Peter J. Cranstone wrote:
In today's environment it's all about 2 words - price/performance. Show me
that Apache 2.x can outperform 1.x by a factor 10 on the same box.
Dig around... I posted a benchmark to this list early in 2.0 development showing a 10x improvement of threaded
2.0 over 1.3 on
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 11:01:46AM -0700, Peter J. Cranstone wrote:
Oh yes - forgot about v6... that's a must have for Apache. Is it available
for 1.x? If not that would be the first feature to add.
The KAME project has IPv6 patches for 1.3.* at
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Apache 1.4, an APR'ized version of Apache 1.3 (to pick up IPV6 and 64 bit support) with all the Windows
specific code stripped out and source compatability (to the extent possible) with Apache 1.3 modules would
probably see rapid
Ben Hyde wrote:
Success stories that create a sense of
safety.
I know of some folks that use an Apache 2 derivitive (a -very- close derivitive) with the worker MPM to
support nearly 10, concurrent clients with a -single- child process. Big honking complex third party
module figures
Brian Akins wrote:
Matthieu Estrade wrote:
mod_cache is not caching / because of negotiate problem, if i remember
well.
We discuss many times to why not caching, and never find really a good
reason to not cache /.
I see this in mod_cache.c
/* DECLINE urls ending in / ??? EGP: why? */
if
Peter J. Cranstone wrote:
Bill,
Here is an interesting link to a problem someone encountered running Apache
on Windows. If he's right there is little hope for Apache to ever run
properly on newer versions of Windows.
http://grumet.net/weblog/archives/2003/11/18/questions_about_windows_apache.
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Brian Akins wrote:
Matthieu Estrade wrote:
mod_cache is not caching / because of negotiate problem, if i
remember well.
We discuss many times to why not caching, and never find really a
good reason to not cache /.
I see this in mod_cache.c
/* DECLINE urls ending
Brian Akins wrote:
I have been thinking about this and just wanted to see if it were possible.
Say that MaxClients is 1024. Normally, with keepalives turned on, all
1024 of these threads (or proc's) can be busy doing keep alives which
means that they could just be sitting around waiting for
Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stoddard2003/11/20 11:44:19
Modified:.CHANGES
server/mpm/winnt child.c mpm.h
Log:
Win32: Make Win32 MPM transaction pools honor MaxMemFree
/* Create the tranaction pool */
-
MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:
I sure would do that sometime today. The leader probably uses some
apr_atomic stuff - and I'm trying to see if I can use IA64 native code to do
the atomics.
For people at ease with visual stuff, here's the CPU performance that I'm
getting with worker
Ian Holsman wrote:
hi.
I was wondering if the queue/hash routines in mod-mem-cache could be
reverted to using the pool based ones, instead of the malloc-based ones.
and possibly change some of the object creation to pool based as well.
this would leave the headers/content as malloc'd
2
Check out this PR:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20462
plog is created after pconf which means that plog will be cleaned up before pconf during
destroy_and_exit_process() called during shutdown. It is not uncommon for modules to register cleanups against
pconf and log
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
So you propose an inversion here? Won't that break as many modules making
the (currently) correct assumptions, w.r.t. config data?
Logs are created *from* values in the configuration, ergo they should go away
*before* the values that created them are also destroyed.
Jean-Jacques Clar wrote:
Bugzilla Defect #21285
This is a rework of the already posted patch.
It address the following situation;
1- request comes in for streaming response
2- before that request could be completed, the entry is ejected from the
cache
3- when completing the write body step,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
martin 2003/12/15 06:24:31
Modified:modules/experimental mod_charset_lite.c
Log:
Flame bait: mod_charset_lite would decide in the mime checker phase
whether a conversion was required, and would stick with that decision,
even if a later handler (like CGI
Jean-Jacques Clar wrote:
Just replaced tabs with spaces to follow guidelines.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/11/2003 5:00:31 PM
Bugzilla Defect #21285
This is a rework of the already posted patch.
It address the following situation;
1- request comes in for streaming response
2- before that request
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 03:57 PM 12/15/2003, Bill Stoddard wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
martin 2003/12/15 06:24:31
Revision ChangesPath
1.67 +70 -0 httpd-2.0/modules/experimental/mod_charset_lite.c
+#if #system(bs2000)
This syntax causes a compile failure on Windows
Jean-Jacques Clar wrote:
There is a memory leak with your patch when running my test.
snip
I need to do more investigation to find out which pieces of memory are
leaking.
