Am 24.09.2014 um 22:21 schrieb Rainer Jung:
Am 24.09.2014 um 22:15 schrieb Rainer Jung:
Am 24.09.2014 um 20:20 schrieb Eric Covener:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org
mailto:p...@querna.org wrote:
Thoughts? Is it reasonable to do something in mod_cgi{d
Am 24.09.2014 um 23:29 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
A workaround like
--- server/util_script.c.orig 2013-09-14 14:12:54.0 +
+++ server/util_script.c2014-09-24 20:35:54.952054361 +
@@ -128,6 +128,12
Am 24.09.2014 um 23:15 schrieb Rainer Jung:
Am 24.09.2014 um 22:21 schrieb Rainer Jung:
Am 24.09.2014 um 22:15 schrieb Rainer Jung:
Am 24.09.2014 um 20:20 schrieb Eric Covener:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org
mailto:p...@querna.org wrote:
Thoughts
Am 04.09.2014 um 12:13 schrieb Ruediger Pluem:
Can we really backport this?
We are increasing the size of proxy_worker_shared and changing offsets inside
the struct.
I documented a woraround for the problem of short proxy URLs in BZ53218.
It should be applicable in many cases.
It is based
Am 04.09.2014 um 12:13 schrieb Ruediger Pluem:
Can we really backport this?
We are increasing the size of proxy_worker_shared and changing offsets inside
the struct.
Bummer, I guess you are right. mod_proxy.h seems to be part of the
public API so we can't backport like this. Will revoke the
Am 26.08.2014 um 17:02 schrieb Eric Covener:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Anyone else seeing this with HEAD of 2.4?
# testing : trailer (pid)
# expected: '67568'
# received: 'No chunked trailer available!'
not ok 3
# Failed test 3 in
Am 21.08.2014 um 14:57 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 10:24 AM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Sat Aug 2 08:24:35 2014
New Revision: 1615289
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1615289
Log:
PR53420: Proxy responses with error status and
ProxyErrorOverride On hang until
Am 22.08.2014 um 19:59 schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
The pre-release candidate Apache httpd 2.2.29 - with simply a rebuild
of the docs/manual/ since 2.2.28, can be found in;
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
+/-1
[ X] Release 2.2.29 (apr 1.5.1, apr-util 1.5.3)
+1 to release,
I investigated PR53420
(https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53420), see my last
reply there.
Using proxy in combination with ProxyErrorOverride shows a hang until
the proxy timeout fires.
The hang happens, when the proxy calls ap_discard_request_body to
discard the origin
Am 01.08.2014 um 18:44 schrieb Eric Covener:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote:
btw: I ran (as best I could) ApacheTest against 2.4.10. On the one hand, all
tests it did passed, but it skipped several, which surprises me somewhat -
because I thought I had all
Am 24.07.2014 um 02:39 schrieb Takashi Sato:
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/configure.in (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/configure.in Wed Jul 23 19:01:45 2014
@@ -236,7 +236,9 @@ if test $PCRE_CONFIG != false; then
fi
case `$PCRE_CONFIG --version` in
[[1-5].*])
-AC_MSG_ERROR([Need at
Am 24.07.2014 um 11:56 schrieb Takashi Sato:
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/include/ap_regex.h (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/include/ap_regex.h Wed Jul 23 20:27:32 2014
@@ -79,6 +79,12 @@ extern C {
#define AP_REG_MATCH MATCH_ /** suggested prefix for ap_regname */
+/* Arguments for
On 23.07.2014 02:25, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi Rainer,
On 22.07.2014 23:01, Rainer Jung wrote:
documenting the requirement PCRE = 6.7 and dropping the check (and
error message) for PCRE_DUPNAMES from server/util_pcre.c.
-1.
Please think of non-configure builds;
it doesnt hurt if the code errors
On 22.07.2014 22:20, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
Hi,
shouldn't the #error just a few lines below be updated as well, to be
more explicit than too old ?
