RE: What should we do of branch_8x?

2021-11-21 Thread Uwe Schindler
ck up the repositories of both projects which have now a very clear state. Uwe ----- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Gus Heck Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2021 5:05 PM To: dev Subject: Re: What should we do of

Re: What should we do of branch_8x?

2021-11-21 Thread Uwe Schindler
-- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > -- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de

RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1

2021-11-20 Thread Uwe Schindler
And now also with JDK-11 and JDK-17 combined, thanks to Robert Muir: https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Release-Tester/5/console - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Uwe Schindler

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1

2021-11-20 Thread Uwe Schindler
ble them when we start discussing doing a new patch >release? > >Le sam. 20 nov. 2021 à 12:51, Uwe Schindler a écrit : > >> Hi, >> >> I setup my usual release tester job on Policeman Jenkins and it succeeded: >> SUCCESS! [0:19:00.801641] >> >> See

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1

2021-11-20 Thread Uwe Schindler
ve (and reason why) >> > >> > Here is my +1 >> > >> > -- >> > Adrien >> > >> > - >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> >

RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene 9.0.0 RC1

2021-11-20 Thread Uwe Schindler
manually check the artifacts and javadocs first. I also enabled the 9.0 and 9.x builds on Policeman Jenkins (sorry for the delay). At the same time I disabled 8.x builds. If Solr people still need them we can enable them. But I think the only ones we need now are 8.11.x ones, right? Uwe - Uwe

RE: 8.11 / 8.x CI disabled

2021-11-17 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi Adrien, will do this. The 9.0 and 9.x (Lucene) builds are still missing. I will also add them. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Adrien Grand > Sent: Wednesday, November 17,

RE: Bump minimum Java version to 17 on main (10.0)

2021-11-04 Thread Uwe Schindler
uld be somewhat > conservative here. > > > > > > ~ David Smiley > > > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 6:10 AM Uwe Schindler wrote: > > >

RE: Bump minimum Java version to 17 on main (10.0)

2021-11-04 Thread Uwe Schindler
That does not work. You can set -release or -target, but not both with incompatible variants. - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: David Smiley Sent: Thursday, November 4, 2021 12:44 PM To: lucene-dev Subject: Re

RE: Bump minimum Java version to 17 on main (10.0)

2021-11-04 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hibernate/Spring/Foobar-like Entities-For-Everything business logic. It may be useful at some point when they are no instances on heap anymore and just data wrappers, but based on classes I see no reason to use them for Lucene. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https

Re: 8.11 and 9.0 release notes

2021-11-02 Thread Uwe Schindler
;> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/LUCENE/Release+Notes+9.0 >> >> -- >> Adrien > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > -- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de

RE: Thank you! JDK 18 Early Access build 20 is now available

2021-10-26 Thread Uwe Schindler
a new target! Thanks for taking care of the open source projects, this was a great success! Have a good time with your family! Uwe - Uwe Schindler uschind...@apache.org ASF Member, Member of PMC and Committer of Apache Lucene and Apache Solr Bremen, Germany https

Re: should we clean up dev-docs?

2021-10-16 Thread Uwe Schindler
ferent flavors of >>> markup formatting languages. I know some of you may disagree but it's >>> not going to change my mind on the subject - sorry for being >>> old-fashioned. >>> >>> D. >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> >>> -- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de

RE: Simplify the release artifacts

2021-10-12 Thread Uwe Schindler
perating system and java compiler differences inside. It could be that the release manager used a buggy JDK with broken javac 😊. I the past I also checked the MR-JARs manually in the 8.x branch to make sure it looks fine. In short: A targz file is just easier to "manually" review. U

RE: Simplify the release artifacts

2021-10-12 Thread Uwe Schindler
in your "tryout code" and do a quick check. So I am not fully happy to completely throw away binary artifacts. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Robert Muir > Sent: Tues

RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.10.0 RC1

2021-09-23 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, all fine from my side: SUCCESS! [1:26:05.502277] Finished: SUCCESS https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-Release-Tester/37/console +1 to release! - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- >

