Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf OSGi runtime 4.4.6 release

+1 best regards, Achim Am Mi., 10. Apr. 2024 um 07:48 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > +1 > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > | Github < > h

Re: Board report for March 2024

+1 Best regards, Achim Grzegorz Grzybek schrieb am Do. 29. Feb. 2024 um 14:39: > +1 > > regards > Grzegorz Grzybek > > czw., 29 lut 2024 o 14:22 Francois Papon > napisał(a): > > > LGTM, thanks JB! > > > > regards, > > > > François > > > > On 29/02/2024 13:45, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Karaf Minho in Apache Karaf

+1 (binding) Am Fr., 14. Okt. 2022 um 19:38 Uhr schrieb Jakub Herkel : > +1 (non-binding) > > Jakub > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 8:47 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > As discussed on the mailing list, I would like to start a formal vote > > to accept Apache Karaf Minho in

Re: [DISCUSS] Accepting K5 in the Karaf ecosystem

a bit late to the party, nevertheless I'm also in favor of making it crystal clear that Karaf is for OSGi and Karaf Minho is the new kid in town. besides that I'm also in favor of accepting this new runtime into the karaf community. regards, Achim Am So., 9. Okt. 2022 um 09:13 Uhr schrieb Serge H

Re: [DISCUSSION] Move PAX projects to Apache Karaf ?

Hi, I'm sorry to be a PITA :) What I've read so far has been feelings, one concern of perception by "big" customers. I would really like to know, which problem we are trying to solve by moving the pax projects under the umbrella of Karaf. Or what I personally would favor under their own tlp of the

Re: [DISCUSSION] Move PAX projects to Apache Karaf ?

Hi JB, Before I come to any conclusion, I would really like to understand what kind of issue/problem you would like to solve with this, which is easier to solve under an apache umbrella. thanks, Achim Am Do., 24. Feb. 2022 um 15:04 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré < j...@nanthrax.net>: > Hi guy

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.6 release

+1 (binding) regards, Achim Am Di., 11. Jan. 2022 um 11:49 Uhr schrieb Francois Papon < francois.pa...@openobject.fr>: > +1 (binding) > > regards, > > François > > On 10/01/2022 21:08, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.6 to your vote. > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.14 release

+1 best regards, Achim Am Mo., 20. Dez. 2021 um 16:17 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré < j...@nanthrax.net>: > Oh yes, sorry typo, you are right: log4j 2.17.0. > > Regards > JB > > On 20/12/2021 14:22, Francois Papon wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > > Just a side note, I think it's an upgrade to l

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.5 release

+1 regards, Achim Am Mo., 20. Dez. 2021 um 14:20 Uhr schrieb Francois Papon < francois.pa...@openobject.fr>: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks JB! > > regards, > > Francois > > On 19/12/2021 22:33, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.5 to your vote. > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.13 release

+1 best regards, Achim Am Do., 16. Dez. 2021 um 17:22 Uhr schrieb Serge Huber : > Thanks a lot for doing this in branch 4.2 ! > > +1 (non-binding) > > cheers, > Serge... > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 4:05 PM Jamie G. wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Cheers, > > Jamie > > > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 10:3

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.4 release (take #3)

+1 (binding) regards, Achim Am Mi., 15. Dez. 2021 um 08:34 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > +1 > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > | Github

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.4 release (take #2)

gt; > Le mar. 14 déc. 2021 à 10:26, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a > > écrit : > > > >> OK, so, let me prepare Pax Logging 2.0.12 then and cancel this vote to > >> include this new Pax Logging version. > >> > >> Regards > >> JB > >> >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.4 release (take #2)

tbh. What's the difference between cutting a new release right after the release and just postponing this release (again) to include this log4j version? I'd rather have a 4.3.4 accepted by our consumers instead of everyone just waiting for the 4.3.5 ;) my 2 cents :) regards, Achim Am Di., 14. D

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.4 release (take #2)

+1 (binding) best regards, Achim Am Mo., 13. Dez. 2021 um 17:48 Uhr schrieb Roedl Lukas < lukas.ro...@ait.ac.at>: > +1 (non-binding) > > regards, > Lukas > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Jean-Baptiste Onofré > Gesendet: Montag, 13. Dezember 2021 16:24 > An: dev@karaf.apache.org > Be

