Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-Linux/237/
Java: 32bit/jdk1.8.0_72 -server -XX:+UseG1GC
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.cloud.TestAuthenticationFramework.testStopAllStartAll
Error Message:
Address already in use
Stack Trace:
java.net.BindException: Address already
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Smiley updated SOLR-8903:
---
Fix Version/s: 6.0
> Move SolrJ DateUtil to Extraction module as ExtractionDateUtil
>
David Smiley created SOLR-8904:
--
Summary: Switch from SimpleDateFormat to Java 8
DateTimeFormatter.ISO_INSTANT
Key: SOLR-8904
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8904
Project: Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15211342#comment-15211342
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-5604:
---
I am working on getting this done now as part of SOLR-4509.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Smiley updated SOLR-8903:
---
Description:
SolrJ doesn't need a DateUtil class, particularly since we're on Java 8 and can
simply
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15211329#comment-15211329
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-2774:
I'm not sure what the issue here is... but I presume you mean
David Smiley created SOLR-8903:
--
Summary: Move SolrJ DateUtil to Extraction module as
ExtractionDateUtil
Key: SOLR-8903
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8903
Project: Solr
Issue
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-Linux/235/
Java: 64bit/jdk-9-jigsaw-ea+110 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
-XX:-CompactStrings
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.handler.TestReqParamsAPI.test
Error Message:
Could not get expected value 'CY val' for
SOLR-445 is fairly well done, and i'm ready to land it on master (and
eventually branch_6x)
My impression is that the sanest way to do that is...
# on master ...
git merge --squash jira/SOLR-445
emacs CHANGES.txt # to add CHANGES entry
git commit -m "Merging branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15211155#comment-15211155
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-4509:
---
bq. Might be able to fix those APIs now, but we will see.
Actually,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated SOLR-4509:
--
Attachment: 0001-SOLR-4509-Move-to-non-deprecated-HttpClient-impl-cla.patch
Here is a much more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15211148#comment-15211148
]
Hrishikesh Gadre commented on SOLR-7374:
[~varunthacker] Sure. I think at the high-level we can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan McKinley updated SOLR-8902:
Attachment: SOLR-8902.diff
Here is a simple patch with a test
> ReturnFields can return fields that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan McKinley updated SOLR-8902:
Summary: ReturnFields can return fields that were not requested (was:
ReturnFields returns fields
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan McKinley updated SOLR-8902:
Summary: ReturnFields returns fields that were not requested (was:
ReturnFields allows fields that
Ryan McKinley created SOLR-8902:
---
Summary: ReturnFields allows fields that were not requested
Key: SOLR-8902
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8902
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15211093#comment-15211093
]
Varun Thacker commented on SOLR-7374:
-
Hi Hrishikesh,
Please feel free to work on it. I've not got
Hrishikesh Gadre created SOLR-8901:
--
Summary: Export data/tlog directory locations for every core in
clusterstate
Key: SOLR-8901
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8901
Project: Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8030?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15211031#comment-15211031
]
Ludovic Boutros commented on SOLR-8030:
---
I learned it the hard way too [~dsmiley]. I'll try to take
Mark Miller created SOLR-8900:
-
Summary: The ObjectReleaseTracker should not reference actual
objects.
Key: SOLR-8900
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8900
Project: Solr
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210995#comment-15210995
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-7878:
A perfect time to do this cut-over will be with the addition of
Mark Miller created SOLR-8899:
-
Summary: MergeStrategy code creates HttpClient(s) and
HttoSolrClient(s) that it does not close.
Key: SOLR-8899
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8899
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/16321/
Java: 32bit/jdk-9-jigsaw-ea+110 -client -XX:+UseParallelGC -XX:-CompactStrings
3 tests failed.