Re: New branch and feature freeze for Lucene/Solr 8.10.0

2021-09-20 Thread Uwe Schindler
JAR files have >>>>>> >> this line in >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> them, such as core: >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> Manifest-Version: 1.0 >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.9.15 >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> Created-By: 1.8.0_265-b01 (AppleJDK-8.0.265.1.1) >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> Extension-Name: org.apache.lucene >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> Specification-Title: Lucene Search Engine: core >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> Specification-Version: 8.10.0 >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> Specification-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> Implementation-Title: org.apache.lucene >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> Implementation-Version: 8.10.0 >>>>>> >> ecf5c747e6df418dd05a18af327c20051f0584d >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> 7 - tjp - 2021-09-14 19:08:42 >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> Implementation-Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> X-Compile-Source-JDK: 8 >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> X-Compile-Target-JDK: 8 >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> Multi-Release: true >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 1:21 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> > All the best, this is the worst step. >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> > On Tue, 14 Sep, 2021, 10:47 pm Timothy Potter, >>>>>> >> wrote: >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> Building RC1 now ... stay tuned. >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 2:30 PM Timothy Potter >>>>>> >> wrote: >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > Thanks for the update Mike! >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > I'm backporting SOLR-15620 right now and am cooking >>>>>> >> up a quick PR for >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > SOLR-15621, which looks like an easy win for the >>>>>> >> issue Cassandra >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > reported on Slack earlier today. >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > Cheers, >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > Tim >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 11:32 AM Mike Drob >>>>>> >> wrote: >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > Hi Tim, I'm still working on SOLR-1, the code >>>>>> >> and benchmarking >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > both look pretty good, but I've got a few last >>>>>> >> unit tests that I need >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > to chase down. Hopefully taken care of by today >>>>>> >> or tomorrow, I'll be >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > sure to keep you updated though. >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 11:39 AM Timothy Potter >>>>>> >> wrote: >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > I found >>>>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15620 while testing >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > the schema designer. I haven't built the RC >>>>>> >> yet, so going to see if I >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > can get this in today. >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 12:36 PM Timothy Potter >>>>>> >> wrote: >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > > NOTICE: >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > > Branch branch_8_10 has been cut and versions >>>>>> >> updated to 8.11 on stable branch. >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > > Please observe the normal rules: >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > > * No new features may be committed to the >>>>>> >> branch. >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > > * Documentation patches, build patches and >>>>>> >> serious bug fixes may be >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > > committed to the branch. However, you >>>>>> >> should submit all patches you >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > > want to commit to Jira first to give others >>>>>> >> the chance to review >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > > and possibly vote against the patch. Keep >>>>>> >> in mind that it is our >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > > main intention to keep the branch as stable >>>>>> >> as possible. >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > > * All patches that are intended for the >>>>>> >> branch should first be committed >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > > to the unstable branch, merged into the >>>>>> >> stable branch, and then into >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > > the current release branch. >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > > * Normal unstable and stable branch >>>>>> >> development may continue as usual. >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > > However, if you plan to commit a big change >>>>>> >> to the unstable branch >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > > while the branch feature freeze is in >>>>>> >> effect, think twice: can't the >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > > addition wait a couple more days? Merges of >>>>>> >> bug fixes into the branch >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > > may become more difficult. >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > > * Only Jira issues with Fix version 8.10 and >>>>>> >> priority "Blocker" will delay >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > > a release candidate build. >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > > >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>> >> - >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>>>>> >> dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: >>>>>> >> dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > > >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> >> - >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>>>>> >> dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: >>>>>> >> dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> - >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>>>>> >> dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: >>>>>> >> dev-h...@solr.apache.org >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >>>>>> >> - >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: >>>>>> >> dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> - >>>>>> >> : > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >>>>>> >> : > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >>>>>> >> : > > >>>>>> >> : > >>>>>> >> : > >>>>>> >> - >>>>>> >> : > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>> >> : > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>> >> : > >>>>>> >> : >>>>>> >> : >>>>>> >> - >>>>>> >> : To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>> >> : For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>>> >> : >>>>>> >> : >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> -Hoss >>>>>> >> http://www.lucidworks.com/ >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> - >>>>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >>>>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> - >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >>>>>> > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org > -- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de

Re: Soften Jira's note when opening new issues?

2021-09-20 Thread Uwe Schindler
discussing them first on IRC or dev@l.a.o. >>> Given that we are not seeing much irrelevant traffic on JIRA, I'd like to >>> soften the message to something like below: >>> >>> ``` >>> If you are looking for support, or if you are not sure whether the &

Re: Java 11/17 Version Matrix

2021-09-13 Thread Uwe Schindler
ks to make a "take two" on these >> algorithms with vectorization in mind. This is just my opinion. >> >> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 2:10 PM Uwe Schindler wrote: >> > >> > There are no good reasons to do Java 17 and it is way too early. >> > >&

RE: Java 11/17 Version Matrix

2021-09-13 Thread Uwe Schindler
(which is LTS) and then decide later if we update to some post-17 version to get the new vector and panama APIs (vector search, SIMD and also MMapDirectory v2). If we do this, we should simply release Lucene 10. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen <ht

RE: getField vs getDeclaredField in analysis SPI

2021-09-13 Thread Uwe Schindler
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10101 - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Uwe Schindler > Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 9:59 AM > To: dev@lucene.apache.org &

RE: getField vs getDeclaredField in analysis SPI

2021-09-13 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi Alan, I will open an issue about this! Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Uwe Schindler > Sent: Monday, September 6, 2021 4:57 PM > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject:

RE: getField vs getDeclaredField in analysis SPI

2021-09-06 Thread Uwe Schindler
yways and that's the exceptional case. A correct factory should have a NAME field and its lookup is fast and the additional check introduced for the class is cheap. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Messag

RE: getField vs getDeclaredField in analysis SPI

2021-09-06 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi Alan, > LUCENE-9281 moved the `lookupSPIName` method from > AbstractAnalysisFactory to AnalysisSPILoader; the method is mostly the same, > but one line has been changed from Class.getField() to > Class.getDeclaredField(). > This can fall foul of the Security Manager, which wants a higher level

RE: [JENKINS] Lucene-main-Windows (64bit/jdk-15) - Build # 10089 - Unstable!

