more
what the offending code piece is?
Thanks,
Stefan
>
>
>
> On Friday 03/06/2022 at 16:57, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
&
-1
Does not build :
Error C2018 C:\VC16\Win32\httpd-2.4\server\core_filters.c
638 unknown character '0x40'
On Friday 03/06/2022 at 16:57, Stefan Eissing wrote:
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days (at least
up to and including Monday) to release this candidate tarball
httpd-2.4.54-rc1 as 2.4.54:
[ ] +1: It's not just good
Hi,
I intend to tag a 2.4.x release candidate later today. It seems everything
is prepped, our CI is green and it has been about 3 months since the last
release.
If you see any reason we should wait, please speak up!
Kind Regards,
Stefan
Am 25.05.2022 um 14:15 schrieb Stefan Eissing:
Anyone feeling release vibes in the air?
it's been a good 2.5 months and some things have accumulated.
Maybe the start of June would be a good target?
+1 and thanks!
Rainer
On 5/25/22 2:15 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> Anyone feeling release vibes in the air?
>
> it's been a good 2.5 months and some things have accumulated.
> Maybe the start of June would be a good target?
+1
Regards
Rüdiger
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 2:15 PM Stefan Eissing wrote:
>
> Anyone feeling release vibes in the air?
+1 thanks for proposing!
+1 ty!
On Wed, May 25, 2022, 8:15 AM Stefan Eissing wrote:
> Anyone feeling release vibes in the air?
>
> it's been a good 2.5 months and some things have accumulated.
> Maybe the start of June would be a good target?
>
> Kind Regards,
> Stefan
>
Anyone feeling release vibes in the air?
it's been a good 2.5 months and some things have accumulated.
Maybe the start of June would be a good target?
Kind Regards,
Stefan
This
Release whenever you want, my 30 years in this game shows most networks,
> including mine, are not going to touch it on a weekend anyway, so monday or
> tuesday before it hits test beds - assuming there is a real need to upgrade
> in the first place (high CVE etc), and later in
Release whenever you want, my 30 years in this game shows most networks,
including mine, are not going to touch it on a weekend anyway, so monday
or tuesday before it hits test beds - assuming there is a real need to
upgrade in the first place (high CVE etc), and later in the week before
On 3/11/22 6:00 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> Thank you all! With 7 +1 votes and no other, I announce rc2 has passed.
>
> I will do the release of 2.4.53 on Monday.
>
> Kind Regards and a nice weekend to you all,
You too and thanks for RM'ing.
Regards
Rüdiger
Thank you all! With 7 +1 votes and no other, I announce rc2 has passed.
I will do the release of 2.4.53 on Monday.
Kind Regards and a nice weekend to you all,
Stefan
> Am 09.03.2022 um 17:19 schrieb Stefan Eissing :
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 11:19 AM Stefan Eissing wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candida
on the release time:
[ ] +1: release it later today, it needs to get out!
[ ] +0: do not really care
[ ] -1: better do it Monday, Admins have a life, too, you know?
Am 09.03.2022 um 17:19 schrieb Stefan Eissing :
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https
On 3/11/22 1:14 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> While the 72 hours have not all passed yet, the votes so far are positive.
>
> Given that no -1 vote will come, I call for a vote on the release time:
>
> [ ] +1: release it later today, it needs to get out!
> [ ] +0: do not re
While the 72 hours have not all passed yet, the votes so far are positive.
Given that no -1 vote will come, I call for a vote on the release time:
[ ] +1: release it later today, it needs to get out!
[ ] +0: do not really care
[ ] -1: better do it Monday, Admins have a life, too, you know
+1 Windows
On Wednesday 09/03/2022 at 17:19, Stefan Eissing wrote:
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.53-rc2
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 05:19:22PM +0100, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candid
> On Mar 9, 2022, at 11:19 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this cand
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 5:20 PM Stefan Eissing wrote:
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.53-rc2 as 2.4.53:
[X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
All good on Debian 10, 11 & 12.