Re: Plan to release Pax Web 8 + some information

Web 8 goals:* > >- I've carefully read chapters 102 (Http Service specification), 128 >(Web Applications specification) and 140 (Whiteboard specification) of OSGi > CMPN R7 and tried to implement everything in best possible way >- I always appreciated how wel

Re: Pax Web 8 - 2 more tasks before GA

Hey Gzegorz, great work you did on Pax Web. Will be very interested in seeing the final product after you finished :) best regards, Achim Am Di., 31. Aug. 2021 um 08:41 Uhr schrieb Grzegorz Grzybek < gr.grzy...@gmail.com>: > Hello > > I'd like to present the state of Pax Web 8. I hope to releas

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.11 release

+1 thanks JB Am Mi., 10. März 2021 um 18:58 Uhr schrieb Freeman Fang < freeman.f...@gmail.com>: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks JB! > Freeman > > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 6:56 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofre > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.11 to your vote. > > > > This rel

Re: Board report March '21

Hi JB, Thanks for taking care of this. Looks good to me. regards, Achim Am Fr., 5. März 2021 um 08:55 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofre < j...@nanthrax.net>: > Hi guys, > > I prepared the Karaf board report for this month: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KARAF/Board+Reports < > h

Re: OPS4J projects migration from OPS4J (cloud) Jira to GitHub issues

Thanks and great work Grzegorz :) Am Do., 25. Feb. 2021 um 17:18 Uhr schrieb Matt Pavlovich < mattr...@gmail.com>: > Thanks! > > > On Feb 25, 2021, at 3:41 AM, Grzegorz Grzybek > wrote: > > > > Hello > > > > I'm proud to announce that I've just finished the migration of OPS4J Jira > > issues to

Re: Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.0 - Decision taken

Hi, I fully support the decision to go for 7.3.x for now. I'm also fully aware of the work Greg did to Pax Web and what it needs to get finished :) So from my point of view, this is the best we as a community can do right now. I wish I would be able to help Greg more than I did. So nobody is to bl

Re: Board report for September '20

+1 regards, Achim Am Mi., 2. Sept. 2020 um 08:41 Uhr schrieb Grzegorz Grzybek < gr.grzy...@gmail.com>: > +1 > > regards > Grzegorz Grzybek > > śr., 2 wrz 2020 o 08:23 Francois Papon > napisał(a): > > > +1 > > > > Thanks JB! > > > > regards, > > > > François > > fpa...@apache.org > > > > Le 02/0

Re: [PROPOSAL] Renaming terms

+1 and wherever it fits best. Make sure the documentation is aligned, and maybe we could give hints in the current documentation already? regards, Achim Am Mo., 27. Juli 2020 um 09:37 Uhr schrieb Fabian Lange < lange.fab...@gmail.com>: > +1 > > as a user of karaf 4.2 building our own distribut

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf Cellar 4.2.0 release

+1 (binging) regards, Achim Am Do., 16. Juli 2020 um 07:09 Uhr schrieb Grzegorz Grzybek < gr.grzy...@gmail.com>: > +1 (binding) > > regards > Grzegorz Grzybek > > czw., 16 lip 2020 o 07:03 Jean-Baptiste Onofre > napisał(a): > > > Gently reminder for the PMC to vote. > > > > Thanks, > > Regards

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache Karaf 4.3.0 and Pax Web

Hi, as being responsible for supporting more then one container for Pax-Web it's been unclear at the time if Jetty would always be the best idea. (which you now can see regarding the latest Servlet spec) That's why I added Tomcat and Guillaume added Undertow later on. So much for the Why multiple

Re: JDK 13/14 support for Karaf 4.2.10 and 4.3.0

Hi JB, thanks for the pointers. Would it be reasonable to place that information also on the download page? regards, Achim Am Fr., 5. Juni 2020 um 07:03 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofre < j...@nanthrax.net>: > Hi guys, > > I would like to send a quick note/update about the Karaf JDK support. >

Re: Board Report for June '20

+1 I would also put the link to the YT in it. regards, Achim Am Di., 2. Juni 2020 um 16:31 Uhr schrieb Serge Huber : > +1 > > Looks good, > > Just wondering if it would make sense to mention the recording of the > meeting if people want to look at it? > > Regards, > Serge... > > > On Tue, Jun

