Looks like Jun's comments on review board were not addressed?
They seem valid to me - especially the points about IPv6 (seen this at some
customers) and InetAddress having both host and port.
Gwen
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Jay Kreps jay.kr...@gmail.com wrote:
Thx,
-Jay
Hi,
Kafka currently builds against Zookeeper 3.3.4, which is quite old.
Perhaps we should move to the more recent 3.4.x branch?
I tested the change on my system and the only impact is to
EmbeddedZookeeper used in tests (it uses NIOServerCnxn.factory, which
was refactored into its own class in
.
/***
Joe Stein
Founder, Principal Consultant
Big Data Open Source Security LLC
http://www.stealth.ly
Twitter: @allthingshadoop http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop
/
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Gwen Shapira gshap
Also, specific Zookeeper 3.4.X version where loss of quorum occurred will help.
3.4.5 fixed some pretty serious issues around hanging.
Gwen
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Gwen Shapira gshap...@cloudera.com wrote:
Thanks for the heads-up, Joe.
We've been shipping Zookeeper 3.4.X for over two
/
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Gwen Shapira gshap...@cloudera.com wrote:
Also, specific Zookeeper 3.4.X version where loss of quorum occurred will
help.
3.4.5 fixed some pretty serious issues around hanging.
Gwen
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Gwen
, since
we treat those clusters more like production (they¹re staging for everyone
else, but we¹re infrastructure).
-Todd
On 8/3/14, 9:56 PM, Gwen Shapira gshap...@cloudera.com wrote:
Hi,
Kafka currently builds against Zookeeper 3.3.4, which is quite old.
Perhaps we should move to the more
/utils/kafka_system_test_utils.py 6edd64a
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24723/diff/
Testing
---
Unit tests + replica test from system tests
Thanks,
Gwen Shapira
/browse/KAFKA-1576
Repository: kafka
Description
---
make topic deletion more user-friendly
Diffs
-
core/src/main/scala/kafka/admin/TopicCommand.scala
003a09c6160618bc94858ebc0d806b2aa4158e0a
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24782/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Gwen Shapira
list.
Diffs
-
core/src/main/scala/kafka/admin/TopicCommand.scala
003a09c6160618bc94858ebc0d806b2aa4158e0a
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24782/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Gwen Shapira
-CREATION
core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/zk/EmbeddedZookeeper.scala d883bde
system_test/utils/kafka_system_test_utils.py fcacf0a
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24723/diff/
Testing
---
Unit tests + replica test from system tests
Thanks,
Gwen Shapira
/system_test_utils.py 50340f0
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25044/diff/
Testing
---
Running system tests bunch of times :)
Thanks,
Gwen Shapira
The wiki is great place to record the results or make suggestions that
require formatting and graphics to explain, but I think I prefer
mailing lists for discussion.
So, let me repeat here a question I raised in the wiki, since I don't
want it to get lost :)
Is there a JIRA for the issues
Stein wrote:
Hi Andrew, yes the meeting took place and we plan to-do it every two
weeks
(same bat time, same bat channel) moving forward.
In attendance was Michael Herstine (LinkedIn), Arvind Mani (LinkedIn),
Gwen
Shapira (Cloudera) and myself.
Gwen updated the wiki after our
and
one broker was down
* min.insync.replicas=4 returned NotEnoughReplicas when required.acks=-1
See notes about retry behavior in the JIRA.
Thanks,
Gwen Shapira
normally (all writes succeeded as long as a
broker was up)
* min.insync.replicas=3 returned NotEnoughReplicas when required.acks=-1 and
one broker was down
* min.insync.replicas=4 returned NotEnoughReplicas when required.acks=-1
See notes about retry behavior in the JIRA.
Thanks,
Gwen Shapira
=3 returned NotEnoughReplicas when required.acks=-1 and
one broker was down
* min.insync.replicas=4 returned NotEnoughReplicas when required.acks=-1
See notes about retry behavior in the JIRA.
Thanks,
Gwen Shapira
NotEnoughReplicas when required.acks=-1
See notes about retry behavior in the JIRA.
Thanks,
Gwen Shapira
---
On Sept. 23, 2014, 12:28 a.m., Gwen Shapira wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25886/
---
(Updated Sept. 23
NotEnoughReplicas when required.acks=-1 and
one broker was down
* min.insync.replicas=4 returned NotEnoughReplicas when required.acks=-1
See notes about retry behavior in the JIRA.