2021-08-19 Thread Uwe Schindler
https://lucene.apache.org/core/8_9_0/core/org/apache/lucene/store/RandomAccessInput.html (which uses MMap behind scenes, if it is an MMapDirectory or on unsupported platform like 32 bit it will use the other directory implementations). Uwe ----- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen

RE: [JENKINS] Lucene-main-Windows (64bit/jdk-15) - Build # 10089 - Unstable!

2021-08-19 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi Why does KNNVectorDict not use IndexInput with a IndexInput#randomAccessSlice()? Then problem is handled by mmapdirectory. Lucene classes should never ever use direct access to file system and always go through the Directory. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https

RE: Gradle HELP

2021-08-19 Thread Uwe Schindler
onfigure gradle to fetch dependencies from other repositories than maven central. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Michael Sokolov > Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2021 5:18 AM > To

Re: javadoc fails with no message

2021-08-12 Thread Uwe Schindler
executed, 27 up-to-date >> > > > > >> > > > > - >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > - >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > > >> > > >> > > - >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > >> > >> > - >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > -- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de

RE: Unable to build lucene-9 with JDK-16.0.1 & Gradle 7.1.1

2021-07-13 Thread Uwe Schindler
. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen <https://www.thetaphi.de> https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Uwe Schindler Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2021 1:14 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Unable to build lucene-9 with JDK-16.0.1 & Gr

RE: Unable to build lucene-9 with JDK-16.0.1 & Gradle 7.1.1

2021-07-13 Thread Uwe Schindler
anything (e.g. 16 or 17). By this Gradle runs with a supported environment for gradle, but compilation, tests,… are executed in the RUNTIME_JAVA_HOME. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen <https://www.thetaphi.de> https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@theta

RE: Could not run benchmark for custom codec in Lucene 9

2021-06-30 Thread Uwe Schindler
this one is always the same, no matter which benchmark you like to run or how you modify the task files. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen <https://www.thetaphi.de> https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: praveen nishchal Sent: Tuesday, J

Re: Welcome Mayya Sharipova to the Lucene PMC

2021-06-28 Thread Uwe Schindler
lcome aboard! > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de

RE: JDK 17 Early Access build 28 & JDK 18 build 3 are available

2021-06-26 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi Rory, will install latest version, soon. I have to be a bit careful regarding the project Panama test runs, but otherwise should be no issue. JDK 18 will come soon to the test-caroussel. Uwe - Uwe Schindler uschind...@apache.org ASF Member, Member of PMC and Committer

RE: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-Check-main - Build # 2824 - Failure!

2021-06-17 Thread Uwe Schindler
This issue should now be fixed. Puppet had a problem on lucene1. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Apache Jenkins Server > Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2021 5:57 AM

RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.9.0 RC1

2021-06-15 Thread Uwe Schindler
://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-8.9.0-RC1-rev05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80/solr/maven/ You can also try this out, but be sure to remove the dowloaded artifacts from your local repository, if we need to respin the release process! Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek

RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.9.0 RC1

2021-06-15 Thread Uwe Schindler
layout looks fine, but I did not do a test build of a Solr plugin this time (I did this before committing the change). The release artifacts are a bit complicated to use as it's 2 repos. Uwe ----- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetap

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.9.0 RC1

2021-06-11 Thread Uwe Schindler
cene-solr-8.9.0-RC1-rev05c8a6f0163fe4c330e93775e8e91f3ab66a3f80 >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours i.e. until >2021-06-16 02:00 UTC. >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> [ ] +1 approve >> > > >> > >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> > > >> > >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> Here is my +1 >> > > >> > >> SUCCESS! [0:01:43.815224] >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >- >> > > >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > > >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: >dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >- >> > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> > > >> >- >> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >- >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > >> > >> > >- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de

RE: [lucene] branch main updated: LUCENE-9995: JDK17 generates wbr tags which make javadocs checker angry.

2021-06-09 Thread Uwe Schindler
Oh my god. is an invention going back to Netscape 4. I have no idea how it came into HTML5, it has nothing to do with structuring documents in HTML sense, it's from the time before there was Unicode. The correct replacement is a zero-width-space (Unicode U+200B). AMEN! Uwe ----

RE: Branch branch_8_9 has been cut and versions updated to 8.10 on stable branch

2021-06-07 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi Mayya, I updated Policeman Jenkins to build the 8.9 branch, too. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen <https://www.thetaphi.de> https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Mayya Sharipova Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 8:24 PM T

RE: SNAPSHOT builds

2021-06-04 Thread Uwe Schindler
://nightlies.apache.org/solr/lucene-prereleases/ (latest is jenkins build 5) Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Nicholas Knize Sent: Friday, June 4, 2021 1:00 AM To: Lucene/Solr dev Subject: Re: SNAPSHOT builds

RE: Welcome Greg Miller as Lucene committer

2021-06-01 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, Welcome Greg! Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen <https://www.thetaphi.de> https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Adrien Grand Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2021 9:47 PM To: Lucene Dev Cc: gsmil...@gmail.com Subject: Welcome Greg Mil

Re: A proposition: Make Luke a standalone package (again)

2021-05-29 Thread Uwe Schindler
t;> > > Thanks, >> > > Tomoko >> > > >> > > >- >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > >> > >> > >- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de

RE: Misconfigured gradle rat inputs?