Thanks Stefan for RMing, now we
> Am 09.03.2022 um 17:19 schrieb Stefan Eissing :
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this cand
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 05:19:22PM +0100, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candid
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.53-rc2 as 2.4.53:
[ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
[ ] +0: Let's have
; >> a bug in autoconf 2.71 used to create the configure script. That problem
> >> was already reported by me during another release vote. I replaced the
> >> changed three files in the bundled apr and apr-util with the earlier ones.
> >
> > Does this depend on the RM's au
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 3:21 PM Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> I've found make extraclean works a bit better
Ah yes great hint, it avoids removing the configure files manually.
Thanks!
Rainer Jung wrote:
>>>>
>>>> - configure for APR in the dependency tarball still fails for me due to
>>>> a bug in autoconf 2.71 used to create the configure script. That problem
>>>> was already reported by me during another release vote. I replaced the
>&g
> Am 09.03.2022 um 15:07 schrieb Stefan Eissing :
>
>
>
>> Am 09.03.2022 um 15:05 schrieb Ruediger Pluem :
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/9/22 2:46 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>>> Are we ready for an rc2 for 2.4.53?
>>
>> With r1898786 I would say yes.
>
> Thanks everyone, will do.
Everything prepped.
> Am 09.03.2022 um 15:05 schrieb Ruediger Pluem :
>
>
>
> On 3/9/22 2:46 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>> Are we ready for an rc2 for 2.4.53?
>
> With r1898786 I would say yes.
Thanks everyone, will do.
>
> Regards
>
> Rüdiger
>
On 3/9/22 2:46 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> Are we ready for an rc2 for 2.4.53?
With r1898786 I would say yes.
Regards
Rüdiger
; >> a bug in autoconf 2.71 used to create the configure script. That problem
> >> was already reported by me during another release vote. I replaced the
> >> changed three files in the bundled apr and apr-util with the earlier ones.
> >
> > Does this depend on the RM's au
ency tarball still fails for me due to
>>> a bug in autoconf 2.71 used to create the configure script. That problem
>>> was already reported by me during another release vote. I replaced the
>>> changed three files in the bundled apr and apr-util with the earlier ones.
>&
was already reported by me during another release vote. I replaced the
>> changed three files in the bundled apr and apr-util with the earlier ones.
>
> Does this depend on the RM's autoconf version?
> If so, Stefan could you downgrade to autoconf 2.69 on your system? I
> just did
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 6:22 PM Rainer Jung wrote:
>
> - configure for APR in the dependency tarball still fails for me due to
> a bug in autoconf 2.71 used to create the configure script. That problem
> was already reported by me during another release vote. I replaced the
> chan
trunk in my httpd release preparations but
didn't observe the failure. This probably was due
to the fact, that our APR trunk configure does not decide to add -std=gnu11, so
the test in the header file doesn't result in
_Thread_local being used.
Of course it still makes sense to apply the same
; BTW: Once we have a final patch the same needs to be done for APR trunk and
>> APR 1.8.x.
>
> Interesting: I did also compile APR trunk in my httpd release preparations
> but didn't observe the failure. This probably was due
> to the fact, that our APR trunk configure doe
as r1898771 to throw it into our CI.
If we need to tweak it further we can do later.
BTW: Once we have a final patch the same needs to be done for APR trunk and APR
1.8.x.
Interesting: I did also compile APR trunk in my httpd release
preparations but didn't observe the failure. This probably
now point to the path of the pcre-config script instead.
>
> Hmm. This could break existing configure calls. Probably not good for a patch
> release. Thanks for pointing out.
>
> Regards
>
> Rüdiger
>
ow point to the path of the pcre-config script instead.
Hmm. This could break existing configure calls. Probably not good for a patch
release. Thanks for pointing out.
Regards
Rüdiger
On 3/8/22 10:09 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>
>
> You gcc 4.8 workaround for _Thread_local still looks good.
>
> Solaris builds and all unit tests not yet done but compiles fine for all my
> Linuxes.
>
> Thanks!
Thanks for testing. I committed to trunk as r1898771 to throw it into our CI.
