[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13538992#comment-13538992
]
Commit Tag Bot commented on LUCENE-4639:
[trunk commit] Shai Erera
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar updated SOLR-4133:
Attachment: SOLR-4133.patch
Test and fix attached.
For null values, the xml looks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-4258.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.0
4.1
Assignee: Shai Erera
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera reopened LUCENE-4258:
Assignee: (was: Shai Erera)
Woops, wrong issue :)
Incremental Field
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-4258:
---
Comment: was deleted
(was: Committed to trunk and 4x)
Incremental Field Updates through
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13538995#comment-13538995
]
Shai Erera edited comment on LUCENE-4258 at 12/23/12 8:44 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-4639.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.0
4.1
Lucene Fields: New,Patch
I would say separating builds should be the duty of a build container.
If Jenkins somehow allows two build plans to run from the same
directory then I think it's either a bug or a risky feature.
This said, there are also downsides of appending anything that changes
(per-run) to build directories
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4639?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13538998#comment-13538998
]
Commit Tag Bot commented on LUCENE-4639:
[branch_4x commit] Shai Erera
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13538999#comment-13538999
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-4258:
I branched
It's not about Jenkins letting two build plans to run from the same
directory, but rather where you set tempDir to. If both are set to say
java.io.tmpdir, then you get a collision. I configured both builds to set a
unique tempDir, and that's working fine so far.
Was just thinking that it'll be
Hi,
The problem here is not only tests. If you run 2 ANT builds in parallel there
are more things that fail horribly (you get javac errors because of
half-written class files, copy tasks corrumpting each other while copying
resource, JAR tasks…). You cannot fix that unless you re-write the
These are two separate jobs in Jenkins, and they each have their own
build.dir (job/build). So I'm not worried that the builds will mess up
with each other in that way.
I am fine w/ setting tempDir to be unique per job.
It makes them, but the parent dirs must be existing, see ANT build file.
I
bq. In my opinion, the better way would be to “lock” the whole
checkout and prevent parallel ANT runs.
I share Uwe's viewpoint here.
bq. The java.io.tmpdir sysprop is only set by the ANT build from the
ANT script, the junit4 task does not modify the property at all – as
Eclipse does not run the
I don't understand. I assume the runner does something like new
File(java.io.tmpdir, J0)? If it called mkdirs(), this should have
created all the path components.
J0, J1 and other per-VM folders are created relative to 'dir'
attribute, not 'java.io.tmpdir' or tempDir, RTFM :)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13539009#comment-13539009
]
Commit Tag Bot commented on SOLR-4133:
--
[trunk commit] Shalin Shekhar Mangar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar resolved SOLR-4133.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 5.0
4.1
Fixed in trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13539011#comment-13539011
]
Commit Tag Bot commented on SOLR-4133:
--
[branch_4x commit] Shalin Shekhar Mangar
I did RTFM. And in common-build.xml these lines are specified:
mkdir dir=@{tempDir}/temp /
junit4:junit4
dir=@{tempDir}
tempdir=@{tempDir}/temp
Sorry for being short in my emails, but I thought you understood that I'm
not just talking. So dir=tempDir, be it java.io.tempdir or whatever
I did RTFM.
Just joking.
So dir=tempDir, be it java.io.tempdir or whatever you set when invoking ant.
[snip]
-DtempDir=/mnt/tmp/job1
There is a crucial difference. Lucene sets this to a temporary folder
underneath the checkout structure. So every checkout (as in a jenkins
plan or something)
I think the misunderstanding here is tests.tempDir != java.io.tmpdir. This
tests.tempDir property in Lucene's ANT does not really modify java.io.tmpdir
(it only does as a side effect), it is (in my opinion) badly named, we should
rename it to working dir (${tests.workingDir}). The
Yes I know about that. I was not at all confused - just thought that the
runner did not call mkdirs(). Anyway, I added mkdir dir=@{tempDir}/temp
to my build.xml to avoid such issues in the future.
+1 for renaming tests.tempDir to tests.workDir.
Shai
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Uwe
Anyway, I added mkdir dir=@{tempDir}/temp to my build.xml to avoid such
issues in the future.
This one is *not* created – the task expects a directory already there (like
the ANT copy task expects that the output dir is there). Look at Lucene’s
common-build.xml. Maybe we should fix this –
Shai Erera created LUCENE-4647:
--
Summary: Simplify CategoryDocumentBuilder
Key: LUCENE-4647
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4647
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type: Improvement
I copied it from lucene's common-build.xml and I don't see any other place
(in that file) where mkdir is called on neither @tempDir or
$tests.tempDir.
Also, at least from: http://ant.apache.org/manual/Tasks/mkdir.html --
*Creates
a directory. Also non-existent parent directories are created, when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4602?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13539016#comment-13539016
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-4602:
I created LUCENE-4647 to simplify CatDocBuilder
Yes, you need the mkdir, my comment was meant to point out that the Junit4
task does *not* create the temp dir (tempdir=), only the working dir (dir=).
The Lucene common-build.xml does this since a week or so (before that tempdir=
and dir= were identical and created in one turn – this change
Ah I see. Thanks !
Shai
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Yes, you need the mkdir, my comment was meant to point out that the
Junit4 task does **not** create the temp dir (tempdir=), only the working
dir (dir=). The Lucene common-build.xml does this
I renamed the tempDir to workDir which makes much more sense and makes it
easier to understand the build file. A lot of confusing stuff in this thread
was caused by this. Attached is the patch.
This reminds me to re-enable backwards tests is 4.x before we release 4.1 L!!!
Uwe
-
Uwe
OK, I committed the change. There was already an inconsistency between 4.x and
trunk, caused by a missing merge or similar. This is now fixed, too.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de/ http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
From:
Hi,
+1 from me to release these artifacts as 3.6.2:
- I did *not* run smoke tester as already lots of people have done this.
- I just tested drop in replacement of the JAR file for my projects with 3.6
(including PANGAEA) - works fine, no checkindex bugs and similar stuff.
Uwe
-
Uwe
This vote passes. Thanks everyone for testing. Will load the artifacts
into santa's sleigh later today.
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone, given the bug Mike fixed in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4635, I think we should
push
I think this message was intended for dev@lucene.apache.org
-- Forwarded message --
From: Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de
Date: Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 5:59 AM
Subject: RE: build hung?
To: d...@tika.apache.org
Oh, permgen issue strikes back again :-)
-
Uwe Schindler
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13539036#comment-13539036
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-4246:
The proper way to close IW today
Woops, sorry, yes :)
/me in unfamiliar computing environment (on vacation!), lacking proper
access to coffee and beer and with kids screaming...
Thanks Rob.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13539038#comment-13539038
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-4246:
-
Why don't the docs say that then? I'm not even
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13539038#comment-13539038
]
Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-4246 at 12/23/12 3:09 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13539040#comment-13539040
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4246:
-
{quote}
These are crazy semantics.
{quote}
+1
This one is *not* created – the task expects a directory already there (like
the ANT copy task expects that the output dir is there).
Yeah... I guess I could make it consistent.
https://github.com/carrotsearch/randomizedtesting/issues/139
Dawid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13539042#comment-13539042
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-4246:
---
bq. Then we should remove
OK. We should then fix common-build, too - I added a comment with TODO already.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: dawid.we...@gmail.com [mailto:dawid.we...@gmail.com] On Behalf
Of Dawid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13539042#comment-13539042
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-4246 at 12/23/12 3:50 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Heisey updated SOLR-4228:
---
Attachment: SOLR-4228.patch
New patch that adds setActionPing method. Test unchanged, so it still
I'll try to take a look at it but I am pretty pessimistic about the
possibility to write any sensible Java code that runs with permgen
exhausted... It's pretty much end-of-the-world to me. I just don't
want to allocate everything statically (a nightmare) and hacks like
allocating a class loader
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13539044#comment-13539044
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-4246:
-
I agree Uwe. I'm just saying that we should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4246?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13539045#comment-13539045
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-4246:
---
Robert: Yes it was not 100% clear to me
OK. We should then fix common-build, too - I added a comment with TODO
already.
Thanks Uwe. I'll see into the permgen issue too and then make a
release. Probably after Christmas though. Wesołych Świąt! :)
Dawid
-
To
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13539048#comment-13539048
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-3963:
This is marked as fixed against 4.0 (even the Wiki
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Heisey updated SOLR-4228:
---
Attachment: SOLR-4228.patch
Fulfilling the open source mandate of releasing often. ;)
Improvements
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Heisey updated SOLR-4228:
---
Attachment: SOLR-4228.patch
New patch. Now the test passes, but I suspect that I am not using the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shawn Heisey updated SOLR-4228:
---
Attachment: SOLR-4228.patch
Comment correction. If my approach to initCore is acceptable, then it's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13539074#comment-13539074
]
Luca Stancapiano commented on LUCENE-3167:
--
great, daje Tom ;)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erick Erickson updated SOLR-4196:
-
Attachment: SOLR-4196.patch
OK, here's a patch. It has lots of stuff left to do, I'm just putting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13539079#comment-13539079
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-4223:
I filed a matching bug against the jetty project.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13539120#comment-13539120
]
Commit Tag Bot commented on SOLR-3180:
--
[trunk commit] Mark Robert Miller
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13539121#comment-13539121
]
Commit Tag Bot commented on SOLR-3180:
--
[branch_4x commit] Mark Robert Miller
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erick Erickson updated SOLR-4196:
-
Attachment: SOLR-4196.patch
fixes one more test, and breaks out classes.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13539129#comment-13539129
]
Commit Tag Bot commented on LUCENE-4638:
[trunk commit] Mark Robert Miller
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13539130#comment-13539130
]
Commit Tag Bot commented on SOLR-3180:
--
[trunk commit] Mark Robert Miller
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13539136#comment-13539136
]
Commit Tag Bot commented on LUCENE-4638:
[branch_4x commit] Mark Robert Miller
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13539137#comment-13539137
]
Commit Tag Bot commented on SOLR-3180:
--
[branch_4x commit] Mark Robert Miller
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13539144#comment-13539144
]
Stefan Matheis (steffkes) commented on SOLR-4220:
-
bq. but also be called
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13539145#comment-13539145
]
Stefan Matheis (steffkes) commented on SOLR-4220:
-
ah .. hm, but perhaps
Build: http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-Linux/3378/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.7.0_09 -XX:+UseParallelGC
All tests passed
Build Log:
[...truncated 25760 lines...]
-documentation-lint:
[echo] checking for broken html...
[jtidy] Checking for broken html (such as invalid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13539151#comment-13539151
]
Commit Tag Bot commented on LUCENE-4638:
[trunk commit] Mark Robert Miller
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13539152#comment-13539152
]
Commit Tag Bot commented on SOLR-3180:
--
[trunk commit] Mark Robert Miller
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13539154#comment-13539154
]
Commit Tag Bot commented on LUCENE-4638:
[branch_4x commit] Mark Robert Miller
Build: http://jenkins.sd-datasolutions.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/3389/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.7.0_09 -XX:+UseG1GC
All tests passed
Build Log:
[...truncated 25883 lines...]
-documentation-lint:
[echo] checking for broken html...
[jtidy] Checking for broken html (such as invalid tags)...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13539178#comment-13539178
]
yuanyun.cn commented on SOLR-2976:
--
I changed the date type to precisionStep=2147483647,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13539178#comment-13539178
]
yuanyun.cn edited comment on SOLR-2976 at 12/24/12 4:25 AM:
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
yuanyun.cn updated SOLR-2976:
-
Comment: was deleted
(was: I changed the date type to precisionStep=2147483647, and run
stats.facet
71 matches
Mail list logo
