 2007, at 6:01 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
Also the scoreboard is a limiting factor for this. The number of
available
scoreboard entries is determined during the configuration phase of the
startup (it cannot even be changed during graceful starts, this is
why we
add some
On Sep 10, 2007, at 6:37 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
For example what about adding:
static APR_OPTIONAL_FN_TYPE(ap_proxy_lb_worker_size)
*proxy_lb_worker_size;
and use a void * in scoreboard and an int for the size?
For me this sounds fine, but I would guess that Jim doesn't like
the
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 10, 2007, at 6:37 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
For example what about adding:
static APR_OPTIONAL_FN_TYPE(ap_proxy_lb_worker_size)
*proxy_lb_worker_size;
and use a void * in scoreboard and an int for the size?
For me this sounds fine, but I would guess
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Auftrag von Vinicius Petrucci
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. September 2007 18:09
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: mod_proxy_balancer
Well, debugging a little bit more... I realize that the condition
(worker is already
On Sep 10, 2007, at 8:24 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 10, 2007, at 6:37 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
For example what about adding:
static APR_OPTIONAL_FN_TYPE(ap_proxy_lb_worker_size)
*proxy_lb_worker_size;
and use a void * in scoreboard and an int for
On Sep 10, 2007, at 9:18 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Auftrag von Vinicius Petrucci
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. September 2007 18:09
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: mod_proxy_balancer
Well, debugging a little bit more...
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 10, 2007, at 8:24 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 10, 2007, at 6:37 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
For example what about adding:
static APR_OPTIONAL_FN_TYPE(ap_proxy_lb_worker_size)
*proxy_lb_worker_size;
and use a void * in
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 13:04:19 +0200
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I propose to add the flag novary (NV) to
RewriteCond in order to avoid adding the respective HTTP header to
the Vary header.
I'm in two minds about that. It's an obscure need, and it could
be
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Nick Kew
Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2007 16:22
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: New flag for RewriteCond: novary (NV)
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 13:04:19 +0200
Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I propose to add the
On Sep 10, 2007, at 10:13 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean. mod_proxy does, in child_init,
the calls to create those scoreboard entries. It does
so via ap_proxy_initialize_worker_share(). No matter
what, the -s is set to:
worker-s =
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 10, 2007, at 6:37 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
For example what about adding:
static APR_OPTIONAL_FN_TYPE(ap_proxy_lb_worker_size)
*proxy_lb_worker_size;
and use a void * in scoreboard and an int for the size?
For me this sounds fine, but I would guess
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2007 16:06
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: mod_proxy_balancer
Regarding the 2nd one... the:
+else {
+worker_is_initialized = 0;
+}
seems
Hi,
In my application I am spawning httpd.exe from the parent process.
My requirement is that:
1. Whenever the parent process is getting killed, it should also kill
the Apache web server and then go down.
This I am able to do successfully.
2. In the Abnormal termination
Please excuse me if this is the wrong forum for such a
request.
Mod_autoindex is used extensively on many sites that
serve files (data, programs) via HTTP. It supports
request query arguments to sort the results by file
name, last-modified date, size or description and to
filter the results
On Sep 10, 2007, at 10:37 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
typedef struct ap_sb_handle_t ap_sb_handle_t;
@@ -181,7 +175,7 @@
AP_DECLARE(worker_score *) ap_get_scoreboard_worker(int x, int y);
AP_DECLARE(process_score *) ap_get_scoreboard_process(int x);
AP_DECLARE(global_score *)
On Sep 10, 2007, at 10:42 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2007 16:06
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: mod_proxy_balancer
Regarding the 2nd one... the:
+else {
+
OK,
So if a proxy connect is used it then creates a stateful connection from
client through proxy to server and get the ACK back from the
backend/server and not the proxy?
OR
We can start by simply asking do apachie proxies in their standard setup
or install send ACK back to requesting client
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: jean-frederic clere
Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2007 16:38
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: svn commit: r573264 -
/httpd/httpd/trunk/include/scoreboard.h
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 10, 2007, at 6:37 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2007 16:51
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: svn commit: r573264 -
/httpd/httpd/trunk/include/scoreboard.h
On Sep 10, 2007, at 10:37 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
typedef struct
On Mon, September 10, 2007 4:57 pm, Shaw, Dan wrote:
So if a proxy connect is used it then creates a stateful connection from
client through proxy to server and get the ACK back from the
backend/server and not the proxy?
OR
We can start by simply asking do apachie proxies in their standard
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Shaw, Dan wrote:
1. Does a apache proxy server create stateful or stateless connection
upon request?
It might help to clarify right off that RFC 2616 defines HTTP/1.1 and prior
as stateless protocols.
Dan, maybe you mean persistent rather than stateful?
