Re: Trying to compile httpd trunk

On 12/21/19 7:37 AM, Stéphane Blondon wrote: Le ven. 20 déc. 2019 à 19:02, Nick Kew a écrit : I take it you have a good reason to want that rather than a packaged version such as Debian's? I'd like to provide a patch to a (whishlist) bug report I've done (#63079). What did buildconf tell y

Re: will anyone build httpd/apr with cmake on Windows?

On 09/03/2013 05:06 AM, Steffen wrote: >> On 8/30/2013 5:25 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> >> Please let me know if you >> >> * are waiting for some certain feature (other than near perfection) before >> you use it > > > After some days puzzling, I realize now that it looks like you want to > accompl

Re: will anyone build httpd/apr with cmake on Windows?

On 09/01/2013 09:55 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Guenter Knauf > wrote: > > Hi Jeff, > 1st of all a big thanks from me that you picked this up! > As you might imagine I'm on your side - means I love to have a > full-automatic bui

Re: User/Realm order in AuthDBDUserRealmQuery (mod_authn_dbd)

KaiGai Kohei wrote: Tom Donovan wrote: Yes, SQL *functions* only return a single value - but if your database supports SQL *stored procedures* (like the example), they return a set of rows; including any extra values to be assigned to environment variables. For example: DROP PROCEDURE

Re: User/Realm order in AuthDBDUserRealmQuery (mod_authn_dbd)

KaiGai Kohei wrote: Tom Donovan wrote: KaiGai Kohei wrote: I'm now trying to set up mod_authn_dbb for authentication purpose. However, I faced to a concern for AuthDBDUserRealmQuery directive. The example shows the query: AuthDBDUserRealmQuery \ "SELECT password FROM authn

Re: User/Realm order in AuthDBDUserRealmQuery (mod_authn_dbd)

KaiGai Kohei wrote: I'm now trying to set up mod_authn_dbb for authentication purpose. However, I faced to a concern for AuthDBDUserRealmQuery directive. The example shows the query: AuthDBDUserRealmQuery \ "SELECT password FROM authn WHERE user = %s AND realm = %s" But, I would like to

Re: mod_dbd and prepared statements (httpd-2.2.9)

Andrej van der Zee wrote: * apr_dbd_pvquery is only for string values. You must use apr_dbd_pvbquery (with a "b") for binary values. see: http://apr.apache.org/docs/apr-util/1.3/group___a_p_r___util___d_b_d.html I tried both versions, but without success. But that was because I did not pass

Re: svn commit: r704883 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/Apache.dsw

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: tdonovan Date: Wed Oct 15 05:24:25 2008 New Revision: 704883 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=704883&view=rev Log: Windows: add apr_dbd_odbc project to Visual Studio workspace .dsw file Hmmm? Guess I'm confused, we trigger _tr

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP server 2.2.10

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: .msi*'s to direct at /dist/httpd/binaries/win32/, -symbols.zip*'s to direct at archive.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/symbols/, and the usual httpd-2.2.10-win32-src.zip* files are all in the usual /dev/dist/ location. I noticed a few little things building 2.2.

Re: svn commit: r683465 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

Nick Kew wrote: On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 01:30:49 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: remove proposal accidentally added twice I was about to ask whether you planned to vote on the other instance of it, when I saw: Looking at the "backport to 2.2" votes in STATUS, they all seem to be from experienced

Re: svn commit: r670061 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES modules/mappers/mod_rewrite.c

Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 06/20/2008 11:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: tdonovan Date: Fri Jun 20 14:12:34 2008 New Revision: 670061 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=670061&view=rev Log: After r649840, mod_proxy_http will no longer append a query string from r->args if "no-canon"

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP Server 2.2.9

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: The two files below are part of the httpd-2.2.9-win32-src.zip file package, which has been uploaded to httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ (and should show up sometime shortly when the server syncs). The README-win32.txt will also be added to th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HTTP Server 2.2.9

APR 1.3 will require a code change in Windows modules which launch FastCGI programs using apr_proc_create. They will need to use the new APR_NO_FILE attribute. This doesn't affect any other platforms AFAIK. e.g. apr_procattr_io_set(attr, NULL, APR_NO_FILE, APR_NO_FILE); This was pret

Re: NOTICE - Intent to T&R 2.2.9

Jim Jagielski wrote: It's my intent to T&R 2.2.9 today... The Windows support\htpasswd.dsp project file now needs to link with rpcrt4.lib to use apr_generate_random_bytes - per r662572. -tom- p.s. - I don't have httpd commit access yet, so hopefully someone else can make this change in time

Re: 2.2.9 status

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It works on XP and Vista, what more do you need? Someone to independently confirm - thanks Gav :) I tested your ApacheMonitor.exe.r652599 and ApacheMonitorU.exe.r652599 from http://people.apache.org/~wrowe on Win2k, XP, & Vista. Also

Re: mod_ftp trunk

Whoops! I forgot - there's one more bug - 44653, for a total of three bugs. Making these 3 changes should let you build mod_ftp trunk to use with httpd trunk. If you are building mod_ftp to use with httpd 2.2, you only need to fix 44653. -tom- Tom Donovan wrote: Jorge Schrauwen wrote

Re: mod_ftp trunk

Jorge Schrauwen wrote: I'l actually not sure if mod_ftp has a separate list... so I'll send it here. On the page it says to fetch the trunk and build it. But the trunk doesn't build! Adding a message saying it won't build or maybe keep a prelease branch that does compile and work on trunk so th

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Tom Donovan wrote: Steffen wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Tom Donovan's confirmed the state of mpm_winnt as again working with mod perl across service, console, and -X modes (and some other slightly more obscure models). I'll backport the correction