Re: [HEADS UP] Three new features proposal this week

+1 for most. only objection to the "Simple" Resolver, therefore -1 on that. I fear we do more harm then improvement. As Grzegorz already said, it's the way it is, not because we love complex stuff, but because bundle resolving is complex. Especially due to the new req/cap inside bundles. Actually t

Re: [VOTE] Remove Apache Karaf EIK & Wicket WebConsole repositories

+1 regards, Achim Am Mo., 6. Apr. 2020 um 16:30 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofre < j...@nanthrax.net>: > Casting my own +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > > Le 6 avr. 2020 à 13:38, Jean-Baptiste Onofre a écrit : > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > While ago we voted to deprecate Karaf EIK & Wicket WebC

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf Runtime 4.2.8 release (take #2)

+1 (bindng) best regards, Achim Am Mi., 22. Jan. 2020 um 18:36 Uhr schrieb Jamie G. < jamie.goody...@gmail.com>: > +1 (binding) > > Cheers, > Jamie > > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 11:15 AM Freeman Fang > wrote: > > > > +1 (Binding) > > > > Thanks! > > Freeman > > > > On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 4:49

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.8 release

+1 (binding) regards, Achim Am Mo., 13. Jan. 2020 um 09:45 Uhr schrieb Roedl Lukas < lukas.ro...@ait.ac.at>: > +1 (non-binding) > > regards, > Lukas > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Jean-Baptiste Onofré > Gesendet: Sonntag, 12. Januar 2020 12:34 > An: Karaf Dev > Betreff: [VOTE] A

Re: [DISCUSS] Donate Winegrower as Karaf subproject, OSGi flavor with flat/single classloader runtime

+1 from my side. Sounds promising :) regards, Achim Am Di., 29. Okt. 2019 um 15:47 Uhr schrieb Jamie G. < jamie.goody...@gmail.com>: > +1 > > Looks interesting, i can think of a few situations here having this as > a tooling option would have been helpful. > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:26 AM P

Re: What's the difference between org.osgi.core-6.0.0.jar and felix and/or equinox?

Hi, just had a very interesting issue which might be related. While working on my Karaf Vertx[1] project, I'm having the following issues: The integration tests with my custom Karaf distribution work nicely when run with eclipse (running OpenJDK 11) on the other hand those tests fail for me when r

Re: [VOTE] Move jclouds-karaf and jclouds-cli projects under Karaf project governance

+1 (binding) makes sense. Am Do., 18. Apr. 2019 um 09:13 Uhr schrieb Andrew Gaul : > +1 > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 05:14:44PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Some days ago we discussed on the Apache jClouds dev mailing list about > > moving the jclouds-karaf and jclouds-cli p

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (runtime) 4.2.5 release

+1 (binding) Am Do., 18. Apr. 2019 um 11:55 Uhr schrieb Stephen Kitt : > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 08:29:53PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Git Tag: > > karaf-4.2.5 > > > > Please vote to approve this release: > > > > [X] +1 Approve the release > > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf Decanter 2.2.0 release

+1 (binding) regards, Achim Am Mo., 18. März 2019 um 08:24 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > +1 (non binding) > > Le lun. 18 mars 2019 à 08:23, Francois Papon > > a écrit : > > > +1 (binding) > > > > regards, > > > > François Papon > > fpa...@apache.org > > > > Le 18/03

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (runtime) 4.2.4 release

+1 (binding) Am Fr., 15. März 2019 um 07:33 Uhr schrieb Freeman Fang < freeman.f...@gmail.com>: > +1(binding) > > Thanks! > － > Freeman(Yue) Fang > > Red Hat, Inc. > > > > > > > On Mar 14, 2019, at 8:43 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I submit Apache Karaf

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf Cellar 4.1.3 release

+1 (binding) regards, Achim Am Di., 26. Feb. 2019 um 06:34 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré < j...@nanthrax.net>: > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > On 21/02/2019 16:51, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I submit Karaf Cellar 4.1.3 release to your vote. This release is a > > maint

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (runtime) 4.2.3 release (take 2)

