Re: [DISCUSSION] Ignite.C++ and CMake

Daschinsky : > Ok, I changed agents requirements to builds and add them to runAll > > пн, 22 июн. 2020 г. в 22:39, Petr Ivanov : > >> Cmake is installed on all agents (except 10 which is currently down and >> will be updated later). >> >> >> > On

Re: [DISCUSSION] Ignite.C++ and CMake

Ok, I changed agents requirements to builds and add them to runAll пн, 22 июн. 2020 г. в 22:39, Petr Ivanov : > Cmake is installed on all agents (except 10 which is currently down and > will be updated later). > > > > On 22 Jun 2020, at 21:03, Ivan Daschinsky wrote: >

MTCGA spam about BinaryConfigurationTest in .NET Core suite

Hi folks! It seems, that this test mysteriously fails only on one agent aitc-lin01_04 with this error. [1] Locally this .NET Core tests doesn't fail for about 20 minutes of continuously run (Mac OS X 10.15, .NET Core 3.1.200) According to stacktrace, it seems that there is problem with build conf

Re: [DISCUSSION] Ignite.C++ and CMake

p;branch_IgniteTests24Java8=pull%2F7854%2Fhead&tab=buildTypeStatusDiv > > пн, 22 июн. 2020 г. в 12:03, Ilya Kasnacheev : > >> Hello! >> >> I think you should contact Peter Ivanov if you want anything to be >> installed on agents. >> >> Regards, >> -- >>

Re: [DISCUSSION] Ignite.C++ and CMake

пн, 22 июн. 2020 г. в 12:03, Ilya Kasnacheev : > Hello! > > I think you should contact Peter Ivanov if you want anything to be > installed on agents. > > Regards, > -- > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > пн, 22 июн. 2020 г. в 12:00, Ivan Daschinsky : > > > Actuall

Re: [DISCUSSION] Ignite.C++ and CMake

t; Regards, > -- > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > вс, 21 июн. 2020 г. в 17:35, Ivan Daschinsky : > > > Hi folks. > > > > Patch is rigorously tested and with Igor Sapego help it is possible to > > build with cmake Ignite.C++ even on windows. > > But, it&

Re: Tool for performance statistics reports

According to [1], it's absolutely OK to include files under MIT licence. But we should mention these components or modules in LICENCE file. [1] -- https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html вс, 21 июн. 2020 г. в 23:34, Saikat Maitra : > Hi Nikita, > > I have reviewed the PR and shared comments.

Re: [MTCGA]: new failures in builds [5395772] needs to be handled

It seems, that this test mysteriously fails only on one agent aitc-lin01_04 with this error. [1] Locally this .NET Core tests doesn't fail for about 20 minutes of continuously run (Mac OS X 10.15, .NET Core 3.1.200) According to stacktrace, it seems that there is problem with build configuration a

Re: [DISCUSSION] Ignite.C++ and CMake

> > > 1 июня 2020 г., в 13:21, Ivan Daschinsky > написал(а): > > > > Igor, could you please check my PR? > > > > пт, 29 мая 2020 г. в 15:28, Ivan Daschinsky : > > > >> Thanks you all. Run patch (I've changed some code also) on TC -- all CP

Discussion: Existence of manual pinger for ZK client

Igniters, I suppose, that existence of manual pinger, introduced in [1], in our ZkDiscoveryImpl is under a big question. This weird thing was introduced to solve specific issue, specifically strange freeze of all threads of process during deallocate (Unsafe.freeMemory) of large amount of data. Actu

IGNITE-12808 Allow create tables for existing caches

Hi Igniters. I've recently submitted patch[1] that implemented subj. Any help with review would be appreciated. [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-12808 -- Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy

Re: [DISCUSSION] Add autocompletion for commands in control.sh

ive benchmark CLI, has ** Apache [Ignite TensorFlow] **, and Apache > Sling. > > > [1] https://github.com/remkop/picocli/blame/master/README.md#L199 > > On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 16:09, Ivan Daschinsky wrote: > > > > +1 But this is not only usability improvement, but also a

Re: [DISCUSSION] Add autocompletion for commands in control.sh

+1 But this is not only usability improvement, but also a huge code improvement. With picocli developers can add custom command without writing a lot of boilerplate and error prone code to do a trivial task of parsing CLI arguments. Cleaner code, less bugs also matter. вт, 2 июн. 2020 г. в 16:02,

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Ignite.C++ and CMake

Igor, could you please check my PR? пт, 29 мая 2020 г. в 15:28, Ivan Daschinsky : > Thanks you all. Run patch (I've changed some code also) on TC -- all CPP > suites are green (GCC, CLang, Win64) > > пт, 29 мая 2020 г. в 15:02, Zhenya Stanilovsky >: > >> >&g

Re: Re[2]: [DISCUSSION] Ignite.C++ and CMake

>That's where we should wait for Igor Sapego to check. > > > >Regards, > >-- > >Ilya Kasnacheev > > > > > >пт, 29 мая 2020 г. в 12:20, Ivan Daschinsky < ivanda...@gmail.com >: > > > >> Ilya, thanks a lot! What about tests? I found

