Deleted documents use IDs, so you may run out of doc IDs with fewer than 2^31
searchable documents.
I recommend designing with a lot of slack, maybe using only 75% of IDs. Solr
might alert when 90% of the space is used.
If you want to delete everything, then re-add everything without a commit,
Is that a 4 second or 0.4 second wait?
You can benchmark the different collectors yourself.
CMS is probably the best choice.
If you have more heap than you need, then the collections will be longer than
necessary. At some point, the collector has to look at all of the heap and that
is slow.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
--
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
-h...@lucene.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
--
Walter Underwood
Venture ASM, Troop 14, Palo Alto
Efficient rule matching goes further back, at least to alerting in Verity K2.
wunder
Search Guy, Chegg
On Mar 26, 2012, at 10:15 AM, J. Delgado wrote:
BTW, the idea of indexing Boolean Expressions inside a text indexing engine
is not new. For example Oracle Text provides the CTXRULE index
Other changes to the build have been mentioned in CHANGES.txt. --wunder
On Apr 6, 2012, at 4:22 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Then please remove the directory refactoring also from CHANGES.txt.
This is still a blocker to me. It
...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
--
Chris Male | Software Developer | DutchWorks | www.dutchworks.nl
--
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
--
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
...@lucene.apache.org
--
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
.
Regardless of the choice to use this particular sequence of filters,
EdgeNGramTokenFilter shouldn't produce a bad stream.
Steve
On Apr 21, 2013, at 8:34 PM, Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org wrote:
Don't use a stemmer with edge ngrams.
Edge ngrams are a tool for matching
Double Metaphone is a good idea, but not that useful. Searchers just don't type
in full phonetic versions of their query. Nobody types ratatooie, instead
they type rata then stop instead of making a mistake.
So, not that important.
wunder
On Apr 27, 2013, at 5:57 PM, Mark Bennett wrote:
As
I se that this is scheduled for 4.3, but I guess that is Lucene 4.3, right?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4810
I don't see a way to get from the Solr change notes to a list of Lucene fixes.
Maybe Lucene should be listed under Versions of Major Components?
wunder
--
Walter
-1
We run everything under Tomcat. This would be a big, unnecessary hassle for ops
and an obstacle to adoption.
wunder
On May 2, 2013, at 9:36 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
+0
I have not used the .war for many many years -- I have nothing against
dropping it, but I wonder what problem we are
-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
--
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
--
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
not it depend on
tokenizer before stemmer kicks in? I.e. in the example, if ' gets removed by
tokenizer we end up having won and t as separate tokens? Is there any lucene
filter able to do the expansion?
Dmitry
2013/6/6 Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org
Stemming is not 1:1
Autowarming works best when the Searcher has been running for a while. If it
has only been up for a short time, the most frequent queries are a poor sample.
I don't use autowarming. I analyzed the logs to get the most frequent twenty
one-word queries. The new Searcher is warmed with those, then
...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
--
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
, Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org wrote:
There is some work on reporting this through the Codahale Graphics system.
For us, that is way way better than a Solr-specific metrics interface.
wunder
On Jul 10, 2013, at 7:06 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
Yonik:
Yes, but correlating
missing something here...
Otis
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org wrote:
So?
JMX-only requires another server to get it into Codahale Metrics.
wunder
On Jul 10, 2013, at 7:19 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Coda's stuff exports to JMX and Solr
as-is ...
3) If the answer to (1) and (2) is NO, I guess my only option is to implement
my own SynonymFilter, copying most of the code from Lucene's ... right?
Shai
--
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
belong to... I'll need to
think about it more.
On Jul 18, 2013 7:49 PM, Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org wrote:
There are two serious issues with query-time synonyms, speed and correctness.
1. Expanding a term to 1000 synonyms at query time means 1000 term lookups.
This will not be fast
/field
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
--
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
Thanks for trying, clean up is a huge amount of work. --wunder
On Nov 30, 2013, at 6:20 AM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, I'm done with messing around with closing/opening issues. Tidying things
up isn't important enough to me continue pursuing.
Again, sorry for all the
for this. Is there one?
We are still on 3.3, but I'll submit a patch for 4.x.
Thanks to whoever converted EdgeNgramTokenFilter to use TokenStream.
wunder
--
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3907 ?
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org
wrote:
I'm fixing position increment in EdgeNgramTokenFilter to act like synonyms,
with each ngram at the same position as the source token. Currently, the
position
, you may be thinking of LUCENE-1224 from a few years ago?
http://search-lucene.com/?q=ngramfc_project=Lucenefc_type=issue
Otis
--
Solr ElasticSearch Support
http://sematext.com/
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org
wrote:
I'm fixing position
I'd appreciate it if this was in:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4810
wunder
On Mar 4, 2013, at 11:58 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
Just a reminder - I'm looking to start pushing this release very soon. I'd
like to get an RC up by early next week if I can.