Thanks,
Gwen Shapira
Using high level consumer and assuming you already created an iterator:
while (msgCount maxMessages it.hasNext()) {
bytes = it.next().message();
eventList.add(bytes);
}
(See a complete example here:
broker was down
* min.insync.replicas=4 returned NotEnoughReplicas when required.acks=-1
See notes about retry behavior in the JIRA.
Thanks,
Gwen Shapira
---
On Sept. 25, 2014, 7:41 p.m., Gwen Shapira wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25886/
---
(Updated Sept. 25, 2014, 7:41
notice that
we now have separate objects for MFromConfig and MToConfig. What's the
reasoning behind that?
- Gwen Shapira
On Sept. 25, 2014, 7:41 p.m., Gwen Shapira wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit
On Sept. 30, 2014, 4:55 p.m., Gwen Shapira wrote:
I didn't get a chance to go over the entire review in detail. I did notice
that we now have separate objects for MFromConfig and MToConfig. What's the
reasoning behind that?
Ignore. commenting on wrong RB.
- Gwen
Re #1:
Since the auth_to_local is a kerberos config, its up to the admin to
decide how he likes the user names and set it up properly (or leave
empty) and make sure the ACLs match. Simplified names may be needed if
the authorization system integrates with LDAP to get groups or
something fancy
for the client librariy
developers too :)
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Gwen Shapira gshap...@cloudera.com wrote:
Re #1:
Since the auth_to_local is a kerberos config, its up to the admin to
decide how he likes the user names and set it up properly (or leave
empty) and make sure the ACLs
was down
* min.insync.replicas=4 returned NotEnoughReplicas when required.acks=-1
See notes about retry behavior in the JIRA.
Thanks,
Gwen Shapira
We typically install Kafka on its own cluster, although it can use the
existing ZK (if its not too busy).
Otherwise Kafka can suffer from disk contention with the slaves and
CPU/memory contention with the masters.
If this is just test cluster, installing Kafka on the slaves is probably fine.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25886/#review55187
---
On Oct. 1, 2014, 1:19 a.m., Gwen Shapira wrote
certain producer side config. My feeling is
that if we make min.isr a topic level config, then it should work in the
same way independent of the producer side config. So, perhaps it's better
to just check inSyncSize minIsr, irrespective of the ack. What do you
think?
Gwen Shapira
NotEnoughReplicas when required.acks=-1 and
one broker was down
* min.insync.replicas=4 returned NotEnoughReplicas when required.acks=-1
See notes about retry behavior in the JIRA.
Thanks,
Gwen Shapira
I think we need to add:
* Authentication of Kafka brokers with a secured ZooKeeper
* Kafka should be able to generate delegation tokens for MapReduce /
Spark / Yarn jobs.
* Extend systest framework to allow testing secured kafka
Gwen
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Jay Kreps jay.kr...@gmail.com
I'm using Hue's ZooKeeper app: http://gethue.com/new-zookeeper-browser-app/
This UI looks very cute, but I didn't try it yet:
https://github.com/claudemamo/kafka-web-console
Gwen
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Shafaq s.abdullah...@gmail.com wrote:
We are going to deploy Kafka in Production
NotEnoughReplicas when required.acks=-1 and
one broker was down
* min.insync.replicas=4 returned NotEnoughReplicas when required.acks=-1
See notes about retry behavior in the JIRA.
Thanks,
Gwen Shapira
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25886/#review55730
---
On Oct. 8, 2014, 1:46 a.m., Gwen Shapira wrote
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25886/#review55745
---
On Oct. 8, 2014, 1:46 a.m., Gwen Shapira wrote
required.acks=-1 and
one broker was down
* min.insync.replicas=4 returned NotEnoughReplicas when required.acks=-1
See notes about retry behavior in the JIRA.
Thanks,
Gwen Shapira
(all writes succeeded as long as a
broker was up)
* min.insync.replicas=3 returned NotEnoughReplicas when required.acks=-1 and
one broker was down
* min.insync.replicas=4 returned NotEnoughReplicas when required.acks=-1
See notes about retry behavior in the JIRA.
Thanks,
Gwen Shapira
it isn't clear to me how to do good
integration testing since we need a KDC to test against and it isn't clear
how that happens in the test environment except possibly manually (which is
not ideal). How do other projects handle this?
-Jay
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Gwen Shapira gshap
+1 :)
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Joe Stein joe.st...@stealth.ly wrote:
+1
On Oct 10, 2014 12:08 PM, Neha Narkhede neha.narkh...@gmail.com wrote:
+1.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Jun Rao jun...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Everyone,
I just committed KAFKA-1555 (min.isr support) to
Wondering the same here :)
I think there are some parallel threads here (SSL is independent of
Kerberos, as far as I can see).
Kerberos work is blocked on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1683 - Implement a
session concept in the socket server. So there's no point in
picking up other
Yes, I think we can focus on Broker to Zookeeper communication only.
At least for initial stage.
Gwen
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Todd Palino tpal...@gmail.com wrote:
For the moment, consumers still need to write under the /consumers tree.
Even if they are committing offsets to Kafka
In #2, do you refer to advertising the internal hostname instead of
the external one?
In this case, will it be enough to use getCanonicalHostName (which
uses a name service)?
Note that I think the problem the blog reported (wrong name
advertised) is somewhat orthogonal to the question of which
. We may want to add this option to the FAQ.
Gwen
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Gwen Shapira gshap...@cloudera.com wrote:
It looks like we are using canonical hostname:
def register() {
val advertisedHostName =
if(advertisedHost == null || advertisedHost.trim.isEmpty
Note that I added a patch with 0.8.2 documentation to KAFKA-1555 (in
order to document the new min.isr behavior).
We need to get this committed in SVN before the release, and probably
document few more things (new producer for example).
Gwen
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Jun Rao
With two patches, we'll need a two-phase commit to maintain
consistency, and we all know what a PITA this can be.
(Sorry, couldn't resist the pun. Carry on.)
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Jay Kreps jay.kr...@gmail.com wrote:
That makes sense. I agree that moving to another doc system isn't a
:37 AM, Gwen Shapira gshap...@cloudera.com wrote:
With two patches, we'll need a two-phase commit to maintain
consistency, and we all know what a PITA this can be.
(Sorry, couldn't resist the pun. Carry on.)
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Jay Kreps jay.kr...@gmail.com wrote:
That makes sense. I
+1 (non-official community vote).
Kicked the tires of the binary release. Works out of the box as
expected, new producer included.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Joe Stein joe.st...@stealth.ly wrote:
Jun, I updated the
https://people.apache.org/~joestein/kafka-0.8.2-beta-candidate1/java-doc/
What's the plan for moving from beta to stable?
Time based? Or are there any patches that need to go in?
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Joe Stein joe.st...@stealth.ly wrote:
This is the first candidate for release of Apache Kafka 0.8.2-beta
Release Notes for the 0.8.2-beta release
I'll upload a clean patch today to make the review easier.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Joel Koshy jjkosh...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes I can update the doc for offset management, and review Gwen's doc
on min.isr/durability guarantees
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 09:10:19AM -0700, Jun Rao wrote:
. It
will be great if companies that pick up beta, deploy it, use it and report
bugs. LinkedIn will be helping do this within a 4-5 weeks timeframe, if
possible.
Thanks,
Neha
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Gwen Shapira gshap...@cloudera.com
wrote:
What's the plan for moving from beta
cee76b323e5f3e4c783749ac9e78e1ef02897e3b
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27203/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Gwen Shapira
core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/network/SocketServerTest.scala
5f4d85254c384dcc27a5a84f0836ea225d3a901a
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27204/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Gwen Shapira
This is very much work in progress.
You can follow the Jira here to see how it goes:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1682
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Stephenson, John L
john.l.stephen...@lmco.com wrote:
List Users,
Does anyone know when/if Kafka security features are being
Strange. I'm seeing it.
Browser cache?
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Jay Kreps jay.kr...@gmail.com wrote:
I actually don't see the beta release on that download page:
http://kafka.apache.org/downloads.html
-Jay
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Joe Stein joest...@apache.org wrote:
The
High level consumer commits before shutting down.
If you'll look at ZookeeperConsumerConnector.scala (currently the only
implementation of ConsumerConnector) you'll see shutdown() includes
the following:
if (config.autoCommitEnable)
commitOffsets()
Gwen
On Tue, Oct 28,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27430/#review59453
---
Ship it!
LGTM :)
- Gwen Shapira
On Nov. 1, 2014, 12:21 a.m
for the
class or from the documentation and add them.
- Gwen Shapira
On Nov. 5, 2014, 6:44 p.m., Dmytro Kostiuchenko wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27634
+1 for dropping Java 6
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Steven Schlansker sschlans...@opentable.com
wrote:
Java 6 has been End of Life since Feb 2013.
Java 7 (and 8, but unfortunately that's too new still) has very compelling
features which can make development a lot easier.
The sooner more
Java6 is supported on CDH4 but not CDH5.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Koert Kuipers ko...@tresata.com wrote:
when is java 6 dropped by the hadoop distros?
i am still aware of many clusters that are java 6 only at the moment.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Gwen Shapira gshap
nottrue?
If String.valueOf(false) no longer works as expected, it looks like a bug
waiting to happen...
core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/integration/UncleanLeaderElectionTest.scala
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27634/#comment101527
why are we removing a test?
- Gwen Shapira
://reviews.apache.org/r/27684/#comment101725
I'd add a comment on why we have two interfaces here, since its
none-obvious and someone may try to refactor in the future... Perhaps link to
the email thread?
- Gwen Shapira
On Nov. 6, 2014, 5:13 p.m., Manikumar Reddy O wrote
On Nov. 7, 2014, 5 a.m., Gwen Shapira wrote:
core/src/main/scala/kafka/utils/Utils.scala, lines 514-522
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27634/diff/3/?file=751666#file751666line514
I think I'm not seeing why we need this.
Shouldn't Scala's JavaConversion class handle this exact
On Nov. 7, 2014, 5 a.m., Gwen Shapira wrote:
core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/integration/UncleanLeaderElectionTest.scala,
line 144
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27634/diff/3/?file=751668#file751668line144
String.valueOf(false) should evaluate to false, right? Why do we need
Perhaps relevant:
Hadoop is moving toward dropping Java6 in next release.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10530
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Jay Kreps jay.kr...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah it is a little bit silly that people are still using Java 6.
I guess this is a
still need to make sure this test will fail if the reassignment command
magically succeeds and not exception is thrown.
core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/admin/DeleteTopicTest.scala
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27990/#comment103389
Any reason for this change?
- Gwen Shapira
On Nov. 13
://reviews.apache.org/r/27990/#comment103766
Maybe comment on why you want to fail here. Unlike assertions, these tests
are not self documenting.
- Gwen Shapira
On Nov. 17, 2014, 2:33 p.m., Dmitry Pekar wrote:
---
This is an automatically
Congrats Guozhang. Well deserved!
—
Sent from Mailbox
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Neha Narkhede neha.narkh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm very happy to announce that the Kafka PMC has invited Guozhang Wang to
become a committer. Guozhang has made significant contributions to
that, I applied the patch
and managed to build jar and cleanTest test with no issues with Java8.
Non-binding +1 from me :)
bin/windows/kafka-run-class.bat
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28268/#comment104378
For some reason this doesn't seem to apply cleanly (failed to apply on
trunk)
- Gwen
. persistent,
epehmeral, sequence, etc...
Does it make sense to put the validation in a function and use it in all
create functions?
- Gwen Shapira
On Nov. 16, 2014, 7:49 p.m., Ashish Singh wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail
/28096/#comment104399
Can be much cleaner using Scala's enumeration withName.
- Gwen Shapira
On Nov. 15, 2014, 6:06 p.m., Ashish Singh wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https
As one of the people who spent too much time building Avro repositories, +1
on bringing serializer API back.
I think it will make the new producer easier to work with.
Gwen
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Jay Kreps jay.kr...@gmail.com wrote:
This is admittedly late in the release cycle to
multiple components, I wrote a short design
document that covers the necessary changes and the upgrade process:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Multiple+Listeners+for+Kafka+Brokers
Comments are more than welcome :)
If this is acceptable, hope to have a patch ready in few days.
Gwen
new clients.
I'll update if any of my customers yells loudly and we'll need to
support old clients too :)
Thanks,
Jun
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Gwen Shapira gshap...@cloudera.com
wrote:
Hi Everyone,
One of the pre-requisites we have for supporting multiple security
protocols (SSL
in the request.
4. Should we plan to support security just on the new java clients?
Supporting security in both the old and the new clients adds more work and
gives people less incentive to migrate off the old clients.
Thanks,
Jun
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Gwen Shapira gshap...@cloudera.com
eliminate this
possibility, unless there's a pretty good reason to do so.
-Todd
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Gwen Shapira gshap...@cloudera.com wrote:
Hey Todd,
You say lose the ability - you mean this ability actually exist now?
Or is this something you hope the new patch will support?
Gwen
,
Gwen Shapira
deploying from trunk will know when it's safe to
use the new feature.
Thanks,
Jun
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Gwen Shapira gshap...@cloudera.com wrote:
Thanks you so much for your help here Jun!
Highlighting the specific protocols is very useful.
See some detailed comments below
it instead of the internal Array.
core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/utils/UtilsTest.scala
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28859/#comment107304
Since this is a generic function, I'd add tests for:
1. list with a single host:port pair (i.e. no commas)
2. ipv4
- Gwen Shapira
On Dec. 9
On Dec. 10, 2014, 3:21 p.m., Gwen Shapira wrote:
Non-binding LGTM from me.
Any chance of cleaning up the whitespace? makes the change looks way bigger
than it really is.
Few suggested improvements below:
My mistake - the whitespaces were in the code originally and this patch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28859/#review64689
---
Ship it!
Non-binding +1
- Gwen Shapira
On Dec. 11, 2014, 2:39
I'd use the one in Flume trunk (it was far better tested) and we also
have Kafka-channel :)
And it works with 0.8.1.
https://github.com/apache/flume/tree/trunk/flume-ng-sources/flume-kafka-source
https://github.com/apache/flume/tree/trunk/flume-ng-sinks/flume-ng-kafka-sink
is that we support
committing offsets to zookeeper on every batch (rather than
automatically) and batch sizes are configurable so you can tune
throughput / latency / cpu utilization / zookeeper load, etc.
Gwen
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Gwen Shapira gshap...@cloudera.com wrote:
I'd use
and use both when creating the override map and in the connection loop? I think
this will make the test less fragile and clearer.
- Gwen Shapira
On Dec. 14, 2014, 5:26 p.m., Jeff Holoman wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail
expected.
- Gwen Shapira
On Dec. 15, 2014, 2:30 a.m., Jeff Holoman wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29029
Hi,
Kafka has public APIs in Java and Scala, intended for use by external
developers.
In addition, Kafka also exposes many public methods that are intended
to use within Kafka but are not intended to be called by external
developers.
Also, some of the external APIs are less stable than others
/scala/kafka/log/LogManager.scala
4d2924d04bc4bd62413edb0ee2d4aaf3c0052867
core/src/test/scala/unit/kafka/admin/DeleteTopicTest.scala
29cc01bcef9cacd8dec1f5d662644fc6fe4994bc
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29210/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Gwen Shapira
in the original scala code.
Thoughts?
-Jay
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Gwen Shapira gshap...@cloudera.com
wrote:
Hi,
Kafka has public APIs in Java and Scala, intended for use by external
developers.
In addition, Kafka also exposes many public methods that are intended
to use within
---
Thanks,
Gwen Shapira
---
On Dec. 18, 2014, 6:59 p.m., Gwen Shapira wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29210
/#review65582
---
On Dec. 19, 2014, 1:56 a.m., Gwen Shapira wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29231
/ConsoleProducer.scala
1061cc74fac69693836f1e75add06b09d459a764
core/src/test/scala/kafka/tools/ConsoleProducerTest.scala PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29231/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Gwen Shapira
it.
- Gwen
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28769/#review64163
---
On Dec. 5, 2014, 8:34 p.m., Gwen Shapira wrote
0c6d7a316cc6b51ac0755ca03558507db0706c31
system_test/utils/kafka_system_test_utils.py
41d511cbc310fa87e0f2cd2f772e479e8e3ae4e2
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28769/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Gwen Shapira
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28769/#review64163
---
On Dec. 25, 2014, 7:04 p.m., Gwen Shapira wrote
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29029/#review66134
---
Ship it!
Non-binding +1 - the fix and test look good.
- Gwen
: https://reviews.apache.org/r/29210/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Gwen Shapira
/kafka_system_test_utils.py
41d511cbc310fa87e0f2cd2f772e479e8e3ae4e2
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28769/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Gwen Shapira
0c6d7a316cc6b51ac0755ca03558507db0706c31
system_test/utils/kafka_system_test_utils.py
41d511cbc310fa87e0f2cd2f772e479e8e3ae4e2
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28769/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Gwen Shapira
/replication_testsuite/testcase_1/testcase_1_properties.json
0c6d7a316cc6b51ac0755ca03558507db0706c31
system_test/utils/kafka_system_test_utils.py
41d511cbc310fa87e0f2cd2f772e479e8e3ae4e2
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28769/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Gwen Shapira
1 - 100 of 2807 matches
Mail list logo