On 02/27/2006 09:35 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 11:55:31PM -0800, Sander Temme wrote:
>
>
> Also, we're getting reports that IE clients on Windows consistently get
> 408s (server timeout) immediately from httpd. Some users with Safari and
> Firefox can see this prob
On 02/27/2006 08:58 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
>>There are also still problems with proxy code corrupting data from the AJP
>>
>>>side of things. See:
>>>
>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-697
>>>
>>>for the infrastructure issue open for this. We were at 2.2.0 but the
>>
>>pro
On 02/27/2006 10:20 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
> On 02/27/2006 08:58 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
>
> Meanwhile I doubt that Tomcat sent the correct response. But maybe it is just
> me,
> so lets see what I found from the dump Justin sent over to me:
>
> The f
On 02/28/2006 05:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I´d like to restart the thread
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/apache/dev/305214
Thanks for starting this again. I also lost track of it.
>
> Please let me know if I just missed a correct config - otherwise I am curious
>
On 03/03/2006 06:55 PM, Joost de Heer wrote:
> Kanagasabai Sriskanthaverl wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Could any one please let me know whether I can use mod_jk with httpd2.2.
>> If so, is it same as with httpd2.0 or different. please guide me to
>> setup it.
>> I am aware that, there is mod_ajp which can
On 03/03/2006 10:51 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
> On 03/03/2006 06:55 PM, Joost de Heer wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>Are there things that mod_jk can do which you can't do with mod_proxy_ajp?
>
>
> Yes, it can handle cluster domains which mod_proxy_ajp can
On 03/07/2006 07:19 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Plüm wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> First: I am the author.
>>
>
> Cool. Did someone ever told you to that you
> need to fix your mail client ;).
> I hate your AW:AW:AW...
Sorry I forgot to remove. Stupid Outlook at work. I don't use
it outside as you may notice
On 03/07/2006 08:58 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> The current implementation breaks a simple timeout write:
> out.write("Hello");
> Thread.sleep(2000);
> out.write("World");
>
> It will send the 'Hello', but only after additional thread
> finishes and times out.
Giv
On 03/07/2006 09:15 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I would suggest that the "bandaid" code no longer be
> compile time but rather runtime, using a
> "force-flush=true" param to the AJP worker.
Just for clarification: What is your exact purpose?
1. Use the poll method of the bandaid, but make it pos
On 03/07/2006 10:10 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
>>For the benefit of folks here and not on mod_jk...
>>
>
>
> Check out jk_ajp_common.c in tomcat-5.5-connectors/jk/native/common
> where whether the flush is forced for each JK_AJP13_SEND_BODY_CHUNK
> is controlled b
On 03/07/2006 11:43 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 3/7/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>I would suggest that the "bandaid" code no longer be
>>compile time but rather runtime, using a
>>"force-flush=true" param to the AJP worker.
>
>
> I'd prefer that we not defer this decis
On 03/08/2006 12:49 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>> OTH I guess we still have to convince some people to switch from mod_jk
>> to mod_proxy_ajp. So I guess having a similar behaviour in mod_proxy_ajp
>> as in mod_jk will ease this. Default fo
On 03/08/2006 12:40 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> The question that remains open to me is what kind of implementation should be
> used
> if force-flush is set to true?
>
> The poll approach in the current code or flushing after each packet?
If the poll approach is
On 03/08/2006 03:46 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> How about something like this? I whipped this out very quickly
> and just did some quick compile and config-test tests on it...
> Comments before I commit sometime tomorrow:
Basicly looks good to me. Thanks for doing so. Some comments inline.
>
> -
On 03/08/2006 03:46 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Index: modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h
> ===
> --- modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h (revision 384045)
> +++ modules/proxy/mod_proxy.h (working copy)
> @@ -301,6 +301,11 @@
> #if APR_HAS_THREADS
>
On 03/08/2006 09:31 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Any other comments about the patch? Should I just
> commit the revised one and we can tweak from
> there...
+1
Regards
Rüdiger
PR 38864 (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38864)
revealed that ProxyPass does not work inside LocationMatch if
LocationMatch uses a regular expression (which might be a frequent
use of it :-)). I helped the reporter by pointing him to a working
mod_rewrite configuration that does
On 03/12/2006 08:51 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Sunday 12 March 2006 00:26, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> The basic problem is putting directives on the server_rec and then
> hacking them to work inside . The original bug was with
> ProxyPassReverse, where multiple s in a virtua
On 03/16/2006 03:49 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On 3/15/06, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>
> That is really one pool globally but there is a mutex per server_rec.
> So a thread handling a request for one vhost grabs the mutex and uses
> the pool but that doesn't protect from a thread handling a request
On 03/22/2006 06:32 PM, Akins, Brian wrote:
>
>
> Looks like it may be in add_pass where it calls ap_proxy_get_balancer:
>
> if (strncasecmp(r, "balancer:", 9) == 0) {
> proxy_balancer *balancer = ap_proxy_get_balancer(cmd->pool, conf,
> r);
> if (!balancer) {
> c
On 03/27/2006 05:15 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Mar 23, 2006, at 9:59 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VIS wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>>> Von: Jim Jagielski
>>>
I want to be able to use same balancer in multiple vhosts.
>>>
>>> This is actually that way by design,
On 03/27/2006 10:03 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>
> What we needed to avoid was the case where a balancer defined in
> VhostA leaked into VhostB. You should not be able to define
> balancers in one Vhost and have them available in others; it's
That makes things clearer to me. Thanks. BTW: I ag
Thanks for the patch. Committed a slightly modified version as r389697
(http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=389697&view=rev).
Regards
Rüdiger
On 03/31/2006 06:53 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> Some concerns about the else path:
>
> a) is 500 proper? should it just return OK instead?
I think 500 is good.
>
> b) what about logging that path to ensure that the administrator has
> some help diagnosing the problem, since we can't carry
On 04/01/2006 09:28 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
> 2.2.1, embedding APR 1.2.6 and APR-Util 1.2.6, is available from:
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Please Test and Vote on releasing 2.2.1 as GA.
>
+1, compiled and started on
RHAS 3 update 3, gcc 3.2.3, glibc 2.3.2, kernel 2.4.21
RHAS 4 upd
On 04/01/2006 11:24 PM, Oden Eriksson wrote:
>
>
> I get these failed tests with perl-framework (r390750) on Mandriva Linux:
>
> Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
> ---
> t/ssl/proxy.t
On 04/02/2006 12:27 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> yep ;)
>
> I'll move the patch to trunk, change it to return OK where original
> patch returned r->status, integrate your logging patch, and commit, if
> it holds up under more varied testing.
>
Thanks.
On 04/02/2006 02:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>>Argh. It seems that http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=379237&view=rev has not
>>been
>>backported. My fault not taking more care of this :-(.
>>So I am now -1.
>>Should I p
On 04/02/2006 04:46 PM, Bjørn Stabell wrote:
>
>
> ProxyPass /zope http://192.168.0.242:7680/
> max=2 timeout=1 acquire=1 ttl=1
>
>
> I'm using mpm-worker, both machines are Linux machines.
>
> I thought Apache would make no more than 2 connections to the b
On 04/02/2006 05:19 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
>> Can someone on win32 PLEASE update the .dsp file for apr-util?
>
>
> Glad to
Does this mean that httpd 2.2.1 does not run with apr-util below 1.2.6
on windows? Is this desired?
Regards
Rüdiger
On 04/02/2006 05:06 PM, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
>
> Adding an ABI doesn't break ABI backwards-compat, so it should be o.k.
But httpd 2.2.1 would not compile with apr-util below 1.2.7 on windows.
So I guess this part of the code should be conditional and only active
either on non windows (BTW:
On 04/02/2006 05:16 PM, Bjørn Stabell wrote:
>
>
> StartServers 2
> MaxClients 128
> MinSpareThreads 25
> MaxSpareThreads 75
> ThreadsPerChild 64
> MaxRequestsPerChild 0
>
>
>
> # /nb/apache-2.2/bin/httpd -l
> Compiled in modules:
On 04/08/2006 09:40 AM, Bjørn Stabell wrote:
>
> In Apache 2.2.1 (the release candidate) mod_proxy_balancer and
> mod_deflate seems ok, but either mod_proxy or mod_rewrite is breaking
> badly. Here's what the trimmed down config file looks like (it still
> exhibits the same problem):
>
>
On 04/08/2006 09:40 AM, Bjørn Stabell wrote:
>
> In Apache 2.2.1 (the release candidate) mod_proxy_balancer and
> mod_deflate seems ok, but either mod_proxy or mod_rewrite is breaking
> badly. Here's what the trimmed down config file looks like (it still
> exhibits the same problem):
>
>
On 04/08/2006 10:52 PM, Davi Arnaut wrote:
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> [Switching to Thread 46912499703168 (LWP 619)]
> 0x003703470004 in strncmp () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x003703470004 in strncmp () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6
> #1 0x
On 04/10/2006 03:58 PM, trawick wrote:
> -
> +* htdbm: Warn when the user adds a plaintext password on a platform
> + with crypt(). The server will assume that the format is crypt().
> +Trunk version of patch:
> + http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=392945&view=rev
I gu
On 04/10/2006 10:21 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> -1 Veto.
>
> You aren't checking the scheme (other than that we've dumped CONNECT
> earlier
> in the code) so you don't know that this transform is appropriate. If you
> would like to test that scheme applies, you still have the question of
On 04/10/2006 11:39 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
>
> No arguing about your veto. I just try to understand it better to address it.
>
> So some questions:
>
> 1. As I just learned from RFC3986 an empty path is allowed (I was not aware
> of this
>before
On 04/10/2006 11:19 PM, Davi Arnaut wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 16:01:29 -0500
> "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Nick Kew wrote:
>>
>>>On Monday 10 April 2006 20:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
* Prevent r->parsed_uri.path from being NULL as this can cause
On 04/10/2006 10:21 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> -1 Veto.
Rolled back by r393088.
Regards
Rüdiger
On 04/11/2006 12:09 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
> On 04/10/2006 10:21 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
>>-1 Veto.
>
>
> Rolled back by r393088.
Of course it must be r393087 :-).
Regards
Rüdiger
On 04/11/2006 04:00 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
>
>
> It probably needs to be updated for RFC 3986 anyway. The path should
> be set to "", not NULL. The HTTP server should take care of the
> redirect from "" to "/", which in this case means the http-proxy
> needs to check for "" when it sends
While investigating PR 38227
(http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38227) I stumbled accross
ap_proxy_add_worker_to_balancer:
PROXY_DECLARE(void)
ap_proxy_add_worker_to_balancer(apr_pool_t *pool, proxy_balancer *balancer,
proxy_worker *worker)
{
pr
On 04/14/2006 02:17 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>>
>> Does anybody remember why we are making a copy of the worker?
>
>
> Usually a worker represents a backend appserver instance.
> Now you can have multiple load balancers with different
&g
On 04/14/2006 05:20 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>>
>> Ok, I understand these goals, but as far as I can see from the current
>> code
>> they do not share the error status as they are using different scoreboard
>> slots a
On 04/15/2006 12:12 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> ... that would prevent me from rolling early tomorrow? Please raise
> hands now, and lets see if we can't get them committed. I'm thinking
> of patches-to-apply, not new efforts :) There's always 2.0.57 for
> new and exciting bug fixes.
No
On 04/18/2006 08:57 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
>>
>>> The httpd community has never objected to it. IF you are suggesting
>>> putting
>>> wire protocol implementations in APR, I think again you are
>>> overloading the
>>> charter. Suggesting that a matching cl
On 04/18/2006 06:35 PM, Parin Shah wrote:
> Plüm, Rüdiger, wrote:
>
> I have been spending some time to remove the libcurl dependency by
> creating fake connection and requests. I didn't know we already have
> such functionality in proxy. Can you tell me where is that code to
> create fake con
On 04/19/2006 12:14 AM, Seán C. Farley wrote:
>
> Although it would be nice, I understand. Since I have not followed the
> 2.[02] series, please check the comment I made about connection timeouts
> to the origin server. Look for "Only GET/HEAD requests are re-used" in
> the patch. Would this
On 04/19/2006 10:57 AM,
> Author: martin
> Date: Wed Apr 19 01:56:59 2006
> New Revision: 395180
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395180&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix for platforms without threads: inreslist exists only if APR_HAS_THREADS
> is set
Thanks for spoting and fixing this.
Regards
On 04/19/2006 01:37 PM,
>+1: rpluem, jim
> + trawick: needs http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395180&view=rev
Thanks for adding.
Regards
Rüdiger
On 04/19/2006 04:53 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
> IIRC (I need to look over my full notes) but the only
> non-fcgi file touched was:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/httpd/httpd/branches/fcgi-
> proxy-dev/modules/proxy/mod_proxy_balancer.c?
> rev=383291&r1=357431&r2=383291
Thanks
On 04/22/2006 06:54 AM, Brandon Fosdick wrote:
> Can I impose upon somebody to explain buckets and brigades to me? That
http://www.apachetutor.org/dev/brigades
Should be a good start for you.
Regards
Rüdiger
On 04/22/2006 06:35 AM, Paul Querna wrote:
> Please test and vote on releasing httpd 2.2.2, bundling APR and APR-Util
> 1.2.7.
>
> Download from:
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Tested on Red Hat AS4. So +1 from me:
waiting 60 seconds for server to start: ...
waiting 60 seconds for server
On 04/24/2006 08:40 PM, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
> O.k., for the last time, hopefully :) A candidate for 2.0.58 is
> available for testing and voting at;
Hopefully my last +1 on this :-).
Regards
Rüdiger
The issue below came up again in PR21260. So anyone with an idea now if
this is a bug in the documentation or in the code?
Regards
Rüdiger
On 01/17/2006 02:11 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> I found a difference between the documentation of CacheMaxExpire and the code.
> The documentat
On 04/28/2006 11:45 PM, Ian Holsman wrote:
>
> On 29/04/2006, at 4:30 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
>>
>> Welcome to the big bad Internet. Not everyone is nice. It's a
>> valuable lesson to learn.
>>
>> We can do all of the obfuscation we want in mod_mbox, but spambots
>> *do* just subscribe
On 05/01/2006 03:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: pquerna
> Date: Sun Apr 30 18:32:18 2006
> New Revision: 398494
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=398494&view=rev
> Log:
> rebuild all.
>
> Modified:
> httpd/site/trunk/docs/security/vulnerabilities_13.html
> httpd/site
On 05/01/2006 03:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: pquerna
> Date: Sun Apr 30 18:25:38 2006
> New Revision: 398492
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=398492&view=rev
> Log:
> Rev website for 2.2.2
>
> Modified:
> httpd/site/trunk/docs/download.html
> httpd/site/trunk/doc
On 05/03/2006 09:53 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> And finally (most important) none of this needs to target 2.2. If 2.2
> lives
> 5 months to be replaced by 2.4 - there is really no issue. 2.0 lived
Please keep in mind that some of us are dependent on commercial httpd modules,
whether
On 05/03/2006 10:46 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
>
> mod_cache definitely needs cache admin, currently it's implemented as an
> external program that is called via cron, which doesn't help if you're
> on a box without cron. Cache cleaning can be done either when a
Not completely true. According to
On 05/03/2006 11:58 PM, Joshua Slive wrote:
>>
>> No, works fine here. Can you get strace output for the failing call?
>
>
> Just a random note: There was a report of a problem with 2.2.2 and
> mod_include on the users list that went away when sendfile was turned
> off. Sounds similar.
Is t
On 05/03/2006 11:27 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> Moreso, we need more third party authors to -participate- in telling us
> what
> in HTTPD-2.4 will make their module better. And a faster cycle of 6mos-1yr
> gives them a chance to do this and realize the benefits in the official
> releas
On 05/04/2006 12:35 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> For simplicity sake, I agree. Let's call this new thing
> mod_cache_generic or mod_frobit. However, let's not touch mod_cache
> and friends for now.
>
> We can rearrange things later if this new "architecture" actually has
> any benefits.
On 05/04/2006 01:26 PM, wrote:
> Author: trawick
>
> + *) mod_charset_lite: Bypass translation when the source and dest charsets
> + are the same. [Jeff Trawick]
As I am not an expert on mod_charset_lite a short question:
Can this ever happen apart from a situation where the server is m
On 05/04/2006 10:51 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> Here is the expected way to encounter that:
>
>
> CharsetSourceEnc IBM-1047
> CharsetDefault ISO-8859-1
>
>
>
> # already in the right charset
> CharsetSourceEnc ISO-8859-1
>
>
> So we shouldn't go through the motions when processing /somed
On 05/07/2006 04:52 PM, wrote:
> Author: niq
>
>*) core: Prevent reading uninitialized memory while reading a line of
> - protocol input. PR 39282. [Davi Arnaut ]
> + protocol input. PR 39282. [Davi Arnaut ]
Just curious: Why did you remove the dots? So far we have only removed
On 05/18/2006 11:21 AM, Plüm wrote:
>
>>-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>>Von: Joe Orton
>>...
>>
>>>@@ -375,15 +380,18 @@
>>> }
>>> }
>>> else {
>>>-scheme = "http";
>>>+scheme = ap_http_scheme(r);
>>> }
>>
>>cache_storage.c: In function `cache_generate_key_
On 05/18/2006 10:50 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 07:16:43PM -,
>
>>--- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/cache/cache_storage.c (original)
>>+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/cache/cache_storage.c Wed May 17 12:16:43 2006
>
> ...
>
>>@@ -375,15 +380,18 @@
>> }
>> }
>>
On 05/22/2006 04:49 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> Great, thanks. In reply to your other questions: "casts are bad" :),
> and I don't think that performance is a good excuse for randomly
> manually inlining functions either (sometimes overall performance is
> improved by reducing executable size
During my analysis of PR39643
(http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39643)
I found out that mod_cache and mod_filter do not work together correctly. In
fact mod_filter
crashes with a segfault if the content is delivered from the cache.
The segfault is caused by line 366 of mod_filte
On 05/25/2006 09:02 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Thursday 25 May 2006 06:56, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> Which begs the question: why are we attaching output filters to mod_cache?
Because some module might offer a protocol or connection filter that should be
also run on cached
On 04/19/2006 12:57 PM,
> Author: jorton
> Date: Wed Apr 19 03:57:20 2006
> New Revision: 395211
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395211&view=rev
> Log:
> * configure.in: Add --with-included-apr flag to force use of the
> bundled copies of APR and APR-util.
>
> Modified:
> httpd/h
On 05/27/2006 02:47 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
> [my previous post contained some irrelevant observations I
> thought I'd deleted. Reposting to reduce confusion]
>
> In mod_rewrite.c, I see
> ap_hook_translate_name(hook_uri2file, NULL, NULL, APR_HOOK_FIRST);
>
> In mod_proxy.c, I see
> /* fix
On 05/27/2006 03:58 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> Are there still fundamental pieces missing from mod_proxy_ajp +
> mod_proxy_balancer which have to be resolved before mod_proxy_ajp is
> the natural solution for anybody on Apache >= 2.2?
Currently mod_proxy_balancer lacks the domain feature of m
On 05/28/2006 03:52 AM, Davi Arnaut wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Remove mod_disk_cache temporary files when rename() fails, otherwise
> they may accumulate in excess.
Thanks for the patch. Committed to trunk as r409942
(http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=409942&view=rev).
Regards
Rüdiger
On 05/28/2006 02:33 PM, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
> On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 10:32:04AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> A significant source of this kind of error is that the filesystem
> suddenly becomes read-only. Either to a protective automative re-mount
> by the kernel, a log journal bec
On 05/28/2006 03:18 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On 5/27/06, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 05/27/2006 03:58 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Are there still fundamental pieces missing from mod_proxy_ajp +
>> > mod_proxy_balancer w
On 05/25/2006 07:56 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> During my analysis of PR39643
> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39643)
> I found out that mod_cache and mod_filter do not work together correctly. In
> fact mod_filter
> crashes with a segfault if the content is
PR 39673 revealed a problem with NTLM and mod_proxy_http.
Actually NTLM does not work any longer with proxied backends doing NTLM
authentication.
As far as I understand NTLM the current 2.2.x proxy implementation does NOT
support
it, because there is no guarantee that the same backend connection
On 05/30/2006 12:55 PM, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
>
> This patch takes advantage of the possibility to do the size-check of
> the file to be cached early.
>
> The current behaviour is to start caching the file and then bail out
> when it notices that it has cached more than the maximum allowed s
Can someone of our RFC experts please have a look at PR 35247
(http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35247)?
Questions that remain are:
1. Does the current behaviour of mod_cache really violate RFC2616?
2. If yes, does the proposed patch fix this violation?
Regards
Rüdiger
On 06/07/2006 10:03 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> After quite a bit of delving into the US export requirements for
> encryption-related software, I have found that we are able to
> distribute 100% open source packages with identifiable source code
> to anyone not in the banned set of countries. H
On 06/07/2006 10:53 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> There's another gray point, without OpenSSL, mod_ssl is a noop, that is,
> it does no crypto. There is more crypto in mod_auth_digest, util_md5 or
> in apr-util than there is in mod_ssl.
I think this is an excellent point regarding the s
On 06/08/2006 07:13 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> I will say this; the people who are wildly waving their arms "no more
> binaries" are the same people who, surprise, haven't contributed binaries
> to httpd, at least not lately (little surprise).
This is true, but I do not think that peo
On 06/08/2006 11:47 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> Sorry, I did a poor job of explaining -- the binaries issue is about
> openssl. The openssl issue is what required me to read the EAR
No reason to say sorry. Thanks for your work on this issue.
> The mere presence of mod_ssl source code appears
On 06/09/2006 10:47 PM, wrote:
> Author: wrowe
> Date: Fri Jun 9 13:47:02 2006
> New Revision: 413158
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=413158&view=rev
> Log:
>
> Note 2.2.2 was our 10 year celebration I believe, (just to put something
> interesting front and center under that top
On 06/09/2006 08:02 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> I'm entirely neutral.) Please vote;
>
> [X] Jettison apache/win 1.3 binaries to a footnote of history in archives
> [ ] Beg of Bill, "One more Round!" of 1.3.36 for old times sake
> [ ] Keep them available from www even if they are ne
On 06/16/2006 10:28 PM, Alexander Lazic wrote:
> Any opinion from the developer, to this issue?!
>
> On Don 01.06.2006 08:14, Alexander Lazic wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> i have read http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.html and asked me
>> follwing:
>>
>> Is it possible to get a logentry from the ho
On 06/17/2006 08:57 AM, Alexander Lazic wrote:
> On Sam 17.06.2006 00:54, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>> From my current point of view the answer is: No, this is not possible
>> out of the box.
>> It may be possible if you modify the hook macros.
>
>
> And do y
On 06/17/2006 05:56 PM, Darryl Miles wrote:
> Internal being a fall through to the configured mapping and content
> handler for the URL just as-if the ProxyPass directive wasn't there, I
> was thinking along the lines of this being configured with a
> "fallthrough:" scheme prefix. This means it
On 06/18/2006 02:49 PM, Mathieu CARBONNEAUX wrote:
> i think is very usefull to have this in production environment... to debug
> probleme without interupting production... in only up the log level with
> reload...
> with strace you must restart apache with strace...and for desactivating it
>
On 06/18/2006 04:03 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> > On 06/17/2006 08:57 AM, Alexander Lazic wrote:
>> > > On Sam 17.06.2006 00:54, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>> > >> From my current point of view the answer is: No, this is not
>> possible
>> > >>
On 06/19/2006 06:21 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm would like to give few notes on the things I'm
> currently working on, so that eventually no duplicate
> work is done if someone already have similar things
> on his drawing board.
>
> 1. Additional by business load balancing method
On 06/19/2006 10:37 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Henri Gomez wrote:
>
>>
>> For the load-balancing algorythm, do you plan to propose a bunch of
>> pre build algos and let users select the right one for their use or
>> allow externals modules ? We could see that like mod_jk / mod_proxy
>> modules lik
On 06/19/2006 10:23 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Henri Gomez wrote:
>
>> Good to see that PING/PONG got such a good response here.
>>
>> When I added this to mod_jk it was just a quick way to detect hang
>> JVMs but it seems to many on the TC-DEV not a very usefull feature :)
>>
>
> And may thanks
On 06/20/2006 08:17 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On 6/20/06, Brian Rectanus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I have a minor patch to mod_proxy_balancer that I would like to get
>> applied. The patch adds some environment vars to balancer requests to
>> export info on the chosen route so that it pos
On 06/22/2006 01:16 AM, wrote:
> Author: niq
> Date: Wed Jun 21 16:16:47 2006
> New Revision: 416165
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=416165&view=rev
> Log:
> PR#39854
> Remove bogus code that chokes on flush buckets
>
>
> if (APR_BUCKET_IS_FLUSH(bkt)) {
> -apr_b
On 06/22/2006 02:08 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Thursday 22 June 2006 00:38, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
>>Is this correct? In fact you ignore flush buckets now.
>
>
> Yes, this ignores flush buckets - which is better than choking on them.
Yes, of course.
> I'm n
On 06/24/2006 08:48 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> APR is now used by a half dozen successful open source projects and many
> many more other development efforts.
>
> Is there a reason for apr issues to continue to go to httpd.apache.org?
> That is, is it time for a [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
901 - 1000 of 2697 matches
Mail list logo