2021-05-26 Thread Uwe Schindler
I opened: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9977 and for Solr: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15436 - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Uwe Schindler Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2021 11:01

RE: Misconfigured gradle rat inputs?

2021-05-26 Thread Uwe Schindler
includes/excludes I gave up, as my time was limited and I was not able to quickly split the task into one for each surceset Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Dawid Weiss Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2021 7

RE: Misconfigured gradle rat inputs?

2021-05-25 Thread Uwe Schindler
be done for Solr and Lucene, both have the problem). Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Alan Woodward > Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2021 7:26 PM > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subje

Re: Lucene 9.0 snapshot names

2021-05-24 Thread Uwe Schindler
erves the >files >required for other Maven-toolchain tools. I'm not sure how it behaves >without signatures. > >It is entirely doable to create a non-maven-task based assembly into a >binary distribution ZIP/ folder. Then no task exclusions will be >required? > >Dawid > &g

Re: Lucene 9.0 snapshot names

2021-05-24 Thread Uwe Schindler
anyone with more gradle-fu than me know either a) how to skip the >signing step or b) how to set things up so that they are signed >correctly without having my PGP password sitting in a plain text file. >> >> Thanks! >> >>> On 20 May 2021, at 14:19, Uwe Schindler

Re: Text search in Arabic

2021-05-20 Thread Uwe Schindler
rs? If not, >would you mind recommending me a medium for discussion on this? >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Mete Kural >>> >- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de

Re: Text search in Arabic

2021-05-20 Thread Uwe Schindler
commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > >--------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de

Re: Lucene 9.0 snapshot names

2021-05-20 Thread Uwe Schindler
nd it is no longer a snapshot. So you are free with versioning. Uwe Am May 20, 2021 1:15:12 PM UTC schrieb Uwe Schindler : >Jenkins does this already: >https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Lucene/job/Lucene-Artifacts-main/242/ > >It uses build number! > >The system property "

Re: Lucene 9.0 snapshot names

2021-05-20 Thread Uwe Schindler
different >> times shouldn’t really have different names. Should we look at >changing >> the existing snapshot generation code to switch to using SHAs? >> >> - Alan >> ----- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> >> -- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de

RE: Release Lucene/Solr 8.9.0 should we have it soon

2021-05-12 Thread Uwe Schindler
idea to build you own Solr plugin / Lucene project pointing to the snapshot artifacts 8.9-SNAPSHOT just as a test. I did it for several of my projects and they passed. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Jan

Re: Moving usage documentation of Luke to Lucene Website

2021-05-01 Thread Uwe Schindler
gt;>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> I just noticed that Luke became a Lucene Module >>>> > >>> >>>> > >>> https://github.com/DmitryKey/luke#important-notice >>>> > >>> >>>> >https://mocobeta.medi

RE: Moving usage documentation of Luke to Lucene Website

2021-05-01 Thread Uwe Schindler
We can also add assets there: It’s all here: https://github.com/apache/lucene/tree/main/lucene/documentation/src - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Uwe Schindler Sent: Saturday, May 1, 2021 12:08 PM To: 

RE: Moving usage documentation of Luke to Lucene Website

2021-05-01 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, we could also add the whole GUI documentation from the old site (I assume it’s Github’s Wiki markdown and just copy it to our documentation module directory. It will then automatically convert all “*.md” files to “*.html” when it builds the “site” documentation. Uwe - Uwe

RE: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2 RC1

2021-04-07 Thread Uwe Schindler
JIRA! Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Mike Drob Sent: Wednesday, April 7, 2021 12:45 AM To: Solr/Lucene Dev ; Solr Dev Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2 RC1 Please vote for release candidate 1

Re: Bugfix release Lucene/Solr 8.8.2

2021-04-06 Thread Uwe Schindler
org/jira/browse/SOLR-15288 in, >but >>>> will likely be able to wrap up by 2 April or so (on vacation right >now due >>>> to the festival of Holi) >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Ishan >>>> >>>> On Sat, 27 Mar, 2021, 7:

Re: Redirect build logs from Solr 8.x branch to bui...@solr.apache.org

2021-04-03 Thread Uwe Schindler
gt;> >>>> On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 3:54 AM Dawid Weiss >wrote: >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Hi folks! >>>> > >>>> > I know the development repository for 8x stays in the previous >location but can we (should

Re: Redirect build logs from Solr 8.x branch to bui...@solr.apache.org

2021-04-02 Thread Uwe Schindler
Policeman Jenkins changed by config slicing plugin. ASF takes more time, need to click through. Uwe Am April 2, 2021 8:07:07 PM UTC schrieb Uwe Schindler : >The solr 8.x builds (artifacts, cloud2refimpl) already go to >builds@solr, what's the problem? > >It is only the test j

Re: Redirect build logs from Solr 8.x branch to bui...@solr.apache.org

2021-04-02 Thread Uwe Schindler
> but can we (should we) update the mailing list address on Solr 8x >build >> jobs to point at bui...@solr.apache.org? >> > >> > D. >> >> ----- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@solr.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@solr.apache.org >> >> -- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de

RE: OpenJDK 17 Early Access build 16 is now available

2021-04-02 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, thanks for the heads-up. JDK-17 is now in the loop for Lucene: we got first fails (our fault): https://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-main-Linux/29852/console It’s easter holiday, no time to fix it! 😊 Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https

Re: [JENKINS] Lucene » Lucene-NightlyTests-main - Build # 215 - Unstable!