If
Am 08.03.2022 um 18:22 schrieb Rainer Jung:
Am 08.03.2022 um 17:06 schrieb Ruediger Pluem:
On 3/8/22 4:38 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Am 08.03.2022 um 16:33 schrieb Rainer Jung:
Am 07.03.2022 um 16:55 schrieb Stefan Eissing:
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball
Am 08.03.2022 um 17:06 schrieb Ruediger Pluem:
On 3/8/22 4:38 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Am 08.03.2022 um 16:33 schrieb Rainer Jung:
Am 07.03.2022 um 16:55 schrieb Stefan Eissing:
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev
On 3/8/22 4:38 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Am 08.03.2022 um 16:33 schrieb Rainer Jung:
>>
>> Am 07.03.2022 um 16:55 schrieb Stefan Eissing:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>>>
>>> https:
Am 08.03.2022 um 16:33 schrieb Rainer Jung:
Am 07.03.2022 um 16:55 schrieb Stefan Eissing:
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
this candidate
For anyone thinking about testing rc1, there is a high chance of an rc2 coming
soon.
Will announce here,
Stefan
> Am 08.03.2022 um 16:33 schrieb Rainer Jung :
>
>
> Am 07.03.2022 um 16:55 schrieb Stefan Eissing:
>> Hi all,
>> Please find below the proposed releas
Am 07.03.2022 um 16:55 schrieb Stefan Eissing:
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.53-rc1 as 2.4.53:
[ ] +1: It's
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 02:01:42PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> > I got a new "may be uninitialized" warning with with the GCC 12 shapshot
> > used in Fedora 36 (which is still under development and can be
> > unreliable). I think it's unreachable, if we enter here:
> >
> >
> On Mar 7, 2022, at 10:55 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this cand
On 3/8/22 12:57 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 04:55:54PM +0100, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>>
>> I wou
On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 04:55:54PM +0100, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candid
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.53-rc1 as 2.4.53:
[ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
[ ] +0: Let's have
> Am 03.03.2022 um 14:32 schrieb Jim Jagielski :
>
> All three promoted. I went ahead and merged the 'dbm' patch
Thanks, Jim!
>
>> On Mar 3, 2022, at 4:37 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>>
>> There are some important fixes pending release. Work d
All three promoted. I went ahead and merged the 'dbm' patch
> On Mar 3, 2022, at 4:37 AM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>
> There are some important fixes pending release. Work does not appear to
> slow down in the foreseeable future, so I'd like us to make them available.
>
> Looki
There are some important fixes pending release. Work does not appear to
slow down in the foreseeable future, so I'd like us to make them available.
Looking at 2.4.x STATUS, there are 3 backport proposals lacking 1 vote:
- dbm: Split the loading of a dbm driver
- mod_proxy: Bump shared worker name
On 2/8/22 12:20 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 4:43 AM Stefan Eissing wrote:
>>
>> Is there any consensus in doing a release this month?
> +1
>
+1. There is one backport for mod_dav that misses 1 vote. Who is brave enough
to backport the PCRE s
On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 4:43 AM Stefan Eissing wrote:
>
> Is there any consensus in doing a release this month?
+1
Is there any consensus in doing a release this month?
With 7 +1 votes and no objections, the vote has PASSED.
Thank you all who took the time to test this! I will start the release work.
Kind Regards,
Stefan
> Am 19.12.2021 um 17:56 schrieb Steffen :
>
> +1 for Windows release.
>
> Cheers, Steffen
>
>> Op 16 dec. 20
+1 for Windows release.
Cheers, Steffen
> Op 16 dec. 2021 om 15:03 heeft Stefan Eissing het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 3:03 PM Stefan Eissing wrote:
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.52-rc1 as 2.4.52:
[X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
All good on Debian 10, 11 & 12.
buildconf and configure.in
Am 16.12.2021 um 15:03 schrieb Stefan Eissing:
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.52-rc1 as 2.4.52:
[X] +1: It's
Le 16/12/2021 à 15:03, Stefan Eissing a écrit :
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.52-rc1 as 2.4.52:
[X] +1: It's
+1
CentOS 6
CentOS 7
AlmaLinux 8
Ubuntu 20.04
Regards,
Cory McIntire
PO – cPanel Security Team
Release Manager – EasyApache
cPanel / WebPros
From: Stefan Eissing
Date: Thursday, December 16, 2021 at 8:03 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.52-rc1 as httpd-2.4.52
Hi
:
configure: error: could not determine the string function for int64_t
It comes from defining some things once in conftest.c and again in the included
confdefs.h.
The problem seems to be known and at least some changes were added to the 1.7.x
APR branch, but we didn't have a release there for a long
: could not determine the string function for int64_t
>
> It comes from defining some things once in conftest.c and again in the
> included confdefs.h.
>
> The problem seems to be known and at least some changes were added to the
> 1.7.x APR branch, but we didn't have a release
things once in conftest.c and again in the
included confdefs.h.
The problem seems to be known and at least some changes were added to
the 1.7.x APR branch, but we didn't have a release there for a long time
... :(
Some pointers:
https://www.mail-archive.com/bug-autoconf@gnu.org/msg04695.html
On 12/16/21 15:03, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball
On Fri, 17 Dec 2021, 10:56 Ruediger Pluem, wrote:
>
>
> On 12/17/21 10:54 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 03:03:13PM +0100, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> >> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> >> this candidate tarball ht
Am 16.12.2021 um 15:03 schrieb Stefan Eissing:
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.52-rc1 as 2.4.52:
[ ] +1: It's
On 12/17/21 10:54 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 03:03:13PM +0100, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
>> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.52-rc1 as 2.4.52:
>> [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 03:03:13PM +0100, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.52-rc1 as 2.4.52:
> [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
> [ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
> [ ] -1: There's trou
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.52-rc1 as 2.4.52:
[ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
[ ] +0: Let's
Release often? let me tell you of a story from a System Administrators
perspective as to why thats bad and should be avoided and you should learn
from other people's mistakes
There is a reason sysads dislike developers, they have this "oh new code
gotta push it out right away" mentali
On 12/8/21 13:56, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 11:36:51AM +0100, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>> Friends of httpd, how do you feel about a release in the next two weeks?
>
> Sounds good to me. We may have fewer people around to test it, but at
> least trying to get a rel
> Am 08.12.2021 um 13:56 schrieb Joe Orton :
>
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 11:36:51AM +0100, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>> Friends of httpd, how do you feel about a release in the next two weeks?
>
> Sounds good to me. We may have fewer people around to test it, but at
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 11:36:51AM +0100, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> Friends of httpd, how do you feel about a release in the next two weeks?
Sounds good to me. We may have fewer people around to test it, but at
least trying to get a release out is better than definitely having no
release
On 08/12/2021 01:14, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 06/12/2021 12:27, Noel Butler wrote: On 06/12/2021 20:36, Stefan
Eissing wrote:
Friends of httpd, how do you feel about a release in the next two
weeks?
Kind Regards,
Stefan
-1
Thats days before christmas, most testers and i'm sure devs
On 07/12/2021 16:16, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 06/12/2021 11:36, Stefan Eissing wrote:
Friends of httpd, how do you feel about a release in the next two weeks?
+1
Release early, release often
Anyhow, who I'm I to say, not even metinioned on
https://httpd.apache.org/contributors
On 06/12/2021 11:36, Stefan Eissing wrote:
Friends of httpd, how do you feel about a release in the next two weeks?
+1
Release early, release often
Regards
--
^TM
On 06/12/2021 12:27, Noel Butler wrote:
On 06/12/2021 20:36, Stefan Eissing wrote:
Friends of httpd, how do you feel about a release in the next two weeks?
Kind Regards,
Stefan
-1
Thats days before christmas, most testers and i'm sure devs will be in
holiday mode, even
On 06/12/2021 20:36, Stefan Eissing wrote:
Friends of httpd, how do you feel about a release in the next two
weeks?
Kind Regards,
Stefan
-1
Thats days before christmas, most testers and i'm sure devs will be in
holiday mode, even if not, that close to christmas means server updates
Friends of httpd, how do you feel about a release in the next two weeks?
Kind Regards,
Stefan
As a preliminary to making a new mod_perl release, I am updating
Apache-Test.
Please download, test, and report back on this Apache-Test 1.43 release
candidate.
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/perl/Apache-Test-1.43-rc1.tar.gz
MD5 = 44d976ae19d5ab2879e43a26a360366b
SHA1
On 10/7/21 11:17, ste...@eissing.org wrote:
> Then I close the vote and start pushing the release.
