Ashish,
Did you ever post this code to the repository?
Thanks,
Mark
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Ashish paliwalash...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Niklas Gustavsson
nik...@protocol7.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@apache.org
I assume the API will be backwards compatible though, right?
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny elecha...@apache.org wrote:
On 9/28/10 4:36 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
I'm afraid that MINA 3.0 will be a total rewrite, with no way to get
fixes
from 2.0... I consider 2.0 as dead
+1, create a mina-2.0.x branch and let trunk be 3.0. Also, what about
all current bugs/feature requests in JIRA, should we move them to 3.0?
I see that there a a bunch of JIRA entries currently in as 2.0.1, but
should we make sure that they should be 2.0.1 and not 3.0?
...just my $.02
On Mon,
+1
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Maarten Bosteels
mbosteels@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Maarten
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.comwrote:
[X] +1 | Release MINA 2.0.0
my vote, btw.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
I am all for using JMX. I have used JMX in a few MINA-based
applications to gather performance numbers and worked out really well.
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Ashish paliwalash...@gmail.com wrote:
Guys,
I just added some thoughts on the Debug tool on MINA 3.0 design page
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12802665#action_12802665
]
Mark Webb commented on DIRMINA-258:
---
I think handing this off to Ashish might be a good
I have the patches and will handle the JIRA entry.
--Mark
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Emmanuel Lecharnyelecha...@apache.org wrote:
Dauch, Kevin - AES wrote:
I'm setting up a connection using an ephemeral port to from X to Y, but
before the connection is attempted I need to know the port
Kevin,
Your best bet would be to submit a bug and then post the patch, or
code. It will probably not go in to the 2.0 baseline, but will
certainly be considered for the 3.0 baseline.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Dauch, Kevin - AESkevin.da...@itt.com wrote:
I'm setting up a connection
at 3:34 AM, Emmanuel Lecharnyelecha...@apache.org wrote:
Mark Webb wrote:
What are the plans for release of 2.0 and the migration to a 3.0
development? Is anyone prototyping any of these ideas in sandboxes?
Hi Mark,
those are just random thoughts I put down on the site after having posted
What are the plans for release of 2.0 and the migration to a 3.0
development? Is anyone prototyping any of these ideas in sandboxes?
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Emmanuel Lecharnyelecha...@apache.org wrote:
I have created a Wiki page containing this discussion :
[X] +1: Yes, release MINA-2.0.0-M6
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
it was expected to be available last week, sorry for the delay.
Here is an official vote for a 2.0.0-M6 mina release, which fixes a few but
serious issues, including one
#4 is the best..
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Michael Jakl jakl.mich...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 14:21, Edouard De Oliveira doe_wan...@yahoo.fr
wrote:
i do agree if some remainder to mina is a wish maybe combining the V
feathers with mina logo (replacing the mina text
+1
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Julien Vermillard
jvermill...@archean.fr wrote:
[X] +1 Yes, accept Vysper as a sub-project
/niklas
I think its a great idea!! +1
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Ashish paliwalash...@gmail.com wrote:
What's the final take on Vysper as a subproject?
- ashish
I see that there are JIRA entries for MINA 3.0. Is there a branch for
this yet, or are we still using the trunk for that?
Sorry, I've been away for a while. New job and grad school are taking
up alot of time.
--Mark
Found this on reddit. Thought you all might find this interesting.
http://github.com/robey/kestrel/tree/master
Looks like their message queue system is written using Scala and uses MINA.
really cool!!
I agree with Ashish. We should move the 1.0 information from the
front main page
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:49 AM, Ashish paliwalash...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Julien Vermillard
My guess would be that an IOException or maybe another related
exception would occur because MINA could not write the data.
Depending on your filter chain, you may get an OOM error.
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Steve Johns
steven.mark.jo...@gmail.com wrote:
Can everyone answer my first
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12658598#action_12658598
]
Mark Webb commented on DIRMINA-586:
---
I vote to close it. If we have functionality
I am trying to add 2 service filters to a service container. I am
using an instance of BasicServiceContainer and adding two instances of
HttpServiceHandler to the service container. I can only get responses
from the first service handler that I add to the service container.
Is this how its
if the request does not match.
--Mark
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Mark Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to add 2 service filters to a service container. I am
using an instance of BasicServiceContainer and adding two instances of
HttpServiceHandler to the service container. I can only
If we have them for other sub-projects we should have one for SSHD.
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
what about requesting some specific mailing list for SSHD (and for AsyncWeb
too) at least for users ?
Also we need to add MINA to the
What was the result of this? Is the integration being done?
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Jeff
On Nov 20, 2008, at 2:52 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
+1
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:21 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi guys,
Not a problem.
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Webb wrote:
What was the result of this? Is the integration being done?
Ooopps... Seems like I forgot to close the vote. My bad !
So here are the results :
7 +1 binding votes,
5 +1 non
Awesome. I am really looking forward to playing with this.
One note, you may want to change the java package to
org.apache.mina.sshd. More of an opinion of mine, but not sure if
there are any guidelines on this.
Thanks
Mark
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 1:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author:
ok. no problem
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Webb wrote:
Awesome. I am really looking forward to playing with this.
One note, you may want to change the java package to
org.apache.mina.sshd. More of an opinion of mine, but not sure
[X] +1, let's release 2.0.0-M4 and freeze the API
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And here is my vote :
[X] +1, let's release 2.0.0-M4 and freeze the API
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
I am working on writing a simple web server application using the
asyncweb library. I am getting the following error. I am using
Google Chrome to test the server. I do get the proper response in the
browser but I also see this exception in the output of the server.
/525.19
X-SDCH = Chrome 0.4.154.29
--
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Webb wrote:
I am working on writing a simple web server application using the
asyncweb library. I am getting the following
hrmm... Shouldn't it be a GET? I am just typing in the URL and
pressing the enter key. I tried Internet Exploder and Google Chrome
and got the same results.
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Webb wrote:
Here is what the browser prints out. I
Just tried Firefox and saw the exception.
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Mark Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hrmm... Shouldn't it be a GET? I am just typing in the URL and
pressing the enter key. I tried Internet Exploder and Google Chrome
and got the same results.
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008
to
valueOf in order to get a result back.
--Mark
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Mark Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just tried Firefox and saw the exception.
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Mark Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hrmm... Shouldn't it be a GET? I am just typing in the URL and
pressing
:
Mark Webb wrote:
Don't committers have apache.org email accounts? I never set mine up.
Where can I go to get directions on that?
You can commit with your apache.org email, which is mwebb at apache dot org
as requested one year and a half ago.
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
Thanks for the info. You certainly don't have to sell me on gmail, I
have been using it for years and think its the best.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Webb wrote:
What I meant was, do we have pop/imap and smtp access using our
apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12649786#action_12649786
]
Mark Webb commented on DIRMINA-489:
---
The code submitted by David Lloyd has been placed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12649891#action_12649891
]
Mark Webb commented on DIRMINA-489:
---
Fine by me.
Composite IoBuffer
AM, Mark Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone ever looked into this?
--
thanks
ashish
Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
+1
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
A few weeks ago, I've started a small project at googlecode to
implement an SSH server in Java based on Mina.
You'll find some background at http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
The project is
simple is all I understand. +1
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Edouard De Oliveira
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for merging
Cordialement, Regards,
-Edouard De Oliveira-
http://tedorg.free.fr/en/main.php
De : Julien Vermillard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
À :
Has anyone ever looked into this?
I might need some beers just to cure the headache I get from looking
at that stack trace.
I agree that the +1 is ugly and the ChainIterator is a much better
solution. Would a queue work in this situation?
--Mark
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
spot on. +1. remove it.
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 7:11 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
a few days ago, Julien suggested that we should remove this event. I never
used it, found it a bit cumbersome, but didn't had time to double check
what's doing.
Let's go back to
never used them.
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Maarten Bosteels
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
never used them.
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
while working on the chain refactoring, I found that those four methods are
never invoked into
If they are not being used, delete them. I can say that I have never used them.
--Mark
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
those methods are called when a new filter is registred into the chain.
However, the few filters implementing those methods
: package org.apache.mina.core.session
--Mark
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 10:54 PM, Mark Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Maarten Bosteels
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Julien Vermillard [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I would like to propose
I just went ahead and fixed the errors.
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Mark Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Getting compilation errors. Cannot find the TrafficMask class:
/Users/elihusmails/dev/mina/mina-cleaning/core/src/main/java/org/apache/mina/core/filterchain/IoFilter.java:[25,35]
cannot
Thanks. I am using eclipse as well. I guess I will keep on creating
new workspaces.
--Mark
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 4:28 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Julien Vermillard wrote:
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 22:24:48 -0500
Mark Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a simple, somewhat
Sure, it can be done. the problem is that the packets could be
received on either end out of order, or not at all. As long as you
are willing to accept these risks, you will be fine.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Lorenz Breu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi again
OK, these questions may seem
+1
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Maarten Bosteels
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Julien Vermillard [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I would like to propose :
- ignore setTrafficMask events in the filter chain (looks like Mark is
already agreeing)
- remove
I have never used it. I could see it having a utility for unit
testing, but that is it.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
peter royal wrote:
On Nov 6, 2008, at 7:28 AM, Dan Creswell wrote:
Hmmm, if VmPipe is done right it should allow me to build
I am not currently using this for anything, I am sure that given
enough time I could come up with reasons for using it. OTOH, if we
are looking to streamline the baseline, I say remove it and maybe
create a filter repository that people can get to for additional
filters. Something similar to
+1 to remove it.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:36 AM, Julien Vermillard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 18:24:15 +0100
Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maarten Bosteels wrote:
Wasn't it an attempt to implement throttling ?
I have no idea. The documentation is pretty
I agree that we should not 'slaughter' the current code since we are
getting close to a final 2.0 release.
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Webb wrote:
After letting the dust settle on this thread, I can say that I agree
with what Alex
I have used MESSAGE_SENT, not sure I agree that it should disappear.
What about situations where MINA is used in a client library? Won't
much of your list be reversed?
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
as I'm looking deeply into the impact on
Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Webb wrote:
I agree that we should not 'slaughter' the current code since we are
getting close to a final 2.0 release.
This is something we have to discuss. Here, IMHO, we have two options, both
have pros and cons :
1) go as far as needed to get a MINA 2.0
, especially filters but
things are fine right now for my requirements.
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Webb wrote:
After letting the dust settle on this thread, I can say that I agree
with what Alex is saying. I think a 2-way system makes complete
WriteFuture's though. If it makes our lives (as API developers)
easier, then I can change my code (as an end user).
--Mark
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Webb wrote:
I have used MESSAGE_SENT, not sure I agree that it should disappear.
May I ask you
I agree completely with all of Niklas's comments.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Mark Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we should focus on getting 2.0 out the door. We have been
After letting the dust settle on this thread, I can say that I agree
with what Alex is saying. I think a 2-way system makes complete
sense. One great interest I have in this is how will it work with
containers such as Spring. I have been using MINA with Spring alot
lately and want to make sure
Not me. I have some hard deadlines here at the office
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Niklas Gustavsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 7:24 PM, Maarten Bosteels
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd love to be there, I will ask my boss to pay for the trip but I am
afraid it
The Travel Assistance Committee is taking in applications for those wanting
to attend ApacheCon US 2008 between the 3rd and 7th November 2008 in New
Orleans.
The Travel Assistance Committee is looking for people who would like to be
able to attend ApacheCon US 2008 who need some financial support
Seems like a very good move to me...
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Otherwise, I would also suggest some refactoring of the main site. Here
is
So how can we get paid to work MINA full time ? :)
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 3:37 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mark,
thanks for the comments !
More inline
Mark Webb wrote:
I agree with everything that you all have said here. The one thing I
would add is about
We did not want it to be spring-centric. The goal was to support
all of the IoC containers like xbeans, spring, pico.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Trustin Lee (이희승) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 01:36:19 +0900, Julien Vermillard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
due to lack of
I agree with everything that you all have said here. The one thing I
would add is about the documentation/tutorials. I look around at some
other projects and sometimes the documentation is better, sometimes
its worse. Focusing on the better projects, the documentation is
spot-on professional.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12622025#action_12622025
]
Mark Webb commented on DIRMINA-489:
---
I have checked in the code. Please take a look
+1
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Julien Vermillard wrote:
[X]: +1, Release MINA 2.0.0-M3
I just created the MINA-2.0.0-M4 version in JIRA, just in case ...
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12619401#action_12619401
]
Mark Webb commented on DIRMINA-519:
---
These are my results on an OS X machine running
Did you try CumulativeProtocolDecoder ?
I had a very similar problem once and once I switched over to this class
everything worked great.
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 2:08 PM, boB Gage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have searched far and wide for an answer on this before resorting to
bothering
+1 Sounds fine with me. I am still working on the composite buffer support,
but I do not think that it is critical to get into a release right away.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 1:15 PM, W.B. Garvelink
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I'd say stick to the 72 hours. Rushing a release is seldom a good idea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Webb reassigned DIRMINA-489:
-
Assignee: Mark Webb
Composite IoBuffer
--
Key: DIRMINA-489
to ease any further review
Cordialement, Regards,
-Edouard De Oliveira-
http://tedorg.free.fr/en/main.php
- Message d'origine
De : Mark Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
À : dev@mina.apache.org
Envoyé le : Lundi, 21 Juillet 2008, 2h47mn 54s
Objet : Re: svn commit: r678238
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12615877#action_12615877
]
Mark Webb commented on DIRMINA-489:
---
Rich,
I have integrated the code into the version
?
- Original Message
From: Mark Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED], Geert Schuring
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How to use a SingleSessionIoHandler?
Date: 21/07/08 04:00
Depending on what type of service you are writing, take a look at classes
extending
I have a question on this class.
Why not use ConcurrentHashMap for this instead of synchronizing? Or
CopyOnWriteMap?
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 7:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: edeoliveira
Date: Sat Jul 19 16:19:14 2008
New Revision: 678238
URL:
: 2.0.0-M2
Environment: All
Reporter: Mark Webb
Assignee: Mark Webb
Priority: Trivial
Fix For: 2.0.0-M3, 1.0.11, 1.1.8
This was discussed in the dev mailing list. I forgot to make the change at the
time, but many people agreed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-611?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Webb closed DIRMINA-611.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.1.8)
(was: 1.0.11)
Updated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12615139#action_12615139
]
Mark Webb commented on DIRMINA-489:
---
Rich,
Thanks for the work that you have done
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12615140#action_12615140
]
Mark Webb commented on DIRMINA-586:
---
Please let me know if this is still an issue. I
+1. Its not hurting anything being there, and unless you know what its for,
you will probably not use it.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Adam Fisk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd just like to chime in with a vote for staying focused. If this is
not causing problems for people and people are
one additional note I have is that maybe it should be moved from core to
util. That way the package name indicates that it is a utility class and
not a core class.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 7:23 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Mark Webb wrote:
+1. Its not hurting anything
[ X]: +1, Release MINA 2.0-M1
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 5:30 AM, Julien Vermillard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
After a lot of package reorganisation, look like it's the moment for
releasing 2.0M2.
Here you can see the list of FIXED issues since M1 and the one still
OPEN :
You are right. This is not MINA-specific. Not sure what you are trying to
accomplish here with MINA.
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Simon Funnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dear List,
This is not exactly Mina specific, its more general, but its close to the
problem Mina surrounds. I have
Glad to have another on board !!
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Maarten Bosteels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Welcome Rich !
Maarten
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 9:41 PM, Rich Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 3:30 AM, Julien Vermillard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rich
very nice. keep them coming.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi guys,
I have drawn three class diagrams of basic MINA structures (IoSession and
IoService, divided in Acceptor and Connector) and put them on the wiki :
Did you do this by hand or use a tool?
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Alex Karasulu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Mark Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
very nice. keep them coming.
Mark and I had at one point discussed a documentation plan and looks like
sounds good to me.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Julien Vermillard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
as Emmanuel stated, the AbstractPollingIoXXX class are badly named.
The polled is here because it's base classes for transport
implementations using event strategy based on system calls
,
Alex
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 1:07 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Mark Webb wrote:
I do not think this is a good idea.
Looking at the three answers, it seems so ;)
3. We may confuse things for alot of people who may already be using
2.0. Telling users that they will have
I do not think this is a good idea.
1. You are assuming that everyone uses maven.
2. Based on many of the discussions that have been going on with this
group, I believe that we have more important issues to consider.
3. We may confuse things for alot of people who may already be using
2.0.
is the system deadlocking or running out of memory?
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Owen Gu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Our chat server is deveolped with mina-2.0 m1 version, we got a very
emergent problem, the chat server dead every week.
The attachment contains thread dump that was
, please help me analyse
the thread dump, thanks.
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Mark Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is the system deadlocking or running out of memory?
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Owen Gu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Our chat server is deveolped with mina-2.0 m1
The easiest way I know of to decrease latency is to cut down on the
filters you are using. This includes thread pools as well. Have you
read this page: http://mina.apache.org/configuring-thread-model.html?
It might help you along...
2008/5/28 Owen Gu [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Thanks for your
since when do people on mailing lists no longer get to voice opinions?
What then would be the purpose of a mailing list?
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Alex Karasulu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Emmanuel Lecharny ha
heh. how do we all feel now? Pretty embarrassing
http://bill.burkecentral.com/2008/05/23/see-why-id-never-develop-at-apache/
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Alex Karasulu ha scritto:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 1:04 PM,
Jeanfrancois,
Welcome. I have been a big fan of your work and have enjoyed your
blog over the years. I will say that I am one of the 'young' ASF
members on the MINA team and welcome any synergies that will be
created as a result of us coming together.
--Mark
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 9:57 AM,
Either email or IRC works for me. I am EDT (GMT-4).
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 10:30 PM, 이희승 (Trustin Lee) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just came to think that we might be able to make this discussion occur
via e-mail exchange, by cross posting to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and grizzly dev
list. It
+1. Although a full-time documentation person would have a hard time
keeping up. I tried for a while, but it was tough.
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Alex Karasulu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi guys,
ok. So we agree. We were just describing it differently.
I will start working on it and see how things turn out.
Thanks...
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 3:40 AM, Maarten Bosteels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
2008/4/10 Mark Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry for the mis-typing of your name
Niall,
Thanks for pointing this out to me. I have updated the wiki and also placed
the code into my sandbox. You may access the code at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/sandbox/mwebb/mina/src/main/java/org/apache/mina/gettingstarted/timeserver/
--Mark
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 5:19 AM,
will do...
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:59 AM, 이희승 (Trustin Lee) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Why don't you include it into the trunk? There's an example module
already.
Cheers,
Mark Webb wrote:
Niall,
Thanks for pointing this out to me. I have updated the wiki and also
placed
the code
1 - 100 of 284 matches
Mail list logo