On Sep 10, 2007, at 11:08 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
Sorry for being a pain in the neck with this topic :-)
:)
It just seems that we're spending so much time on something
which was envisioned as a quick, logical fix to trunk
which could then be backported to 2.2. But it's getting
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 05:02:52PM +0200, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
1. IMHO requires a minor bump.
2. Why messing around with lb_score any longer? Instead of
...
Sorry for stepping in on the discussion -- but Jim has tried to clean
the code, JFC has helped providing alternative patches,
I've tried the 1st patch (which is simpler and nicer) in httpd-trunk
and now It seems to work... :)
On 10/09/2007, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 10, 2007, at 10:42 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Jagielski
Gesendet:
Plüm wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: jean-frederic clere
Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2007 16:38
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: svn commit: r573264 -
/httpd/httpd/trunk/include/scoreboard.h
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 10, 2007, at 6:37 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger,
On Sep 10, 2007, at 12:19 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Well that just because I am thinking that the size of
proxy_worker_stat
could be changed by a balancer, like adding extra bytes to
proxy_worker_stat.
That is what 'void *context' is designed to do. Be a place
where unique data can
Fred Woods wrote:
I've written an extension/hack for mod_dav. I would like to know if it
would be useful to others and how I might change it to be more portable?
The hack hooks the code to store, copy, rename, and remove files.
It creates a string representing the operation and the path
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 10, 2007, at 12:19 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Well that just because I am thinking that the size of proxy_worker_stat
could be changed by a balancer, like adding extra bytes to
proxy_worker_stat.
That is what 'void *context' is designed to do. Be a
Sure,
We are going to be implementing BizTalk and BizTalk guaranties delivery
of messages per their application. One of the first layers is the
transport layer BizTalk listens to for ACK(s) and if the ACK(s) come
from the proxy server then we will get a false positive and the
connection closes.
On Sep 10, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Shaw, Dan wrote:
Sure,
We are going to be implementing BizTalk and BizTalk guaranties
delivery
of messages per their application. One of the first layers is the
transport layer BizTalk listens to for ACK(s) and if the ACK(s) come
from the proxy server then we
Yes, that is correct TCP/IP transport layer.
Thanks,
Dan
Daniel P. Shaw
Triad Financial
Pro-Tem Contractor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ext: 25106
Ph: 714-799-5106
Start Date: 08-13-2007
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 10:46 AM
In that case, I think we can answer your question...
As you know, HTTP operates above tcp/ip which means
that there is the normal tcp/ip handshaking
and flow between the client and Apache, whether
Apache is itself handling the request or if
it is a proxy for another server. Apache simply
takes
On 09/10/2007 06:16 PM, Vinicius Petrucci wrote:
I've tried the 1st patch (which is simpler and nicer) in httpd-trunk
and now It seems to work... :)
Thanks for testing, but can you please also test the 2nd patch?
Only the 2nd patch is backportable and I would like to see this fixed in 2.2.x
On 09/10/2007 05:39 PM, Martin Kraemer wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 05:02:52PM +0200, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
1. IMHO requires a minor bump.
2. Why messing around with lb_score any longer? Instead of
...
Sorry for stepping in on the discussion -- but Jim has tried to clean
the
On 09/10/2007 08:40 AM, Plüm wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: William A. Rowe, Jr.
Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2007 07:50
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: SSL_VERSION_LIBRARY
Zvi Har'El wrote:
This looks similar to PR 43334
Hello,
Congratulations on the new release 2.2.6.
Would there be any possiblity of applying (or reviewing) my
outstanding patch? request.c hasn't evolved since I did the
patch against trunk.
I had also submitted a new test procedure for the test suite.
It hasn't yet been commited, although it
Jose Kahan wrote:
I had also submitted a new test procedure for the test suite.
It hasn't yet been commited, although it reproduces the faulty
behavior that my patch is intended to fix.
Fantasic :)
I don't know what else to do to be able to submit a valid bug
report and potential patch
Over the past couple of years, the company I work for has begun to make
use of Apache httpd quite a bit. At this point, we feel like we have
enough experience under our belts that we've come to make a request.
First, a little bit of background, if you will permit me.
We use httpd largely as a
Hi Rüdiger,
I've tested the 2nd. It works fine. :)
best,
Vinicius
On 10/09/2007, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 09/10/2007 06:16 PM, Vinicius Petrucci wrote:
I've tried the 1st patch (which is simpler and nicer) in httpd-trunk
and now It seems to work... :)
Thanks for
What do I have to do to work in 2.2.6? Too much changes in r572937?
On 10/09/2007, Vinicius Petrucci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rüdiger,
I've tested the 2nd. It works fine. :)
best,
Vinicius
On 10/09/2007, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 09/10/2007 06:16 PM, Vinicius
46 matches
Mail list logo
