Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I agree - I think it's reversed. +1 on your patch in Bugzilla.
Feel free to commit it, if you wish. It'd be nice if your patch in
bugzilla was unified diff format. diff -u. =) -- justin
Woops. I lost my .cvsrc on one machine. Anyway, thanks for the review.
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
How many problems does it cause? Having to give gdb a different name
is a problem (minor), but how many others are there?
ps and other process utilities won't filter on httpd. ps -C httpd,
pkill -HUP httpd would all fail if the binary isn't
On 15 May 2002, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What about
- Incorporate the restart stuff into httpd
- Make apachectl a simple shell script that just sets up the environment
and calls httpd
- Encourage everyone to use apachectl
Would the syntax
On 16 May 2002, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Who would be in favor of this, or parts thereof? I'm anxious to see a
consensus so that steps toward the goal can be filled in over time.
+1 That looks good to me. Really, I have no particular problem with httpd
being the wrapper script, but it would
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Ryan Bloom wrote:
My own opinion is that we leave things exactly as they are today. If
you are running the binary by hand, you are taking some responsibility
for knowing what you are doing. That means having the environment
variables setup correctly before you start.
On 17 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
brianp 02/05/16 18:43:52
Modified:docs/conf httpd-std.conf.in
Log:
Added EnableMMAP (commented out) to the standard config
Is this a directive that pretty much everyone using apache needs to know
about? My guess is no, and if that is
On 17 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Added EnableMMAP (commented out) to the standard config
I lost your response to my question, but I think I remember the gist of
it. To respond:
1. It seems pretty nasty that we need to people to adjust their
configuration based on the underlying
Anyone mind if I make the following changes:
- Make subdirectories for flood and apreq and move releases there.
- Rename httpd-2.0.36-win32.zip to httpd-2.0.36-source_only-win32.zip
There seems to be a ton of people downloading the win32.zip, and I imagine
the majority of them are just
On Wed, 22 May 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
There seems to be a ton of people downloading the win32.zip, and I imagine
the majority of them are just confusing themselves.
I've seen far fewer complaints since .36 when I rewrote the first few sentences
about what the downloads are.
On 22 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wrowe 02/05/22 13:13:08
Modified:.HEADER.html
Log:
Attempt to cool off download hell. Simplify the HEADER to just what
we MUST state up front, so folks will take the time to read it.
Not to discourage you, but I
On Wed, 22 May 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
And Josh and I are suggesting we add -src to the end of every package name
in the source distro directory.
Yes, src would be an improvement. Note that build seems very
ambiguous to me. That could mean stuff you need in order to build, but
it
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Jerry Baker wrote:
Aaron Bannert wrote:
+pDo not download from www.apache.org. Please use a mirror site
May I suggest that we put this notice in HEADER.html? Otherwise
it shows up underneath the links that allow downloads from apache.org
directly, which means
On 23 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure at what point all of these links got out of date
w.r.t. the stylesheet, but anyway I regenerated them all. This
link seems to work better than the old one, kind of.
Nope. The one with httpd should be correct. I had just forgotten
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
+ lia href=http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/httpd/;from a
mirror/a/li
Have you tried it? It's nonsensical. It comes up with an httpd/ link,
which when you click on it expands to a httpd/dist/httpd/ link, and you
click on that and get
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
I'm not sure where you are getting that. There is a slight problem with
the link to the full list of mirrors (and I'll fix that in a second), but
if it finds mirrors in your country code, then those work
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
Well, if you are coming from .edu, then you should be getting all the
us ones. Is that not working? I can only test from .ca and .org.
Nope. I get:
I can't replicate that. What is the IP address
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
I can't replicate that. What is the IP address of your client?
Perhaps it doesn't have reverse DNS? I'm not sure how the
script would handle that.
That's true, it doesn't. Well, at least not from
On Fri, 24 May 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
httpd -k start -DSSL
Yes. How many other server modules [protocols especially, such as
pop3 and so on] will beg the same. It's bogus.
I agree.
As another data point, I've seen a couple people confused by the startssl
thing. They do:
Cliff, I think this should solve (or at least hack around) the mirror
problem you were having. Please give it a go when you have a chance.
On 25 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
slive 02/05/25 09:27:50
Modified:docs/dyn closer.cgi
Log:
Make a couple small improvements to
Is there any particular reason why SSIErrorMsg and SSITimeFormat are
OR_ALL? I don't see any other non-deprecated directives with that
setting. Wouldn't OR_FILEINFO be more appropriate?