+1 (binding) Am Fr., 8. Feb. 2019 um 15:08 Uhr schrieb Christian Schneider < ch...@die-schneider.net>: > +1 (binding) > > Christian > > Am Fr., 8. Feb. 2019 um 05:31 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > j...@nanthrax.net>: > > > Hi all, > > > > I submit Apache Karaf (runtime) 4.2.3 to your vote.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (runtime) 4.2.2 release

+1 (binding) regards, Achim Am Di., 18. Dez. 2018 um 10:25 Uhr schrieb Dennis Kieselhorst < d...@apache.org>: > +1 > > Thanks! > -- Apache Member Apache Karaf Committer & PMC OPS4J Pax Web Committer & Project Lead blo

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (runtime) 4.1.7 release

+1 regards, Achim Am Di., 27. Nov. 2018 um 07:19 Uhr schrieb Francois Papon < francois.pa...@openobject.fr>: > +1 > > Thanks! > > regards, > > François Papon > fpa...@apache.org > > Le 26/11/2018 à 22:37, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > > Hi all, > > > > I submit Karaf (runtime) 4.1.7 release t

Re: [PROPOSAL] Add spotless to Karaf and subprojects

Hi, why not? it's worth a try. regards, achim Am Do., 8. Nov. 2018 um 20:31 Uhr schrieb Francois Papon < francois.pa...@openobject.fr>: > Hi JB, > > The plugins works well (just tested on Vineyard) and I can see that we > can add the license header in the plugin configuration : > > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Add spotless to Karaf and subprojects

Hi, the overall idea sounds, good. I'd also would like to have at least 4 spaces for a tab for the indention :) regards, Achim Am Mi., 7. Nov. 2018 um 08:46 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré < j...@nanthrax.net>: > Thanks for the update Robert. > > That's why I postponed a bit findbugs/spotbugs

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf Cellar 4.1.2 release

+1 (binding) regards, Achim Am Sa., 13. Okt. 2018 um 10:21 Uhr schrieb Andrea Cosentino : > +1(non-binding) > Thanks JB > > Inviato da Yahoo Mail su Android > > Il mer, 10 ott, 2018 alle 8:05, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > ha scritto: Hi all, > > I submit Karaf Cellar 4.1.2 release to your vote. Th

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf Cellar 4.0.5 release

+1 (binding) regards, Achim Am Mi., 10. Okt. 2018 um 14:01 Uhr schrieb Jamie G. < jamie.goody...@gmail.com>: > +1 (binding) > > Cheers, > Jamie > On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 3:43 PM Serge Huber wrote: > > > > Big +1 (non-binding) > > > > Thanks a lot JB, we were anxiously waiting on this one ! > > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Create karaf-4.2.x branch and move master to 4.3.x supporting R7

+1 regards, Achim Am Mo., 24. Sep. 2018 um 12:28 Uhr schrieb Andrea Cosentino : > +1. > > Thanks JB > > > > > > > On Monday, September 24, 2018, 10:01:48 AM GMT+2, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > j...@nanthrax.net> wrote: > > > > > > Hi guys, > > based on what Guillaume started already, I moved forward

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf Decanter 2.1.0 release

+1 (binding) Am Di., 11. Sep. 2018 um 13:39 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré < j...@nanthrax.net>: > +1 (binding) > > Gently reminder for this vote. > > Regards > JB > > On 07/09/2018 17:33, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I submit Apache Karaf Decanter 2.1.0 release to your vote. > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf "Container" 4.2.1 release

Hi Francois, The path to long will happen with any application on Windows. I've seen that a long long time ago, for example if you use your users documents folder and add a couple of extra folder beneath. Eventually you will hit that barrier :) regards, Achim Am Mi., 22. Aug. 2018 um 23:39 Uhr s

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf "Container" 4.2.1 release

+1 (binding) regards, Achim Am Sa., 18. Aug. 2018 um 20:58 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré < j...@nanthrax.net>: > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > On 18/08/2018 15:34, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I submit Apache Karaf 4.2.1 release to your vote. > > > > This release is a major

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (Container) 4.1.6 release - take #2