2021-03-19 Thread Uwe Schindler
doesn't create actual >indexwriters >with slow codecs and index tons of documents or anything. > >I'd say good chance it's a deadlock? Need to remember how to get that >special linedocs file to try to reproduce it. -- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de

Re: Lucene (unexpected ) fsync on existing segments

2021-03-15 Thread Uwe Schindler
>> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> Hello everyone, >>>>> > >> >> >> Following up on my question in case anyone has any >idea. Why >>>>> it's important to know this is because I am thinking of allowing >the backup >>>>> process to not hold any lock on the index files, which should >allow the >>>>> fsync during parallel commits. BUT, in case doing an fsync on >existing >>>>> segment files in a saved commit point DOES have an effect, it >might render >>>>> the backed up index in a corrupt state. >>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> Thanks, >>>>> > >> >> >> Rahul >>>>> > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 3:04 PM Rahul Goswami < >>>>> rahul196...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> > >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >>> Hello, >>>>> > >> >> >>> We have a process which backs up the index (Solr >7.7.2) on >>>>> a schedule. The way we do it is we first save a commit point on >the index >>>>> and then using Solr's /replication handler, get the list of files >in that >>>>> generation. After the backup completes, we release the commit >point (Please >>>>> note that this is a separate backup process outside of Solr and >not the >>>>> backup command of the /replication handler) >>>>> > >> >> >>> The assumption is that while the commit point is >saved, no >>>>> changes happen to the segment files in the saved generation. >>>>> > >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >>> Now the issue... The backup process opens the index >files >>>>> in a shared READ mode, preventing writes. This is causing any >parallel >>>>> commits to fail as it seems to be complaining about the index >files to be >>>>> locked by another process(the backup process). Upon debugging, I >see that >>>>> fsync is being called during commit on already existing segment >files which >>>>> is not expected. So, my question is, is there any reason for >lucene to call >>>>> fsync on already existing segment files? >>>>> > >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >>> The line of code I am referring to is as below: >>>>> > >> >> >>> try (final FileChannel file = >FileChannel.open(fileToSync, >>>>> isDir ? StandardOpenOption.READ : StandardOpenOption.WRITE)) >>>>> > >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >>> in method fsync(Path fileToSync, boolean isDir) of the >>>>> class file >>>>> > >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >>> >lucene\core\src\java\org\apache\lucene\util\IOUtils.java >>>>> > >> >> >>> >>>>> > >> >> >>> Thanks, >>>>> > >> >> >>> Rahul >>>>> > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>> >- >>>>> > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>> > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: >dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>> > >> >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> >- >>>>> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>> > >> >>>>> >>>>> >- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>>> >>>>> -- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de

Re: Lucene (unexpected ) fsync on existing segments

2021-03-15 Thread Uwe Schindler
Correction: the windows limitation is only till windows server 2012 / Windows 8. So you can memory map easily terabytes of data nowadays. Uwe Am March 15, 2021 7:42:26 PM UTC schrieb Uwe Schindler : >Hi Mike, > >Windows has unfortunately some crazy limitation on address space, so &

Re: Lucene (unexpected ) fsync on existing segments

2021-03-15 Thread Uwe Schindler
fsync on >existing >>>> segment files in a saved commit point DOES have an effect, it might >render >>>> the backed up index in a corrupt state. >>>> > >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> Thanks, >>>> > >> >> >> Rahul >>>> > >> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 3:04 PM Rahul Goswami < >>>> rahul196...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > >> >> >>> >>>> > >> >> >>> Hello, >>>> > >> >> >>> We have a process which backs up the index (Solr 7.7.2) >on a >>>> schedule. The way we do it is we first save a commit point on the >index and >>>> then using Solr's /replication handler, get the list of files in >that >>>> generation. After the backup completes, we release the commit point >(Please >>>> note that this is a separate backup process outside of Solr and not >the >>>> backup command of the /replication handler) >>>> > >> >> >>> The assumption is that while the commit point is saved, >no >>>> changes happen to the segment files in the saved generation. >>>> > >> >> >>> >>>> > >> >> >>> Now the issue... The backup process opens the index >files in >>>> a shared READ mode, preventing writes. This is causing any parallel >commits >>>> to fail as it seems to be complaining about the index files to be >locked by >>>> another process(the backup process). Upon debugging, I see that >fsync is >>>> being called during commit on already existing segment files which >is not >>>> expected. So, my question is, is there any reason for lucene to >call fsync >>>> on already existing segment files? >>>> > >> >> >>> >>>> > >> >> >>> The line of code I am referring to is as below: >>>> > >> >> >>> try (final FileChannel file = >FileChannel.open(fileToSync, >>>> isDir ? StandardOpenOption.READ : StandardOpenOption.WRITE)) >>>> > >> >> >>> >>>> > >> >> >>> in method fsync(Path fileToSync, boolean isDir) of the >class >>>> file >>>> > >> >> >>> >>>> > >> >> >>> >lucene\core\src\java\org\apache\lucene\util\IOUtils.java >>>> > >> >> >>> >>>> > >> >> >>> Thanks, >>>> > >> >> >>> Rahul >>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> >- >>>> > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>> > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>> > >> >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> >- >>>> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>> > >> >>>> >>>> >- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>>> >>>> -- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de

