Re: Using GIT

2012-12-11 Thread Robert Matthews
On 12/08/12 15:01, Dan Haywood wrote: > >I've made some changes and can't push them because I've used the http >protocol when I cloned. What should I be using? At a guess is it >[email protected]/isis.**gitfor SSH connection, and can I switch easi

Re: Using GIT

2012-12-08 Thread Dan Haywood
On 8 December 2012 10:55, Robert Matthews wrote: > Dan > > Did you mean to add the idea directory to the code base? > No ... have now deleted. > > I've made some changes and can't push them because I've used the http > protocol when I cloned. What should I be using? At a guess is it > usern..

Using GIT

2012-12-08 Thread Robert Matthews
Dan Did you mean to add the idea directory to the code base? I've made some changes and can't push them because I've used the http protocol when I cloned. What should I be using? At a guess is it [email protected]/isis.git for SSH connection, and can I switch easily. Rob PS for thos

Re: [VOTE] move to using git rather than svn for Isis code

2012-11-13 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
Oh sorry On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Dan Haywood wrote: > Nour, this was concluded... see [RESULT] thread [1] > > I've also raised the infra ticket [2], waiting for infra to action. > Because of workload, they indicate might take >= 1 week. > Then it is time to help :D I will start looki

Re: [VOTE] move to using git rather than svn for Isis code

2012-11-13 Thread Dan Haywood
Nour, this was concluded... see [RESULT] thread [1] I've also raised the infra ticket [2], waiting for infra to action. Because of workload, they indicate might take >= 1 week. [1] http://markmail.org/thread/i3qddjyg3f73ivi6 [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5502 ~# O

Re: [VOTE] move to using git rather than svn for Isis code

2012-11-13 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
I think it is time to conclude this discussion and I believe there is strong consensus around moving totally to Git, so lets do it :D On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Kevin Meyer wrote: > 3 > > Ok, so the time has come to learn something else new! ;) > -- > Sent from my Android phone with K-9 M

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] move to using git rather than svn for Isis code

2012-11-09 Thread Dan Haywood
te: > > > CouchDB has a useful page [1] about contributing using Git which could be > > adopted. I especially like there emphasis on creating branches for > tickets. > > > > For the newbies, the main Git site [2] has loads of information including > > the free 230

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] move to using git rather than svn for Isis code

2012-11-08 Thread Alexander Krasnukhin
If you are new to git you have to spend more than 15 minutes... Much more. On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Jeroen van der Wal wrote: > CouchDB has a useful page [1] about contributing using Git which could be > adopted. I especially like there emphasis on creating branches for tickets. &

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] move to using git rather than svn for Isis code

2012-11-08 Thread Jeroen van der Wal
CouchDB has a useful page [1] about contributing using Git which could be adopted. I especially like there emphasis on creating branches for tickets. For the newbies, the main Git site [2] has loads of information including the free 230 page Pro Git e-book. If you have 15 minutes to spare you

[RESULT] [VOTE] move to using git rather than svn for Isis code

2012-11-08 Thread Dan Haywood
The vote was to select between: 1. carry on using svn. 2. use git.apache.org as a read-only clone, with svn remaining as the master. 3. use git.apache.org as a read/write master. The community voted for (3). Votes cast: - for (3): +4 PMC (Dan Haywood, Jeroen van der Wal, Robert Matthews, Kev

Re: [VOTE] move to using git rather than svn for Isis code

2012-11-07 Thread Kevin Meyer
3 Ok, so the time has come to learn something else new! ;) -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: [VOTE] move to using git rather than svn for Isis code

2012-11-06 Thread Robert Matthews
Who would dare contradict Linus and suggest Subversion is better . It'll take some time to get use to a new model and tool, but it's all rage these day with many people using it. 3 for me. Rob On 04/11/12 23:29, Dan Haywood wrote: The idea of using git rather than svn fo

Re: [VOTE] move to using git rather than svn for Isis code

2012-11-06 Thread
I do not have a preference and I am open to both. --- [email protected] wrote: From: Mohammad Nour El-Din To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [VOTE] move to using git rather than svn for Isis code Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 11:38:06 +0100 I am open for both and in case we choose to use git

Re: [VOTE] move to using git rather than svn for Isis code

2012-11-06 Thread Vangjel Stavro
My vote is for option 3

Re: [VOTE] move to using git rather than svn for Isis code

2012-11-06 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
n number 3 now exists for Apache projects. If > >> its > >> > true then +1 for option 3 (non-binding) > >> > > >> > - Henry > >> > > >> > > >> > On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Dan Haywood < > >> d...@haywood-asso

Re: [VOTE] move to using git rather than svn for Isis code

2012-11-05 Thread Giedrius Graževičius
/git-wip-us.apache.org/ >> >> >> On 4 November 2012 23:35, Henry Saputra wrote: >> >> > Hi Dan, >> > >> > I did not know that option number 3 now exists for Apache projects. If >> its >> > true then +1 for option 3 (non-binding) >>

Re: [VOTE] move to using git rather than svn for Isis code

2012-11-05 Thread Jeroen van der Wal
ow that option number 3 now exists for Apache projects. If > its > > true then +1 for option 3 (non-binding) > > > > - Henry > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Dan Haywood < > [email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > &

Re: [VOTE] move to using git rather than svn for Isis code

2012-11-04 Thread Dan Haywood
3:29 PM, Dan Haywood >wrote: > > > The idea of using git rather than svn for the Isis codebase has been > > discussed several times in the past. Now that we have graduated, it > seems > > a good time to formally vote on whether we want to make this change. > > > &g

Re: [VOTE] move to using git rather than svn for Isis code

2012-11-04 Thread Matthew Adams
3 On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Dan Haywood wrote: > My own vote is (3) - use git.apache.org as a read/write master. > > Dan > > > On 4 November 2012 23:29, Dan Haywood wrote: > >> The idea of using git rather than svn for the Isis codebase has been >> di

Re: [VOTE] move to using git rather than svn for Isis code

2012-11-04 Thread Henry Saputra
Hi Dan, I did not know that option number 3 now exists for Apache projects. If its true then +1 for option 3 (non-binding) - Henry On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Dan Haywood wrote: > The idea of using git rather than svn for the Isis codebase has been > discussed several times in th

Re: [VOTE] move to using git rather than svn for Isis code

2012-11-04 Thread Dan Haywood
My own vote is (3) - use git.apache.org as a read/write master. Dan On 4 November 2012 23:29, Dan Haywood wrote: > The idea of using git rather than svn for the Isis codebase has been > discussed several times in the past. Now that we have graduated, it seems > a good time to form

[VOTE] move to using git rather than svn for Isis code

2012-11-04 Thread Dan Haywood
The idea of using git rather than svn for the Isis codebase has been discussed several times in the past. Now that we have graduated, it seems a good time to formally vote on whether we want to make this change. There are three options available: 1. carry on using svn. (In this case, I will