You are right. But what about instead changing the configure pcre
version test:
Index: configure.in
On 15.07.2014 19:20, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.10 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.10 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will
On 15.07.2014 19:20, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.10 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.10 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will
On 15.06.2014 09:51, Kaspar Brand wrote:
On 14.06.2014 12:53, Rainer Jung wrote:
I'm slightly in favor of the latter, i.e. something like
SSL_CTX_set_timeout(sc-server-ssl_ctx,
sc-session_cache_timeout == UNSET
On 14.06.2014 10:23, Kaspar Brand wrote:
On 13.06.2014 16:55, Rainer Jung wrote:
Now since a long time most clients do no longer rely on the server
caching the sessions. Instead they use TLS session resumption (RFC
5077).
without server-side state/stateless is actually the important term
On 14.06.2014 11:44, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 14.06.2014 10:23, Kaspar Brand wrote:
On 13.06.2014 16:55, Rainer Jung wrote:
Now since a long time most clients do no longer rely on the server
caching the sessions. Instead they use TLS session resumption (RFC
5077).
without server-side state
Traditionally mod_ssl allows reuse of SSL sessions by its SSL session
cache on the server side. One can control via SSLSessionCacheTimeout how
long a session is kept in the cache (if the cache is big enough).
Now since a long time most clients do no longer rely on the server
caching the sessions.
While doing some customization of mod_ssl I checked for memory leaks on
Solaris using libumem and found 5 allocations that happen for each
handshake and do not seem to get freed.
Versions: httpd 2.4 head plus OpenSSL 1.0.1g
::findleaks
...
000b9688 85 002779c8
On 05.05.2014 15:34, Eric Covener wrote:
I don't want to churn in SVN too much, does anyone have an issue with
dropping the context info stuff for the regex case completely?
Thanks for asking again and agreed here.
Regards,
Rainer
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Eric Covener
On 21.04.2014 23:15, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 20/04/2014 20:11, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 20/04/2014 18:51, Rainer Jung wrote:
CCing Mark our Bugzilla (and much more) champion, hoping he knows more
or at least needs the info.
@Mark: I think the transform svn revision to link feature is a
Bugzilla
On 14.04.2014 13:08, Jeff Trawick wrote:
(not to say there aren't complications, like trying to keep system
directories out of rpath)
Adding my current workarounds for 2.4 here for reference.
Here openssl_libs is either -ldl -lz (Linux) or -lz -ldl -lsocket
-lnsl (Solaris). The value of
CCing Mark our Bugzilla (and much more) champion, hoping he knows more
or at least needs the info.
@Mark: I think the transform svn revision to link feature is a
Bugzilla global one, not specific to httpd. It seems partially broken
after the recent update, see below for details.
Regards,
Rainer
Hi Jeff,
On 14.04.2014 13:08, Jeff Trawick wrote:
(not to say there aren't complications, like trying to keep system
directories out of rpath)
See a related discussion from 2011 RUNPATH for module dependencies on
Unix/Linux e.g. here:
http://markmail.org/message/guastewy5uvn36s7
Joe had some
On 11.04.2014 18:05, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com
mailto:traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Rainer M. Canavan
rainer.cana...@sevenval.com mailto:rainer.cana...@sevenval.com
wrote:
On Apr
On 09.04.2014 18:05, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.04.2014 17:41, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
Combined with typical ssl session shmcb ... That single process still has
session keys of other prefork processes,
as well as the common ssl session ticket key and ssl cert keys. In practice
the
On 09.04.2014 21:42, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 09.04.2014 18:05, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.04.2014 17:41, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
Combined with typical ssl session shmcb ... That single process still has
session keys of other prefork processes,
as well as the common ssl session ticket
On 30.03.2014 22:52, Eric Covener wrote:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
AFAICT {
In as much that it was ever useful, this breaks people relying on the
context info for aliasmatches structured the way this code was
originally biased to expecting
On 30.03.2014 20:29, Eric Covener wrote:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 2:20 PM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Sun Mar 30 18:20:09 2014
New Revision: 1583175
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1583175
Log:
Fix segfault in mod_alias introduced in r1132494.
AliasMatch does not append
On 17.03.2014 10:59, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
I try to find a slot to vote on 2.2.x later today, but I guess it will be in
the evening my local time (GMT+1).
Same here, some builds and tests still running, currently looks OK.
One minor nag: out of tree build found another problem
On 17.03.2014 20:15, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 13:25:32 +0100
Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 17.03.2014 10:59, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
I try to find a slot to vote on 2.2.x later today, but I guess it
will be in the evening my local time (GMT
the
failures. Unfortunately I'm a bit limited on time during this weekend to
narrow down the root cause (test framework, OpenSSL, httpd) on the
failing platform.
Regards,
Rainer
On Mar 14, 2014, at 2:13 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 13.03.2014 17:49, Jim Jagielski wrote
On 15.03.2014 17:25, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 15.03.2014 14:45, Jim Jagielski wrote:
What platform? I'll try to recreate...
Solaris 10 Sparc.
I used the latest and greatest for test framework, Perl 5.18.2 and
needed Per modules build from scratch. Also OpenSSL 1.0.1f.
For the Linux
On 13.03.2014 17:49, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.9 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.9 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will
On 12.03.2014 11:37, Jim Jagielski wrote:
At the very least, upgrading from 2.4.7 to 2.4.8 should not
cause this much pain. I will let the vote run a bit more to
gauge additional feedback, but my sense says that 2.4.8
will likely be revoked/dropped and 2.4.9 will be proposed
which either (1)
On 12.03.2014 01:59, Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
On 12/03/2014 00:30, Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
The fix was applied on Feb 11 2013. That would mean that official releases
affected would be 0.9.8y, 1.0.0j and 1.0.1c. Any later official release
should
include the fix but we weren't planning to
On 12.03.2014 14:55, Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
On 12/03/2014 12:29, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 12.03.2014 11:37, Jim Jagielski wrote:
At the very least, upgrading from 2.4.7 to 2.4.8 should not
cause this much pain. I will let the vote run a bit more to
gauge additional feedback, but my sense says
On 12.03.2014 18:39, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:30:57 +
Dr Stephen Henson shen...@opensslfoundation.com wrote:
On 11/03/2014 21:46, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 3/11/2014 1:29 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 11.03.2014 17:34, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs
On 11.03.2014 17:34, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.8 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.8 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will
On 11.03.2014 21:41, Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
On 11/03/2014 20:29, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 11.03.2014 17:34, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.8 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing
On 11.03.2014 21:53, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 11.03.2014 21:41, Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
On 11/03/2014 20:29, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 11.03.2014 17:34, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.8 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist
On 22.02.2014 18:17, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 19.02.2014 14:08, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'd like to shoot for a TR sometime next week...
I updated aurora our US server for www.apache.org, the project sites and
also mail-archives.a.o to 2.4.8 dev svn revision 1570851 plus apr/apu
head revision
On 20.02.2014 18:24, Jeff Trawick wrote:
BTW, do you know if there's a known collection of patches for 2.4
support or for other critical fixes?
mod_wsgi is running on eos and reliably serves wiki.apache.org using the
following patch on top of 3.4 in combination with 2.4.4, 2.4.6 and 2.4.6
On 19.02.2014 14:08, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'd like to shoot for a TR sometime next week...
I updated aurora our US server for www.apache.org, the project sites and
also mail-archives.a.o to 2.4.8 dev svn revision 1570851 plus apr/apu
head revision of their 1.5 branches. Looks good, but only
On 11.01.2014 14:02, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org
mailto:b...@reser.org wrote:
On 1/10/14, 5:38 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
[ ] It is an accepted practice (but not required) to obscure or
omit the
vulnerability impact in
On 09.01.2014 19:48, jaillet...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jailletc36
Date: Thu Jan 9 18:48:11 2014
New Revision: 1556914
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1556914
Log:
Add missing break in 'dav_generic_do_refresh' to avoid useless computation.
Modified:
On 01.01.2014 18:26, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 1. Januar 2014, 14:06:17 schrieb Graham Leggett:
Maybe making ap_regname() accept an optional prefix string that
is
prepended to each name would be a good idea?
Maybe the use in LocationMatch and friends should add some
prefix to
On 20.12.2013 10:51, Alex Bligh wrote:
On 19 Dec 2013, at 19:29, Hong wrote:
I wrote an Apache module that call functions in openssl library to sign the
messages. The module is dynamic linked to openssl library 1.0.1d when I
built it. It works fine when it is loaded into the Apache that
On 16.12.2013 20:25, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On Sat, 14 Dec 2013 10:25:00 +0100
Kaspar Brand httpd-dev.2...@velox.ch wrote:
On 14.12.2013 09:36, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
ProxyPass is not involved in the SSL forward proxy case at all, as I
already tried to point out.
Good, we've
On 12.12.2013 10:16, Ewald Dieterich wrote:
I already asked on the mod_security developer mailing list for help, but
didn't get a response. So I'm trying my luck here.
On a Debian unstable installation (Apache 2.4.6, apr 1.4.8, apr-util
1.5.3, mod_security 2.7.5) I enabled mpm_worker and
On 12.12.2013 16:16, Ewald Dieterich wrote:
On 12/12/2013 11:53 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 12.12.2013 10:16, Ewald Dieterich wrote:
On a Debian unstable installation (Apache 2.4.6, apr 1.4.8, apr-util
1.5.3, mod_security 2.7.5) I enabled mpm_worker and configured a simple
reverse proxy. When I
On 08.12.2013 19:32, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com
mailto:traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Rainer Jung
rainer.j...@kippdata.de mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 26.11.2013 15:58, olli
On 02.12.2013 13:18, j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Mon Dec 2 12:18:19 2013
New Revision: 1546976
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1546976
Log:
Merge r1544820 from trunk:
mod_lua: Fix compiler warning by using correct
APR_SIZE_T_FMT and APR_OFF_T_FMT format macro
in debug
On 27.11.2013 19:15, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
Done (for httpd and APR). You need to have the needed permissions on
Bugzilla. Just request them from infra for your Bugzilla account.
I right now also added 2.2.26 and 1.5.3, I have the needed permissions.
If you prefer it that way, you
On 26.11.2013 15:58, olli hauer wrote:
On 2013-11-25 23:25, Jeff Trawick wrote:
See if this brings any happiness:
Index: network_io/unix/sockets.c
===
--- network_io/unix/sockets.c (revision 1545394)
+++
On 24.11.2013 01:03, Eric Covener wrote:
I'm curious what other scenarios will fail though. I can try Sun Studio on
Solaris 10 x86_64 (32-bit and 64-bit builds) soon. But Sun Studio on
SPARC presumably uses different explicit code in APR and I don't have access
to that.
I will try to get
On 22.11.2013 23:03, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Anyone ever try OpenPA?
https://trac.mcs.anl.gov/projects/openpa/
It's under MIT, fwiw.
Haven't tried it but the README
http://git.mcs.anl.gov/radix/openpa.git/blob_plain/HEAD:/README
indicates only platform support based on gcc plus
On 23.11.2013 14:19, Jeff Trawick wrote:
(maybe sf already knows something about this)
[Thu Nov 21 16:20:17.035427 2013] [:emerg] [pid 1237:tid 47440161182336]
AH00017: Pre-configuration failed, exiting
Maybe main.c isn't a module, but it is probably best to put core there.
Some other
On 23.11.2013 14:15, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de
mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 22.11.2013 23:03, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Anyone ever try OpenPA?
https://trac.mcs.anl.gov/projects/openpa
On 22.11.2013 18:47, Jim Jagielski wrote:
With +1 votes from
jim,covener,trawick,gsmith,breser,noel.butler,hiding,jblond and h.reindl
and NO -1 votes, I call the voting closed with the
result of Releasing 2.4.7 as GA.
Jim I just now found out that the atomics problem for event also happens
On 19.11.2013 23:45, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi Rainer,
Am Sonntag, 17. November 2013, 12:47:53 schrieb Rainer Jung:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1542615
Log:
Explicitly list in which directories to look for config*.m4 files.
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/build/config-stubs (original)
+++ httpd
Hi Stefan,
On 17.11.2013 00:49, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sf
Date: Sat Nov 16 23:49:04 2013
New Revision: 1542615
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1542615
Log:
Explicitly list in which directories to look for config*.m4 files.
If some distributor patches a config*.m4 file with quilt,
On 13.11.2013 18:03, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.26 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.2.26 GA.
[X] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
[ ] -1: Danger Will
On 01.10.2013 09:53, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
I see the following autoconf warning when executing buildconf on trunk:
rebuilding configure
configure.in:406: warning: AC_COMPILE_IFELSE was called before
AC_USE_SYSTEM_EXTENSIONS
../../lib/autoconf/specific.m4:386: AC_USE_SYSTEM_EXTENSIONS is
On 25.09.2013 07:33, Kaspar Brand wrote:
On 23.09.2013 11:17, Joe Orton wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 12:32:23PM +0200, Kaspar Brand wrote:
Feedback on this approach is again very welcome. Increasing the minimum
required OpenSSL version from 0.9.7 to 0.9.8a shouldn't be of concern,
IMO, as
On 15.09.2013 05:31, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 10.09.2013 16:13, Jim Jagielski wrote:
For completeness, a full, combined patch is:
http://people.apache.org/~jim/patches/httpd-2.4-event-test.patch
It requires a patch that knows about creating new files
when encountering /dev/null
On 06.08.2013 19:36, Paul Querna wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Paul Querna p...@querna.org wrote:
Hiya,
Has anyone given much thought to changes in httpd to help mitigate the
recently publicized breach attack:
On 05.08.2013 13:18, Eric Covener wrote:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 2:49 AM, Thomas Eckert
thomas.r.w.eck...@gmail.com wrote:
One could do an 'OPTIONS *' request. But I am not sure if that is any
better than proxy-initial-not-pooled in terms of performance.
I don't see why an OPTIONS request
On 02.08.2013 14:41, Daniel Gruno wrote:
Hi dev@,
Though this is mainly a question for docs@, I thought I'd drop this
email into the dev@ list instead, since this is where I think
objections, if there are any, will arise.
Today, on various Internet channels, I have had to do my very best to
On 27.07.2013 19:14, Michael Felt wrote:
1) Congradulations on an EOL - seems it was idle for a long time anyway.
2) small typo on download page:
Unix Source: httpd-2.0.66.tar.bz2
http://mirror.sdunix.com/apache//httpd/httpd-2.0.65.tar.bz2 [ PGP
On 25.07.2013 13:43, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
I see many tests for mod_deflate currently failing on trunk (OS is RH5 64
Bit).
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
---
On 25.07.2013 14:55, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 25.07.2013 13:43, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
I see many tests for mod_deflate currently failing on trunk (OS is RH5 64
Bit).
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
On 15.05.2013 17:46, minf...@apache.org wrote:
Author: minfrin
Date: Wed May 15 15:46:01 2013
New Revision: 1482918
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1482918
Log:
core: Stop ap_finalize_request_protocol() and ap_get_client_block() from
silently
swallowing errors from the filter stack, create
On 15.07.2013 18:48, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.6 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.6 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make
On 15.07.2013 15:20, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Jul 15, 2013 9:07 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com
mailto:j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Just a FYI: I plan to TR 2.4.6 this afternoon (eastern).
It will be 2.4.5 minus r1485675. As such, 2.4.6 will still
ship with PR54948 un-patched, but I think it's
On 11.07.2013 20:54, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.5 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.5 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make
On 11.07.2013 20:54, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.5 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.5 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make
On 14.07.2013 23:05, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 11.07.2013 20:54, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.5 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.5 GA.
NOTE: The -deps
On 14.07.2013 23:40, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 14.07.2013 23:05, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 11.07.2013 20:54, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.4.5 can be found
at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing
Hi Jeff,
On 14.07.2013 03:46, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Tested with event on FreeBSD 9 (amd64).
I'm running the test suite on an ASF FreeBSD 9 system as well. There I
get two observations:
- long (several minutes) hanging in t/apache/limits.t
Failed test 8 in t/apache/limits.t at line 141
(Read
On 10.07.2013 13:14, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 08:53:03AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Do you have time to test with this patch on top of 2.4.x and report back?
http://people.apache.org/~sf/open_htaccess_hook.patch
Hi,
I've tried this, adjusted mpm-itk, and it
On 09.07.2013 17:47, Joe Orton wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 08:41:04AM -0400, Eric Covener wrote:
I'm only concerned with someone who was getting by with LDAPReferrals
OFF because the default gave their SDK an error. Now OFF would be
fatal too.
Just revisiting this... at least it seems
On 03.07.2013 19:04, Eric Covener wrote:
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_io.c?rev=1497466r1=1497465r2=1497466view=diff
==
---
On 28.06.2013 23:28, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Candidates are in http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
+/-1
[+1] Release 2.0.65 as the final 2.0 series package
+1 for release and thanks for RM.
Tested on Solaris 8+10 Sparc, SuSE Linux Enterprise 10 32Bit, SLES 10+11
64 Bit, RedHat
On 28.06.2013 23:29, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Candidates are in http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
+/-1
[+1] Release 2.2.25 (apr 1.4.8, apr-util 1.5.2)
+1 to release:
- Netware src artefact not checked (missing)
- signature and hashes OK
- key in KEYS file
- gz and bz2 contents
On 28.06.2013 03:59, Guenter Knauf wrote:
On 28.06.2013 01:03, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Daniel and/or Günter,
can you have a look at the trunk CHANGES file and move the lua items
that should now be in 2.4 to the 2.4 CHANGES file? We forgot that when
we synced 2.4 with trunk and it would be nice
On 28.06.2013 19:55, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Just wanted to know the opinion of some of you who are on email today.
[ ] stay at apr-util 1.4.1 (last 1.4 release)
[X] jump up to apr-util 1.5.2 (now that it is more stable)
Rainer
Hi Daniel and/or Günter,
can you have a look at the trunk CHANGES file and move the lua items
that should now be in 2.4 to the 2.4 CHANGES file? We forgot that when
we synced 2.4 with trunk and it would be nice to have them in the 2.4
file before 2.4.5 gets tagged.
It would be nice if you could
On 26.06.2013 23:16, wr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Wed Jun 26 21:16:53 2013
New Revision: 1497101
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1497101
Log:
mod_dav: Sending a MERGE request against a URI handled by mod_dav_svn with
the source href (sent as part of the request body as XML)
On 23.04.2013 15:14, minf...@apache.org wrote:
Author: minfrin
Date: Tue Apr 23 13:14:34 2013
New Revision: 1470940
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1470940
Log:
mod_dav: Make sure that when we prepare an If URL for Etag comparison,
we compare unencoded paths. PR 53910
Patch submitted by
On 22.06.2013 15:26, Eric Covener wrote:
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 6:05 PM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Sun Jun 6 22:05:17 2010
New Revision: 952007
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=952007view=rev
Log:
make shared moduled and module set most the default.
Static
While testing the new APR 1.4.8 I ran the httpd test suite on trunk, the
first time since long.
1) eventopt didn't run on SLES 10 32 Bit
Error message:
[Wed Jun 19 14:24:21.443541 2013] [mpm_eventopt:crit] [pid 25540:tid
3082651312] AH02406: atomics not
On 17.06.2013 18:03, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
ATM I cant get the Java docu stuff working on my new dev box:
BUILD FAILED
java.lang.StackOverflowError
and also I'm short of time to look further into fixing it - therefore I
would like to ask someone for some help with the below commit to
On 14.06.2013 16:41, André Malo wrote:
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 21:18:05 Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Tuesday 11 June 2013, André Malo wrote:
trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1491155
2.4.x patch: trunk patch works
nd: why would you do that in a stable branch?
+ sf:
On 14.06.2013 17:44, André Malo wrote:
On Friday 14 June 2013 17:34:26 Rainer Jung wrote:
On 14.06.2013 16:41, André Malo wrote:
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 21:18:05 Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Tuesday 11 June 2013, André Malo wrote:
trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1491155
2.4.x
I call the vote closed. Results are:
+1: covener, fuankg, humbedooh, rjung, sf
+0: -
-1: -
So mod_lua is now CTR in 2.4.
Regards,
Rainer
On 10.06.2013 15:37, Eric Covener wrote:
Is there some historical or other reason that the location has higher
precedence that directory/files? I think the other way is much more
intuitive
Don't know about th real motivation, but after having learned that from
the explicit description in the
As announced yesterday in the proposal thread:
I suggest to switch mod_lua in 2.4 to CTR mode.
Motivation:
mod_lua is still marked experimental because we did not yet expect it to
be complete or the APIs to be stable. So we did expect and wanted to
allow incompatible changes.
Now that a few of
501 - 600 of 1303 matches
Mail list logo
