When I see "global" I think scope (applies to all users) not precedence
(applies first).
I'm happy with option 5 as it stands. It allows configuration to be set
that can both overide or be overridden by the project, without changing
system files.
Delany
On Mon, 9 Aug 2021, 15:09 Benjam
Ok nevermind, that would include all classes, meta, etc.
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 at 13:18, Delany wrote:
> Hi there
>
> As per instructions at
> https://github.com/apache/maven-remote-resources-plugin
>
> I have resources outside of src/main/resources directory I wo
will float?
Thanks,
Delany
Might be helpful:
https://checksum-maven-plugin.nicoulaj.net/examples/using-custom-checksum-algorithms.html
Delany
On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 at 12:10, Mickael Istria wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While I'm investigating into Maven code to allow re-using checksums of
> Maven artifacts when &quo
Just use the Maven wrapper. Honestly all this can be avoided.
Delany
On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 at 10:42, Fred Cooke wrote:
> Gidday Tamas,
>
> Yeah, I'm not surprised. I don't install maven on my personal machines with
> Brew, I grab and expand the tarball and have a system of symlin
the replacement(s).
Accept 0, 1 or many.
...
a
a
y
y
z
z
q
q
w
w
x
x
...
Regards,
Delany
On Sun, 21 Nov 2021 at 02:05, Enno Thieleke
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> it's been a while and I've
n, it becomes a
mess of properties and profiles. I know I could clean it up with xincludes.
Delany
On Wed, 17 Nov 2021 at 18:19, Maarten Mulders wrote:
> Gary beat me to it :-) I would be hesitant to add support for XML
> Entities or XML Includes. Both have proven themselves to be a frequent
>
structure. But then excluding doesn't require DM.
You're right about wrapping the lists. Will you at least allow not defining
a dependency at all, aka a global exclude?
Delany
On Sun, 21 Nov 2021 at 17:14, Enno Thieleke
wrote:
> Hi, Delany,
>
> thanks for the feedback.
>
> I get y
the plugins seem to overlap and could probably be merged.
Just throwing around ideas.
Thanks,
Delany
Hi Tibor,
Does the site get staged as well, or do I have to build it myself?
Thanks,
Delany
On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 at 14:35, Tibor Digana wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 111 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317927=12344613
>
> The
Thanks. Tests run fine and I tried out the
maven-surefire-junit5-tree-reporter
Delany
On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 at 16:22, Slawomir Jaranowski
wrote:
> Hi Delany,
>
> Site is staged: http://maven.apache.org/surefire-archives/surefire-LATEST/
>
>
> czw., 31 mar 2022 o 15:50 Delany na
+1
Tried out fast delete.
Kind regards,
Delany
On Fri, 1 Apr 2022 at 23:31, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 10 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12343770=Text=12317224
>
> There are still one issue le
seed.
+1
Tested on Linux & Windows, JDK8 & 11
Delany
On Sat, 2 Apr 2022 at 15:48, Tibor Digana wrote:
> Hi Delany,
>
> You used the plugin. Feel free to vote in this release.
>
> T
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 4:43 PM Delany wrote:
>
> > Thanks. Tests run fi
Hi all,
JDK21 reaches general availability today. Could someone provide another
release of the shade plugin to support it?
Kind regards,
Delany
I tested v3.5.0 with an updated jdependency, which worked fine on jdk21-ea.
Delany
On Tue, 19 Sept 2023 at 13:16, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Have you tried the current master for this plugin ?
> Can I just go ahead and release it in the current state or is there
> anything to fix first
+1
On Thu, 21 Sept 2023, 21:53 Slawomir Jaranowski,
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 4 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317921=12353341
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
>
+1
JDK11 on *nix
Delany
On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 08:11, Herve Boutemy wrote:
> here is my +1
>
> Reproducible Build confirmed: reference done with JDK 8 on *nix
>
> I need more votes, please
>
> On 2022/05/08 09:28:32 Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
>
https://www.mojohaus.org/keytool/keytool-maven-plugin/plugin-info.html
On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 at 14:09, Graham Leggett
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I find myself yet again fixing a bug in an application where client
> certificates don’t work, as the constructors for the code work for the
> trivial case
to avoid doing the
inevitable is just making more work.
What little I know, I appreciate the bold move to JDK17 and I guess it'll
pay off in the long run. Who knows what's next around the corner.
Regards,
Delany
On Tue, 19 Jul 2022 at 20:39, Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2
Hi Markus,
How will this be different from
https://khmarbaise.github.io/iterator-maven-plugin/iterator-mojo.html ?
Kind regards,
Delany
On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 at 19:36, Markus Karg wrote:
> Dear Maven Developers,
>
>
>
> today I'd like to propose a new core feature of Maven:
I tried toolchains but dropped it because of the exorbitant performance
costs.
A multi-module build that normally built in 3:50 took 10:34, and that's
with toolchaining only maven-compiler-plugin.
Delany
On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 at 00:21, Benjamin Marwell wrote:
> KH just released a vi
Using mvnd with toolchains doesn't improve the situation, in fact
toolchains seem to invalidate any benefit of using mvnd.
Even if this was resolved, is it fair to require mvnd?
Delany
On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 at 10:17, Mark Derricutt wrote:
> Is that due to cold starting the JVM each time?
&g
Hi. Is there integration between the wrapper and the upcoming mvnd?
Thanks,
Delany
On Sun, 8 May 2022 at 11:29, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 14 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12350929=Text=12323721
>
>
to banish the problem once and for all, what are my
options?
Kind regards,
Delany
( I'm specifically thinking of
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-2751 )
Just to add, IntelliJ's tooltip links to
https://maven.apache.org/ref/2.2.1/maven-model/maven.html
Where is it getting v2.2.1 from?
The plugin depends on v3.1.1 (
https://github.com/apache/maven-shade-plugin/blob/maven-shade-plugin-3.3.0/pom.xml
)
Delany
On Tue, 6 Sept 2022 at 15:35, Romain Manni
software.amazon.awssdk:ecr
And it builds!
How can this situation be improved?
Kind regards,
Delany
On Tue, 6 Sept 2022 at 13:25, tison wrote:
> Thank you!
>
> Best,
> tison.
>
>
> Karl Heinz Marbaise 于2022年9月6日周二 17:44写道：
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I will try to d
sol/.m2/repository/commons-io/commons-io/2.11.0/commons-io-2.11.0.jar
[ERROR] Number of foreign imports: 1
[ERROR] import: Entry[import from realm ClassRealm[maven.api, parent:
null]]
Regards,
Delany
On Sat, 15 Oct 2022 at 02:19, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I've staged a release candidate at
>
Can I answer that? Because devs are principled, and the thought of the
build changing source is anathema.
In practice it happens with versions, release, sortpom plugins so why not
format too.
Personally I draw the line at commit time.
But crickey, in Golang you cant even save an incorrectly
So you're saying the only way I can know is to run it or interrogate the
code?
There's no mention of this in the release notes at
https://github.com/apache/maven-deploy-plugin/releases/tag/maven-deploy-plugin-3.0.0
m-install-p doesn't issue a warning like m-deploy-p does
Kind regards,
Delany
-java/issues/2312
Thanks,
Delany
nouncement about the m-install-p v3.0.1 release.
Delany
On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 14:00, Michael Osipov wrote:
> Am 2022-08-04 um 13:32 schrieb Delany:
> > So you're saying the only way I can know is to run it or interrogate the
> > code?
> > There's no mention of this in t
though?
Delany
On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 at 15:19, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I've staged a release candidate at:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1835
>
> Source distributions:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/maven/maven-4/4.0.0-alpha-3/so
which bug - suffice to say there are such edge cases.
Delany
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 at 21:01, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Le jeu. 17 nov. 2022 à 19:16, Arnaud Héritier a
> écrit :
>
> > install is a source of issues if you are in a multi-module project, you
> > switch be
What problem is caused from skipping a patch version number?
If it applies to Maven, should it apply to everyone? ie https://semver.org/
Thanks
Delany
On Sat, 14 Jan 2023, 14:56 Elliotte Rusty Harold,
wrote:
> -1
>
> The version number's wrong. This should be 1.9.3.
>
> On Fr
t; because the return value of
"org.apache.maven.model.Profile.getReporting()" is null
Delany
On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 at 19:56, Slawomir Jaranowski
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 40 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317520=12351838
>
>
Hi Tamas,
Will you create a staging for 3.9.0?
I don't see anything at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/apache/maven/maven/
Delany
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 at 11:03, Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> The 3.9.0 changelist:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/j
Hi Romain. As far as I know executions are not required.
The relationship: plugin > goals is valid against
https://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd
Delany
On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 at 16:40, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> +1
>
> @Delany netty bom looks incorrect (misses execution(s).
&g
Ok, thanks
+1
Delany
On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 at 21:25, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Yes, I already reported and provided a fix on netty.
>https://github.com/netty/netty/pull/12911
> So recent netty versions don't have this problem anymore.
>
> Le dim. 29 janv. 2023 à 19:59, Rom
reproduce it?
> Or full stack.
>
>
> czw., 26 sty 2023 o 19:21 Delany napisał(a):
>
> > Thank you for this. My build on 3.8.7 is failing though:
> >
> > [ERROR] org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli - Rule 0:
> > org.apache.maven.enforcer.rules.RequirePluginV
+1
Delany
On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 at 23:39, Slawomir Jaranowski
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 44 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317520=12352857
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
> https://issues.apache.o
)
at org.apache.maven.plugin.DefaultBuildPluginManager.executeMojo
(DefaultBuildPluginManager.java:143)
Delany
On Fri, 27 Jan 2023 at 19:11, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I've staged a release candidate at [1]. The distributions are available at
> [2].
> The release notes are available at [3] for JIRA and [4] for github.
&
Thanks for explaining
Delany
On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 at 13:08, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> There are known issues that will be fixed in the next milestone. This
> problem in particular has already been fixed in [1].
> The flatten plugin is still relevant, as the goal for
Hi. I noticed the vote passed for alpha-2, but I'm still getting this
issue. Can someone comment?
Is the flatten plugin still relevant in Maven 4?
Thanks,
Delany
On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 at 09:26, Delany wrote:
> hi. I just changed .mvn/wrapper/maven-wrapper.properties to
> distributionUrl=
&
+1
Delany
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 at 12:37, Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> We solved 95 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MNG%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.9.0
>
> There are still some open issues left in JIRA:
>
> https://is
wrote:
> Do you have a small project to reproduce the problem ?
> The violation looks legit if you haven't specified a version for the
> surefire plugin.
>
> Le mer. 15 mars 2023 à 19:21, Delany a écrit
> :
>
> > Build fails
> >
> > org.apache.maven.lifecy
Build fails
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.LifecycleExecutionException: Failed to execute
goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-enforcer-plugin:3.2.1:enforce (fail) on
project t1000:
Rule 0: org.apache.maven.enforcer.rules.RequirePluginVersions failed with
message:
Some plugins are missing valid
Maven complains about an absent pom. Why does it not try to resolve from
the staging repo?
I set it up in settings.xml
stage
stage
staging
Maven Staging
What should URL can I use for
https://maven.apache.org/wrapper/maven-wrapper-plugin/wrapper-mojo.html#mvndversion
?
The github link is broken.
Kind regards,
Delany
On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 at 12:22, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I've staged a candidate release at
> https://dist.apache.org
n't be able to find it
> * the wrapper plugin does not support the new mvnd distributions with m39
> / m40 qualifiers, please raise a JIRA issue for that
>
>
> Le jeu. 23 mars 2023 à 14:46, Delany a écrit
> :
>
> > What should URL can I use for
> >
>
+1
I want my colleagues to care about the compiler warnings so I turned off
that new Maven internal deprecation warning
-Dorg.slf4j.simpleLogger.log.org.apache.maven.plugin.internal.DeprecatedCoreExpressionValidator=error
On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 12:14, Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> We
+1
Delany
On Sat, 11 Mar 2023 at 11:09, Slawomir Jaranowski
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 6 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317927=12352998
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/
You're arguing based on principles, but my experience suggests otherwise.
Some real life examples:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MENFORCER-462
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7214
I would not have noticed or logged either of these issues without logging.
Its because they were
Another example of excessive logging prompting one to find the root cause:
On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 at 15:03, James Agnew wrote:
> Just to close the loop in case anyone finds this post.
>
> I had discounted the idea that a version range was the cause because I went
> over all of the POMs in my
logger properties.
Delany
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 at 16:46, Christoph Läubrich
wrote:
> Well you can just reduce it to a single '.' who cares WHAT is download
> and where it is placed and from where... now put a line break after say
> 50 dots
>
>
> Am 20.02.23 um 15:42 schri
In the spirit of your elephant analogy, what is deserving of INFO level
logging?
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 14:11, Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 11:51 AM Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
> >
> > Eliotte I kind of fail to follow your reasoning because it literally
> means
> >
?
Another point is that if you can't easily rebuild with -e on to replicate
your problem you've got a bigger problem than lots of log output.
Delany
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 at 15:15, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Hi Elliotte,
>
> I agree -e should be the default, I don't see the point to
I wouldn't miss a thing past line 2. Since its all ERROR I have no control
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.10.1:compile
(default-compile) on project error_prone_core: Compilation failure
[ERROR]
What is the value of having a separate plugin repository, even when
dependencies of those plugin are drawn from the standard repository?
Kind regards,
Delany
+1
On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 at 17:09, Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 3 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317223=12352856
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
>
+1
"The Maven Plugin Tools contains the necessary tools to generate
rebarbative content like descriptor, help and documentation."
Rebarbative means unattractive and objectionable.
On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 at 18:32, Slawomir Jaranowski
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 10 issues:
>
>
li of goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-help-plugin:3.4.0:effective-settings failed:
Cannot invoke "org.codehaus.plexus.util.xml.Xpp3Dom.getDom()" because
"configuration" is null
Is this now a bug in the help plugin?
Regards,
Delany
+1
On Sat, 1 Apr 2023 at 23:13, Slawomir Jaranowski
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 11 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317520=12352877
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
>
-1
Fine on jdk11. On jdk17:
[INFO] java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class
org.codehaus.groovy.vmplugin.v7.Java7
[INFO] at
org.codehaus.groovy.vmplugin.VMPluginFactory.(VMPluginFactory.java:43)
[INFO] at
3.5.0 wasn't working because of
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINVOKER-328
There's a reproducer on the issue (with wrong issue number)
On Tue, 28 Mar 2023, 00:32 Slawomir Jaranowski,
wrote:
> wt., 28 mar 2023 o 00:23 Delany napisał(a):
>
> > -1
> >
> >
Thanks Sławomir
+1 from me
Delany
On Tue, 28 Mar 2023 at 01:09, Slawomir Jaranowski
wrote:
> Please try: https://github.com/delanym/MINVOKER-283/pull/1
>
> wt., 28 mar 2023 o 00:36 Delany napisał(a):
>
> > 3.5.0 wasn't working because of
> > https://issues.apache.org/
ust seems
about time for an xpath function.
"snapshots repository update interval:
$#{/project/repositories/repository[id="maven-releases"]/snapshots/updatePolicy/text()}"
Thanks,
Delany
+1 with 3.9.0
Delany
On Sun, 5 Feb 2023 at 14:50, Michael Osipov wrote:
> Am 2023-02-04 um 10:12 schrieb Michael Osipov:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We solved 10 issues:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12324322=12351555
> >
> &g
+1
Delany
On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 at 11:21, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to release Apache Maven Surefire 3.0.0-M9
> We fixed 4 issues.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317927=12352730
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repos
be off by default, not on by default.
The only way to do that is to allow multiple properties as in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-3328
I'm just reminding this issue is 16 years old with over 100 watchers
Kind regards,
Delany
On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 at 09:02, Tamás Cservenák wrote:
>
+1
Delany
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 at 10:51, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to release Apache Maven Compiler Plugin 3.11.0
>
> 7 issues fixed
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MCOMPILER/versions/12351444
>
> draft github release notes (sadly only for people with
I have chosen to get the latest features with the tradeoff of having to
deal with new issues.
This way the window for change is widened to include real world scenarios
and one settles these sorts of issues sooner.
Delany
On Sun, 28 May 2023 at 22:58, Henning Schmiedehausen <
henn...@schmiedehausen.org&
Hi Tamas,
I'm still getting locking issues with maven-surefire-plugin:3.1.0
I assumed these were resolved in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-346 which i believe made it
into Maven 3.9.2, so switched back to Maven 3.9.0
What was the previous default value of
Excuse my ignorance but what do customer requirements have to do with the
build tool's required JDK?
Delany
On Wed, 31 May 2023 at 13:57, Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 8:30 AM Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
> > I think with those improvements, requiring JDK 1
hould choose Maven"
Delany
On Sat, 3 Jun 2023 at 23:05, Hunter C Payne
wrote:
> Folks who think like that have been using Scala or Kotlin for at least 5
> years by now. If you are still writing Java, it isn't for new features.
> Hunter
>
> PS If you want to use "new
.
With Maven tracking the latest LTS JDK I wonder how many fingers would be
freed from plugging up the JDK8 dyke.
Delany
On Fri, 9 Jun 2023 at 10:58, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> this jdk discussion could be ended if someone could say we need jdk17
> as a minimum because we really need this jdk f
Your inclination to ignore points of the debate doesn't do your own
arguments any justice.
Multiple times it's been explained that raising the required runtime JDK in
Maven 4 will not prevent you from
- building with a lower JDK (via toolchains)
- targeting a lower JDK (via the release property)
-
You need toolchains if your code needs the JAXB classes removed in JDK11.
Delany
On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 at 01:54, Henning Schmiedehausen <
henn...@schmiedehausen.org> wrote:
> To get this discussion a bit more back to actual substance:
>
> Do you still need toolchains with J
quot;satisfying" to work with JDK17.
Ignoring that fact is itself irrational.
Delany
On Sat, 3 Jun 2023 at 11:46, Hervé Boutemy wrote:
> +1
>
> I really don't what benefit we get from going to Java 17
>
> I perfectly see the impact we'll have on our users: for what benefit?
&g
there are issues.
Delany
On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 at 14:34, Jeremy Landis wrote:
> Delany,
>
> "You need toolchains if your code needs the JAXB classes removed in JDK11.
> Delany"
>
> That isn't accurate. You do not need toolchains for jaxb. You need to
> add the corre
Listed as "won't do"
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-5773
Is it possible as a future XSD change, or should I rather pursue an
enforcer rule? Or both?
Delany
On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 at 18:22, Michael Osipov wrote:
> This is known, search JIRA and Plexus i
The format is
codelt;namegt;valuelt;/namegt;/code.
Thanks,
Delany
+1
Delany
On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 at 12:09, Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> We solved 3 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922=12353369
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/
+1
On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 at 15:34, Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> We solved 22 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922=12353255
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
>
You might be interested in https://basepom.github.io/
Delany
On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 at 08:40, Geoffrey De Smet
wrote:
> *Summary
> *
>
> Specifying the Java version (11, 17, ...)
> and latest maven plugin versions (compiler 3.11.0, surefire 3.1.2,
> failsafe, ...)
> in e
+1
On Tue, 9 May 2023 at 18:48, Slawomir Jaranowski
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 13 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317825=12352115
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
>
Premature send :()
Basically I don't know how to test shared components, so I dont vote on
those.
What about some way to run maven where it only runs to bootstrap another
version of maven? Wrapper could possibly do this.
Delany
On Fri, 12 May 2023 at 12:25, Delany wrote:
> Well w
Well what is the reason people don't vote? I just think we need to make it
easier to actually test the releases.
My system is setup to vote on plugins that I use. Obviously I don't vote on
plugins I don't use.
stage
stage
, just
not that specific one.
I thought changing the updatePolicy to NEVER would solve this, but the new
enforcer (which now uses resolver) fails nonetheless.
Is there a way to get resolver to treat all snapshots as equal in offline
mode? Is there a reason this isn't the default?
Thanks,
Delany
for a button to push that will say "All SNAPSHOT versions are
equal". And you can add to that "from any repository".
I get why you wouldn't want to introduce that though. Thanks for answering.
Delany
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 10:49, Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> you are c
If a pom says it has a dependency "2.4.1-SNAPSHOT" then
I don't want the validation failing in offline mode because
"2.4.1-20240322.141808-12 has not been downloaded".
Delany
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 16:15, Tamás Cservenák wrote:
> Delany,
>
> What do you mean by &qu
+1
Delany
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 at 23:14, Slawomir Jaranowski
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 2 issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317526=12354551
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/
91 matches
Mail list logo