No need. I was removing the object from the cache but never cleaning it up. Easy enough to fix.
Bill
Ben Laurie wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Ben Laurie wrote:
One of the problems that crops up depressingly often is that someone
gets owned, and they can't find out why. This is generally because
the offending request didn't get logged, because the server died
before it logged it.
far more
Ben Laurie wrote:
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Ben Laurie wrote:
If it does nothing unless a file is specified, why not enable by
default?
Like Jeff, I am more interested in this for debugging process crashes
that are not necessarily related to attacks. Might be useful to enable
this function
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Ben Laurie wrote:
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Ben Laurie wrote:
If it does nothing unless a file is specified, why not enable by
default?
Like Jeff, I am more interested in this for debugging process crashes
that are not necessarily related to attacks. Might be useful
Hi Jean-Jacques,
What specific problem is this patch correcting? I committed a fix for 21287 prior to the holidays. The idea
behind using atomic operators on refcount is to avoid the need to acquire the mutex when
incrementing/decrementing refcount.
Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
clar
Here is the patch that fill fix the problem reported by 21287
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/httpd-2.0/modules/experimental/mod_mem_cache.c?r1=1.99r2=1.100
Bill
Hi Jean-Jacques,
What specific problem is this patch correcting? I committed a fix for
21287 prior to the holidays. The idea behind
Jean-Jacques Clar wrote:
Bill,
The patch you committed is only for 21285.
My bet for 21287 (no mutex lock protection in decrement_refcount).
from the bug description:
/There are no mutex lock protection in decrement_refcount if it is
defined USE_ATOMICS.
I think you simply forgot the mutex in
Richard Reiner wrote:
mod_proxy hangs when both KeepAlive and ProxyErrorOverride are enabled,
and a non-200 response without a body is generated by the backend
server.
Commited to 2.1 and called a vote to backport to 2.0.
Thanks,
Bill
Sander Striker wrote:
On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 03:48, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Looks like 21287 it is not a valid defect based on your explanation.
How do I rev back my changes?
Here is how you can see the patch:
cvs diff -u -r 1.102 -r 1.103 mod_mem_cache.c
revison numbers are from cvs.apache.org
Do you know of any cases that actually require mpm_state to be updated in ap_signal_parent()? Setting
winnt_mpm_state to AP_MPMQ_STOPPING in child main should be sufficient unless I am missing something.
Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
trawick 2003/12/16 18:16:44
Modified:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Do you know of any cases that actually require mpm_state to be updated
in ap_signal_parent()? Setting winnt_mpm_state to AP_MPMQ_STOPPING in
child main should be sufficient unless I am missing something.
the code in service.c which shuts down
WHat happens if the handler DECLINES the request and do we care?
Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm interested in doing some scalability testing with worker on Linux to
see what the O(1) scheduler and new pthread library buys us, and what
happens with different values for ThreadsPerChild. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Stoddard wrote:
WHat happens if the handler DECLINES the request
My guess is that the default handler will be called, try to open a
non-existant file and send back a 404. I'll find out.
Make sure file 'silly' exists in documentroot and make sure it has access
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Ben Laurie wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
See http://www.apache.org/~trawick/exception_hook_13.html
You should make the logged strings safe, like mod_log_forensic does,
and I think the format should be compatible (which means no space
after the colon).
Thanks for taking a
if the code is always built into the server (with/without
EnableExceptionHook setting), perhaps we should add the #define
AP_ENABLE_EXCEPTION_HOOK in ap_config.h for platforms where we know it
will work
+1
Bill
Jeff Trawick wrote:
The buglet was that prctl() was issued always when available, when goal
(to be consistent with httpd 2.x) was to only issue it if admin has
coded CoreDumpDirectory. The buglet was due to a misunderstanding in
the use of ap_coredump_dir[].
ap_coredump_dir_configured is not
GEORGE JOSEPH wrote:
Hi all,
Is the Apache server capable of Providing Streaming
Media with RTP/RTCP or RTSP.Should I put up a
different server for the RTP/RTCP.Or can it be used in
some way to put up the stream for Video/Audio.