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

Steffen wrote: - Original Message - From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, 07 January, 2008 19:52 Subject: Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Tom Donovan's confirmed the state of mpm_win

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Steffen wrote: mod_perl on Windows 2.2.7 Using http://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/ppms/ with ActivePerl 5.8.8.822 FAILS I'd be happy to see a fix; yes I consider 'as a console' to be a test environment, but I also consider it to be very useful and worth fixing. Even t

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

Yes, the crash dissappears. I built with MS Visual Studio 8 on win2k and tested on win2k, winxp, and vista. Also tried it with: ab -n 10 -c 100 http://localhost/large_file.html Where large_file.html is 200kb. No continued memory growth observed (after the first few seconds), so I don't

Re: Pre-release test tarballs of httpd 1.3.40, 2.0.62 and 2.2.7 available

Steffen wrote: Looks like that it happens only when add Win32DisableAcceptEx to the conf. Steffen On 01/05/2008 11:36 AM, Steffen wrote: It crashes when apr_bucket_alloc() is called by modules ... \srclib\apr-util\buckets\apr_buckets_alloc.c + list 0x00b71f10 {pool=0x00b6ff08 allocator=0x

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache Win32 Binary, mod_perl and mod_fcgid working

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Steffen wrote: To inform you. We at http://www.apachelounge.com made a binary available which works with mod-perl and mod-perl etc. How did the perl-framework regression tests look; and which patch did you happen to use? Or is this the cobbled-together 2.2.6 + sm

OpenSSL compression (Windows)

New topic - was "Thoughts on Camillia in openssl binaries?" William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Tom Donovan wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Two questions, one technical one legal. On a slightly-related note; it might also be a good change to statically link zlib into OpenSSL to avoi

Re: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: Thoughts on Camillia in openssl binaries?]]

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Feedback from Ben via legal-discuss, since his httpd-dev list seems to have fallen over and can't get up. Bill Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Thoughts on Camillia in openssl binaries?] From: Ben Laurie <

Re: Thoughts on Camillia in openssl binaries?

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: But if mod_deflate doesn't use it, and openssl is built zlib-dynamic, they simply pitched compression from ssl sessions as well with no other adverse effects. Yes, exactly. openssl doesn't select gzip compression if zlib-dynamic and zlib1.dll is missing. The other

Re: Thoughts on Camillia in openssl binaries?

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Two questions, one technical one legal. Technically, do we want to enable the Camillia algorithms in our binary builds of openssl 0.9.8 for win32 and other platforms where we might build it? Legally are we satisfied by http://info.isl.ntt.co.jp/crypt/eng/info/chiteki

Re: svn commit: r569947 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Many thanks to Ruediger for reviewing 2.0 and 2.2 so far, and to both Jim and Jeff for their reviews of current/2.2 modern flavors. I could use a set of eyeballs on the final log.c patch for 2.2, and the patch set for our old 'n crusty 2.0. I'm especially interested

Re: Apachelounge problems

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > doesn't belong on any external site. Since it's not an ASF release, > *you* are absorbing all the liability and risk that any released ASF > package would carry. It's an apachelounge release, so you would > personally answer to any IP issues. Not smart. Issac Gol

Re: mod_dbd updates

Nick Kew wrote: I've got back to reviewing Chris's substantial fixes to mod_dbd in trunk, and I'm prepared to give it my +1. The alternative is to apply simpler fixes by Bojan and others. On the plus side, Chris's work fixes some known (and hard) issues with mod_dbd, and feedback has been pos

Re: mod_authn_dbd - internal server error after certain idle time

Danie Qian wrote: > >> >> With this patch, setting DBDTimout lower than the MySQL system variable >> 'wait_timeout' will ensure than expired connections never get used. >> > > Assuming by DBDTimeout you mean DBDExptime in mod_dbd documentation > where it implies a keepalive value, how about mak

Re: DBD framework, APR, caching

elmut Tessarek wrote: On 24.03.2007 14:54, Tom Donovan wrote: If procedures only require input parameters and return a result set (like the example procedure GROUP_SP in mod_auth_ibmdb2) - they can be invoked by apr_dbd_select with the SQL statement: "CALL GROUP_SP(?)" If this is th

Re: DBD framework, APR, caching

Joachim Zobel wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 22.03.2007, 14:03 +0100 schrieb Helmut Tessarek: Writing stored procedures is usually part of the DBA, but if the database server is not on the same machine as the web server, stored procedures are most of the time faster than SQL statements invoked from t

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

re: "start an incident at Microsoft" I'll try - but since Win2000 is in what MS calls "Extended support phase", only security bugs are accepted. I'll describe it as creatively as I can... re: "I don't see this as a showstopper" True. The Win32DisableAcceptEx directive certainly works. There

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

re: the Windows 2000 0.0.0.0 IP address problem Bill, Both solutions work. Applying win32sock_is_known.patch corrects the problem for win2000. The Win32DisableAcceptEx directive also works to correct the problem (without the patch). -tom- William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: It's actually apr_os_

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

re: the Windows 2000 0.0.0.0 IP address problem A quick look through win32/sockets.c shows code to fill in remote_addr after accept() and connect(), as well as after acceptEx(). This led me to believe that "Windows has the peer name". Ditto for the win9x_*() functions in Apache server/mpm/win

Re: [VOTE] httpd-2.2.4 release candidate for review

I have had some difficulties running 2.2.4 RC on Windows 2000. The remote IP is always seen as 0.0.0.0. Here are a few lines from my logs\access.log: 0.0.0.0 - - [07/Jan/2007:11:22:59 -0500] "GET /server-status HTTP/1.1" 403 215 0.0.0.0 - - [07/Jan/2007:11:23:36 -0500] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 200 20417