Re: [DISCUSSION] Ignite.C++ and CMake

Also without with flag we can observe many failures of suites on TC https://ci.ignite.apache.org/buildConfiguration/IgniteTests24Java8_PlatformCLinux?branch=%3Cdefault%3E&mode=builds#all-projects пт, 29 мая 2020 г. в 12:20, Ivan Daschinsky : > Ilya, thanks a lot! What about tests? I fo

Re: [DISCUSSION] Ignite.C++ and CMake

release, without and with odbc, checked running thick > node and ODBC connection on Linux. > > Regards, > -- > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > чт, 28 мая 2020 г. в 17:31, Ivan Daschinsky : > > > Ok, PR is ready > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-13078 &g

Re: [DISCUSSION] Ignite.C++ and CMake

reports are welcomed! вт, 26 мая 2020 г. в 18:51, Ivan Daschinsky : > Stephen, looks great! I do mostly the same things in C++ code. Thank you! > > вт, 26 мая 2020 г. в 18:33, Stephen Darlington < > stephen.darling...@gridgain.com>: > >> Not sure if it’ll help, but I

Re: Prevent insertion of cache entry if the binary field type and the type of the query entity do not match.

I think this feature quite easy to implement. Before put in cache tree, we can iterate over query descriptor fields and check whether this field presents in binary object and if typeId is the same. But I think there can l be a quite noticeable performance penalty when this feature is enabled. It sh

Re: [DISCUSSION] Ignite.C++ and CMake

e code worth taking. > > https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4872 < > https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4872> > > Regards, > Stephen > > > On 26 May 2020, at 16:02, Ivan Daschinsky wrote: > > > > I appreciate any help, thank you, Ilya. > > >

Re: [DISCUSSION] Ignite.C++ and CMake

: > Hello! > > I will assist with checking on Linux if you would contribute a patch. > Please start with a ticket (or even an IEP maybe?) > > Regards, > -- > Ilya Kasnacheev > > > вт, 26 мая 2020 г. в 16:47, Ivan Daschinsky : > > > Guys, I will certainly thor

Re: [DISCUSSION] Ignite.C++ and CMake

Guys, I will certainly thoroughly test my fix not only unices, but on windows too. And I will describe it very thoroughly. When I was C++ developer (more than 10 years ago), I have not any trouble at all with CMake and Visual Studio 2005. Everything works and works good. Moreover, you can build wi

Re: [DISCUSSION] Ignite.C++ and CMake

Igor, I just said about native support from Visual Studio, not from cmake itself. Modern cmake can generate projects even for Visual Studio 2008 [1] [1] -- https://cmake.org/cmake/help/v3.16/generator/Visual%20Studio%209%202008.html вт, 26 мая 2020 г. в 16:16, Igor Sapego : > Nikolay, removing

Re: Why OPTIMIZE_REUSE_RESULT is set to 0 explicitly in o.a.i.i.p.query.h2.ConnectionManager#DEFAULT_DB_OPTIONS

Thank you for your response, Konstantin I think we cannot just turn this optimization > Of course not, that is the reason why I started this thread. org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.query.h2.opt.GridH2Table don't change > it neither on remove or update Yes, but we can increment this count

Re: Possible concurrency bug in GridCacheLockImpl

Sorry, I meant not GridCacheLockImpl but CacheLockImpl. пт, 3 апр. 2020 г. в 17:04, Ivan Daschinskiy : > Folks, > > Lurking through code, it seems I found some concurrency issue in subj. > > * This class contains two fields, volatile Thread lockedThread and > non-volatile int cntr (used for reent

Re: Apache Ignite 2.7. Last Mile

Hi! Is it possible to merge IGNITE-9854? Fix is pretty simple, but quite important. ср, 17 окт. 2018 г. в 17:49, Andrey Gura : > JFYI > > IGNITE-9737 and IGNITE-9710 are merged to release branch. > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 5:41 PM Pavel Tupitsyn > wrote: > > > > Thank you. Fix has been merged to

Re: IGNITE-6827 - Review needed.

Hi all, I've implemented corresponded .NET api. Pavel, could you review my PR, please? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8075 2018-04-10 21:06 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Pavlov : > Hi Pavel, > > thank you for bring up test questions. It seems my previous comments were > not taken into account

PR#3697 IGNITE-8021: Delete cache config files when destroyed

Hi Team, Could you review this PR https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3697 please? Tests result: https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=1159660 Jira ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-8021 -- Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy

Request for contributor permissions

Hello Ignite Community! My name is Ivan Daschinskiy. I want to contribute to Apache Ignite and want to start with this issue - IGNITE-6860 , my JIRA username *ivandasch*. Any help on this will be appreciated. Thanks a lot! -- Sincerely yours, Iv

<    1   2   3   4   5