On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Sunday, August 15, 2004 7:30 PM -0700 Mathihalli, Madhusudan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought the 8K limit was a compile-time constant.
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/core.html#limitrequestfieldsize
8190 is just our default. HTH. --
Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Sunday, August 15, 2004 7:30 PM -0700 Mathihalli, Madhusudan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought the 8K limit was a compile-time constant.
Joe Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Isn't the core_input_filter's HUGE_STRING_LEN argument to
apr_brigade_split_line() also going to cause problems on
lines larger than that value (8K)?
Scratch that- I see that ap_rgetline_core has enough loops
to handle it.
--
Joe Schaefer
* Mathihalli, Madhusudan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: It might make sense to increase the compile-time default
: while retaining 8k as the config-file default. (But this
: would probably require changing the name of the constant to
: avoid confusing people.)
It's precisely what I was
--On Tuesday, August 17, 2004 1:03 AM +0200 André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I see no sense in restricting at compile time at all. As far as
I can see, we can just take the 8k config default and drop the upper
compile time limit.
+1. -- justin
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 16:36:29 -0700, Justin Erenkrantz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On Tuesday, August 17, 2004 1:03 AM +0200 André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I see no sense in restricting at compile time at all. As far as
I can see, we can just take the 8k config default and drop
: -Original Message-
: From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
: --On Friday, August 13, 2004 10:02 AM -0700 Mathihalli, Madhusudan
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:
: I was wondering if there's any potential harm in increasing the
: LimitRequestFieldsize from it's
--On Sunday, August 15, 2004 7:30 PM -0700 Mathihalli, Madhusudan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought the 8K limit was a compile-time constant.
http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/core.html#limitrequestfieldsize
8190 is just our default. HTH. -- justin
--On Friday, August 13, 2004 10:02 AM -0700 Mathihalli, Madhusudan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if there's any potential harm in increasing the
LimitRequestFieldsize from it's current value of 8k to something more
(like 32k).
Instances that need to support larger header sizes
