0On 1/2/2012 3:06 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On Sunday 01/01/2012 at 19:03, Mario Brandt wrote:
The loadbalancer still crashes on windows. See
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52402
We should try to get at least the rewrite/proxy issue resolved, first.
About the
Honesty,
never tries with these on ... especially sendfile ... slows us wintards
outbound down bigtime.
On 1/2/2012 3:08 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/1/2012 12:30 PM, Steffen wrote:
Also IMHO blocking GA:
- SSL on windows not usable
- Hanging logging workers
Does disabling the
Since I have been the most vocal about this
watchdog/hearmonitor/heartbeats on windows ... I should chime in.
I can tell someone what each do (as far as I have seen). There are,
minimal docvs on all but watchdog (which is required for a couple) ...
but ... look at my emails in the past ... am
My vote ... Stefan, wherever it fits (depends on whom I speak to) ,
these are showstoppers. But, it can be said these are one OS specific
... which usually does not stop the press AFAIK. I can say however .. as
a small time distributor ... this will be noted as the problems yet
remaining on
Suprised.
When ASF is going that way, we theoritical can have:
GA Windows 2.4
Beta OSX 2.3.19
Alpha Ubuntu 2.3.19
Steffen
On Monday 02/01/2012 at 23:11, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Sunday 01 January 2012, Steffen wrote:
Also IMHO blocking GA:
- SSL on windows not usable
- Hanging logging
Suprised.
When ASF is going that way, we theoritical can have:
GA Windows 2.4
Beta OSX 2.3.19
Alpha Ubuntu 2.3.19
Steffen
On Monday 02/01/2012 at 23:11, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Sunday 01 January 2012, Steffen wrote:
Also IMHO blocking GA:
- SSL on windows not usable
- Hanging logging
I agree with Gregg, this server is the best I ever worked with. Since
one of the early betas I run it on my prod systems on windows and
*nix. Except for known issues it works like a charm.
A public beta or RC does not hurt. More testers may find some more
stuff to fix. An api freeze coulod gve the
On Tuesday 03/01/2012 at 09:16, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
0On 1/2/2012 3:06 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On Sunday 01/01/2012 at 19:03, Mario Brandt wrote:
The loadbalancer still crashes on windows. See
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52402
We should try to get at
On Tuesday 03/01/2012 at 09:16, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
0On 1/2/2012 3:06 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On Sunday 01/01/2012 at 19:03, Mario Brandt wrote:
The loadbalancer still crashes on windows. See
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52402
We should try to get at
Was off.
Still, I want to ask to reconsider going back to the 2.2 behavior (for
the time being).
On Tuesday 03/01/2012 at 00:09, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/1/2012 12:30 PM, Steffen wrote:
Also IMHO blocking GA:
- SSL on windows not usable
- Hanging logging workers
Does disabling
Was off.
Still, I want to ask to reconsider going back to the 2.2 behavior (for
the time being).
On Tuesday 03/01/2012 at 00:09, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/1/2012 12:30 PM, Steffen wrote:
Also IMHO blocking GA:
- SSL on windows not usable
- Hanging logging workers
Does disabling
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote:
AIX 5.3.7
xlC v7
After minor edits, compiles (with warnings)
root@x105:[/data/prj/httpd-2.3.16-beta]./httpd -V
Server version: Apache/2.3.16 (Unix)
Server built: Dec 27 2011 07:28:45
Server's Module Magic Number:
One reason to announce my intent was to basically encourage
people to try HEAD and see how it works for them. If we lack
sufficient people with access and/or knowledge about Windows,
or if they don't bother to try things out until they get a
tagged and rolled tarball (or whatever), then that is
On 1/3/2012 3:30 AM, Steffen wrote:
Still, I want to ask to reconsider going back to the 2.2 behavior (for the
time being).
Highly unlikely for the reasons I responded nearly a year or so back.
This bug is irritating, but it is exactly that, a bug. Not 1000's of
lines of redundant code.
On 1/3/2012 2:15 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
I all for stop any and all API changes other than anything that may require
fixing these.
Hopefully, there is consensus that the API is baked :)
I am all for RCs if it means changing the -dev is to -rc#
-rc# isn't an httpd concept. Long threads
On 1/3/2012 7:48 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
One reason to announce my intent was to basically encourage
people to try HEAD and see how it works for them. If we lack
sufficient people with access and/or knowledge about Windows,
or if they don't bother to try things out until they get a
tagged
On Jan 3, 2012, at 10:01 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/3/2012 7:48 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
One reason to announce my intent was to basically encourage
people to try HEAD and see how it works for them. If we lack
sufficient people with access and/or knowledge about Windows,
or if they
User ID : 1758
Title: Apache Rivet
Details : https://modules.apache.org/search.php?id=2592
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.html#backtrace-win
There is no Dr Watson anymore in Windows Server 2008.
Steffen
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.html#backtrace-win
There is no Dr Watson anymore in Windows Server 2008.
Steffen
You can still modify Windows' default error reporting to save a backtrace:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb787181%28VS.85%29.aspx
Mathijs
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Steffen i...@apachelounge.com wrote:
On 1/3/2012 12:48 PM, Steffen wrote:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.html#backtrace-win
There is no Dr Watson anymore in Windows Server 2008.
Of course you can accomplish the same with windbg, but instructions on
precisely how to do it would be much more wordy to the point of not
On Tuesday 03 January 2012, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 1/3/2012 3:30 AM, Steffen wrote:
Still, I want to ask to reconsider going back to the 2.2 behavior
(for the time being).
Highly unlikely for the reasons I responded nearly a year or so
back. This bug is irritating, but it is
On 30.12.2011 22:04, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
On 12/27/2011 10:40 AM, Steffen wrote:
Gregg reported it also:
I've also found AcceptFilter https none to be problematic. First time
you hit a site via https it usually comes up with a blank white
nothing. Hitting reload and it comes up proper.
On 1/3/2012 9:19 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 30.12.2011 22:04, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
On 12/27/2011 10:40 AM, Steffen wrote:
Gregg reported it also:
I've also found AcceptFilter https none to be problematic. First time
you hit a site via https it usually comes up with a blank white
nothing.
25 matches
Mail list logo