FAILED: junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.core.TestLazyCores
Error Message:
ObjectTracker found 4 object(s) that were not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210937#comment-15210937
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on SOLR-8785:
--
GitHub user randomstatistic opened a pull request:
GitHub user randomstatistic opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/25
SOLR-8785: Use Metrics library for core metrics
There were three main areas that used the copied classes in
org.apache.solr.util.stats:
- AnalyticsStatisticsCollector
-
Łukasz Dywicki created SOLR-8898:
Summary: Solr mapreduce doesn't work in kerberized environment
Key: SOLR-8898
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8898
Project: Solr
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicholas Knize updated LUCENE-7094:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-7094.patch
Updated patch includes the following:
* Per request,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210827#comment-15210827
]
Timothy Potter commented on SOLR-445:
-
LGTM +1 Nice test coverage of all this! This will be very useful
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alan Woodward updated LUCENE-6871:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-6871.patch
Here's an updated patch that just moves everything out of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-445:
--
Affects Version/s: (was: 1.3)
Fix Version/s: 6.1
master
Description:
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-Windows/70/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_72 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseG1GC
1 tests failed.
FAILED:
org.apache.solr.handler.TestReplicationHandler.doTestIndexAndConfigAliasReplication
Error Message:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210784#comment-15210784
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-445:
---
I'm still beasting the tests a bit, but i think this is pretty solid and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210781#comment-15210781
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-445:
--
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210779#comment-15210779
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-445:
--
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210780#comment-15210780
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-445:
--
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-7136.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 6.1
master
> remove Threads from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210691#comment-15210691
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7136:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210689#comment-15210689
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7136:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicholas Knize updated LUCENE-7075:
---
Affects Version/s: master
> Clean up LegacyNumericUtils usage.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicholas Knize updated LUCENE-7075:
---
Priority: Blocker (was: Major)
> Clean up LegacyNumericUtils usage.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicholas Knize updated LUCENE-7075:
---
Affects Version/s: 6.0
> Clean up LegacyNumericUtils usage.
>
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Jack Krupansky
wrote:
> Yeah, I do recall seeing LUCENE-6917 (Deprecate and rename
> NumericField/RangeQuery to LegacyNumeric) go by in the Jira traffic
It was also mere weeks between this deprecation (which did not address
Solr), and
Thanks Robert, sounds good. And I'll give the blog post a read Mike.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> See also my recent blog post describing this new feature:
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-7137.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 6.1
master
> consolidate many tests
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210552#comment-15210552
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7137:
-
Commit
See also my recent blog post describing this new feature:
https://www.elastic.co/blog/lucene-points-6.0
Net/net, in the 1D case, points looks like a win across the board vs.
the legacy (postings) implementation.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:33 PM,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210524#comment-15210524
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-7137:
-
Commit
On 3/24/2016 10:00 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> How does this play with the notion bandied about during the whole
> "stop shipping a war file" of replacing Jetty with something? IIRC
> Netty was mentioned as an example.
>
> Wouldn't want you to put effort into a dead-end...
Some build system work
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-master/970/
3 tests failed.
FAILED:
junit.framework.TestSuite.org.apache.solr.cloud.hdfs.HdfsChaosMonkeySafeLeaderTest
Error Message:
ObjectTracker found 2 object(s) that were not released!!! [HdfsTransactionLog,
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Joel Bernstein wrote:
> I'm pretty confused about points as well and until very recently thought
> these we geo-spacial improvements only.
>
> It would be good to understand the mechanics of points versus numerics. I'm
> particularly
Esther Quansah created SOLR-8897:
Summary: SSL-related passwords in solr.in.sh are in plain text
Key: SOLR-8897
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8897
Project: Solr
Issue Type:
Scalar doesnt mean anything. Point is simple, it is a point in n
dimensional space, that is what the data structure provides for fast
searching on. Numbers are points in one dimensional space. Think of a
number line.
On Mar 24, 2016 8:37 AM, "David Smiley" wrote:
> bq.
I'm pretty confused about points as well and until very recently thought
these we geo-spacial improvements only.
It would be good to understand the mechanics of points versus numerics. I'm
particularly interested in not losing the high performance numeric
DocValues support, which has become so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210469#comment-15210469
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-6359:
Maybe I misunderstand the impacts of these configuration options,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210464#comment-15210464
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7136:
+1
> remove Threads from BaseGeoPointTestCase
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210456#comment-15210456
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-7137:
+1, wonderful!
> consolidate many tests across
Shawn:
How does this play with the notion bandied about during the whole
"stop shipping a war file" of replacing Jetty with something? IIRC
Netty was mentioned as an example.
Wouldn't want you to put effort into a dead-end...
Erick
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:21 PM, Shawn Heisey (JIRA)
bq. it wasn't at all clear that the intention was that simple scalars would
now and forever henceforth be referred to as "points". My impression at the
time was that the focus of the Jira was on implementation and storage level
indexing detail rather than the user-facing API level. I see now that
I wasn't paying close attention when this whole PointValues saga was
unfolding. I get the value of points for spatial data, but conflating the
terms "point" and "numeric" is bizarre to say the least. Reading the code,
I see "Points represent numeric values", which seems nonsensical to me. A
little
I’ve filed a JIRA to have this account banned - it’s been used to post 6 spam
comments in the last 3 weeks: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11537
--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com
> On Mar 23, 2016, at 10:51 PM, velorina (Confluence)
> wrote:
>
> velorina
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210400#comment-15210400
]
Nim Lhûg commented on SOLR-8145:
Any chance this can be fixed in 5.5.1?
> bin/solr script oom_killer arg
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/16318/
Java: 64bit/jdk-9-jigsaw-ea+110 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
-XX:-CompactStrings
1 tests failed.
FAILED:
org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene60.TestLucene60PointsFormat.testMultiValued
Error Message:
wrong
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-Solaris/29/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC
2 tests failed.
FAILED:
org.apache.solr.schema.BadIndexSchemaTest.testSimDefaultFieldTypeHasNoExplicitSim
Error Message:
Test abandoned because suite timeout was
Again we dont care except that its bytes. FieldInfo already records
the same thing we recorded for legacy shit:
the length in bytes.
That is all legacy numerics ever knew before (simply from the length
of the term), if it was 32 or 64 bits. It could not differentiate
integer from float, you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210334#comment-15210334
]
Steve Rowe commented on SOLR-8742:
--
FYI, git bisect blames the same commit sha for me with this new seed
I should add, it we keep FieldType.NumericType and use it as I suggest, it
would either need a new enum value of "UNSPECIFIED" (think IPV6 or other
custom uses) or null; I'd prefer to avoid the null.
~ David
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:34 AM David Smiley
wrote:
> With
This is not recorded into fieldinfo.
For points lucene treats the data as a multidimensional byte[]. Its up
to higher level indexing classes (Field) and search classes (Query) to
deal with various ways to encode information in that byte.
There is a lot more that can go in here than just INT,
With the move to PointValues and away from trie based indexing of the terms
index, for numerics, everything associated with the trie stuff seems to be
labelled as "Legacy" and marked deprecated. Even FieldType.NumericType
(now FieldType.LegacyNumericType) -- a simple enum of INT, LONG, FLOAT,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210312#comment-15210312
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-8896:
bq. The SolrCloud _route_ param is supposed to end in a !
No it's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-7137:
Attachment: LUCENE-7137.patch
Here's a patch. consolidating the checks found a few minor bugs and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210296#comment-15210296
]
Joel Bernstein commented on SOLR-8521:
--
I think the generic guide makes sense on the CWIKI for sure.
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-master-Linux/16317/
Java: 32bit/jdk-9-jigsaw-ea+110 -server -XX:+UseParallelGC -XX:-CompactStrings
2 tests failed.
FAILED:
org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene60.TestLucene60PointsFormat.testMultiValued
Error Message:
wrong number of points in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210273#comment-15210273
]
Alessandro Benedetti commented on LUCENE-6954:
--
Thanks Tommaso, let me know !
A test is in
David Smiley created SOLR-8896:
--
Summary: Processing of _route_ param should imply trailing '!' if
not present
Key: SOLR-8896
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8896
Project: Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210233#comment-15210233
]
Steve Rowe commented on SOLR-8742:
--
Another reproducing failure (master/branch_6x/branch_6_0):
{noformat}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steve Rowe resolved SOLR-8895.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
Sorry didn't do a JIRA search - I'll add the seed over there.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tommaso Teofili reassigned LUCENE-6954:
---
Assignee: Tommaso Teofili
> More Like This Query: keep fields separated
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210228#comment-15210228
]
Tommaso Teofili commented on LUCENE-6954:
-
[~alessandro.benedetti], thanks for your patch. I can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210225#comment-15210225
]
Kevin Risden commented on SOLR-8521:
Was there consensus on where the documentation should go?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210221#comment-15210221
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-8895:
---
SOLR-8742
> HdfsDirectoryTest.testEOF() failure: NPE
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210220#comment-15210220
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-8895:
---
I think [~hossman_luc...@fucit.org] already filed an issue for this.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210211#comment-15210211
]
Alessandro Benedetti commented on LUCENE-6954:
--
I do agree, it does not make a lot of sense
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210206#comment-15210206
]
Joel Bernstein commented on SOLR-:
--
I've been digging into the implementation and it looks like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Smiley updated LUCENE-6954:
-
Issue Type: Bug (was: Improvement)
Summary: More Like This Query: keep fields separated
Robert Muir created LUCENE-7137:
---
Summary: consolidate many tests across Points and GeoPoint
queries/fields
Key: LUCENE-7137
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7137
Project: Lucene -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210194#comment-15210194
]
David Smiley commented on LUCENE-7094:
--
BTW even if UninvertingReader doesn't work when the field
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210192#comment-15210192
]
Ishan Chattopadhyaya edited comment on SOLR-8894 at 3/24/16 1:17 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210192#comment-15210192
]
Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-8894:
If we cannot find a workaround for this, I suggest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8895?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210159#comment-15210159
]
Steve Rowe commented on SOLR-8895:
--
This seed reproduces for me on master and branch_6_0 as well.
>
Steve Rowe created SOLR-8895:
Summary: HdfsDirectoryTest.testEOF() failure: NPE
Key: SOLR-8895
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8895
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-7136:
Attachment: LUCENE-7136.patch
> remove Threads from BaseGeoPointTestCase
>
Robert Muir created LUCENE-7136:
---
Summary: remove Threads from BaseGeoPointTestCase
Key: LUCENE-7136
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7136
Project: Lucene - Core
Issue Type:
Varun Thacker created SOLR-8894:
---
Summary: Support automatic kerberos ticket renewals in standalone
Solr
Key: SOLR-8894
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8894
Project: Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210109#comment-15210109
]
Alessandro Benedetti commented on LUCENE-6954:
--
Just reviewed the patch again, it seems fine
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Renaud Delbru updated LUCENE-6966:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-6966-1.patch
This patch contains the current state of the codec for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andreas Daffner updated SOLR-8893:
--
Description:
Hi,
we are currently facing the issue that some calculated values of the TV
Andreas Daffner created SOLR-8893:
-
Summary: Wrong TermVector docfreq calculation with enabled
ExactStatsCache
Key: SOLR-8893
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8893
Project: Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15210008#comment-15210008
]
Ahmet Arslan commented on LUCENE-7132:
--
It is really hard to decipher what is going on inside the
Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-6.x-Linux/226/
Java: 64bit/jdk1.8.0_72 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.core.TestDynamicLoading.testDynamicLoading
Error Message:
Could not get expected value 'X val' for path 'x' full
I pushed a fix ... test bug, only affecting 6.1 and master.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 5:05 AM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> I'll dig, this is a new check I added to BKDWriter recently.
>
> Mike McCandless
>
>
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo