Re: [Lucene.Net] Windows Phone 7

2011-11-01 Thread Michael Herndon
The 4e branch is exploring using PLT (portable library tools) for that as well, which in theory would allow you to compile one assembly that runs against multiple versions of .NET. including Silverlight 4 and Silverlight 4 for WP7 and hopefully MonoDroid MonoTouch in the future. PLT:

RE: [Lucene.Net] [jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-452) Add docs to release

2011-11-01 Thread Prescott Nasser
Michael - I'm looking through the docs, and it looks like the much of the contrib stuff is MIA - if I navigate to Lucene.Net.Analysis.Cz the page is MIA. It's similar for most of contrib Are we missing something that would allow this documentation to be produced? ~P

Re: [Lucene.Net] [jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-452) Add docs to release

2011-11-01 Thread Michael Herndon
I'll have to look. RapidSVN's GUI froze when pushing that many files up. so its possible the static files did not make it up. On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.comwrote: Michael - I'm looking through the docs, and it looks like the much of the contrib

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Updated] (LUCENENET-448) GeoHashFilteredDocIdSet does not work at all

2011-11-01 Thread Digy (Updated) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Digy updated LUCENENET-448: --- Affects Version/s: (was: Lucene.Net 2.9.4) Lucene.Net 2.9.4g Fix

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Updated] (LUCENENET-451) Missing License Headers in trunk

2011-11-01 Thread Christopher Currens (Updated) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christopher Currens updated LUCENENET-451: -- Attachment: LUCENENET-451.slnfix.trunk.patch Attached a patch against trunk

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-451) Missing License Headers in trunk

2011-11-01 Thread Christopher Currens (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141665#comment-13141665 ] Christopher Currens commented on LUCENENET-451: --- Committed solution fix

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Resolved] (LUCENENET-451) Missing License Headers in trunk

2011-11-01 Thread Christopher Currens (Resolved) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christopher Currens resolved LUCENENET-451. --- Resolution: Fixed Closed issue. (whoops, meant to do it last comment)

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-451) Missing License Headers in trunk

2011-11-01 Thread Stefan Bodewig (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141932#comment-13141932 ] Stefan Bodewig commented on LUCENENET-451: -- I've used RAT's trunk to add the

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3490) Restructure codec hierarchy

2011-11-01 Thread Uwe Schindler (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141001#comment-13141001 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3490: --- bq. remains to factor out all these little

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3490) Restructure codec hierarchy

2011-11-01 Thread Uwe Schindler (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=1314#comment-1314 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3490: --- I removed CodecProvider again in revision:

[jira] [Reopened] (LUCENE-3546) IW#nrtIsCurrent retruns true if changes are in del queue but not in bufferedDeleteStream yet

2011-11-01 Thread Simon Willnauer (Reopened) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer reopened LUCENE-3546: - I wasn't completely wrong here. The DWDQ#anyChanges() implementation actually has this

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3546) IW#nrtIsCurrent retruns true if changes are in del queue but not in bufferedDeleteStream yet

2011-11-01 Thread Simon Willnauer (Updated) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-3546: Attachment: LUCENE-3546.patch I added an isolated testcase which fails without this

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2861) transaction log / realtime-get failures

2011-11-01 Thread Michael McCandless (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141141#comment-13141141 ] Michael McCandless commented on SOLR-2861: -- bq. once you call

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-3547) TestIndexWriterWithThreads.testOpenTwoIndexWritersOnDifferentThreads test failure

2011-11-01 Thread selckin (Created) (JIRA)
TestIndexWriterWithThreads.testOpenTwoIndexWritersOnDifferentThreads test failure - Key: LUCENE-3547 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3547 Project:

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-2868) DistributedTermsComponentTest.testDistribSearch test failure

2011-11-01 Thread selckin (Created) (JIRA)
DistributedTermsComponentTest.testDistribSearch test failure Key: SOLR-2868 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2868 Project: Solr Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2723) If you don't choose a shard name for a SolrCore, the system should auto assign shard names.

2011-11-01 Thread Mark Miller (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141182#comment-13141182 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2723: --- This is currently implemented with a very simple

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-3548) CharsRef#append broken on trunk 3.x

2011-11-01 Thread Simon Willnauer (Created) (JIRA)
CharsRef#append broken on trunk 3.x - Key: LUCENE-3548 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3548 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Bug Components: core/other Affects Versions:

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3548) CharsRef#append broken on trunk 3.x

2011-11-01 Thread Robert Muir (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141186#comment-13141186 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3548: - while we are at it, maybe we should look at

[jira] [Assigned] (LUCENE-3548) CharsRef#append broken on trunk 3.x

2011-11-01 Thread Simon Willnauer (Assigned) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer reassigned LUCENE-3548: --- Assignee: Simon Willnauer CharsRef#append broken on trunk 3.x

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3548) CharsRef#append broken on trunk 3.x

2011-11-01 Thread Simon Willnauer (Updated) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-3548: Attachment: LUCENE-3548.patch here is a patch CharsRef#append broken on

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3548) CharsRef#append broken on trunk 3.x

2011-11-01 Thread Simon Willnauer (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141188#comment-13141188 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3548: - bq. In my opinion the best thing we

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3548) CharsRef#append broken on trunk 3.x

2011-11-01 Thread Robert Muir (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141189#comment-13141189 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3548: - +1 to fixing things one piece at a time... no

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3277) CharsRef has confusing methods/needs tests/bugs

2011-11-01 Thread Robert Muir (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141190#comment-13141190 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3277: - LUCENE-3548 addresses the confusing append()

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-3549) Remove DocumentBuilder interface from facet module

2011-11-01 Thread Shai Erera (Created) (JIRA)
Remove DocumentBuilder interface from facet module -- Key: LUCENE-3549 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3549 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3549) Remove DocumentBuilder interface from facet module

2011-11-01 Thread Michael McCandless (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141202#comment-13141202 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3549: I think we should just remove

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-2591) Remove commitLockTimeout option from solrconfig.xml

2011-11-01 Thread Luca Cavanna (Updated) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luca Cavanna updated SOLR-2591: --- Attachment: SOLR-2591.patch I think this unused option can be misleading, so why not remove it? I

[jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (SOLR-2591) Remove commitLockTimeout option from solrconfig.xml

2011-11-01 Thread Luca Cavanna (Issue Comment Edited) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141203#comment-13141203 ] Luca Cavanna edited comment on SOLR-2591 at 11/1/11 2:32 PM: - I

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3549) Remove DocumentBuilder interface from facet module

2011-11-01 Thread Uwe Schindler (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141207#comment-13141207 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3549: --- +1 to remove. Alltogether it looks too

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2134) Trie* fields should support sortMissingLast=true, and deprecate Sortable* Field Types

2011-11-01 Thread Erick Erickson (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141210#comment-13141210 ] Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-2134: -- Should we at least mark this as fixed in 4.0?

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-3550) Create example code for core

2011-11-01 Thread Shai Erera (Created) (JIRA)
Create example code for core Key: LUCENE-3550 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3550 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: New Feature Components: core/other Reporter: Shai

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3550) Create example code for core

2011-11-01 Thread Steven Rowe (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141215#comment-13141215 ] Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-3550: - +1 {{lucene/contrib/demo/}} is an existing

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3549) Remove DocumentBuilder interface from facet module

2011-11-01 Thread Shai Erera (Updated) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shai Erera updated LUCENE-3549: --- Attachment: LUCENE-3549.patch Patch against 3x (but easy to apply on trunk as well). I will commit

[Lucene.Net] Windows Phone 7

2011-11-01 Thread Paul Shealy
What's the status of Windows Phone 7 support for lucene.net? I found some test cases, but no code. If it's not being worked on, I'll pick it up. It's something I could use and I know other people want it too.

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2861) transaction log / realtime-get failures

2011-11-01 Thread Simon Willnauer (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141265#comment-13141265 ] Simon Willnauer commented on SOLR-2861: --- {code} #those two happen at the same time

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2861) transaction log / realtime-get failures

2011-11-01 Thread Yonik Seeley (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141287#comment-13141287 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2861: bq. as I said - we can not rely on the order

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2134) Trie* fields should support sortMissingLast=true, and deprecate Sortable* Field Types

2011-11-01 Thread Erick Erickson (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141292#comment-13141292 ] Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-2134: -- Of course I can, but I'm not about to until

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2720) TestLBHttpSolrServer sometimes fails

2011-11-01 Thread Mark Miller (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141317#comment-13141317 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2720: --- {noformat} Build:

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-2587) Highlighter picks wrong offset for fragment boundaries

2011-11-01 Thread Roberto Minelli (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2587?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141378#comment-13141378 ] Roberto Minelli commented on LUCENE-2587: - Do you think that this dummy

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Resolved] (LUCENENET-448) GeoHashFilteredDocIdSet does not work at all

2011-11-01 Thread Digy (Resolved) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Digy resolved LUCENENET-448. Resolution: Fixed Hi Jeff, Your fix is for 2.9.4g branch and I committed it. (Although I was hard to

Re: [Lucene.Net] [jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-452) Add docs to release

2011-11-01 Thread Michael Herndon
Yep, that folder was missing about 10 mb of files. Pushed as of r1196183. Can you update and confirm when you have a chance Prescott? - Michael On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Michael Herndon mhern...@wickedsoftware.net wrote: I'll have to look. RapidSVN's GUI froze when pushing that many

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Commented] (LUCENENET-450) Incorrect use of StreamReader in MoreLikeThis

2011-11-01 Thread Digy (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141418#comment-13141418 ] Digy commented on LUCENENET-450: Similarity net is obsolete and all of its

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Closed] (LUCENENET-441) Encountered: EOF after : \\\\ during parsing a query

2011-11-01 Thread Digy (Closed) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Digy closed LUCENENET-441. -- Resolution: Invalid Maverick904, Please use mailing lists to ask question. Encountered:

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-3546) IW#nrtIsCurrent retruns true if changes are in del queue but not in bufferedDeleteStream yet

2011-11-01 Thread Simon Willnauer (Resolved) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-3546. - Resolution: Fixed Committed in revision 1196211 IW#nrtIsCurrent

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-2848) DirectSolrSpellChecker fails in distributed environment

2011-11-01 Thread James Dyer (Updated) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] James Dyer updated SOLR-2848: - Attachment: SOLR-2848-refactoring.patch This version also contains refactorings to

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2134) Trie* fields should support sortMissingLast=true, and deprecate Sortable* Field Types

2011-11-01 Thread Uwe Schindler (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141484#comment-13141484 ] Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-2134: - The whole story is more complicated: The

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2134) Trie* fields should support sortMissingLast=true, and deprecate Sortable* Field Types

2011-11-01 Thread Yonik Seeley (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141488#comment-13141488 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2134: From a Solr user standpoint it's simple though:

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-3551) Yet another race in IW#nrtIsCurrent

2011-11-01 Thread Simon Willnauer (Created) (JIRA)
Yet another race in IW#nrtIsCurrent --- Key: LUCENE-3551 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3551 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Bug Components: core/index Affects Versions:

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3551) Yet another race in IW#nrtIsCurrent

2011-11-01 Thread Simon Willnauer (Updated) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3551?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-3551: Attachment: LUCENE-3551.patch here is a patch that checks the flushQueue as a last resort

[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-3548) CharsRef#append broken on trunk 3.x

2011-11-01 Thread Simon Willnauer (Resolved) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3548?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-3548. - Resolution: Fixed fixed in trunk backported to 3.x CharsRef#append

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3551) Yet another race in IW#nrtIsCurrent

2011-11-01 Thread Simon Willnauer (Updated) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3551?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-3551: Attachment: LUCENE-3551.patch ups one negation to rule them all :) - fixing the prev

[jira] [Created] (SOLR-2869) IllegalStateException when requesting multiple pages.

2011-11-01 Thread Phil Scadden (Created) (JIRA)
IllegalStateException when requesting multiple pages. -- Key: SOLR-2869 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2869 Project: Solr Issue Type: Bug Components: search

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-3551) Yet another race in IW#nrtIsCurrent

2011-11-01 Thread Simon Willnauer (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3551?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141532#comment-13141532 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3551: - this seems to have a deadlock I

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-1395) Integrate Katta

2011-11-01 Thread JohnWu (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141576#comment-13141576 ] JohnWu commented on SOLR-1395: -- Tom: now I need confirm one thing about the global score in

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2860) In solr-test-framework, SolrTestCaseJ4 tracking of SolrIndexWriter opens / closes is incorrect

2011-11-01 Thread Hoss Man (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141593#comment-13141593 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-2860: Aaron: great catch. I was going to commit your patch, but

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2134) Trie* fields should support sortMissingLast=true, and deprecate Sortable* Field Types

2011-11-01 Thread Erick Erickson (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141597#comment-13141597 ] Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-2134: -- OK, so I'll mark this as fixed 4.0 and open up

[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-2860) In solr-test-framework, SolrTestCaseJ4 tracking of SolrIndexWriter opens / closes is incorrect

2011-11-01 Thread Hoss Man (Resolved) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hoss Man resolved SOLR-2860. Resolution: Not A Problem Fix Version/s: 4.0 Assignee: Hoss Man I removed the

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Reopened] (LUCENENET-451) Missing License Headers in trunk

2011-11-01 Thread Christopher Currens (Reopened) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Christopher Currens reopened LUCENENET-451: --- Assignee: Christopher Currens (was: Prescott Nasser) I'm reopening

[Lucene.Net] [jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (LUCENENET-451) Missing License Headers in trunk

2011-11-01 Thread Christopher Currens (Issue Comment Edited) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141637#comment-13141637 ] Christopher Currens edited comment on LUCENENET-451 at 11/1/11 9:43 PM:

[JENKINS] Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7 - Build # 807 - Failure

2011-11-01 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/807/ No tests ran. Build Log (for compile errors): [...truncated 12112 lines...] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For

RE: [Lucene.Net] [jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (LUCENENET-451) Missing License Headers in trunk

2011-11-01 Thread Prescott Nasser
Apologies - thanks for that catch Sent from my Windows Phone From: Christopher Currens (Issue Comment Edited) (JIRA) Sent: 11/1/2011 2:43 PM To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org Subject: [Lucene.Net] [jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (LUCENENET-451) Missing License

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2565) Prevent IW#close and cut over to IW#commit

2011-11-01 Thread Mark Miller (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141651#comment-13141651 ] Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2565: --- bq. that test now fails for me due to what looks

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2860) In solr-test-framework, SolrTestCaseJ4 tracking of SolrIndexWriter opens / closes is incorrect

2011-11-01 Thread Aaron Beppu (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141643#comment-13141643 ] Aaron Beppu commented on SOLR-2860: --- Thanks for cleaning this up! In

ReusableAnalyzerBase bug in 3.4.0?

2011-11-01 Thread Paul Jakubik
Hi, I think I found a bug in ReusableAnalyzerBase, but am also wondering if I'm simply missing something. Let me describe what I am seeing, and maybe you can point out where I'm making bad assumptions. By using the ReusableAnalyzerBase you can create a single shared analyzer, and it contains

Re: ReusableAnalyzerBase bug in 3.4.0?

2011-11-01 Thread Robert Muir
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Paul Jakubik p...@purediscovery.com wrote: If there is a good reason to avoid resetting the sink here, then would it help other people to better document that implementations of ReusableAnalyzerBase.createComponents should not create stateful components? Paul

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-2191) rename Tokenizer.reset(Reader) to Tokenizer.setReader(Reader)

2011-11-01 Thread Robert Muir (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141708#comment-13141708 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2191: - Uwe: I'm starting to agree. as much as I would

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-2191) rename Tokenizer.reset(Reader) to Tokenizer.setReader(Reader)

2011-11-01 Thread Robert Muir (Updated) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2191: Attachment: LUCENE-2191.patch patch for trunk, just doing a rename rename

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-2829) Filter queries have false-positive matches. Exposed by user's list titled Regarding geodist and multiple location fields

2011-11-01 Thread Hoss Man (Updated) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hoss Man updated SOLR-2829: --- Attachment: SOLR-2829.patch I don't really understand yonik's comment at all, but the patch looks good to me

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3539) IndexFormatTooOld/NewExc should try to include fileName + directory when possible

2011-11-01 Thread Michael McCandless (Updated) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3539: --- Attachment: LUCENE-3539.patch New patch folding in Robert's idea I added final

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2829) Filter queries have false-positive matches. Exposed by user's list titled Regarding geodist and multiple location fields

2011-11-01 Thread Yonik Seeley (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141795#comment-13141795 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2829: bq. I don't really understand yonik's comment at

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2829) Filter queries have false-positive matches. Exposed by user's list titled Regarding geodist and multiple location fields

2011-11-01 Thread Yonik Seeley (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141826#comment-13141826 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2829: bq. pretty sure the bug is that

[jira] [Updated] (SOLR-2829) Filter queries have false-positive matches. Exposed by user's list titled Regarding geodist and multiple location fields

2011-11-01 Thread Hoss Man (Updated) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hoss Man updated SOLR-2829: --- Attachment: SOLR-2829.patch Oh man ... it's a fucking precendence problem. binds more tightly then ?: ...

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2829) Filter queries have false-positive matches. Exposed by user's list titled Regarding geodist and multiple location fields

2011-11-01 Thread Yonik Seeley (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141887#comment-13141887 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2829: bq. binds more tightly then ?: {code} return

[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-2715) TestJMXSolrIntegration fails

2011-11-01 Thread Robert Muir (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13141918#comment-13141918 ] Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2715: --- Also this test writes lucene indexes to