>
> Thanks for everyone to participate here on such a short notice!
>
Well gee ... that was far too fast for me to catch!
I guess I will just go get the production release.
--
D
+1 on Slackware64 -current
Alex
> On Oct 7, 2021, at 09:17, ste...@eissing.org wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> due to found security weaknesses in our 2.4.50 release, the security team
> feels it is necessary to do a new release on very short notice. We will skip
> the usua
Then I close the vote and start pushing the release.
Thanks for everyone to participate here on such a short notice!
Kind Regards,
Stefan
> Am 07.10.2021 um 17:06 schrieb Joe Orton :
>
> ASF release policy [1] suggests that we have a >=72 hour voting period
&g
+1 Cent6/7/8 Ubuntu 20.04
Thanks,
Cory McIntire
PO – cPanel Security Team
Release Manager – EasyApache
cPanel / WebPros
From: ste...@eissing.org
Date: Thursday, October 7, 2021 at 8:17 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.51-rc1 as httpd-2.4.51
Hi all,
due to found
ASF release policy [1] suggests that we have a >=72 hour voting period
for releases, but this is a "SHOULD" not a hard rule. Due to:
a) the severity of the issue being fixed, and
b) the extensive review and testing which the patch has received both
here and off-list, and
c
On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 3:17 PM ste...@eissing.org wrote:
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days^h^h^h^hhours to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.51-rc1 as 2.4.51:
+1 on Debian 10 and 11.
Thanks Stefan!
+1 looks ok on Windows
On Thursday 07/10/2021 at 15:17, ste...@eissing.org wrote:
Hi all,
due to found security weaknesses in our 2.4.50 release, the security
team
feels it is necessary to do a new release on very short notice. We
will skip
the usual 3 day voting period and close
On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 9:17 AM ste...@eissing.org wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> due to found security weaknesses in our 2.4.50 release, the security team
> feels it is necessary to do a new release on very short notice. We will skip
> the usual 3 day voting period and close the
On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 03:17:36PM +0200, ste...@eissing.org wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> due to found security weaknesses in our 2.4.50 release, the security team
> feels it is necessary to do a new release on very short notice. We will skip
> the usual 3 day voting period and close t
On 10/7/21 3:17 PM, ste...@eissing.org wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> due to found security weaknesses in our 2.4.50 release, the security team
> feels it is necessary to do a new release on very short notice. We will skip
> the usual 3 day voting period and close the vote once we f
> Am 07.10.2021 um 15:17 schrieb ste...@eissing.org:
>
> Hi all,
>
> due to found security weaknesses in our 2.4.50 release, the security team
> feels it is necessary to do a new release on very short notice. We will skip
> the usual 3 day voting period and close
+1 on Fedora 34
On 2021/10/07 13:17:36, "ste...@eissing.org" wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> due to found security weaknesses in our 2.4.50 release, the security team
> feels it is necessary to do a new release on very short notice. We will skip
> the usual 3 day voting period a
+1 on Debian 11
ste...@eissing.org schrieb am Do., 7. Okt. 2021, 15:17:
> Hi all,
>
> due to found security weaknesses in our 2.4.50 release, the security team
> feels it is necessary to do a new release on very short notice. We will
> skip
> the usual 3 day voting period
Hi all,
due to found security weaknesses in our 2.4.50 release, the security team
feels it is necessary to do a new release on very short notice. We will skip
the usual 3 day voting period and close the vote once we feel comfortable
with our testing.
Please find below the proposed release
Happy to announce that the httpd-2.4.50 release is out.
The website is updated, the vulnerabilities listed.
The mails to announce's sent, hopefully sitting in the
moderators queues now.
Thanks all for participating!
Kind Regards,
Stefan
> Am 04.10.2021 um 21:59 schrieb Dennis Clarke :
>
> On 10/4/21 04:01, ste...@eissing.org wrote:
>> I count 10 +1 votes for release and none against. I will go ahead and start
>> preparing it.
>>
>> Thanks to everyone for putting in the time on such a
201 - 300 of 4444 matches
Mail list logo