Thanks,
George.
Try it (but be prepared for a fallback plan). I
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'd like to float the idea of releasing 1.3.30 soonish.
Not only are there enough changes to warrant a release, but
also to coincide with the changeover to AL 2.0.
+1
Bill
Ben Laurie wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'd like to float the idea of releasing 1.3.30 soonish.
Not only are there enough changes to warrant a release, but
also to coincide with the changeover to AL 2.0.
one question: who would support putting the 1.3 versions of
what is the state of the Apache 2.0 FAQ? It's not clear to me how all the pieces, index.html, index.xml,
all_in_one.xml, all_in_one.html, index.html.en, et.al. should fit together. For instance, faq/index.html.en
has information that is -not- in faq/index.xml. Is this broken or do I just not
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
However I completely disagree that Python (or Perl or PHP) is
a good choice for use in build systems.
As part of the configure process, I would agree with you, but as part of
buildconf, I disagree--not everyone needs to run buildconf--only
developers, and if
Benedict DSilva wrote:
Hi all,
Just wanted to know about how does the Apache HTTP Server start, and all
that it does with the modules (Initialization, Configuration etc).
Explaining how Apache HTTPD works to the degree of detail you are looking for is a rather tall request to
answer in an
Geoffrey Young wrote:
I seem to recall there being a perl script to convert the 6.0 project files to 5.0 format. If it exists, it
will be in the source distribution. Perhaps it is in 1.3 distro? No time to check now.
Bill
Configure mod_mem_cache to cache files in mem, set CacheExpiresMax 1 then turn ab loose fetching a single
cachable static file and watch what happens. You get exploding memory usage in the subprocess_env serialized
headers.
The initial cache load caches whatever is in subprocess_env. On the
André Malo wrote:
* Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 08:32:30PM +0100, André Malo wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* include/http_connection.h: Declare eoc bucket interface.
Shouldn't this be a minor MMN bump?
I dunno, I don't really see the point in bumping the
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I would +1 moving over after release of 2.0.49 and 1.3.30... :)
+1
Bill
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Sander Striker wrote:
There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
This is not a regression issue, but it is a storage corruption issue as
well as a simple fix that should be easy to review:
*) mod_cgid: Fix storage corruption caused by
Sander Striker wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 20:16, Andre Breiler wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
There are 2.0.49-rc2 tarballs available at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I guess you didn't get around to do the -rc3 yet.
Actually, I did :)
You can find -rc3
Joshua Slive wrote:
Didn't we decide in the move to 2.0 that all directives would take an
argument?
Maybe I wasn't paying attention.
Win32DisableAcceptex seems to work just by being present in the
config with no argument.
True.
Shouldn't it instead be Win32DisableAcceptex on|off
To be more
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 08:42 AM 3/22/2004, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Shouldn't it instead be Win32DisableAcceptex on|off
To be more consistent with EnableSendFile on|off, et. al? Hadn't considered that but it makes sense.
or easier to parse and consistant w/ mmap/sendfile
Bojan Smojver wrote:
I think I finally found the culprit. At first I thought it was the
core_output_filter, but it turns out that emulate_sendfile (incorrectly)
assumes that it is at the beginning of the file even when it's not.
The attached patch works here when I have the combo of buckets as
Tikka, Sami wrote:
Rather than talk about what the name of the directive is, I'd like to raise
the issue does workaround involved really work or not.
I have a customer who runs a lightly loaded W2K server with Apache 2.0.45 +
selected patches and every couple of hours it hangs for 10-15 minutes
Bojan Smojver wrote:
I think I finally found the culprit. At first I thought it was the
core_output_filter, but it turns out that emulate_sendfile (incorrectly)
assumes that it is at the beginning of the file even when it's not.
The attached patch works here when I have the combo of buckets as
Philip Gladstone wrote:
I noticed that the performance of TransmitFile (used when EnableSendFile
On on Windows platforms) was significantly worse than EnableSendFile Off.
It turns out that the way that TransmitFile is called is *without* the
TF_WRITE_BEHIND flag. This means that TransmitFile does
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Philip Gladstone wrote:
I noticed that the performance of TransmitFile (used when EnableSendFile
On on Windows platforms) was significantly worse than EnableSendFile Off.