+1 (binding) cheers, Achim Am Fr., 10. Aug. 2018 um 13:21 Uhr schrieb Jamie G. < jamie.goody...@gmail.com>: > +1 (binding) > > Cheers, > Jamie > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 8:14 AM Christian Schneider > wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Christian > > > > Am Fr., 10. Aug. 2018 um 06:58 Uhr schrieb

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (Container) 4.1.6 release

+1 cheers, Achim Am Sa., 4. Aug. 2018 um 14:30 Uhr schrieb Jamie G. : > +1 > > Cheers, > Jamie > On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 5:33 AM Andrea Cosentino > wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks JB > > > > Il ven, 3 ago, 2018 alle 19:20, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > ha scritto: Hi all, > > > > I submi

Re: [PROPOSAL] - Jenkins build

+1 Sounds like very good idea to me Jean-Baptiste Onofré schrieb am Di. 31. Juli 2018 um 06:55: > Hi, > > So basically, it means creating a build pipeline per build job. > > It sounds good to me. I think it makes sense to do that for master and > PR build. > > I can do the changes once Karaf 4.

Re: [June 18] Board report

Hi JB looks good to me. regards, Achim 2018-06-13 21:06 GMT+02:00 Francois Papon : > Hi, > > Good for me :) > > Thanks JB ! > > Regards > > François Papon > fpa...@apache.org > Open3m - https://www.open3m.io > > Le 13/06/2018 à 23:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > > Hi guys, > > > > I prepar

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (Container) 4.2.0 release (take 2)

+1 (binding) regards, Achim 2018-04-08 9:10 GMT+02:00 Freeman Fang : > +1(binding) > Thanks! > － > Freeman(Yue) Fang > > Red Hat, Inc. > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > > > > > On Apr 5, 2018, at 2:03 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I submit Karaf (Con

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (Container) 4.2.0 release

+1 (binding) 2018-04-03 12:23 GMT+02:00 Andrea Cosentino : > +1 (non-binding) > Thanks JB > --Andrea Cosentino --Apache Camel PMC > MemberApache Karaf CommitterApache Servicemix PMC MemberEmail: > ancosen1985@yahoo.comTwitter: @oscerd2Github: oscerd > > On Tues

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (Container) 3.0.9 release

+1 (binding) Achim 2018-03-01 7:48 GMT+01:00 Andrea Cosentino : > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks JB > > -- > Andrea Cosentino > -- > Apache Camel PMC Member > Apache Karaf Committer > Apache Servicemix PMC Member > Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com > Twitter: @oscerd2 > G

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (Container) 4.1.5 release

+1 (binding) 2018-02-14 10:37 GMT+01:00 Oliver Wulff : > +1 (non-binding) > > > Cheers > > Oli > > > Von: Roedl Lukas > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. Februar 2018 10:26:07 > An: dev@karaf.apache.org > Betreff: AW: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (Container) 4.1.5 release > > +1 (n

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf Decanter 2.0.0 release, take 2

+1 (binding) regards, Achim 2018-02-02 17:15 GMT+01:00 Francois Papon : > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks for the release ! > > François > > > Le 02/02/2018 à 18:20, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > > Hi all, > > > > I submit Karaf Decanter 2.0.0 release to your vote. > > > > This is the first relea

Re: [RELEASE] Preparing Karaf Decanter 2.0.0, Karaf Cellar 4.1.2/4.0.4, and Karaf "Container" 4.2.0

Hi, it's been me asking for a bump to 7 for Pax Web when using Jetty 9.4 with full J9 support. I'm not that much involved in it anymore so my idea might be overruled by anyone knowing it better. The point for me to do a Pax Web 7, with Jetty 9.4 is: - jetty 9.4 does have some Major changes, so isn

Re: [PROPOSAL] Docker feature in Karaf container

+1 sound like an interesting idea i'd like to see. 2018-01-18 11:15 GMT+01:00 Andrea Cosentino : > +1 :-) > > -- > Andrea Cosentino > -- > Apache Camel PMC Member > Apache Karaf Committer > Apache Servicemix PMC Member > Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com > Twitter: @osc

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Karaf Decanter 2.0.0

Hi, like the idea :) so +1 from my side. regards, Achim 2018-01-08 14:53 GMT+01:00 Francois Papon : > Hi, > > +1 (non-binding) > > François > > > Le 08/01/2018 à 14:25, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > I'm working on the preparation of the next Decanter release. > > > > I would