Please help me out by
I have used Basistech linguistics in two products at two companies and they
make high-quality software. At one point, I met with our Japanese partner, in
Japan, and was able to make them comfortable with using Basistech instead of
their own morphological package.
wunder
On Apr 20, 2014, at
. In a profit making business, the choice between the latest
Java and something that brings in revenue is a pretty easy choice.
Sure, take trunk forwards, but if you want Lucene to be widely used, the
releases need to be conservative about Java versions.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http
is there.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
--
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
I think of snippets and highlighting as explaining to the end user why the
engine decided this was relevant. This tends to increase the user’s trust in
the engine even when the results are not relevant.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/
On Oct 10
And get fuzzy matches on title and author.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/
It looks like some work on this stalled out a few years ago:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-949
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
On Feb 12, 2015, at 2:24 PM, Scott C. Cote scottcc...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been an on again
/SOLR-629
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
On Mar 10, 2015, at 10:58 AM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for 5.1.
- Mark
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:47 PM Anshum Gupta ans...@anshumgupta.net wrote:
+1 Tim.
On Mon, Mar 9
have servlet filter to provide actual useful
metrics. Solr has really lame metrics.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
There may be other good reasons for using git, but this is not one.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
On May 29, 2015, at 6:57 PM, Yonik Seeley ysee...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Walter Underwood wun
* RCS
* HP history manager
* ClearCase
* CVS
* Perforce
* Subversion
* git
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
On May 29, 2015, at 8:58 PM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya ichattopadhy...@gmail.com
wrote:
Life is so much easier on long train/plane journeys
“git breaks when it tries to mirror” is not a convincing argument for moving to
git. It might be an argument for fixing the mirroring in git.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
On May 29, 2015, at 6:03 PM, Yonik Seeley ysee...@gmail.com
Depending on how fast the access needs to be, you could put that big map in
memcache.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Nov 11, 2015, at 4:04 PM, Gus Heck <gus.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> P.S. I posted the o
Alternatively, do not store values in the Solr fields. Return a key and fetch
encrypted data from a database or other repository.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
On Sep 5, 2015, at 9:40 AM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
It seems odd for Solr to be a “NoSQL search platform” and have SQL.
I wonder if the NoSQL claim is why we keep getting user questions from people
who want to use Solr as a database.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Jun 17, 2
Use the hostname of the Ubuntu server instead of “localhost”. This URL will
only connect to the same host where your client is running:
localhost:8983/solr/SearchCore
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Mar 14, 2016, at 8:12 AM, Sh
> On May 4, 2016, at 11:50 AM, Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com>
> wrote:
>
> Lucene is perfect and has no bugs.
The correct form of that statement is “the Lucene test suite is inadequate.” :-)
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wu
the list.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Sep 4, 2016, at 8:11 AM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I can argue both ways as usual. Stopwords may have started as a way to help
> deal with li
early.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Sep 4, 2016, at 10:01 AM, Doug Turnbull
> <dturnb...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
>
> I see it more of a performance tweak than a relevance thing. matches on
>
I’ve never removed stopwords and I started working on search in 1996 at
Infoseek.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Aug 29, 2016, at 6:32 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 30 August 2016 a
SOLR-629 was submitted with a patch eight years ago. I know it is useful,
because I’ve implemented it on 1.3, 3.1, and 4.10.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Sep 29, 2016, at 11:32 AM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com&
cluster. In each collection,
we have
several different handlers. Usually, one for autosuggest (instant results), one
for the SRP,
and one for mobile, though we also have SEO requests and so on. We can track
performance
for each of these.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http
Why would other nodes need to see stale state?
If they really need intermediate state changes, that sounds like a problem.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Nov 23, 2016, at 2:53 PM, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com&
, it would be a lot more work to
compile the latest delta.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Nov 23, 2016, at 2:45 PM, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I talked about this type of thing with Jessica at Lucene /
could be
collapsed as soon as they ignore the second-hand state.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Nov 23, 2016, at 3:08 PM, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Although, if we fixed that the leader sometimes
” as a 15 s
response.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Nov 15, 2016, at 7:27 AM, Ryan Josal <rjo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I haven't tried for 95th percentile, but generally with those collection
> start stats you w
browse/SOLR-8785
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8785>
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Nov 14, 2016, at 3:25 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> What do people think about expo
I like the list version. Might want to use historical version numbers (4, 5, 6)
to
avoid predicting the future. We’re jumping from 4.10.4 to 6.4 right now. Well,
we have some 3.x in production, but I’m trying to stomp that flat.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http
If the metrics changes get in, I will be very, very happy. We’ve been running
with local hacks for four years.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Jan 3, 2017, at 9:25 AM, Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com>
> wr
SOLR-10420 is the only reason I would install a 6.5.1. That is a serious bug
that affects every user of Solr Cloud.
That bug was the reason why the 6.5.1 process was started, right?
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Apr 12, 2
olr-data-not-appearing-in-apm-solr-tabs-caches-updates/37507/4>
https://docs.newrelic.com/docs/agents/java-agent/troubleshooting/solr-data-not-appearing-apm-solr-tab-java
<https://docs.newrelic.com/docs/agents/java-agent/troubleshooting/solr-data-not-appearing-apm-solr-tab-java>
wunder
Walt
I like that.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Apr 14, 2017, at 7:47 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> We could put commented out wt=xml in the solrconfig.xml as a secondary
> reminder.
>
This is guaranteed to break stuff, but I support it. Even though I put the
first XML support into a search engine and worked for an XML database company.
Also, if someone even proposes a PDF response writer, I will hunt them down.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http
in the last 24
hours
If you think there should be Solr data here, first check to see that JMX is
enabled for your application server. If enabled, then please contact support.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Apr 19, 2017, at 2:28
for no gain in performance. Maybe a slight loss.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Apr 19, 2017, at 6:32 AM, Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hello, Dorian.
> I'm not sure about 1. But you can create Embedded
of node in
the collection.
Lots more code, lots more testing, no benefit.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Apr 19, 2017, at 9:40 AM, Dorian Hoxha <dorian.ho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> @Walter:
>
> Think o
Pretty sure the back-compat did not work, because New Relic cannot find the
MBeans in our 6.5.0 cluster.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Apr 11, 2017, at 2:28 PM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org> wrote:
>
>
,
but if they do, then this approach looses that benefit too.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Apr 19, 2017, at 9:01 AM, Dorian Hoxha <dorian.ho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> @Walter
>
> Usually you have: client-app --> r
they’ll all be fast together.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Aug 2, 2017, at 3:11 PM, Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com>
> wrote:
>
> Do you really need to know which term/s caused a given hit for e
I’m working on updating the 4.10.4 patch for SOLR-629 to work on master.
If anyone is familiar with the guts of the edismax query parser, I might need
some help. It seems to take me a week to figure out that code every time I
update this patch.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
I’m a little tired of re-implementing the patch. I did it for 1.3, 3.x, and
4.x. Perhaps someone more familiar with edismax could take a look.
With the 100X speedup for fuzzy in 4.x, should be widely useful.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my
Who do I have to bribe to get SOLR-629 included?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-629
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-629>
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Apr 25, 2017, at 10:46 AM, Ishan Chatt
"
SOLR_OPTS="$SOLR_OPTS -Dgraphite_host=${graphite_host}"
SOLR_OPTS="$SOLR_OPTS -javaagent:/apps/solr6/newrelic/newrelic.jar"
SOLR_OPTS="$SOLR_OPTS -Dnewrelic.environment=${environment}"
ENABLE_REMOTE_JMX_OPTS="true"
SOLR_LOGS_DIR=/solr/logs
wunder
Walter Und
If you do want a composite key in Solr, you could use an update request
processor script to make it out of the multiple fields.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Apr 29, 2017, at 11:02 AM, Yonik Seeley <ysee...@gmail.com&
Optimizing for frequent changes sounds like a caching strategy, maybe “LRU
merging”. Perhaps prefer merging segments that have not changed in a while?
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Aug 1, 2017, at 5:50 AM, Tommaso Teof
and makes Solr slow at the beginning. The heap will always get to max.
7. Setting a longer time for auto soft commit than for auto hard commit is
nonsense. Just don’t do the soft commit.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Aug 4, 2017, at 7
I’m fine with more than seven bullet points. In fact, when I see a list of 8 or
9 things, I know it is a real list, and not someone just trying to get to the
magic 7 or 10.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Sep 20, 2017, at 7:39
I scan it for all big changes, not just features. Is a version of Java dropped
in this release? That sort of thing should be included.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Sep 20, 2017, at 9:12 AM, Anshum Gupta <ansh...@apple.com&
If this happens in a precise zone, how about adding some random jitter to the
threshold? That tends to get this kind of lock-up unstuck.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Aug 28, 2017, at 12:44 PM, Erick Erickson <eric
That makes sense.
I guess the alternative would be to occasionally roll the dice and decide to
merge that kind of segment.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Aug 28, 2017, at 1:28 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com&
In your request handlers, add:
xml
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Oct 2, 2017, at 4:48 AM, Roland Villemoes <r...@alpha-solutions.us> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Default response in Solr 7 is now JSON ins
/FuzzyEquals.java
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Nov 14, 2017, at 8:57 AM, Chris Hostetter <hossman_luc...@fucit.org> wrote:
>
> : In the BM25 case, scores would decrease in some situations with very
> : high
We’ve had G1GC in production with 6.6.2 for nearly a year with Java 1.8.0_121.
No issues.
That is a 32 node cluster of 36 CPU instances with 1-2 million queries per day.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Aug 2, 2018, at 2:00
expect.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Jul 26, 2018, at 3:23 AM, Andrea Gazzarini wrote:
>
> Hi Alan, thanks for the response and thank you very much for the pointers
>
> On 26/07/18 12:16, Alan Woodward wrot
Please do not close SOLR-629. I’ve been submitting patches and trying to get
someone to commit that for years. This is blocking us from upgrading one of our
clusters from 4.10.4.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-629
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http
Thanks.
Update the version if that helps people. It is a new feature and still hasn’t
been implemented or obsoleted.
There are enough changes in edismax that we’ll need to re-implement the changes.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog
In 6.5.1, when the logging panel in the new UI refreshes, it closes any stack
trace that has been opened up. This makes me always use the old UI for viewing
the log.
Has this been reported and/or fixed?
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
But…why do you want an obsolete version of Solr?
4.3.1 is from almost five years ago!
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Apr 5, 2018, at 9:05 AM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote:
>
> On 4/5/2018 7:32 AM, S
This is Solr used inside the Magento platform. I recommend asking in a Magento
group.
https://community.magento.com/
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Jun 28, 2018, at 7:40 AM, David Smiley wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> T
Should I try and get a new patch for SOLR-629 working with 7.x?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-629
Previous patches have been ignored, so I’d like somebody to promise to look at
it. Getting those changes into the edismax code makes my brain hurt.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun
. That might come under character folding. There was a draft, now
withdrawn, for standard character folding. I’d probably start there for a
Unicode folding char filter.
https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr30/tr30-4.html
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my
I’m not a big fan of console/file magic. If that is done, there needs to be a
big WARN at the beginning that says some log messages are suppressed because a
console has been detected.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Nov 27, 2
in a wiki.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Mar 27, 2019, at 1:24 AM, Jan Høydahl wrote:
>
> Because the Reference Guide is versioned, we only need to discuss what JDK to
> grab that works with e.g. Solr/Lucene 8. But I thi
ld have to look in
> the 8.1 reference guide which is confusing as well.
I don’t have any problem with that.
Consider someone upgrading from 7.x to 8.x. They might upgreade the JVM first,
if they know that 7.x runs on that JVM version. Then upgrade Solr.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@w
I’ve responded on Stack Overflow, but questions always to go
solr-u...@lucene.apache.org, never to this list.
Also, a quick summary of the question in the email would make it more likely
that you would get help.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my
Starting work on this change. Should that be against branch_8x?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15056
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15056>
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
instead
of the java.lang.management version? getSystemCpuLoad() is only in the
former. The current code uses java.lang.management.OperatingSystemMXBean.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Jan 8, 2021, at 10:16 AM, David Smiley wr
I’d love for SOLR-15056 to be in, but it is just a patch now and hasn’t had
anything besides
local testing, so that is a bit of a long shot.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Jan 11, 2021, at 9:29 AM, Timothy Potter wrote:
>
&
last month.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15056
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/96
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
Understood, getting well is more important.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On May 6, 2021, at 9:23 AM, Atri Sharma wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have been recovering from Covid so this has been delayed.
>
> Apologi
behavior and the
documented behavior, with unit tests and detailed documentation.
What else am I supposed to do? This seems like we’ve lost the spirit of Yonik’s
Law of Patches and perfection has become the enemy of progress.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http
. Actually, the compatbility normalization should be done by default,
too. That transform was designed specifically for string matching and search.
We have this in every solrconfig.xml.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On May 20, 2
Has anyone had a chance to look at this for 8.9?
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On May 6, 2021, at 10:03 AM, Walter Underwood wrote:
>
> Understood, getting well is more important.
>
> wunder
> Walt
1 - 100 of 272 matches
Mail list logo