RE: [solr-operator] branch main updated (fc76f66 -> 75830c3)

2021-03-15 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi Houston, Can we change the commit mail address of this repository? Or does this need INFRA involvement? Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: hous...@apache.org > Sent: Monday,

RE: [NOTICE] Old git branches will be pruned (in lucene.git repo)

2021-03-15 Thread Uwe Schindler
Deleting unneeded tags is easy, so starting with the automatied script is fine. I agree to remove those “orking” branches/tags in the lucene and solr repos. Once done, the disk space may reduce, as “git gc” will remove all refs. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen

RE: Lucene-Solr-cloud2refimpl

2021-03-13 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, I changed this already (about the time when you send this email). Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Michael Sokolov > Sent: Friday, March 12, 2021 2:59 PM > To: Lucene De

RE: [lucene] branch main updated: Always include errorprone dependency, even if we're not checking. This ensures consistent use patterns across JVMs.

2021-03-11 Thread Uwe Schindler
it might be more complicated, but I’m happy! Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Uwe Schindler Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 10:53 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [lucene] branch main updated

Re: [lucene] branch main updated: Always include errorprone dependency, even if we're not checking. This ensures consistent use patterns across JVMs.

2021-03-11 Thread Uwe Schindler
eParameterUnusedInFormals:OFF', >+'-Xep:UnusedNestedClass:OFF', >+'-Xep:OverrideThrowableToString:OFF', >+'-Xep:FutureReturnValueIgnored:OFF', >+'-Xep:BadInstanceof:OFF', >+'-Xep:UnusedNestedClass:OFF', >+'-Xep:OverrideThrowableToString:OFF', >+'-Xep:EqualsIncompatibleType:OFF', >+'-Xep:ByteBufferBackingArray:OFF', >+'-Xep:ByteBufferBackingArray:OFF', >+'-Xep:UnusedMethod:OFF', >+'-Xep:ObjectsHashCodePrimitive:OFF', >+'-Xep:ObjectsHashCodePrimitive:OFF', >+'-Xep:UnnecessaryAnonymousClass:OFF', >+'-Xep:BoxedPrimitiveConstructor:OFF', >+'-Xep:ArgumentSelectionDefectChecker:OFF', >+'-Xep:StringSplitter:OFF', >+'-Xep:MixedMutabilityReturnType:OFF', >+'-Xep:EqualsUnsafeCast:OFF', >+'-Xep:OperatorPrecedence:OFF', >+'-Xep:HidingField:OFF', >+'-Xep:ThreadPriorityCheck:OFF', >+'-Xep:InlineFormatString:OFF', >+'-Xep:EqualsUnsafeCast:OFF', >+'-Xep:UnsynchronizedOverridesSynchronized:OFF', >+'-Xep:OperatorPrecedence:OFF', >+'-Xep:ArrayToString:OFF', >+'-Xep:ClassCanBeStatic:OFF', >+'-Xep:InvalidInlineTag:OFF', >+'-Xep:EmptyCatch:OFF', >+'-Xep:UnnecessaryParentheses:OFF', >+'-Xep:AlmostJavadoc:OFF', >+'-Xep:Finally:OFF', >+'-Xep:ImmutableEnumChecker:OFF', >+'-Xep:NonAtomicVolatileUpdate:OFF', >+'-Xep:MutablePublicArray:OFF', >+'-Xep:LockNotBeforeTry:OFF', >+'-Xep:WaitNotInLoop:OFF', >+'-Xep:UndefinedEquals:OFF', >+'-Xep:JdkObsolete:OFF', >+'-Xep:NarrowingCompoundAssignment:OFF', >+'-Xep:InconsistentCapitalization:OFF', >+'-Xep:IntLongMath:OFF', >+'-Xep:SynchronizeOnNonFinalField:OFF', >+'-Xep:ThreadLocalUsage:OFF', >+'-Xep:ProtectedMembersInFinalClass:OFF', >+'-Xep:BadImport:OFF', >+'-Xep:InconsistentHashCode:OFF', >+'-Xep:MissingOverride:OFF', >+'-Xep:EqualsGetClass:OFF', >+'-Xep:PublicConstructorForAbstractClass:OFF', >+'-Xep:EscapedEntity:OFF', >+'-Xep:ModifiedButNotUsed:OFF', >+'-Xep:ReferenceEquality:OFF', >+'-Xep:InvalidBlockTag:OFF', >+'-Xep:MissingSummary:OFF', >+'-Xep:UnusedVariable:OFF' >+] >+ } > } > } > } -- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de

RE: [JENKINS-EA] Lucene-main-Linux (64bit/jdk-16-ea+36) - Build # 29666 - Failure!

2021-03-11 Thread Uwe Schindler
. When then JDK 16 disables errorprone (see the if statement), Palantir sees no usage of the dependency anymore. I think we must either put that on some white- ähm exclusion-list! Dawid, does this sound correct? - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail

RE: [JENKINS-EA] Lucene-main-Linux (64bit/jdk-16-ea+36) - Build # 29666 - Failure!

2021-03-11 Thread Uwe Schindler
and_line_interface.html#sec:command_line_warnings BUILD FAILED in 16m 2s I see no commit that may cause this, so I have the feeling it's java 16 only. Dawid, do you have an idea? - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > --

RE: Branch cleaning/ archiving

2021-03-10 Thread Uwe Schindler
os (which survives also branch deletes and would have been detached after master was nuked). - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Dawid Weiss > Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 8:13 PM > To:

RE: Repository fork (master) about to happen (Wednesday)

2021-03-10 Thread Uwe Schindler
“Master” builds are disabled on ASF Jenkins and Policeman Jenkins. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen <https://www.thetaphi.de> https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Uwe Schindler Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 4:47 PM To: dev@lucene.apac

RE: Repository fork (master) about to happen (Wednesday)

2021-03-10 Thread Uwe Schindler
+1 - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Dawid Weiss > Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 8:56 AM > To: Lucene Dev > Subject: Re: Repository fork (master) about to happen (Wednes

RE: Repository fork (master) about to happen (Wednesday)

2021-03-09 Thread Uwe Schindler
e done for policeman jenkins, too, but I am not sure about ASF jenkins! It looks like most mailinglists have an auto-whitelist for all @apache.org addresses. Uwe ----- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen <https://www.thetaphi.de> https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...

RE: Repository fork (master) about to happen (Wednesday)

2021-03-09 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi Dawid, give me a short ping when you start tomorrow. I will disable master jenkins jobs possibly this evening. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen <https://www.thetaphi.de> https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Dawid Weiss Sent: T

RE: Repository fork (master) about to happen (Wednesday)

2021-03-08 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi Dawid, > My plan is as follows: > > 1. DISABLE CI jobs and anything that pulls from current master. (Uwe, > would you do help me with this?) Yes, I can do this. I have meetings on Wednesday, but I can already do this tomorrow evening. > 2. Branch master to lucene/main and solr/main. Remove

RE: Repository fork (master) about to happen (Wednesday)

2021-03-08 Thread Uwe Schindler
rse without PRs. We can only do this in cooperation with Apache Infra stuff, because we can' change the Github repo settings or rename them using the Github UI. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message

RE: Repository fork (master) about to happen (Wednesday)

2021-03-08 Thread Uwe Schindler
copypaste the URL there as "source branch" for the merge. Then you execute the merge, squash and commit/push. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Dawid Weiss > Sent: Monda

Re: Solr webpage SEO

2021-03-04 Thread Uwe Schindler
/docs/8_6_2/solr-solrj/index.html: 10 >> /guide/6_6/running-solr.html: 10 >> /docs/7_2_1/solr-solrj/overview-summary.html: 9 >> /docs/8_0_0/solr-solrj/overview-frame.html: 9 >> /guide/6_6/format-of-solr-xml.html: 9 >> /guide/6_6/index.html: 9 >> /guide/6_6/learning-to-rank.html: 9 >> /guide/6_6/making-and-restoring-backups.html: 9 >> /guide/6_6/working-with-dates.html: 9 >> /guide/8_0/reindexing.html: 9 >> /docs/7_2_1/solr-solrj/allclasses-frame.html: 8 >> >> -- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de

Re: Solr webpage SEO

2021-03-04 Thread Uwe Schindler
ml: 10 >> /docs/8_6_2/solr-solrj/index.html: 10 >> /guide/6_6/running-solr.html: 10 >> /docs/7_2_1/solr-solrj/overview-summary.html: 9 >> /docs/8_0_0/solr-solrj/overview-frame.html: 9 >> /guide/6_6/format-of-solr-xml.html: 9 >> /guide/6_6/index.html: 9 >> /guide/6_6/learning-to-rank.html: 9 >> /guide/6_6/making-and-restoring-backups.html: 9 >> /guide/6_6/working-with-dates.html: 9 >> /guide/8_0/reindexing.html: 9 >> /docs/7_2_1/solr-solrj/allclasses-frame.html: 8 >> >> -- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de

RE: Who has access to Google Analytics for Lucene site?

2021-03-03 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, sorry, I just noticed that the account disappeared from my google analytics profile. It was setup by Grant Ingersoll, maybe he can give us access again. If it is no longer there, we lost the data, but we can recreate one. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357

Re: Who has access to Google Analytics for Lucene site?

2021-03-03 Thread Uwe Schindler
d be nice to track and >graph the traffic ramp-up. > >Jan >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de

RE: Review request - New Solr website

2021-03-02 Thread Uwe Schindler
- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Jan Høydahl Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 7:25 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Review request - New Solr website Thanks for reviewing. Yes, the javadocs and refguide are

RE: Congratulations to the new Apache Solr PMC Chair, Jan Høydahl!