Re: Happy new year

Thank you JB! To you and all the wonderful people here at the Karaf Project also a Happy new Year from me regards, Achim 2018-01-01 9:15 GMT+01:00 François Papon : > Thanks JB ! > > Happy new year to all the Karaf team ! > > Thank you for the Karaf project, the subprojects, the release, and the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf 4.2.0.M2 release

+1 (binding) Achim 2017-12-29 20:59 GMT+01:00 Christian Schneider : > +1 > > Christian > > 2017-12-29 9:57 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > > > Hi all > > > > I submit Karaf 4.2.0.M2 release to your vote. Like 4.2.0.M1, it's not a > GA > > release but a second technical preview. The purpose is

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf Cave 4.1.0 release

+1 (binding) 2017-12-28 21:08 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > > On 24/12/2017 08:08, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I submit Karaf Cave 4.1.0 release to your vote. >> This first release in the new Cave 4.1.x series introduces the Deployer >> fe

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (Container) 4.1.4 release

+1 (binding) regards, Achim 2017-12-16 13:13 GMT+01:00 Francois Papon : > +1 (non-binding) > > thanks for the release ! > > > Le 16/12/2017 à 10:23, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > > Hi all, > > > > I submit Karaf (Container) 4.1.4 release to your vote. > > > > Release Notes: > > https://issues

Re: Update on the Karaf website look'n feel

Hi JB & François, indeed it looks much more eye friendly. Great work. Achim 2017-12-04 18:29 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > Hi guys, > > A new Karaf enthusiast and close friend, François (Papon) proposed a > website pull request providing a nice update for the website. > > He provided a ve

Re: [UPDATE] MavenTest itest fails randomly but often

Hi Grzegorz, interesting that you have issues with that version. I just updated pax-web to use 2.20.1 and all tests are passing (finally) regards, Achim 2017-11-27 8:28 GMT+01:00 Grzegorz Grzybek : > Hello > > I found that maven-surefire-plugin 2.20+ has some problems with pax-exam. > I'd love

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (Container) 4.1.3 release

+1 (binding) 2017-10-29 23:21 GMT+01:00 Krzysztof Sobkowiak : > > Hi > > I'm trying following steps > > karaf@root()> feature:repo-add camel 2.19.3 > Adding feature url mvn:org.apache.camel.karaf/apache-camel/2.19.3/xml/ > features > karaf@root()> feature:repo-add activemq 5.15.2 > Adding featur

Re: [DISCUSS] Trim down karaf distributions for 4.2

+1 Like the idea regards, Achim 2017-10-11 15:00 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Nodet : > The point that makes me raise this problem is that the karaf default > distribution uses the Apache versions of xerces and xalan. Fwiw, the > latest xerces release is from 2011 and the latest xalan from 2014, so > th

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf Cellar 4.1.1 release

+1 (binding) regards, Achim 2017-10-09 11:45 GMT+02:00 Andrea Cosentino : > +1 (non-binding) > Thanks JB > -- > Andrea Cosentino > -- > Apache Camel PMC Member > Apache Karaf Committer > Apache Servicemix PMC Member > Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com > Twitter: @oscer

Re: [DISCUSS] Remove Karaf specific SCR commands

+1 for removing the duplicated commands :) 2017-10-04 11:04 GMT+02:00 Christian Schneider : > +1 > > Christian > > 2017-10-04 11:02 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Nodet : > > > I'm working on KARAF-4785 > > and > > I've already fixed the completion of the n

Re: [VOTE] Migrate to gitbox

+1 regards, Achim 2017-10-02 10:04 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > +1 > > NB: we have to update the dev guide on the website after the move. > > Regards > JB > > > On 10/02/2017 10:02 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > >> Following a few discussions we had, I'm starting a vote. >> The overall idea

Re: Board report October '17

+1, nothing else to add :) regards, Achim 2017-10-01 7:10 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > Hi > > Gently reminder, I plan to send the report tomorrow. > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB > > > On 09/29/2017 10:55 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I prepared the board report for Octobe

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to gitbox

fine with me, what are the benefits of it again? couldn't find what it is really good for compared to what we already got ... regards, Achim 2017-09-11 9:48 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > +1 > > I think I already sent an e-mail about this while ago (when gitbox has > been proposed by infra).

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (Container) 4.1.2 release

+1 (binding) regards, Achim 2017-08-05 10:50 GMT+02:00 Andrea Cosentino : > +1 (non-binding). > > Thanks JB. > > -- > Andrea Cosentino > -- > Apache Camel PMC Member > Apache Karaf Committer > Apache Servicemix PMC Member > Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com > Twitter:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf Decanter 1.4.0 release

+1 (binding) regards, Achim 2017-07-20 16:05 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > Gently reminder as we need an additional binding vote. > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB > > On 07/17/2017 03:02 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I submit Karaf Decanter 1.4.0 release to your vote. >> >>

Re: Preparing Apache Karaf "Container" 4.1.2 and Decanter 1.4.0 releases

Hi Kai, that warning happens if you have more then one *org.eclipse.jetty.server.HttpConfiguration *in your jetty.xml. [1] Just make sure you only have one of them, like in [2] regards, Achim [1] - https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/blob/master/pax-web-jetty/src/main/java/org/ops4j/pax/

Re: [PROPOSAL] New pax project 'transx'

> DataSource proxy (for JDBC) appears in your Service Registry. Maybe > >> it's > >>> just me not following bridge provider-projects like Aries too closely. > >>> Anything that makes setup simpler and offers a wider range of options > >> is > >

Re: [PROPOSAL] New pax project 'transx'

Hi Guillaume, sounds like a good idea to me, and the pax space like the perfect eco system :) regards, Achim 2017-06-15 10:20 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > +1 > > It sounds like a good idea and definitely a good candidate for PAX. > > By the way, on my side, I did good progress on: > - kar

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Karaf Slack & discuss about GitBox

I have my doubts about slack ... the nice thing about slack: you don't miss anything the bad thing about slack: you don't miss anything and it's a memory hog regards, Achim 2017-06-12 14:07 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Schoreels : > That's a good idea. As pointed out, the integration with Github is

Re: Multiple JPA features available

I also agree that feature names are not unique enough. Probably we need > >repo id or url + feature name. > > > >Christian > > > >2017-06-10 16:22 GMT+02:00 Achim Nierbeck : > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> just recently I stumbled over a strang

Multiple JPA features available

Hi, just recently I stumbled over a strange effect while building a customized Karaf with boot features. In the end it turned out, the reason for that had been two features with the same name but not the same content. Right now we do have a jpa feature in the enterprise repository (feature.xml) i

Re: [UPDATE] Remove org.json dependency

(lighter than > johnzon). > > Regards > JB > > > On 05/25/2017 06:26 PM, Achim Nierbeck wrote: > >> hmm ... we do have a JSON Apache Library, before we A) start our own, we >> should B) prefer it over any other non-apache library. >> That would be apache jo

Re: [UPDATE] Remove org.json dependency

>> On 25 May 2017 at 08:41, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >> >> Yeah, but we are using json for our "webconsole plugins". So, I'm changing >>> in our plugins. >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> >>> On 05/

Re: [UPDATE] Remove org.json dependency

Hi JB, I thought the felix team did some effort in replacing all that json stuff with internal handling. We should just update to the latest then ... regards, Achim 2017-05-25 15:38 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > Hi, > > Chris Mattmann (new Legal VP) sent a reminder about json dependency u

Re: Board report for June '17

looks good from my point of view ... +1 regards, Achim 2017-05-24 10:58 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > Hi all, > > I prepared the board report for June '17: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KARAF/Board+Reports > > Please, review and update if I forgot something. > > Thanks !

