[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16826483#comment-16826483
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-13320:
---
+1!
> add a param ignoreDuplicates=true to update
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16794015#comment-16794015
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-13320:
---
Shalin lemme break this down a bit...
Imagine you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16794015#comment-16794015
]
Scott Blum edited comment on SOLR-13320 at 3/15/19 11:19 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16794015#comment-16794015
]
Scott Blum edited comment on SOLR-13320 at 3/15/19 11:19 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Blum resolved SOLR-5180.
--
Resolution: Fixed
This is now fixed
> Core admin reload for an invalid core name returns 500 rather tha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5180?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Blum reassigned SOLR-5180:
Assignee: Scott Blum
> Core admin reload for an invalid core name returns 500 rather than 400 statu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16297371#comment-16297371
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-8327:
--
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/294
> Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Blum resolved SOLR-11423.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: master (8.0)
7.2
> Overseer queue needs a h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16284021#comment-16284021
]
Scott Blum edited comment on SOLR-11423 at 12/8/17 6:52 PM:
I'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16284021#comment-16284021
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-11423:
---
I'm fixing solr/CHANGES.txt while cherry-picking in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16283972#comment-16283972
]
Scott Blum edited comment on SOLR-11423 at 12/8/17 6:21 PM:
So
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16283972#comment-16283972
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-11423:
---
Sounds good to me.
> Overseer queue needs a hard c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16282711#comment-16282711
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-11423:
---
I didn't resolve due to Noble's #comment-16203208 b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16238276#comment-16238276
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-11590:
---
LGTM
> Synchronize ZK connect/disconnect handling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16236685#comment-16236685
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-11423:
---
Oh wow, nice catch. How'd I mess that one up?
> O
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16204874#comment-16204874
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-11423:
---
Is it possible to pick a number related to ZK's inh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16204443#comment-16204443
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-11443:
---
LGTM
> Remove the usage of workqueue for Overseer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16204004#comment-16204004
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-11423:
---
I'm happy to defer on this issue, but I just want t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16204001#comment-16204001
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-11443:
---
SOLR-11447 looks interesting, might well address th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16203992#comment-16203992
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-11443:
---
BTW, have you tried out github PRs? It would be so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16201129#comment-16201129
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-11443:
---
Should probably deprecate and update all the doc on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16201095#comment-16201095
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-11443:
---
Can you talk me through:
{code}
if (knownChild
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16201120#comment-16201120
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-11443:
---
Just a few nits / questions, otherwise LGTM. Super
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16201107#comment-16201107
]
Scott Blum edited comment on SOLR-11443 at 10/11/17 10:47 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16201107#comment-16201107
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-11443:
---
it might be more clear to do the `processedNodes.ad
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16201081#comment-16201081
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-11443:
---
When would numUpdates diverge from updates.size()?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16201074#comment-16201074
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-11443:
---
I feel like the maybeFlushBefore, maybeFlushAfter b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16201064#comment-16201064
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-11443:
---
I might be thinking about this wrong, but the test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16200881#comment-16200881
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-11443:
---
Love the idea; having a separate queue-work never m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16194900#comment-16194900
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-11423:
---
Perhaps you're right. In our cluster though, Overs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16193435#comment-16193435
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-11423:
---
[~noble.paul] both good questions!
> This looks fi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16191962#comment-16191962
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-11423:
---
[~shalinmangar] [~noble.paul] either of you want to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1617#comment-1617
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-11423:
---
Patch passes tests for me.
> Overseer queue needs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16188867#comment-16188867
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-11423:
---
[~noble.paul] I went with 20k. We could make it co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16188803#comment-16188803
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-11423:
---
[~erickerickson] I have backported changes to reduc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16186282#comment-16186282
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-11423:
---
CC: [~jhump] [~noble.paul] [~shalinmangar]
> Overs
Scott Blum created SOLR-11423:
-
Summary: Overseer queue needs a hard cap (maximum size) that
clients respect
Key: SOLR-11423
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11423
Project: Solr
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16078603#comment-16078603
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-11025:
---
Thanks guys! I didn't bother adding an entry to CH
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Blum reassigned SOLR-11025:
-
Assignee: Scott Blum
> OverseerTest.testShardLeaderChange() failures
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Blum resolved SOLR-11025.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> OverseerTest.testShardLeaderChange() failures
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16078506#comment-16078506
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-11025:
---
You da bomb [~steve_rowe]
> OverseerTest.testShard
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16078440#comment-16078440
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-11025:
---
Will committing to master be sufficient a test? Or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Blum updated SOLR-11025:
--
Attachment: SOLR-11025.patch
Any way to test if this fixes the failure before we commit it to 3 branches
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16077749#comment-16077749
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-11025:
---
Possible issue: the order or operations in SOLR-109
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16075666#comment-16075666
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-10983:
---
BTW: this issue most likely affects all 6.x release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Blum resolved SOLR-10983.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 7.1
master (8.0)
7.0
> F
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16074225#comment-16074225
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-10983:
---
Thanks! Will do
> Fix DOWNNODE -> queue-work expl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16070340#comment-16070340
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-10276:
---
Please add a patch! This is super useful operation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Blum reassigned SOLR-10276:
-
Assignee: Scott Blum
> Update ZK leader election so that leader notices if its leadership is revo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16069503#comment-16069503
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-10983:
---
[~shalinmangar] [~jhump]
> Fix DOWNNODE -> queue-w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Blum updated SOLR-10983:
--
Attachment: SOLR-10983.patch
> Fix DOWNNODE -> queue-work explosion
> --
Scott Blum created SOLR-10983:
-
Summary: Fix DOWNNODE -> queue-work explosion
Key: SOLR-10983
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10983
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Security Le
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Blum updated SOLR-10619:
--
Attachment: SOLR-10619-dragonsinth.patch
What do you think about this?
> Optimize using cache for DQ.pe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16002053#comment-16002053
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-10619:
---
[~caomanhdat] Okay, I see what's going on here. Yo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16002013#comment-16002013
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-10619:
---
Hmm lemme take a look. Maybe that test should just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16001872#comment-16001872
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-10619:
---
[~caomanhdat] patch LGTM. I would update the main
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16001856#comment-16001856
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-10524:
---
Thanks [~caomanhdat], committed to master.
> Bette
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Blum updated SOLR-10524:
--
Summary: Better ZkStateWriter batching (was: Explore in-memory
partitioning for processing Overseer que
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Blum updated SOLR-10524:
--
Attachment: SOLR-10524-dragonsinth.patch
Fixes ZkStateWriterTest, etc
> Explore in-memory partitioning
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16001810#comment-16001810
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-10524:
---
ZkStateWriterTests.testZkStateWriterBatching() is w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16000304#comment-16000304
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-10619:
---
I'll take another look tomorrow.
> When DQ.knowChi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16000303#comment-16000303
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-10285:
---
[~jhump] did you have a patch for this? or did we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15999680#comment-15999680
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-10619:
---
Sounds good!
> When DQ.knowChildren is not empty,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15999652#comment-15999652
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-10619:
---
Good thought. I was debating the same thing in my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15999586#comment-15999586
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-10619:
---
I completely follow your logic. But then, why do w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15999299#comment-15999299
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-10619:
---
What's the whole "singleConsumer" thing? Can you j
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15997804#comment-15997804
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-10524:
---
Updated patch DistributedQueue LGTM
> Explore in-m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15997500#comment-15997500
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-10524:
---
Couple of thoughts:
1) In the places where you've
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15997500#comment-15997500
]
Scott Blum edited comment on SOLR-10524 at 5/4/17 9:56 PM:
---
Coup
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Blum resolved SOLR-10420.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Solr 6.x leaking one SolrZkClient instance per second
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15973346#comment-15973346
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-10420:
---
Got it. I do think it would be a mistake. In that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Blum updated SOLR-10420:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 6.4.3)
> Solr 6.x leaking one SolrZkClient instance per second
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Blum updated SOLR-10420:
--
Fix Version/s: 5.6
> Solr 6.x leaking one SolrZkClient instance per second
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15973320#comment-15973320
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-10420:
---
So my plan is to commit this to master, branch_6x,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Blum updated SOLR-10420:
--
Fix Version/s: 6.6
> Solr 6.x leaking one SolrZkClient instance per second
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Blum updated SOLR-10420:
--
Fix Version/s: master (7.0)
6.5.1
6.4.3
5.5.5
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15973246#comment-15973246
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-10420:
---
Great! Thanks [~steve_rowe]! I'll get this commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15973093#comment-15973093
]
Scott Blum edited comment on SOLR-10420 at 4/18/17 5:14 PM:
Ag
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15973093#comment-15973093
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-10420:
---
Agreed. It passes for me. Anyone on this issue wa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Blum updated SOLR-10420:
--
Attachment: (was: SOLR-10420-dragonsinth.patch)
> Solr 6.x leaking one SolrZkClient instance per sec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Blum updated SOLR-10420:
--
Attachment: SOLR-10420-dragonsinth.patch
> Solr 6.x leaking one SolrZkClient instance per second
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Blum reassigned SOLR-10420:
-
Assignee: Scott Blum
> Solr 6.x leaking one SolrZkClient instance per second
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Blum updated SOLR-10420:
--
Attachment: SOLR-10420-dragonsinth.patch
[~caomanhdat] [~jhump] I think this may be the right approach a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15971259#comment-15971259
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-10420:
---
[~caomanhdat] I didn't literally mean that we shoul
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15970030#comment-15970030
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-10420:
---
Let me try to unpack what you said..
1) We want a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15968618#comment-15968618
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-10420:
---
Fix LGTM.
Is this actual fix this?
```
// w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15957285#comment-15957285
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-10277:
---
Thank you Shalin!
> On 'downnode', lots of wastefu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15955283#comment-15955283
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-10420:
---
Hard to see how the problem could be localized to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15955274#comment-15955274
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-10277:
---
Agreed, [~shalinmangar] I'm actually OOO all week--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15948316#comment-15948316
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-10277:
---
Sure thing, no rush! Would love to get more eyes +
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Blum reassigned SOLR-10277:
-
Assignee: Scott Blum
> On 'downnode', lots of wasteful mutations are done to ZK
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15948297#comment-15948297
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-10277:
---
Patch LGTM, any objections to merging this?
> On '
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Blum updated SOLR-10277:
--
Affects Version/s: 5.5.4
6.0.1
6.2.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15716043#comment-15716043
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-9811:
--
I'm not sure, but it might have something to with race
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15715840#comment-15715840
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-9811:
--
The replica is marked by LEADER and DOWN.
Basically,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15715835#comment-15715835
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-9811:
--
REQUESTRECOVERY did not work:
{code}
2016-12-02 18:03
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15709534#comment-15709534
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-7282:
--
Thanks Kevin, we'll use that.
> Cache config or index
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15709533#comment-15709533
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-7282:
--
OH, it was just added in 6.2
https://issues.apache.or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15709464#comment-15709464
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-9811:
--
Yeah I'll give that a shot next time, didn't know it e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15709449#comment-15709449
]
Scott Blum commented on SOLR-9811:
--
Seems fine to me. I was mostly posting what I'd done
1 - 100 of 500 matches
Mail list logo