2021-02-20 Thread Uwe Schindler
Congrats Jan! Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen <https://www.thetaphi.de> https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Anshum Gupta Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2021 7:55 PM To: Lucene Dev ; solr-u...@lucene.apache.org Subject: Congratulations

RE: Random disabling of asserts in tests is not working

2021-02-20 Thread Uwe Schindler
of all cases. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Dawid Weiss Sent: Friday, February 19, 2021 7:52 PM To: Lucene Dev Subject: Re: Random disabling of asserts in tests is not working Hi Uwe, No

RE: GC cost of creating String resource description on IndexInput clone

2021-02-20 Thread Uwe Schindler
I would say: you can’t figure out from JFR what’s the main contributor (the small strings in between should be optimized away anyways). Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Uwe Schindler Sent: Saturday

RE: GC cost of creating String resource description on IndexInput clone

2021-02-20 Thread Uwe Schindler
igh. It also depends on the GC you use. If you use old ConcMarkSweepGC, I agree this is an overhead, but nowadays, Lucene should use G1GC. In addition, the strings are not for debugging, they are really useful when something goes wrong, e.g. when I/O errors occur. Uwe -

RE: Random disabling of asserts in tests is not working

2021-02-19 Thread Uwe Schindler
thinking that we have Security Manager enabled/disabled from time to time. But recently, I see no randomization for this on Jenkins, unless it’s part of the Gradle build. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Robert

Re: Failing gradle precommits

2021-01-08 Thread Uwe Schindler
;>>>> >>>>>> * Where: >>>>>> Script >>>>>> >'/Users/joelbernstein/committer/lucene-solr/gradle/validation/validate-source-patterns.gradle' >>>>>> line: 324 >>>>>> >>>>>> * What went wrong: >>>>>> Execution failed for task ':solr:contrib:validateSourcePatterns'. >>>>>> > Found 8 violations in source files (tabs instead spaces). >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Are others seeing this as well? I'm not seeing Jenkins emails >about >>>>>> this. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Joel Bernstein >>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ___ >>>>>> *Eric Pugh **| *Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | >434.466.1467 >>>>>> | http://www.opensourceconnections.com | My Free/Busy >>>>>> <http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal> >>>>>> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed >>>>>> ><https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw> >>>>>> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is >considered to >>>>>> be Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, >regardless >>>>>> of whether attachments are marked as such. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de

RE: [JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-jdk16panama-Linux (64bit/jdk-16-ea+30) - Build # 11 - Still Unstable!

2021-01-07 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, > No, you'll have to get used to it (and you will, I guarantee you). >> What is “+” and “-“? > Unified diff markers. They're helpful but they're just explanations - why > would you care, run gradlew tidy and continue working. Oh well, that’s obvious what format that is. My comment

RE: [JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-jdk16panama-Linux (64bit/jdk-16-ea+30) - Build # 11 - Still Unstable!

2021-01-07 Thread Uwe Schindler
wrong: Should the code look like “+” or should the code look like “-“? To my personal style, the “one-liners” are much better readable to me, so splitting the lines is just horrible and I would never write code like that ☹ Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https

RE: [JENKINS-EA] Lucene-Solr-jdk16panama-Linux (64bit/jdk-16-ea+30) - Build # 11 - Still Unstable!

2021-01-07 Thread Uwe Schindler
Hi, I am a bit confused by this mail: “Lucene-Solr-jdk16panama-Linux” Jenkins jobs only run „gradlew test -Dtests.directory=MMapDirectory” nothing else!? Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Dawid Weiss

RE: [JENKINS] $PROJECT_NAME (${ENV,var="JAVA"}) - Build # $BUILD_NUMBER - $BUILD_STATUS!

2021-01-06 Thread Uwe Schindler
affect many other plugins (as many use tokens and their expansion), so I expect a fix soon. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Policeman Jenkins Server > Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 202

RE: Old programmers do fade away

2021-01-04 Thread Uwe Schindler
tomato plants all survived and I was able to harvest this year. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Erick Erickson > Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 3:09 PM > To: dev@lucen

RE: LeafReaderContext ord is unexpectedly 0

2020-12-27 Thread Uwe Schindler
IndexReader instances around (no matter what type), always use ReaderContexts, especially in public APIs. Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Joel Bernstein Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 7:36 PM To: lucene

RE: LeafReaderContext ord is unexpectedly 0

2020-12-27 Thread Uwe Schindler
creates a new one – an then you’re lost! Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de From: Joel Bernstein Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2020 5:59 PM To: lucene dev Subject: LeafReaderContext ord is unexpectedly 0 I ran

RE: [JENKINS-Experimental-GC] Lucene-Solr-master-Linux (64bit/jdk-12.0.2) - Build # 28914 - Still Failing!

2020-12-11 Thread Uwe Schindler
ooses a JVM/GC combination which is "uptodate" and "often used" (LTS). What do you think? Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Dawid Weiss > Sent: Friday, December

RE: Approach towards solving split package issues?

2020-11-30 Thread Uwe Schindler
and builds (kinda integration test). Uwe - Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, D-28357 Bremen https://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Dawid Weiss > Sent: Monday, November 30, 2020 11:51 AM > To: Lucene Dev > Subject: Re: Approach towa

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >