[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938269#comment-14938269
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6594:
-
Commit 1706128 from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938239#comment-14938239
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-6594 at 9/30/15 6:34 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-6594:
--
Fix Version/s: 5.4
> Add java.time forbidden-apis to trunk
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14937734#comment-14937734
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-8109:
Isn't this situation already pretty sell resolved more robustly by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938239#comment-14938239
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-6594:
---
Forbidden-Apis 2.0 was released a minute ago. I will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-6594:
--
Summary: Add java.time forbidden-apis to trunk (update to forbiddenapis
2.0) (was: Add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-6594:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-6594.patch
Patch.
> Add java.time forbidden-apis to trunk (update to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938168#comment-14938168
]
Gus Heck commented on SOLR-8109:
Does FirstFieldValueUpdateProcessorFactory accept wildcards? The case that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938274#comment-14938274
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6594:
-
Commit 1706130 from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938312#comment-14938312
]
Gus Heck commented on SOLR-8109:
So what I think you are saying is that copyField will soon be deprecated?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timothy Potter reassigned SOLR-8101:
Assignee: Timothy Potter
> Installation script permission issues and other scripts fixes
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14937964#comment-14937964
]
Timothy Potter commented on SOLR-8101:
--
Thanks for the updated patch [~urusha]. I'll try this out soon
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-6594.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Robert for review.
> Add java.time forbidden-apis to trunk (update
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ishan Chattopadhyaya closed SOLR-7839.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
> SolrJ support for BasicAuth
> ---
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938279#comment-14938279
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6594:
-
Commit 1706132 from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938276#comment-14938276
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6594:
-
Commit 1706131 from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938260#comment-14938260
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-6594:
-
+1
> Add java.time forbidden-apis to trunk (update to
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 13:30 +0100, Upayavira wrote:
> Could it be added to the debug component? That seems like a natural
> place for it. It could, as you say, look for standard things that
> might make a query perform badly, and report them in a new
> element, or such.
Agreed. I'll take a
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-5.x-Java7/3565/
3 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.cloud.SaslZkACLProviderTest.testSaslZkACLProvider
Error Message:
java.net.BindException: Address already in use
Stack Trace:
java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.BindException:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14936541#comment-14936541
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-6821:
--
See (also?) LUCENE-4483.
> TermQuery's constructors should
So I went down the route of creating a new QParser named "fulljoin", and I
have it essentially working.
https://github.com/fullstorydev/lucene-solr/commits/scottb/fulljoin
Basically, I copied JoinQParserPlugin, ripped out the local index "from"
processing, and replaced it with a SolrCloud facet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3931?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938785#comment-14938785
]
Ivan Provalov commented on SOLR-3931:
-
Ideally, I would like to plug in a similarity class at search
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938830#comment-14938830
]
Sergio commented on SOLR-2834:
--
The same problem happens if the filter is used
in the schema.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938802#comment-14938802
]
Scott Blum commented on LUCENE-3759:
Request for feedback / comments:
Hi Scott,
I've replied to your comment on SOLR-7090.
I just had a look at the your fulljoin implementation, but I wasn't sure if
I follow this properly. Maybe a unit test would help?
Also, do you plan to open a JIRA (or, maybe, use SOLR-7090 JIRA itself, so
as to keep all related efforts together
I think LUCENE-3759 is not a good place, since this is a Solr specific
implementation.
Please feel free to use SOLR-7090. Based on my idea of your implementation,
it wasn't clear to me whether or not the intention of the patch is the same
as what SOLR-7090 (at a high level), as per the description
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938789#comment-14938789
]
Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-7090:
bq. I couldn't figure out how to use the
Hi Ishan,
I definitely should write a test. It's supposed to be a drop-in
replacement for the existing Join query. I wasn't sure if I should hijack
SOLR-7090, or maybe LUCENE-3759, or just open a new JIRA. Please advise!
Or I'm happy to continue discussing high level on this thread.
Best,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14936669#comment-14936669
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-6650:
--
bq. I substituted BooleanClause.Occur.FILTER instead of MUST
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14936739#comment-14936739
]
David Smiley commented on LUCENE-6650:
--
Thanks for the review Adrien.
I'll change the
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-Tests-trunk-Java8/429/
3 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.client.solrj.io.sql.JdbcTest.doTest
Error Message:
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError
at
__randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([6E84BD2F6D27DC55:C9C0058B009CCFEC]:0)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14936856#comment-14936856
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-8095:
---
The problem is that getting metrics like this is per file and so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14936794#comment-14936794
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-6650:
--
Fair enough.
> Remove dependency of lucene/spatial on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14936810#comment-14936810
]
David Smiley commented on LUCENE-6650:
--
I was just thinking -- maybe a Java 8
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/14355/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_60 -XX:+UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC
3 tests failed.
FAILED:
junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.handler.TestSolrConfigHandlerCloud
Error Message:
ERROR: SolrIndexSearcher opens=305 closes=304
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938964#comment-14938964
]
Upayavira commented on SOLR-6688:
-
[~hossman_luc...@fucit.org] I haven't yet implemented admin-extra in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Upayavira updated SOLR-6688:
Comment: was deleted
(was: [~hossman_luc...@fucit.org] I haven't yet implemented admin-extra in the
new UI.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938963#comment-14938963
]
Upayavira commented on SOLR-6688:
-
[~hossman_luc...@fucit.org] I haven't yet implemented admin-extra in the
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015, at 10:55 PM, vetrik kumaran murugesan wrote:
> Dear Team,
>
> I am wondering can we use Solr 5.3 search server without the
> following jar files,
>
> commonsfileupload: 1.2.1 xerces : xercesImpl : 2.9.1 org.apache.ant :
> ant : 1.8.2
>
>
> If yes , how can I do it. I am
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938973#comment-14938973
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-8110:
As far as the "how" to implement this, i think it would be pretty straight
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938945#comment-14938945
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-6688:
bq. I am still experiencing the errors with the block commented out.
Hoss Man created SOLR-8110:
--
Summary: Start enforcing field naming recomendations in next X.0
release?
Key: SOLR-8110
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8110
Project: Solr
Issue Type:
Alright, I'll put something on SOLR-7090 in a bit.
Meanwhile, I'm trying to get a basic test running, and running into a
stupid problem... I am trying to write a cloud and non-cloud code path for
the facet query. What I want to do is create a solrj HttpSolrClient either
way, but I can't figure
Dear Team,
I am wondering can we use Solr 5.3 search server without the following
jar files,
commonsfileupload: 1.2.1
xerces : xercesImpl : 2.9.1
org.apache.ant : ant : 1.8.2
If yes , how can I do it. I am trying to evaluate Solr 5.3 , you input is
valuable and appreciated.
Thanks,
Vetrik
In branch_5x, the MultiSpansWrapper.java file exists in two places. I
only noticed this because of an error in eclipse. The two files look
identical. This doesn't seem to cause any actual problems with the
build, just the IDE error.
One copyishere:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14939004#comment-14939004
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-6688:
bq. Possible?
Possible, but as I mentioned before -- really ugly ... for
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-5.x/972/
2 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.CollectionsAPIDistributedZkTest.test
Error Message:
Captured an uncaught exception in thread: Thread[id=11987, name=collection2,
state=RUNNABLE,
Hi Upayavira,
Thanks for your quick reply.
Files above use GPL and MIT license , like junit4-ant 2.1.13 has GPL and
MIT.
Regards,
Vetrik
2015-09-30 17:27 GMT-05:00 Upayavira :
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015, at 10:55 PM, vetrik kumaran murugesan wrote:
>
> Dear Team,
>
> I am
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 9:11 PM, vetrik kumaran murugesan
wrote:
> Hi Upayavira,
>
> Thanks for your quick reply.
>
> Files above use GPL and MIT license , like junit4-ant 2.1.13 has GPL and
> MIT.
There is no MIT or GPL to Xerces or ant, they are Apache products. Why
makes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14939305#comment-14939305
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6650:
-
Commit 1706184 from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14939199#comment-14939199
]
Steve Davids commented on SOLR-5748:
Due to the continued comments about an impending "ZK as truth"
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14939218#comment-14939218
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6650:
-
Commit 1706181 from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14938196#comment-14938196
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-8109:
bq. Does FirstFieldValueUpdateProcessorFactory accept wildcards?
it does,
Hi,
The licenses of those files are all explained and listed in the licenses/
subdirectory of the Solr distribution (same for Lucene). All those 3 files are
Apache 2.0 license, see corresponding files:
- ant-LICENSE-ASL.txt, but I think you are talking about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14936869#comment-14936869
]
Steve Davids commented on SOLR-7577:
After looking at the test for this issue, why would anyone need to
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-trunk-Linux/14356/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_60 -server -XX:+UseParallelGC
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.search.TestFiltering.testRandomFiltering
Error Message:
FAILURE: indexSize=2 iiter=4 qiter=474 request=[q, {! cost=172
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14936882#comment-14936882
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-7577:
--
Replica placement is about identifying nodes for replicas. The user
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrien Grand updated LUCENE-6815:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-6815.patch
Here is a patch I've been hacking on. Nothing changes in the case
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ishan Chattopadhyaya updated SOLR-5944:
---
Attachment: SOLR-5944.patch
WIP patch, updated to trunk. The logic to deal with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14937711#comment-14937711
]
Gus Heck commented on SOLR-8109:
Sometimes when using dynamic fields, the majority of the dynamic fields
Gus Heck created SOLR-8109:
--
Summary: Option to Copy just the first value from a multivalued
field
Key: SOLR-8109
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8109
Project: Solr
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gus Heck updated SOLR-8109:
---
Attachment: SOLR-8109.patch
patch vs 5x branch
> Option to Copy just the first value from a multivalued field
62 matches
Mail list logo