It turns out that the way that TransmitFile is called is *without* the
TF_WRITE_BEHIND flag. This means
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 15 Apr 2004, at 04:45, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
* mod_proxy: Ability to run SSL over proxy gateway connections,
encrypting (or reencrypting) at the proxy.
Does this mean that in 2.1 the SSLProxyEngine on doesn't work anymore?
Pier
I think it means
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jorton 2004/05/17 08:24:31
Modified:server core.c
Log:
* server/core.c (core_output_filter): Don't explicitly delete the EOC
bucket, and don't buffer the brigade if it ends in an EOC.
Won't this change result in a memory leak?
Bill
Jeff Trawick wrote:
looks like 30-35 real fixes already in 2.0.50-dev and another several
approved for backport, as well as a handful of enhancements
+1
Bill
@@ -1340,7 +1343,7 @@
/* Run cleanups */
run_cleanups(pool-cleanups);
-pool-cleanups = NULL;
+pool-free_cleanups = pool-cleanups = NULL;
/* If new child pools showed up, this is a reason to raise a flag */
if (pool-child)
@@ -1886,7 +1889,13 @@
#endif /*
Bill Stoddard wrote:
@@ -1340,7 +1343,7 @@
/* Run cleanups */
run_cleanups(pool-cleanups);
-pool-cleanups = NULL;
+pool-free_cleanups = pool-cleanups = NULL;
/* If new child pools showed up, this is a reason to raise a flag */
if (pool-child)
@@ -1886,7 +1889,13
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 11:47 AM 6/21/2004, Bill Stoddard wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Thanks for the interesting references and citations.
Apache HTTP server works at a lower level, below the layer exposed
by this http.dll API. To actually use this interface would require a few
Jeff Trawick wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 07:12 AM 6/21/2004, Jeff Trawick wrote:
There is an explanation with enough detail to be interesting about
why Apache 2.0 doesn't get along with layered service providers.
See http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23982
Can some
Playing with this patch... seems to work w/minimal performance penalty...
Bill
Index: sendrecv.c
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/network_io/win32/sendrecv.c,v
retrieving revision 1.64.2.1
diff -u -r1.64.2.1 sendrecv.c
--- sendrecv.c 13
I just commited a fix for this.
Bill
Andre Schild wrote:
Hello,
I have taken the sources as tagged in CSV and tried it to build under
Windows 2000.
It fails when compiling xlate.c to generate libaprutil
xlate.c
c:\Develop\Apache\httpd-2.0.50-rc1\srclib\apr-util\xlate\xlate.c(181) :
error C2
198:
+1
Looks like an oversite that this patch wasn't applied long ago. The pattern of saving the errno of an earlier
operation then restoring it on error exit is repeated all over alloc.c.
Bill
eff Trawick wrote:
When COMSPEC is unset or set to something bogus, trying to start Apache
with a piped
The %b option is used to log the 'bytes_sent' in a reply. Unlike %B, %b should log a '-' rather than '0' if no
body is sent on a reply. I recently ran across two cases where %b incorrectly logs '0': First case is when
ap_set_byterange sets HTTP_RANGE_NOT_SATISFIABLE to the default_handler.
Brian Akins wrote:
I'm writing an optimized caching module. I've been using 2.0.50. Here
are the top 50 from oprofile ( http://oprofile.sourceforge.net/ ):
I submitted a patch to rework ap_rgetline/core_input_filter a year or so ago that provided some performance
improvements. If you are
Brian Akins wrote:
Jean-Jacques Clar wrote:
Would you please share with us some info on that
optimized caching module.
I'll say what I can. I'm hoping I can GPL it.
Is mod_url_cache a modified copy of the current ones?
No. It borrows some ideas from various other modules, including
mod_cache
Brian Akins wrote:
Bill Stoddard wrote:
I'd certainly be interested in knowing how much faster mod_url_cache
is as compared to mod_cache/mod_mem_cache. The only way I can see to
-dramatically- improve the performance of mod_cache/mod_mem_cache is
to completely bypass i/o filters. I have some
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
I don't understand why mod_cache forcedly avoids caching URLs ending
with the / (slash) character.
Apparently EGP (who's he?) agrees.
Anyhow, it's several months that we're running with this patch in
production, and nothing bad seems to be happening.
Pier
diff -U3 -wr
Too many changes in one patch. Break this up into multiple consumable in 15 minute
patches and I'll review them.
Bill
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Sunday, August 1, 2004 11:25 AM -0400 Bill Stoddard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Too many changes in one patch. Break this up into multiple consumable
in 15
minute patches and I'll review them.
* modules/http/http_request.c (ap_internal_redirect): Call quick_handler
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Sunday, August 1, 2004 11:25 AM -0400 Bill Stoddard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Too many changes in one patch. Break this up into multiple consumable
in 15
minute patches and I'll review them.
* modules/experimental/mod_cache.h: Always use atomics.
* modules
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Sunday, August 1, 2004 11:25 AM -0400 Bill Stoddard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Too many changes in one patch. Break this up into multiple consumable
in 15
minute patches and I'll review them.
* modules/experimental/mod_disk_cache.c: Allow sendfile on cache bodies
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Sunday, August 1, 2004 11:25 AM -0400 Bill Stoddard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Too many changes in one patch. Break this up into multiple consumable
in 15
minute patches and I'll review them.
(This is probably the largest and most complicated one. At the bottom
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Sunday, August 1, 2004 11:25 AM -0400 Bill Stoddard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Too many changes in one patch. Break this up into multiple consumable
in 15
minute patches and I'll review them.
* modules/experimental/mod_cache.c: Delay no-store check until saving
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Sunday, August 1, 2004 11:25 AM -0400 Bill Stoddard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Too many changes in one patch. Break this up into multiple consumable
in 15
minute patches and I'll review them.
* modules/experimental/mod_cache.c: Reduce logging in mainline case
Brian Akins wrote:
Bill Stoddard wrote:
/* Open the headers file */
-rc = apr_file_open(hfd, headers, APR_READ|APR_BINARY, 0, r-pool);
+rc = apr_file_open(hfd, headers, flags, 0, r-pool);
Should be something like this adapted from core:
core_dir_config *core_config;
core_config
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Sunday, August 1, 2004 11:25 AM -0400 Bill Stoddard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Too many changes in one patch. Break this up into multiple consumable
in 15
minute patches and I'll review them.
* modules/experimental/mod_disk_cache.c (load_headers): Only validate
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Monday, August 2, 2004 10:35 AM -0400 Bill Stoddard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* modules/experimental/mod_disk_cache.c: Allow sendfile on cache bodies.
-1, Need to check for EnableSendfile off.
No, core_output_filter does that check. Modules don't have
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Monday, August 2, 2004 1:05 PM -0400 Bill Stoddard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I should amend my vote a -.5. The patch should work as you've coded it
but
opening a file for use with apr_sendfile causes the file to be opened for
overlapped i/o on Windows. I expect
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
mod_cache isn't doing anything stupid or damaging
performance-wise, I'd like to start being more aggressive about what we
can cache. From my perspective, these patches I've posted (and started
to commit) are just the beginning of trying to get mod_cache on more
solid
Mads Toftum wrote:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 04:54:07PM -0400, Brian Akins wrote:
Any reason md4 was not used in mod_cache? In my ad hoc tests, it seems
much faster. I do not know the in-and-outs of encryption, but is there
any compelling reason to use md5 over md4 in this case? We don't care
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Monday, August 2, 2004 8:18 PM -0400 Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, it's really good to see the interest in this picking back up. This
seems like a really good way to get us motivated to do a 2.2 release
Sometime Soon. :)
How 'bout 2.2 GA for
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Monday, August 2, 2004 2:49 PM -0400 Bill Stoddard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To get mod_cache/mod_mem_cache (I know little or nothing about
mod_disk_cache) really performing competatively against best-of-breed
caches
will require bypassing output filters
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Monday, August 2, 2004 2:49 PM -0400 Bill Stoddard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To get mod_cache/mod_mem_cache (I know little or nothing about
mod_disk_cache) really performing competatively against best-of-breed
caches
will require bypassing
Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
: -Original Message-
: From: Bill Stoddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
:
: Here's some comparative numbers to chew on.
:
: One client and one server on 100Mbps network (cheapy
: 100Base-T switch);
: 50 simulated users hitting 7 URLs 100 times
Brian Akins wrote:
I think I missed the answer to this:
Has the feature that prevents mod_cache from caching urls ending in /
(as related to mod_dir) been fixed? If so, will this make it into 2.0?
yes it has been fixed. I volunteer to help with the backport. Just need to get the votes to
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Brian Akins wrote:
I think I missed the answer to this:
Has the feature that prevents mod_cache from caching urls ending in
/ (as related to mod_dir) been fixed? If so, will this make it into
2.0?
yes it has been fixed. I volunteer to help with the backport. Just need
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, 03 Aug 2004 23:47:21 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 09:29 PM 8/3/2004, Bill Stoddard wrote:
mod_cache, mod_mem_cache and mod_disk_cache are experimental modules in 2.0, so I am going to bypass the votes and just start backporting fixes. Please
Brian Akins wrote:
Should this:
cache_in_filter_handle =
ap_register_output_filter(CACHE_IN,
cache_in_filter,
NULL,
AP_FTYPE_CONTENT_SET-1);
Actually be this:
cache_in_filter_handle =
I've written a module to ARM4 instrument Apache 2. I'd like to donate this module to the ASF and ideally put
it in the modules/experimental directory (or somewhere else in the ASF where we can place it under cvs
control?). The ARM4 API headers are available from the Open Group website at
Paul Querna wrote:
So, after a quick look at the website, it looks like ARM4 is some sort
of SNMP on Steroids?
Also, the License is quite important for any possibility of donating any
module to the ASF I think that needs to be pinned down before any
discussion can really move forward.
The
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
So, after a quick look at the website, it looks like ARM4 is some sort
of SNMP on Steroids?
Also, the License is quite important for any possibility of donating any
module to the ASF I think that needs to be pinned down before any
discussion can really
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Doesn't some de minimis treatment through the incubator still apply? There
are two templates, one for a full project's incubation, one for a lightweight
pass through IP vetting. ++1 here for submission to the incubator as
a new httpd instrumentation subproject. Also
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
Small patch that enables building against zlib-1.2.1
instead of ancient 1.1.4 version.
Are there any compelling reasons to move from 1.1.4 to 1.2.1? Just curious and no time to investigate for
myself right at the moment.
Bill
André Malo wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stoddard2004/08/23 18:49:59
Modified:modules/generators mod_cgi.c
Log:
Escape bytes returned by the errfn because it might be from an untrusted
source
Could you ifndef AP_UNSAFE_ERROR_LOG_UNESCAPED it for those who don't want it?
nd
André,
Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
I'm going to start a TR cycle for both 2.0 and 2.1 monday.
Objections?
Sander
Got a few 2.0 backports from 2.1 I need to drum up support for but otherwise +1
Bill
Jean-Jacques Clar wrote:
Should the type for refcount be apr_atomic_t instead of apr_uint32_t?
It does not build currently for NetWare.
JJ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/26/04 10:59 AM
stoddard2004/08/26 09:59:46
Index: mod_cache.h
Joe Schaefer wrote:
Joe Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The concept of multiplexing apache's lingering
close comes from lingerd, but I thought it'd be
interesting to try the same thing for worker with
a dedicated closer thread.
The patch is intended to improve worker's scaling
Jean-Jacques Clar wrote:
Testing 2.0 and 2.1 Head.
I am running a test that requires frequent ejections of cache entities:
max_cache_size and max_object_count are smaller than my sampling.
2 threads running at the concurrently on 2 CPUs.
Thread1(T1): an entry is ejected from the cache in
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Tuesday, September 7, 2004 2:48 PM +1000 Ian Holsman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok.. so I've started playing with mod-cache again, and I noticed the
following:
- there is no way to cache something with query-args which doesn't return
a expires tag.
proposal: add a
Not to knock over the apple cart or anything, but had a 15 second chat with Greg today and he had an idea that
sounded good. His idea was to eliminate the cleanup bit entirely and fold the function it is providing into
the refcount. With the code in HEAD right now, a cache object sitting in the
1 - 100 of 744 matches
Mail list logo