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf Cellar 4.1.0 release

+1 (binding) regards, Achim 2017-05-12 19:22 GMT+02:00 Christian Schneider : > +1 > > Christian > > On 11.05.2017 08:12, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I submit Karaf Cellar 4.1.0 release to your vote. This release is the >> first one in the Cellar 4.1.x serie, fully compatible

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf Cellar 4.0.4 release

+1 (binding) regards, Achim 2017-05-12 19:22 GMT+02:00 Christian Schneider : > +1 > > Christian > > On 11.05.2017 11:08, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I submit Karaf Cellar 4.0.4 release to your vote. This release is a >> maintenance release of the Cellar 4.0.x serie. >> >> Rele

Re: Karaf starting slow on new mac

Hi, first you should post your question on the users list, issues is actually for the issue tracker :) second, I'm using macOS Sierra, and everything is running fine so I can not reproduce this. regards, Achim 2017-04-19 20:35 GMT+02:00 Aaron Jones : > I have tried using several different versi

Re: Feature configurations do not update existing property as part of etc

Hi Yogesh, you only can append existing configurations, but not replace. [1] This is by design, as already existing files can't be differentiate between, already accustomed or needs to be "patched". Regards, Achim [1] - https://github.com/apache/karaf/blob/master/features/core/src/main/resources

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (Container) 4.0.9 release

+1 (binding) 2017-04-08 12:25 GMT+02:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > > On 04/06/2017 06:21 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I submit Karaf (Container) 4.0.9 release to your vote. >> >> Release Notes: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Release

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (Container) 4.1.1 release

+1 (binding) looks good. regards, Achim 2017-03-29 8:54 GMT+02:00 Christian Schneider : > +1 > > I already did some basic tests with activemq. I will continue testing and > report if I find anything. > > Christian > > On 28.03.2017 22:11, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I submit

Re: Karaf 4.1.0 whiteboard issues

I'll do that There are still some bugs that I need to verify Regards, Achim Christian Schneider schrieb am Fr. 17. März 2017 um 18:46: > Hi JB, > > we will need a pax web release for karaf 4.1.1. Should I take care of it? > > Christian > > 2017-03-17 15:41 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > > >

Re: Board report March '17

+1 regards, Achim 2017-03-09 8:12 GMT+01:00 Andrea Cosentino : > Looks good! > > Thanks JB! > -- > Andrea Cosentino > -- > Apache Camel PMC Member > Apache Karaf Committer > Apache Servicemix Committer > Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com > Twitter: @oscerd2 > Github:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (Container) 4.1.0 release, RC#2

+1 (binding) 2017-02-02 15:47 GMT+01:00 Guillaume Nodet : > +1 > > 2017-02-01 20:32 GMT+01:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > > > Hi all, > > > > I submit Karaf (Container) 4.1.0 release (second attempt) to your vote. > > > > Release Notes: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proj

Re: Towards Karaf (Container) 4.1.0

As I'm with Krzysztof it's sometimes hard to find good plain OSGi samples, I'd keep those. Still nowadays plain OSGi is actually rather advanced. Therefore a "starter" sample should start with DS, instead of plain OSGi. Besides this, why not start with some examples now and publish the full set wi

Re: karaf git commit: [KARAF-4931] - Static profile generation fails if configfile element contains a placeholder

That is rather strange, as I changed Karaf [1] for that prior fixing the corresponding issue at Pax Web [2]. right now I don't have much time, so I'd need to check tonight. But it did work before, so was there another change to the Profiles? regards, Achim [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/br

Re: Karaf 4.1 and JDK9

> > > > My plan is to create the karaf-4.1.x branch tomorrow, and then, prepare > > the full JDK9 support on master. > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > Regards > > JB > > > > > > On 01/04/2017 01:25 PM, Achim Nierbeck wrote: > > > >> Hi, &g

Karaf 4.1 and JDK9

Hi, got a question regarding Karaf 4.1 and JDK9 compatibility. I've seen we had numerous issues regarding JDK9 for Karaf 4.1. Is it our goal to have Karaf 4.1 runnable with JDK9? If so, the ops4j community just came across some major drawbacks. First it just seemed like we just need to bump the v

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf (Container) 4.0.8 release

+1 (binding) looks good so far, tested with a couple of different custom applications. regards, Achim 2016-12-14 10:50 GMT+01:00 Christian Schneider : > +1 (binding) > > I also tested on Raspberry Pi. The shell works fine now. > So I think the issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-4

Re: [DISCUSS] & in feature (KARAF-4829)

felix. > As fileinstall is also at felix they might be interested to solve this > anyway. > > I will open an issue. > > Christian > > > On 09.12.2016 11:32, Achim Nierbeck wrote: > >> But this will only work, if the configuration passed through the >> file-

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >