+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/04/02 13:41:01 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 5 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317320=12353068
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 17 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/04/01 21:12:57 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 11 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317520=12352877
>
> There are still a couple of issues left
+1
generated META-INF/LICENSE and META-INF/NOTICE not reproducible: my local build
contains much more details, I'd be interested to understand how the reference
build can have ignored these, we'll have to discuss :)
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/03/28 17:09:23 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference done with JDK 17 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/03/27 20:29:16 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 6 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317525=12352974
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in
+1
but I could not reproduce the build: META-INF/LICENSE and META-INF/NOTICE give
different result
notice also that it can't be build with Maven 3.9: Jira issue created (and
easy to fix: I keep it for a new contributor)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSKINS-220
Regards,
Hervé
On
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/03/08 15:12:29 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 17 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922=12352869
>
> There are still hundreds of issues left in
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/03/05 19:15:43 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 1 issue:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12324322=12352975
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in
here is my +1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 11 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/02/19 15:16:26 Hervé Boutemy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 1 issue:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317220=12352065=Text
>
> Staging repo:
>
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 17 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/02/14 08:51:00 Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to release Apache Maven Compiler Plugin 3.11.0
>
> 7 issues fixed
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MCOMPILER/versions/12351444
>
> draft
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/02/12 18:12:22 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 8 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317529=12352256
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/02/12 19:42:49 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 9 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317525=12352645
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/02/11 20:42:28 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IMPORTANT: Requires Maven Reporting Impl 4.0.0-M4 vote/staging repo!
>
> We solved 9 issues:
>
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/02/11 19:48:59 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 13 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922=12352665
>
> There are a few issues left in JIRA:
>
I'm working on Reproducible Builds for a long time now.
Having the same binary done on Windows and *nix is a big challenge particularly
at Git level, even before thinking at the build process
I chose not to try to have the same binary, because there are always edge cases.
The only thing I did
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/02/04 09:12:14 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 10 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12324322=12351555
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in
> The only "problem" is that it
> creates a cycle between maven-core and plexus-utils, but
to reduce the problem, that's why I proposed at plexus-utils level to split the
xml part in another plexus-xml artifact, so at least the overlap is reduced and
there is clarification about the fact
+1
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/01/28 14:16:17 Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I've staged a release candidate at
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/maven/mvnd/1.0.0-m4/
>
> Note that his release is based on Maven 4.0.0-alpha-4 under vote.
> The release notes are available at
>
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/01/31 20:54:14 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IMPORTANT: Requires Doxia Sitetools 2.0.0-M5 vote/staging repo!
>
> we solved 5 issues:
>
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 11 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/01/31 18:00:23 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 10 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317320=12352573
>
> There are still a couple of issues left
there is no problem with maven-api-meta(annotations) and maven-api-xml which
are completely new (java packages and artifactIds) and created for Maven core.
I added links to the documentation to share where everything lives and what it
contains
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 17 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/01/28 21:38:50 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 44 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317520=12352857
>
> There are still a couple of issues left
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/01/22 19:06:27 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IMPORTANT: Requires Doxia 2.0.0-M5 vote/staging repo!
>
> We solved 2 issues:
>
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/01/22 18:47:57 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 12 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317230=12352482
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/01/07 13:07:57 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 18 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317927=12351809
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/01/06 23:17:26 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 3 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317227=12352602
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/01/06 22:41:41 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 1 issue:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317223=12352729
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/01/06 22:14:18 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 6 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317621=12352270
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
notice that 2 ITs failed:
[ERROR] The following builds failed:
[ERROR] * mskins-76_topbar/pom.xml
[ERROR] * mskins-76/pom.xml
The text counting patterns looks a little bit fragile
Regards,
Hervé
On 2023/01/04 19:10:41
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference built with JDK 8 on Windows
thanks a lot
Hervé
On 2022/12/24 20:20:32 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 19 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922=12352690
>
> There are still hundreds of issues left in
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference build done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2022/12/18 21:57:37 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 1 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318122=12352696
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in
+1
notice that I get the same IT failing as Jenkins master:
https://ci-maven.apache.org/job/Maven/job/maven-box/job/maven-site-plugin/job/
master/
I did not yet investigate if I can fix it easily or not
Reproducible Builds ok: reference done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2022/12/02
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2022/11/26 21:40:46 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 21 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317227=12351068
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2022/11/26 15:52:08 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we solved 10 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317320=12352134
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
I had a look: only root module documentation had been published
I republished the whole multi-module site
Some issues remain, but less than previously
site publication script is available in Maven core:
https://github.com/apache/maven/blob/master/deploySite.sh
and resulting svn content/commits
+1
as defined in our release process for core
https://maven.apache.org/developers/release/maven-core-release.html
I replaced md5 and sha1 with sha512 in
https://maven.apache.org/developers/release/maven-core-release.html
build is not fully reproducible: reference was done on *nix with JDK 8,
+1
Reproducible Builds ok on source archives
not ok on binaries, particularly it seems GraalVM binary is not reproducible,
then something that will be hard for us to fix...
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Guillaume Nodet"
À: "Maven Developers List"
Envoyé: Mardi 4 Octobre 2022
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference done with JDK 8 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2022/09/22 20:37:43 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 14 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922=12352314
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference done with JDK 8 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2022/09/12 19:26:02 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 2 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922=12352116
>
> There are still one issues left in JIRA:
>
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference done with JDK 8 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2022/09/12 16:04:09 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 6 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317526=12351126
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference done with JDK 8 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2022/09/01 10:07:05 Andreas Dangel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 2 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12352255=Text=12317621
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference done with JDK 8 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2022/08/20 15:36:40 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 9 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922=12342991
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2022/08/20 07:15:48 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 7 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317621=12351813
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2022/08/20 07:01:15 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 12 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317223=12345559
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2022/08/16 20:25:34 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 1 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317620=12352204
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2022/08/16 10:35:58 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 6 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317527=12351480
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Michael Osipov"
À: "Maven Developers List"
Envoyé: Dimanche 14 Août 2022 14:34:34
Objet: [VOTE] Release Maven Help Plugin version 3.3.0
Hi,
We solved 11 issues:
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference done with JDK 8 on Windows
On 2022/07/31 19:17:04 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 5 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317923=12351751
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2022/07/28 19:02:32 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 24 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317828=12351598
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2022/07/29 20:31:36 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 1 issue:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922=12352152
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2022/07/25 17:23:20 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 3 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12320628=12351875
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
+1
Reproducible Builds near fully ok: reference build done on Windows with JDK 8
the only lille issue is for maven-resources-plugin-3.3.0-tests.jar that
contains a
unit/test-dir/resourceSystemProperties_Filtering/target/classes/file4.txt file
containing current working directory
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2022/07/22 17:21:24 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 2 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317923=12352119
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 : Slawomir Jaranowski, Olivier Lamy, Tamás Cservenák, Michael Osipov, Hervé
Boutemy
PMC quorum reached
I will promote the source release zip file to Apache distribution area and the
artifacts to the central repo.
uh, yes, it seems the Jira report plugin is wrong...
If someone wants to open a Jira issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MCHANGES and work on it, help is welcome
Regards,
Hervé
On 2022/07/14 08:42:35 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> +1
>
> Jira reports contains only one issue [1]
>
>
here is my +1
build checked reproducible: reference done with JDK 8 on *nix
I need more votes, please
On 2022/07/09 21:47:56 Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 5 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317821=12351758=Text
>
> Staging repo:
>
+1
Reproducible Builds ok
Regards,
Hervé
On 2022/07/10 09:39:24 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 14 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311250=12351591
>
> Changes since the last release:
>
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2022/07/06 20:08:41 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 7 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922=12352045
>
> There are no issues left in JIRA:
>
given in the past, maven-shared-utils was expected to replace in the long term
plexus-utils and give us more a Maven-centric view, yes, I added the
Maven-specific logging code in maven-shared-utils in 2016
if we finally go the other way now, and create a new lib, we'll need to avoid
the same
as an old guy on the project, here is the proposal that explains why/how
maven-shared-utils was introduced to try to replace plexus-utils:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MavenSharedUtils
how we went from a situation where shared-utils was expected to be easier to
upgrade to
+1
Reproducible Build ok: reference done on *nix with JDK 8
Regards,
Hervé
On 2022/06/25 21:33:03 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 3 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317926=12351608
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
+1
Reproducible Builds ok: reference done with JDK 8 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2022/06/07 15:30:44 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 13 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317520=12341008
>
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 : Michael Osipov, Samuel Le Berrigaud, Sylwester Lachiewicz, Olivier Lamy,
Hervé Boutemy, Karl Heinz Marbaise, Slawomir Jaranowski
PMC quorum: reached
I will promote the source release zip file to Apache distribution area and the
+1
Reproducible Build confirmed: reference done with JDK 8 on *nix
Regards,
Hervé
On 2022/05/14 11:00:13 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 2 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922=12350387
>
> There are still a couple of issues left
ok, I was able to reproduce: yes, IT seems to expect wrapper.jar to have been
previously installed: Tamas will bite because this is a build cycle :)
I suppose this can easily be tested with SNAPSHOTs, you just have to delete the
artifacts in local repository
nice future improvement for the
here is my +1
Reproducible Build confirmed: reference done with JDK 8 on *nix
I need more votes, please
On 2022/05/08 09:28:32 Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 14 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12350929=Text=12323721
>
> Staging repo:
>
you're focusing on Maven core only
I'm talking about Maven = core + plugins
and on Maven core, 3.9 and master are for new features, 3.8 is a stabilisation
branch only (bugfixes) = the intent of initial message from Tamas
older releases are stable: yes, we don't expect fixes because they are
here is my +1
On 2022/04/03 15:36:12 Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 2 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12324322=12350902=Text
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1734/
>
-1
I read them sometimes
and they don't cost anything
please just ignore them if you don't use them
On 2022/04/03 20:46:19 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have plans for the next release for parents poms.
>
> Maybe I will be boring, but I still do not see any values for some of the
>
and reporting profile was done for this:
- without reporting profile, just light site generation
- with reporting profile, full documentation site
disabling reporting profile for CI should do the job
- Mail original -
De: "herve boutemy"
À: "Maven Developers List&quo
done on GH and Jenkins, then on each commit?
we're heating oceans for nothing
IMHO, we need to differentiate CI vs release documentation: CI should be much
lighter than release
- Mail original -
De: "Slawomir Jaranowski"
À: "Maven Developers List"
Envoyé: Jeudi 24 Février 2022
full site building with reports enabled (through reporting profile) is just
done after release, isn't it?
- Mail original -
De: "Slawomir Jaranowski"
À: "Maven Developers List"
Envoyé: Jeudi 24 Février 2022 20:24:56
Objet: Review of used reports for Maven project sites.
Hi,
Building
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 : Sylwester Lachiewicz, Slawomir Jaranowski, Olivier Lamy, Hervé Boutemy,
Tamás Cservenák, Karl Heinz Marbaise, Michael Osipov, Tibor Digana
PMC quorum reached
I will promote the source release to Apache distribution area and artifacts to
Jira project created and issues moved: old issues like
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7129 will automatically redirect to
their new location
issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7391 created to track the
addition of API to Maven core that is required for Build Cache
+1
Reproducible Build checked: reference build was done with JDK 8 on *nix
FYI everybody can check during the vote with: mvn -Papache-release clean verify
-Dgpg.skip artifact:compare
-Dreference.repo=https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1697
Later, when the reference
+1
Reproducible Build checked: reference build was done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2022/01/08 20:24:01 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 6 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317828=12350622
>
> There are still a couple of issues
I rebuilt from current Git HEAD and got same result
looking at ASF Jenkins, it seems 1 configuration has exactly the same issue
than me:
https://ci-maven.apache.org/job/Maven/job/maven-box/job/maven-compiler-plugin/job/master/92/execution/node/249/log/
it's JDK 8 with Maven 3.2 on ASF Jenkins,
having worked on this for the whole WE, please review my last comment in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPLUGIN-384 and associated PR
in short: given Maven classloading, Sonatype plugin cannot be fixed by our
breaking move done in our own plugin in MPLUGIN-377 : in up to us to restore
do the current fixes have no value if MPLUGIN-384 is not fixed also?
is it really "must" or is it more "it would be really useful"?
sometime, if you want more, you'll get less...
On 2022/01/08 12:52:23 Slawomir Jaranowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> MPLUGIN-384 - IMHO must be resolved it corrupts
+1
Reproducible Build checked: reference build was done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2022/01/05 18:29:30 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 3 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317526=12348050
>
> There are still a couple of issues
+1
Reproducible Build checked: reference build was done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2022/01/02 12:48:58 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 2 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922=12349631
>
> There are still a couple of issues
done: https://github.com/apache/maven-build-cache-extension
On 2022/01/04 07:30:40 Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I'd go for #2 ...
>
> Le mar. 4 janv. 2022 à 00:14, Hervé BOUTEMY a
> écrit :
>
> > yes, I was happy to learn about that shallow + filter approach :)
> >
> > now, we have one choice to
+1
Reproducible Build checked: reference build was done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Michael Osipov"
À: "Maven Developers List"
Envoyé: Dimanche 2 Janvier 2022 11:41:24
Objet: [VOTE] Release Maven Release version 3.0.0-M5
Hi,
We solved 9 issues:
+1
Reproducible Build checked: reference build was done with JDK 8 on Windows
Regards,
Hervé
On 2021/12/22 23:07:27 Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 5 issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318122=12351145
>
> There are still a couple of issues
Hi,
We solved 4 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318121=12348374=Text
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1593/
"pip install maven" will apparently install https://pypi.org/project/maven/
which is https://github.com/john-sandall/maven
nothing related to the well known Apache Maven build tool
https://maven.apache.org/
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Vikas Mishra"
À: "Maven Developers
Reproducible Builds is now implemented in many plugins: it's time to work on
reproducible war files.
I created MWAR-432 issue and implemented classical Reproducible jar output in
corresponding branch.
But in our discussion in november [1], an issue was reported for unchanged
timestamp in
+1
reproducibility verified: little issue found on source-release.zip, with
strange generated file added, but nothing serious
mvn -Papache-release clean verify buildinfo:save -Dgpg.skip
-Dreference.repo=https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1557
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail
please "git pull": you're one commit behind HEAD
https://github.com/apache/maven-studies/commits/maven-buildinfo-plugin
- Mail original -
De: "Karl Heinz Marbaise"
À: "Maven Developers List" , "Hervé BOUTEMY"
Envoyé: Samedi 7 Mars 2020 12:12:08
Objet: Re: [DISCUSS] checking
see:
- http://maven.apache.org/ref/3.6.3/maven-model/maven.html#class_relocation
- https://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-relocation.html
Everything is there.
I confess I never tried it myself, but there are POMs in central using it.
- Mail original -
De: "Elliotte Rusty Harold"
À:
+1
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Karl Heinz Marbaise"
À: "Maven Developers List" , "Andreas Dangel"
Envoyé: Lundi 27 Janvier 2020 10:49:32
Objet: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven PMD Plugin version 3.13.0
Hi,
+1 from me.
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
On 25.01.20 12:04,
maven-studies looks like the right location:
https://github.com/apache/maven-studies
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Enrico Olivelli"
À: "Maven Developers List"
Envoyé: Jeudi 30 Janvier 2020 04:31:14
Objet: Re: Maven Runtime Metrics
I sound like to draft a prototype.
Any
Hi,
The vote has passed with the following result:
+1 : Enrico Olivelli, Sylwester Lachiewicz, Karl Heinz Marbaise, Robert
Scholte, Hervé Boutemy
PMC quorum: reached
I will promote the artifacts to the central repo.
-
To
good news: finally, the build is reproducible
there is just a subtle task to do if you build from source-release.zip archive:
start with "rm DEPENDENCIES LICENSE NOTICE"
still need one vote, please
- Mail original -
De: "herve boutemy"
À: "Maven Developer
here is my +1
sadly, the build is not fully reproducible, I'll need to investigate why...
I need more votes, please
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Hervé BOUTEMY"
À: "Maven Developers List"
Envoyé: Dimanche 26 Janvier 2020 01:16:20
Objet: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Parent
nothing really went wrong: there are a few cases I did not migrate because I
was convinced that classical migration to 1 git repo each was not appropriate,
but I did not know really what to do better (and was tired doing the migration
on the many "easy" cases)
correponding repositories are
BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 06:27 min
[INFO] Finished at: 2019-12-11T17:58:08+01:00
All its run without problems.
Enrico
Il giorno mer 11 dic 2019 alle ore 17:35 Herve Boutemy
ha scritto:
> nobody interested? Or I was too hard on testing reproducibility with JDK 7?
>
nobody interested? Or I was too hard on testing reproducibility with JDK 7?
This reproducibility test is just an option, don't hesitate to not test
On next vote, I'll do the release with JDK 8, which will be easier for everyone
to have on his computer...
Regards,
Hervé
On 2019/12/08 23:35:03,
I agree on all points, perfect match :)
Regards,
Hervé
- Mail original -
De: "Enrico Olivelli"
À: "Maven Developers List"
Envoyé: Jeudi 7 Novembre 2019 12:08:11
Objet: Re: Apache Wagon vs maven-shade vs embedded licenses
Il giorno gio 7 nov 2019 alle ore 10:38 ha scritto:
> sure,
sure, if you know how to fix, yes, I can drop this release and start the next
one quickly
particularly if it helps us later to improve Maven handling of the case
This case of -shaded.jar published to Central [1] is really a completely
different scenario than Maven -bin.zip/tar,gz binary
MNG-6799 issue created [1]
proposed fix added to the reproducible branch [2] by simply removing the @Named
annotation for the deprecated StringSearchModelInterpolator: CI seems ok
ok for merge?
Regards,
Hervé
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6799
[2]
101 - 200 of 276 matches
Mail list logo
