://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-598 From: herve.bout...@free.fr
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is Maven Site Plugin 3.0-beta-4 ready for release?
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 21:56:22 +0200
one last decision/documentation point about m-site-p 3 with Maven 3
we had a discussion on IRC yesterday
A thought: since 'extensions' has no 'management' or inheritance
control, the use of it is actually harder and more obscure when people
want to use other versions. It's far easier to just manage
dependencies of the site plugin via pluginManagement. So, I'm in favor
of using and documenting
one last decision/documentation point about m-site-p 3 with Maven 3
we had a discussion on IRC yesterday with Robert, Mark and Benjamin about
wagon and its change in M3 [1].
It was about the way we promote configuring wagon protocols in plugins:
- in m-deploy-p, we promote using extensions
/MSITE-598
From: herve.bout...@free.fr
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is Maven Site Plugin 3.0-beta-4 ready for release?
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 21:56:22 +0200
one last decision/documentation point about m-site-p 3 with Maven 3
we had a discussion on IRC yesterday with Robert, Mark
and the failure-message, including the required xml to
add to the pom. -Robert [1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-598
From: herve.bout...@free.fr
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is Maven Site Plugin 3.0-beta-4 ready for release?
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 21:56:22 +0200
one last decision
this very well, both on the site and the failure-message, including the
required xml to add to the pom. -Robert [1]
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-598 From: herve.bout...@free.fr
To: dev@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is Maven Site Plugin 3.0-beta-4 ready for release?
Date: Sun, 24
green light from here, thanks Herve for the updates!
-Lukas
On 07/22/2011 12:48 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Maven Site Plugin 3.0 is now ready for release (with its documentation) for me
If anybody still has something to change, please explain what so we can fix it
and release ASAP
Regards,
On 2011-07-22 00:48, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
Maven Site Plugin 3.0 is now ready for release (with its documentation) for me
If anybody still has something to change, please explain what so we can fix
it
and release ASAP
Thanks for all your work Hervé!
Now that we plan for 3.0 to be the main
nice team work, guys, I like it :)
yes, please go with this release and switch plan: the release was expected for
a long time, the result should really be a big step forward to full Maven 3
support even for the whole release process with docs
Regards,
Hervé
Le vendredi 22 juillet 2011,
Maven Site Plugin 3.0 is now ready for release (with its documentation) for me
If anybody still has something to change, please explain what so we can fix it
and release ASAP
Regards,
Hervé
Le samedi 2 juillet 2011, Dennis Lundberg a écrit :
Hi
What's the status on this? I know Hervé
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:55:31 +0200
Lukas Theussl ltheu...@apache.org wrote:
Tony Chemit wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 21:22:43 +0200
Hervé BOUTEMYherve.bout...@free.fr wrote:
I forgot we had this great Jenkins instance with lots of OSes and
configuration combinations, and improved ITs
Tony Chemit wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 21:22:43 +0200
Hervé BOUTEMYherve.bout...@free.fr wrote:
I forgot we had this great Jenkins instance with lots of OSes and
configuration combinations, and improved ITs to cover a lot of cases
(more than +50% over 3.0-beta-3)
Then I'm now confident that
Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
the rationale behind not going directly to 3.0 was that site plugin is hard to
test, particularly now that it is both compatible with Maven 2 and Maven 3,
which is something really new and probably tested by only a few of us
I don't quite agree with this rationale. Ease
Lukas Theussl wrote:
Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
the rationale behind not going directly to 3.0 was that site plugin is
hard to test, particularly now that it is both compatible with Maven 2
and Maven 3, which is something really new and probably tested by only a
few of us
I don't quite
We've been running the beta for (I don't know how many) months, and
works better than it ever has. I agree with Lukas; release it.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Lukas Theussl ltheu...@apache.org wrote:
Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
the rationale behind not going directly to 3.0 was that site
I forgot we had this great Jenkins instance with lots of OSes and configuration
combinations, and improved ITs to cover a lot of cases (more than +50% over
3.0-beta-3)
Then I'm now confident that we can release a good quality even without a lot of
users having done tests themselves.
+1 for
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 21:22:43 +0200
Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr wrote:
I forgot we had this great Jenkins instance with lots of OSes and
configuration combinations, and improved ITs to cover a lot of cases
(more than +50% over 3.0-beta-3)
Then I'm now confident that we can release a
Any objections to making this 3.0-final? AFAICT the plugin is
functionally (almost) equivalent to the 2.x trunk version (only
exception is MSITE-484?), so why keep the beta?
-Lukas
Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Hi
What's the status on this? I know Hervé worked on extracting a shared
component
No objections from me.
beta cycle has started long time ago.
2011/7/6 Lukas Theussl ltheu...@apache.org:
Any objections to making this 3.0-final? AFAICT the plugin is functionally
(almost) equivalent to the 2.x trunk version (only exception is MSITE-484?),
so why keep the beta?
-Lukas
the rationale behind not going directly to 3.0 was that site plugin is hard to
test, particularly now that it is both compatible with Maven 2 and Maven 3,
which is something really new and probably tested by only a few of us
sure, 3.0-beta-4 should at least be 3.0-RC-1, but perhaps not 3.0
On 2011-07-04 20:11, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
On 2011-07-03 00:14, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
AFAIK, code is ok: I'm closing MSITE-560
Great, thanks!
the only thing to confirm is the documentation: there is a TODO in
maven-3.apt.vm that we should check carefully: I'm personnally lost on this
2011/7/5 Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org:
On 2011-07-04 20:11, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
On 2011-07-03 00:14, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
AFAIK, code is ok: I'm closing MSITE-560
Great, thanks!
the only thing to confirm is the documentation: there is a TODO in
maven-3.apt.vm that we should check
On 2011-07-05 22:00, Olivier Lamy wrote:
2011/7/5 Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org:
On 2011-07-04 20:11, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
On 2011-07-03 00:14, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
AFAIK, code is ok: I'm closing MSITE-560
Great, thanks!
the only thing to confirm is the documentation: there is a
I worked on IRC with Olivier to understand more precisely what is available.
Then added documentation to maven-reporting-exec and maven-site-plugin.
I won't repeat what is in the doc: please ping if it is not clear
Regards,
Hervé
Le mardi 5 juillet 2011, Dennis Lundberg a écrit :
On
Thanks ! :-)
2011/7/6 Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr:
I worked on IRC with Olivier to understand more precisely what is available.
Then added documentation to maven-reporting-exec and maven-site-plugin.
I won't repeat what is in the doc: please ping if it is not clear
Regards,
Hervé
On 2011-07-03 00:14, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
AFAIK, code is ok: I'm closing MSITE-560
Great, thanks!
the only thing to confirm is the documentation: there is a TODO in
maven-3.apt.vm that we should check carefully: I'm personnally lost on this
one.
I'll have a look at it.
To pull off this
Hello,
2011/7/4 Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org:
On 2011-07-03 00:14, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
AFAIK, code is ok: I'm closing MSITE-560
Great, thanks!
the only thing to confirm is the documentation: there is a TODO in
maven-3.apt.vm that we should check carefully: I'm personnally lost on
Hi
What's the status on this? I know Hervé worked on extracting a shared
component (maven-reporting-exec) for the Maven 3 specific parts of the
plugin. Did you finish with that?
I would like to push for a release of Site Plugin 3 shortly. The only
issue left according to JIRA is this one:
AFAIK, code is ok: I'm closing MSITE-560
the only thing to confirm is the documentation: there is a TODO in
maven-3.apt.vm that we should check carefully: I'm personnally lost on this
one.
Regards,
Hervé
Le samedi 2 juillet 2011, Dennis Lundberg a écrit :
Hi
What's the status on this? I
29 matches
Mail list logo