(I'm just trying to clean up some docs and I don't know what to do with
these.)
Joshua.
Joe Orton wrote:
Currently config directory processing isn't very useful in practice
because all files in the config dir are loaded - so if you use an editor
which creates backup files, the backup file will still be loaded.
A simple way to fix this is to only load files in the config dir
On Mon, 27 May 2002, Sascha Schumann wrote:
-0.9. Whoever said we were deprecating them? I thought the plan was that
apachectl would continue to accept 'start|stop|restart' and would pass
them as 'httpd -k $ARGV' to Apache. That is what apachectl does
currently. Yes, you *could* say
On Mon, 27 May 2002, Marc Slemko wrote:
It seems that the thing named apachectl has become something very
very different from what it was created to be. The need to set certain
environment variables before running httpd, and the need for a
wrapper script that provides standard command line
On Mon, 27 May 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
- Having two different sets of arguments for httpd and apachectl is
confusing and difficult to document
How so? How is this different from syntax differences between any
other two commands? Here is a wrapper used by administrators for
five
I just did a quick update on the mod_proxy documentation. But since I
don't really use the proxy myself, and I haven't looked at the code in
depth, I can only go so far.
We really need one of the proxy gurus to take a look at the
documentation when they have time so we can eventually get rid
On Tue, 28 May 2002, Joe Orton wrote:
Sounds reasonable: patch is below.
This removes support for Include somedir, by the argument that
include dirs will just trip people up unexpectedly, and Include
somedir/* is equivalent if they really want that behaviour. (Although
the ability to
On Tue, 28 May 2002, Thom May wrote:
I'd be quite surprised if anyone in a mass vhosting environment _wasn't_
using it, to be honest. Especially the recursion.
This seems like a pretty bad thing to remove.
Could you provide more details about this? I can imagine some very
limited
On Tue, 28 May 2002, Marc Slemko wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
Include is really only a convenience to the administrator. It can't be
used for distributed management, because anyone with write access to one
of these directories could easily crash the server at the next
On Tue, 28 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 28 May 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
Sure, I agree with all that. I'm just trying to figure out the use-case
for having Include dir/ recursively include subdirectories. If there is
such a case, we should keep it, but I don't know
I got myself into a bug that is way over my head:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9673
It seems that conditional GET (If-Modified-Since) is not working at all
correctly with output filters. If someone wants to take a look, please
have at it.
Joshua.
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
I got myself into a bug that is way over my head:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9673
It seems that conditional GET (If-Modified-Since) is not working at all
correctly with output
Jie Gao wrote:
This is quite ambiguous, but I think this is how it should read:
On the Apache web server, the last modified HTTP header is returned if
the file is an HTML file. If it is a SHTML (or processed by
mod_include), then the last modified header is only returned when
the SHTML file is
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 01:24 PM 6/11/2002, Aaron Luo wrote:
I am a software developer. But currently unemployeed right. I would like
to do some volunteer work. Anyone can give me a hint how to get some work
from this site? What is criteria to get some work?
It appears to me that this patch:
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/apache-1.3/src/support/split-logfile.diff?r1=1.7r2=1.8
was never forward ported to 2.0. I believe the exact same patch will
work in 2.0, but I'm fairly perl-ignorant, so I'd appreciate it if
someone else can check this in.
Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Joshua Slive wrote:
+1. If I don't hear any objections, I will comment out this section of
httpd.conf and reverse the changes to the error docs.
I would suggest that BOTH changes are appropriate. Somebody just looking
through the config
[Sorry, I missed this earlier.]
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 10:25:59PM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
In any case, I have a patch ready to commit that removes Ryan's changes,
but comments-out the internationalized error docs in the default config.
I believe that is better
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 03:04:07PM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
Someone snuck in and moved the furniture on you while you were
sleeping (i.e. follow the source).
SERVER_SOFTWARE is the variable used by error/include/bottom.html.
That is added in ap_add_common_vars
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Playing devil's advocate :-) mod_status and mod_info should NOT be loaded by
default.
True.
But even if they aren't, adding them in active IfModule sections in
the default config is too dangerous in my opinion. Those are
security-sensitive modules, and there is
Günter Knauf wrote:
the patch doesnt enable the modules, just only it's easier to enable them with only
removing one # at the load command...; also I'm more thinking of disabling the
modules after I have already used them; and if I then comment the load command I must
also comment six config
Günter Knauf wrote:
Ahhh, but you forget that not everyone uses DSO modules. Many people
compile the modules into the server, and for them the module is active
regardless of the LoadModule line.
Ok, that was the point I missed and convinces me that it's not such a good idea
then...
then
Jerry Baker wrote:
The doc at http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/vhosts/name-based.html has a
misleading statement.
Configuration directives set in the main server context
(outside any VirtualHost container) will be used only
if they are not overriden by the virtual host
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In apache 1.3 we had this little trick:
if [ x`$aux/getuid.sh` != x0 -a x$port = x ]; then
conf_port=8080
fi
to make the port 8080 when the user is not root - thus to reduce the
number of 'apache wont start' newby errors and be
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
According to Ravindra Jaju:
How about an extra echo:
if [ x`$aux/getuid.sh` != x0 -a x$port = x ]; then
conf_port=8080
echo Non-root process. Server will run on port $conf_port
fi
+1
I don't see how that helps. Newbie users
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Have there been any complaints about how 1.3 has been doing it for
ages?
Yes. I've seen many confused people posting to
comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix who where caught by exactly this issue.
It usually starts with a basic query like I installed
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Erik Abele wrote:
Hi!
Some weeks ago I posted the attached patch on the docs-list. Last week I
posted it a second time, but didn't receive any replies. Therefore I am
posting it here on the dev-list
Thanks! I commited your patch with the sole change that I removed
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Erik Abele wrote:
I'm a little bit unsure about the meta-content-type header: the XHTML 1.0
specification (http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/) recommends to use both methods
to define the content-type on existing/older user agents.
Ech. Browsers will get the charset and
On Sun, 21 Jul 2002, Adrian Grajdeanu wrote:
I'm writing off the list because this might be configuration/support issue
...
We're on the list, so I might as well respond here.
RewriteRule /Bob(.*) /Bob$1 [NC]
In my filesystem I have the e:/Html/Bob/index.html file
To the request:
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
So, unless someone has a solution I'm missing, I'd like to propose adding
a sort of pseudo-envariable during the logging phase. Something like
'status_is_NNN', where NNN is appropriately substituted. Then something
like
CustomLog
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
I personally find that a bit baroque. :-) Also, it's tied
specifically to mod_log_config. However, you've given me
an idea, so here's a counterproposal:
LogStatus envname[=val] statusre ...
(I think the envname should be last to align
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, Oden Eriksson wrote:
On Thursday 18 July 2002 19.54, Oden Eriksson wrote:
Hi.
Since stuff like CacheRoot moved from mod_proxy into mod_disk_cache, that
should be reflected in the documentation.
Thanks.
Since there where no responce on this, I have to repeat
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Joshua Slive wrote:
LogVariable %s 40[0-9] exclude
Fine and cool -- except that this is mod_log_config specific, and it
would be nice to have something that was module-neutral. Or are the
logging format effectors dissociated from
On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 11:46:45AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In case anyone is interested, here are some captures taken with Sniffer
Pro. The key things to note are that Apache 2.0.39 mod_proxy drops the
Content-Length header, and also
On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, James Cox wrote:
Silly question,
but why aren't we using DocBook for this?
Not really a silly question. It was debated extensively, although not
necessarily on this list. (I tried to start the debate here, but most
not many people seemed insterested in arguing the
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Tim Wilde wrote:
I'm reposting the attached patch yet again, which adds various IfModule
sections to the default httpd.conf to allow proper function without
changes to httpd.conf if various modules aren't enabled. Sent this twice
within the last two months now without
I am in the process of changing the docs build process so the build stuff
will no longer live in the httpd-2.0 tree. If you want docs builds to
work, don't update your tree for the next little while. When I am
finished, instructions for using the new system will be at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 httpd-site/docs/info/security_bulletin_20020809a.txt
Permanent URL: http://httpd.apache.org/info/security_bulletin_20020908a.txt
Problem here. Not the month/day day/month switch. I've done a mv on
daedalus so
Mark J Cox wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
For Immediate Disclosure
Incidentally, I didn't see this get sent to users@httpd and
announce@httpd (it was sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Did I miss it?
Joshua.
Alan Skea wrote:
I got a bit frustrated by the lack of flexibility in the mod_log_config CustomLog
directive. What I wanted was to make logging conditional on multiple environment
variables that get set by different modules, and also to be able to make logging
behaviour depend on the value
Alan Skea wrote:
I don't think SetEnvIf quite does it. In one module I extract a session tracking
token from the URI and set it into an env var. If this var is present then I want to
use a particular log format. I also started looking at a module called robotcop the
other day. It
Jim Jagielski wrote:
By the by, do we have a canonical list of such env-vars currently is use?
Last I checked, the doccos were somewhat dated and sparse.
The canonical list is here:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/env.html#special
(and similarly for 2.0)
But I believe that some of the recent
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 03:03:40PM -0700, Brian Pane wrote:
With this patch, we'll end up not sending a C-L header on most
shtml or CGI pages. As a result, the server will add a
Connection: close for HTTP/1.0 clients and will use chunked
encoding for HTTP/1.1 clients.
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Thom May wrote:
Hi Guys,
this is a newly filed bug from the debian www team; it holds for apache2
and
is a real problem for us.
As this person seems to somewhat realize, Apache's behavior in this case
is following the requirements in the standard. It is the browser
Graham Leggett wrote:
Hi all,
In the v2.0 proxy, the following code exists:
/* In order for ap_set_keepalive to work properly, we can NOT
* have any length information stored in the output headers.
Surely the correct fix is to make sure that ap_set_keepalive()
Jamni wrote:
Hi all
I am just thinking whether i can alter the module mod_log_config to log
all the accesses/errors into another user-defined file, in addition to
the original access/error log files. Can anyone tell me how i could do
this ?? Or do i need to write a new module for this
Graham Leggett wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am very much against putting more modules into the standard server.
I think such a decision should be based on whether it is desirable for
core Apache to offer certain features, not whether there are many or few
modules in the core.
Jon Travis wrote:
Well, if people are agreeing to this, can we get someone involved
in the HTTPD project (non-Covalent affiliated) to review and
approve/decline? Volunteers?
I can't publicly post the source under the ASF license until it has been
accepted (which is a chicken egg
I was just trying to correct the docs for ThreadLimit and
ThreadsPerChild to have the correct defaults for mpm_winnt, and I ran
into a little confusion. From a very quick reading, it appears that the
mpm_default.h for mpm_winnt is stolen directly from an MPM that has
min/maxsparechild
Brad Nicholes wrote:
Is it appropriate to place the docs
for an experimental module in /docs/manual/mod
Yes. They'll need to be converted to XML, but you can just drop them in
for now if you don't have time to do that.
and the sample .conf in
/docs/conf
No, I don't think we want to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bnicholes2002/08/30 13:46:55
Modified:docs/manual/platform netware.html
Log:
Fixing up the broken links
Sorry, I probably missed fixing those when I moved platform docs into a
subdirectory. But your fix is not really the best, because now these
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Please realize that I don't think it's possible to maintain
backwards compatibility due to the relevant Authoritative directives.
So, a vote for 2.0 means it is okay to break backwards compatibility.
Just as a crazy idea: Since you are retaining
Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Getting more specific, I envision a directive that works like this:
NameLookups All|IPv4Okay|IPv6Okay
Can I suggest IPLookups, or something along those lines. That makes
it clearer that we are talking about looking up an IP address using a
name, and
Ian Holsman wrote:
aren't all these HTML files autogenerated now ?
I'm just wondering if they belong in CVS at all anymore
Ideally, No. (Although that particular one is not auto-generated, the
majority are.)
There are a couple reasons they are in CVS:
1. To make the release-manager's job
Bojan Smojver wrote:
I guess the HTML file would get generated automatically, but I'm
attaching it anyway.
Thanks. Both the FAQ and glossary entries are committed.
Joshua.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I agree it would be nice to repost an OpenSSL/mod_ssl advisory on our
pages (mod_ssl is a sister project, after all.)
But understand that the ASF took ownership of mod_ssl for Apache 2.0,
not 1.3, and we not married to any particular SSL library (although many
Jeff Trawick wrote:
There probably does need to be an EBCDIC section describing minor
issues with the core code and with standard modules (e.g., SSI files
need to be in the native character set so that mod_include can parse
them*).
Anyone feel like taking that on?
Joshua.
Erik Parker wrote:
I hate to reply to my own post, but because of my apparent crack habits.. I
didn't realize the testing environment configs weren't nearly exact..
The http 2.0 server still had a AddDefaultChar set lower in the config file.
So.. the only issue/question is..
When
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Marc Slemko wrote:
Lets not encode env variables, as we discussed earlier.
Escaping them is bogus and doesn't solve anything since there are all
sorts of variables that aren't and shouldn't be encoded.
+1 to what Marc says. The encoding serves no purpose. Preventing
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
YES!
All that merging stuff is true. But let's go back to the original
problem:
Location /
limitexcept GET
require valid-user
/limitexcept
/location
directory /
require valid-user
/directory
This has the effect of leaving GET unrestricted,
André Malo wrote:
* Daniel Lopez wrote:
| Note: If CGI processes are not running under userids other than the
| web server userid, this directive will limit the number of
| processes that the server itself can create. Evidence of this
| situation will be indicated by cannot fork messages in
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
This patch fixes the problem I mentioned in my reply to Jeff - namely
that any deny host directive should deny access when a double reverse
lookup fails.
If I understand you correctly, that would be a major change to current
behavior. I believe that people expect
Not acked.
Original Message
Subject: Forwarded mail
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 09:09:51 +0200 (MEST)
From: Henk P. Penning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Followup-To: ruuinf.misc
Hi,
when mirroring apache, rsync says:
readlink
André Malo wrote:
I've tried to find a solution. It's certainly not complete, but a first
suggestion. I simply fetched the old module docs from the Attic, named
them obs_* and modified the xslt a little bit. As proposed by
Joshua they got the status Obsolete and also a large warning on top of
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Sunday, October 13, 2002 9:36 PM -0400 Joshua Slive
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more note: I'd like to see the rename of mod_access reversed.
That just seems like a gratuitous change that hurts users and
doesn't really help developers.
Could you please
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Granted, the underscores always bugged me. But seeking to change
the config further introduces even more support headaches if we
incorporate these changes into Apache 2.0.
Yes. I prefer not to use this as an opportunity to break everything.
Break what needs to
I'm +1 for creating 2.1 and 2.2 trees as proposed by Bill.
The current auth-docs problems can be fixed (and, in fact, André has
already gotten us most of the way there), but things would be much
cleaner with a new tree.
I also believe this would better communicate with users the current
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
One bit concerns me, we cannot state that we will break MMN compat
between security fixes and modules are always forward compatible
within a version (e.g. 2.1).
I agree that is a conflict, and I can't really decide which way I favor.
It seems attractive to say
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
STABLE RELEASES, 2.{odd}.{revision}
All even numbered releases will be considered stable revisions. That
means;
One way to summarize this would be: upgrading from a stable release to
the next minor number should be painless:
On Jan 25, 2008 5:28 PM, Chris H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings all,
I'm toying with the idea of using PCRE in Apache 1.3.
I see already that there is support for REGEX in the
Configuration.tmpl that permits a choice of bundled
or system (if available). But was wondering how hard,
or if
On Feb 5, 2008 5:40 AM, Boyle Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
Our security guy noticed this alert about a XSS vulnerability in
mod_negotiation: http://www.mindedsecurity.com/MSA01150108.html.
According to the link, it applies to apache = 2.2.6, so no worries for
2.2.8.
However,
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Chris Stromsoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All requests for php in /opt/html authenticate properly but don't set
REMOTE_USER and are logged with r-user == NULL. I'm guessing that's
because the handler is not inside the protected directory.
Feature or bug?
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The advantage of mod_headers is more flexibility that what could
be comfortably added to the proxy module itself as well...
This comes up maybe once or twice a year... I think I'll add
it to my standard Apache 2.2
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:29 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Thu Apr 3 08:28:59 2008
New Revision: 644357
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=644357view=rev
Log:
Correct broken configuration in 2.2 - this example didn't run out of the box
+AuthDigestProvider
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The easiest way to do this would be to run a dedicated httpd process for
each application (forming your pool), and then combine them into one
website using a standard reverse proxy configuration.
2008/5/4 Niko Wilfritz Sianipar Sianipar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How to get the response time in the apache log file in msec. Thank you.
%D in the logformat string gives you microseconds.
Joshua.
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 1:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+note type=warningtitleNote/title
+ pThis directive will be ignored in a name-based virtual host
context./p
+/note
That should just be an ordinary note with no type=.
warning is for really-important stuff like
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 6:57 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Fri May 9 03:57:46 2008
New Revision: 654752
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=654752view=rev
Log:
backport from trunk:
*) mod_cgid:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Jorge Schrauwen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd say tomorrow so most mirrors will be synced by then... unless they sync
very fast... no idea how fast that is.
You can see a histogram of last-sync times near the bottom of this page:
http://www.apache.org/mirrors/
501 - 597 of 597 matches
Mail list logo
